Review article: adherence to Rome criteria in therapeutic trials in functional dyspepsia

Menthacarin for long-term treatment of functional dyspepsia - Results from a clinical trial follow-up

BACKGROUND

Menthacarin was shown to be effective and safe in clinical trials in patients with functional dyspepsia (FD). Long-term treatment results have not been reported yet.

METHODS

An open-label, 11-month follow-up (FU) was offered to FD patients who had undergone treatment with Menthacarin (1 gastro-resistant capsule b.i.d. vs. placebo (PL)) in a 4-week, double-blind, clinical trial. During FU, all patients (former verum and PL) were treated with 1 gastro-resistant capsule Menthacarin b.i.d. Main outcomes were the changes in pain intensity and severity of sensation of pressure, heaviness, and fullness from original baseline and global improvement.

RESULTS

70 patients were included in the analyses (former Menthacarin group: 36, former PL group: 34). At the end of the PL-controlled study phase, all 3 main efficacy variables were statistically significantly improved in the Menthacarin group compared to PL. In the FU phase, former PL patients started to improve under Menthacarin treatment towards the outcomes seen in the former Menthacarin group (alignment at approximately 6 months), while former Menthacarin patients showed sustained or even continuously improved outcomes by month 12. At study end, more than 90% of patients were "much or very much improved" in both groups. Menthacarin treatment was well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

The favorable effects seen in the FU period suggest that Menthacarin is a valuable treatment option in FD patients who require symptomatic treatment also in the longer term for up to 12 months.

Design characteristics of comparative effectiveness trials for the relief of symptomatic dyspepsia: A systematic review

Background

Dyspepsia represents a symptom domain rather than a diagnostic condition and covers a wide range of complex, underlying pathophysiologies that are not well understood. The review explores comparative effectiveness interventions for the treatment of symptomatic dyspepsia along a pragmatic-explanatory continuum. The aim is to identify relevant design characteristics applicable to future upper gastrointestinal comparative effectiveness research employing integrative medicine.

Methods

Medline, CINAHL, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and WHO Clinical Trials were systematically searched until January 2019. Included articles were original research with two or more comparative intervention arms for the primary outcome; relief of symptomatic dyspepsia. Evaluation of the studies was conducted using the pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS-2) tool.

Results

Thirty-six articles were included in the review. A total of 68 Patient Reported Outcome Measurements (PROMs), utilizing 50 different formats were deployed across the studies. The appraisal process revealed eligibility, flexibility in adherence, flexibility in delivery and organization domains further aligned towards an explanatory design.

Conclusion

This review identified three design characteristics relevant for future comparative effectiveness research for the treatment of upper gastrointestinal disorders in a community setting. Extensive exclusion eligibility criteria limited the generalization of comparative effectiveness study results by removing sub-groups of the target populations more at risk of dyspeptic symptoms. The requirement for entry endoscopy was found to be common and not always pragmatically justifiable. Development of validated PROMs appropriate for a generic application to upper gastrointestinal disorders would be advantageous for future comparative effectiveness research within integrative medicine.

Combination of 15 lipid metabolites and motilin to diagnose spleen-deficiency FD

BACKGROUND

This study aims to assess clinical characteristics in FD with spleen deficiency syndrome and metabolic perturbations involved in FD progress. We combined metabolic biomarkers and clinical features into a better prediction for FD with Spleen Deficiency syndrome.

METHODS

A total of 276 people were recruited, including 215 FD patients and 61 healthy control group (HC). The clinical characteristics and gastric emptying rate were compared between spleen deficiency-FD group and non-spleen deficiency-FD. The serum lipids metabonomics analysis was performed to determine the metabolic differences in spleen deficiency-FD group and HC.

RESULTS

The symptoms of postprandial discomfort in Spleen Deficiency group were more severe (P < 0.05), and delayed gastric emptying was more pronounced (P < 0.05) vs. non-Spleen deficiency. Decreased motilin (OR = 0.990, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.982-0.997) was independent risk factor related to Spleen Deficiency group. We identified 15 metabolites for spleen deficiency group vs. HC, majority of those biomarkers belonged to the glycerophospholipid metabolic pathway. The combination of 15 metabolics could diagnose spleen deficiency-FD, with the AUC of 0.9943, 95% CI 0.9854-1.0000), and the combination of 15 metabolics and motilin could diagnose spleen deficiency-FD, with the AUC of 0.9615, 95% CI 0.9264-9967).

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides supportive evidence that Spleen deficiency syndrome was associated with delayed gastric emptying and the glycerophospholipid metabolic pathway was perturbed in FD patients. The combination of metabolic biomarkers and clinical features provided us with new ideas for multidimensional diagnosis of FD.Trial registration http://www.chictr.org.cn, no: ChiCTR-TRC-13003200. clinicaltrials.gov, no: NCT02762136.

Present state and future challenges in pediatric abdominal pain therapeutics research: Looking beyond the forest

At the present time, it is nearly impossible to treat pediatric functional gastrointestinal disorders associated with pain in an evidence based fashion. This is due to the overall lack of controlled studies and, even more importantly, the complexity of the contributors to disease phenotype which are not controlled or accounted for in most therapeutic trials. In this manuscript, we review the challenges of defining entry criteria, controlling for the large number of biopsychosocial factors which may effect outcomes, and understanding pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic factors when designing therapeutic trials for abdominal pain in children. We also review the current state of pediatric abdominal pain therapeutics and discuss trial design considerations as we move forward.