Systematic review with meta-analysis: ondansetron for vomiting in children with acute gastroenteritis

Randomized trial to assess the efficacy and safety of xyloglucan for the treatment of acute gastroenteritis in children

Acute gastroenteritis is one of the most common diseases in children and an important cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. No specific treatment is available; therefore, management is exclusively symptomatic. Xyloglucan has been approved in Europe as a class IIa medical device for restoration of the physiological functions of the intestinal wall. Our objective was to assess efficacy and safety of xyloglucan for the treatment of acute gastroenteritis in children. We performed a triple-blind, randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial in four primary care centers and one continued care hospital center. The study population comprised children with acute gastroenteritis aged >3 months and <5 years. Our primary endpoint was time (in hours) of resolution of diarrhea, defined as the time to resolution of stool consistency (Bristol Stool Form Scale ≤5 or Amsterdam Stool Form Scale B or C) or time until deposition frequency resumes to normality, whichever occurred first. We also recorded intravenous rehydration, hospitalization, stools per day, Vesikari scale, vomiting, relapse, weight loss, drugs prescribed, and adverse events. Eighty children were included in the intention-to-treat population (43 xyloglucan and 37 placebo) and 74 (93%) in the per-protocol population. Time to resolution of diarrhea was similar in both groups with (median, 95% CI) 24, 17-24 h in the xyloglucan group versus 24, 19-24 h in the placebo group, p = .680. Significant differences were observed for patients with moderate-to-severe diarrhea (Vesikari scale ≥9): xyloglucan group (20 [15-24] h) versus placebo group (85 [51-120] h) (p = .04). No other significant differences were found. Xyloglucan can be considered safe and other studies should be performed to confirm the usefulness in patients with moderate-to-severe diarrhea.

Pilot Study of Ondansetron in Improvement of Pediatric Colonoscopy Preparation Outcomes at an Urban Academic Center

Objectives

To gather initial data on the effectiveness and tolerability of the addition of Ondansetron to bowel preparation regimens to justify a funded, larger, placebo-controlled study.

Methods

Design, Setting, and Participants:: A total of 41 pediatric and young adult (age 2-22) patients participated in a single center, open label, parallel randomized trial, with simple randomization. All patients were recruited as outpatients, and all procedures occurred as outpatient procedures, with both recruitment and procedures occurring at a low-resource urban academic medical center in Brooklyn.Interventions and Outcome Measures:: The intervention studied was a single dose of oral-dissolving tablet Ondansetron provided before initiation of bowel preparation using a standardized prep of Polyethylene Glycol 3350 and Bisacodyl. There were 2 arms, a study arm using typical preparation (Polyethylene Glycol 3350 and Bisacodyl) and Ondansetron, and a control arm (Polyethylene Glycol 3350 and Bisacodyl). Patients received standard weight-based dosing. The primary outcome measure assessed was the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) to assess efficacy of preparation. Secondary objectives included evaluation of patient satisfaction via a survey answered by each patient. The questionnaire assessed the presence of the following symptoms during bowel prep: abdominal pain, nausea, bloating, vomiting, scale of ease/difficulty, and if the entire bowel prep was completed.

Results

No benefit to BBPS from the addition of Ondansetron to bowel preparation was observed. Statistically significant improvement in reports of abdominal pain (35% decrease in Ondansetron arm) was noted with a P = 0.019. No statistically significant improvement was noted in other symptoms although all domains showed nonsignificant improvement in the Ondansetron arm.

Conclusion

No benefit to efficacy of preparation as measured by the BBPS was observed. A single dose of Ondansetron before bowel preparation reduced reports of abdominal pain by 35%, with other symptomatic improvements suggesting possible improvements to be confirmed by a higher-powered study. Trial registration: NCT05439772.

Comparative Analysis of Oral Ondansetron, Metoclopramide, and Domperidone for Managing Vomiting in Children With Acute Gastroenteritis

Background Acute gastroenteritis (AGE) is a major health concern in pediatric populations because of its associated vomiting, which worsens dehydration and the severity of illness. Objective The purpose of the research was to compare the relative effectiveness of oral ondansetron in treating AGE in children's vomiting when compared to oral domperidone and oral metoclopramide. Methodology A clinical investigation involving 120 pediatric patients diagnosed with AGE was conducted in Pakistan from November 2022 to April 2023 using a single-blind randomized design and convenience sampling. The participants received oral suspensions of ondansetron, metoclopramide, and domperidone, with doses of 0.15 mg/kg, 0.1-0.2 mg/kg, and 0.5 mg/kg, respectively, adjusted according to their body weight. The outcome in different groups was analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) (version 20.0; IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Armonk, NY). Results At six hours, vomiting cessation rates were 80.0% for ondansetron (n=32), 72.5% for domperidone (n=29), and 67.5% for metoclopramide (n=27; p=0.29). By 24 hours, ondansetron exhibited significantly higher efficacy (92.5%; n=37) compared to domperidone (82.5%; n=33) and metoclopramide (77.5%; n=31; p=0.03). Adverse effects were minimal and comparable across groups. Conclusion Oral ondansetron demonstrated superior efficacy in managing AGE-related vomiting in children within 24 hours compared to metoclopramide and domperidone.

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Ondansetron and Domperidone in Cessation of Vomiting in Children Presenting With Acute Gastroenteritis: A Meta-Analysis

Acute gastroenteritis is one of the common diseases of childhood. Dehydration is the most frequent consequence of acute gastroenteritis, and vomiting is the most distressing clinical manifestation. Various anti-emetic agents are used in practice to control vomiting. However, not all anti-emetic agents are safe and effective. This meta-analysis aims to compare the effectiveness of ondansetron and domperidone in the cessation of vomiting in children with acute gastroenteritis. The current meta-analysis was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive search strategy was developed to identify prospective studies that compared the effectiveness of ondansetron and domperidone in the cessation of vomiting in children with acute gastroenteritis. The primary outcome was the number of children in whom there was a cessation of vomiting. The secondary outcomes included a number of children who required an additional dose of the assigned anti-emetic and the number of children who required intravenous rehydration therapy. Overall, seven randomized trials were included in the current meta-analysis. The pooled sample size of enrolled patients was 1,262, of which 639 patients were randomized to the ondansetron group and 623 were randomized to the domperidone group. In the ondansetron group, a higher number of children experienced cessation of vomiting (risk ratio [RR]: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.08-1.37, p-value=0.002), a lower proportion of children needed an additional dose of the assigned anti-emetic (RR=0.50, 95% CI: 0.33-0.77, p-value=0.002), and a lower number of children received intravenous rehydration (RR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.16-0.83, p-value=0.02) as compared to domperidone group. Compared to domperidone, ondansetron was found to have better efficiency in aiming cessation of vomiting in children with gastroenteritis.

Improving ondansetron use and oral rehydration instructions for pediatric acute gastroenteritis

In paediatric patients with acute gastroenteritis (AGE), ondansetron use decreases the need for intravenous fluids, reduces hospitalisations and shortens illness duration. Oral rehydration is also known to have excellent outcomes for mild to moderate dehydration secondary to AGE. Although these interventions are recommended in guidelines from international professional societies, baseline data at our clinic showed that <2% of these patients were offered ondansetron, and that few patients received appropriately detailed rehydration instructions. Therefore, we engaged residents and fellows as teachers and leaders in our university clinic’s quality improvement programme to promote evidence-based practice for paediatric AGE. Our gap analysis identified opportunities for interventions including educating paediatricians and paediatrics residents on the safety and utility of the medication. We created standardised oral rehydration after-visit instructions and implemented a trainee-led educational approach that encouraged appropriate medication use. We used a follow-up survey to uncover provider concerns and tailor future interventions. The process metrics included: proportion of paediatric patients appropriately treated with ondansetron (goal of 80%), and proportion of patients given appropriate oral rehydration instructions. The outcome metric was 7-day representation rates. To achieve sustainability, we restructured our process to have senior residents take ownership of teaching and data collection. Trainee-driven interventions increased ondansetron prescription rates to a median of 66.6%. Patients prescribed ondansetron were less likely to represent to care, although representation rate was low overall. Postintervention data suggests that prescription rates decreased without continued interventions and additional systems redesign may help sustain impact.

The Cutting Edge of Gastroenteritis: Advances in Understanding of Enteric Infection

ABSTRACT

In recent years, multiple advances have been made in the care, diagnosis, and mechanistic understanding of acute gastroenteritis (AGE). In this review, we discuss the current state of the art of diagnosis and management, as well as how changes in practice can improve care and decrease costs. We will discuss present study demonstrating the effect of AGE on the microbiome and how that may be linked to secondary effects or long-term changes. We will explore the use of novel technologies to further our capacity to understand how gastrointestinal infections occur and promulgate. Finally, will discuss advances in our understanding of how gastrointestinal infections capacitate other changes such as post-viral motility or other post viral intestinal dysfunction.

Association Between Antidiarrheal Drug Prescription and Return Visits Among Adult Patients With Acute Diarrhea

Whether antidiarrheal medications have benefits or demerits when administered to adult patients with diarrhea remains controversial. We aimed to evaluate the association between antidiarrheal drug prescription and clinical outcomes in adult patients with acute diarrhea.

This retrospective cohort study was conducted by collecting secondary data of patients' health records at St. Luke’s International Hospital from April 1, 2004, to March 31, 2016. We included all participants aged 20-59 years who visited the division of general internal medicine or the emergency room in the hospital due to acute diarrheal symptoms. We excluded those who had chronic diarrhea or were immunocompromised (e.g., those with cancer or immunosuppressant usage). Our primary outcome was return visits within two weeks; the secondary outcome was admission to the hospital due to acute diarrhea within two weeks from the first visit. We compared the outcomes between patients with and without antidiarrheal drug prescriptions. 

During the study period, a total of 10,246 patients were included, of which 204 (2.0%) were prescribed antidiarrheal drugs. The mean age of the patients was 35.0 (standard deviation: 10.7) years, and 4,130 (40.3%) were men. Patients who were prescribed antidiarrheal drugs were more likely to be prescribed antibiotics (p<0.01). The adjusted odds ratios for return visits among patients with and without antidiarrheal drug prescription were 1.24-1.59, which were not significant.

We demonstrated that antidiarrheal drug prescription was not associated with return visits or hospital admission among adult patients with acute diarrhea. This finding suggests that antidiarrheal medications have more benefits than risks in adult patients with acute diarrhea.

Benefit-Risk Assessment of Off-Label Drug Use in Children: The Bravo Framework

A drug is granted a license for use after a thorough assessment of risks and benefits based on high-quality scientific proof of its efficacy and safety. Many drugs that are relevant to children are not licensed for use in this population implying that a thorough assessment of risks and benefits in the pediatric population has not been made at all, implying a negative risk-benefit balance in children, or implying insufficient information to establish the risk-benefit balance. Use of drugs without positive assessment of risks and benefits exposes children to potential lack of efficacy, unknown toxicity, and harm. To aid guideline committees and individual prescribers, we here present a tutorial of the Benefit and Risk Assessment for Off-label use (BRAvO) decision framework. This pragmatic framework offers a structured assessment of benefits and risks of off-label drug use, including a clinical pharmacological based approach to age-appropriate dose selection. As proof of concept and to illustrate the practical use, we have applied the framework to assess benefits and risks of off-label use of ondansetron for gastroenteritis-induced nausea and vomiting. The framework could also guide decisions on off-label use in other special populations (e.g., pregnant women, elderly, obese, or critically ill patients) where off-label drug use is frequent, thereby contributing to effective and safe pharmacotherapy.

Oral ondansetron for paediatric gastroenteritis in primary care: a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Acute gastroenteritis (AGE) affects almost all children aged ≤5 years. In secondary care, ondansetron was found to be effective at reducing vomiting.

AIM

To determine the effectiveness of adding oral ondansetron to care as usual (CAU) to treat vomiting in children with AGE attending out-ofhours primary care (OOH-PC).

DESIGN AND SETTING

A pragmatic randomised controlled trial at three OOH-PC centres in the north of the Netherlands (Groningen, Zwolle, and Assen), with a follow-up of 7 days.

METHOD

Children were included if they were: aged 6 months-6 years; AGE diagnosed by a GP; ≥4 reported episodes of vomiting in the 24 hours before presentation; ≥1 reported episode of vomiting in the 4 hours before presentation; and written informed consent from both parents. Children were randomly allocated to either the control group or the intervention group. The control group received CAU, namely oral rehydration therapy. The intervention group received CAU plus one dose of oral ondansetron (0.1 mg/kg).

RESULTS

In total, 194 children were included for randomisation. One dose of oral ondansetron decreased the proportion of children who continued vomiting within 4 hours from 42.9% to 19.5%, with an odds ratio of 0.37 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.20 to 0.72, number needed to treat: four). Ondansetron also decreased the number of vomiting episodes within 4 hours (incidence rate ratio 0.51 [95% CI = 0.29 to 0.88]) and improved overall parental satisfaction with treatment (P = 0.027).

CONCLUSION

Children with AGE and increased risk of dehydration due to vomiting could be treated with ondansetron in primary care to stop vomiting more quickly and increase parental satisfaction with treatment. These results could be used to improve the quality and efficacy of general practice medicine.

Recommendations for clinical research in children presenting to primary care out-of-hours services: a randomised controlled trial with parallel cohort study

BACKGROUND

Research in primary care is essential, but recruiting children in this setting can be complex and may cause selection bias. Challenges surrounding informed consent, particularly in an acute clinical setting, can undermine feasibility. The off-protocol use of an intervention nearing implementation has become common in pragmatic randomised controlled trials (RCTs) set in primary care.

AIM

To describe how the informed consent procedure affects study inclusion and to assess how off-protocol medication prescribing affects participant selection in a paediatric RCT.

DESIGN & SETTING

A pragmatic RCT evaluating the cost-effectiveness of oral ondansetron in children diagnosed with acute gastroenteritis (AGE) in primary care out-of-hours services and a parallel cohort study.

METHOD

Consecutive children aged 6 months to 6 years attending primary care out-of-hours services with AGE were evaluated to assess the feasibility of obtaining informed consent, the off-protocol use of ondansetron, and other inclusion and exclusion criteria.

RESULTS

The RCT's feasibility was reduced by the informed consent procedure because 39.0% (n = 325/834) of children were accompanied by only one parent. GPs prescribed ondansetron off-protocol to 34 children (4.1%) of which 19 children were eligible for the RCT. RCT-eligible children included in the parallel cohort study had fewer risk factors for dehydration than children in the RCT despite similar dehydration assessments by GPs.

CONCLUSION

The informed consent procedure and off-protocol use of study medication affect the inclusion rate, but had little effect on selection. A parallel cohort study alongside the RCT can help evaluate selection bias, and a pilot study can reveal potential barriers to inclusion.

Paediatrics: how to manage viral gastroenteritis

Background

Viral gastroenteritis is the most common diarrhoeal disorder seen in general practice and emergency departments. This article aims to provide a narrative updated review on the evaluation and management of viral gastroenteritis in children.

Methods

A PubMed search was performed with Clinical Queries using the key term 'viral gastroenteritis'. The search strategy included clinical trials, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, observational studies and reviews. The search was restricted to the English literature and the paediatric population.

Results

Acute viral gastroenteritis is usually self-limiting. However, it can lead to dehydration and electrolyte imbalance if not properly treated. Adequate fluids containing physiological concentrations of glucose and electrolytes should be provided to compensate for gastrointestinal losses and cover maintenance needs. Oral rehydration therapy is as effective as intravenous (IV) fluid therapy for rehydration for children with mild-to-moderate dehydration. Measurements of serum electrolytes, creatinine and glucose are usually not necessary and should only be considered in a subset of children with severe dehydration who require hospitalization and IV therapy. Judicious use of ondansetron can increase the success rate of oral rehydration therapy and minimize the need for IV therapy and hospitalization.

Conclusion

Acute viral gastroenteritis is associated with substantial morbidity in developed countries and significant mortality in developing countries. Physicians should educate caregivers on proper personal hygiene and handwashing to prevent faecal to oral transmission of the pathogen as well as the importance of rotavirus vaccine in the prevention of rotavirus gastroenteritis. Several norovirus vaccines are currently undergoing clinical trials with promising results. It is hoped that development of an effective norovirus vaccine will further reduce the incidence of viral gastroenteritis.

Variables Associated With Intravenous Rehydration and Hospitalization in Children With Acute Gastroenteritis: A Secondary Analysis of 2 Randomized Clinical Trials

IMPORTANCE

Despite guidelines endorsing oral rehydration therapy, intravenous fluids are commonly administered to children with acute gastroenteritis in high-income countries.

OBJECTIVE

To identify factors associated with intravenous fluid administration and hospitalization in children with acute gastroenteritis.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This study is a planned secondary analysis of the Pediatric Emergency Research Canada (PERC) and Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) probiotic trials. Participants include children aged 3 to 48 months with 3 or more watery stools in 24 hours between November 5, 2013, and April 7, 2017, for the PERC study and July 8, 2014, and June 23, 2017, for the PECARN Study. Children were from 16 pediatric emergency departments throughout Canada (6) and the US (10). Data were analyzed from November 2, 2018, to March 16, 2021.

EXPOSURES

Sex, age, preceding health care visit, distance between home and hospital, country (US vs Canada), frequency and duration of vomiting and diarrhea, presence of fever, Clinical Dehydration Scale score, oral ondansetron followed by oral rehydration therapy, and infectious agent.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Intravenous fluid administration and hospitalization.

RESULTS

This secondary analysis of 2 randomized clinical trials included 1846 children (mean [SD] age, 19.1 [11.4] months; 1007 boys [54.6%]), of whom 534 of 1846 (28.9%) received oral ondansetron, 240 of 1846 (13.0%) received intravenous rehydration, and 67 of 1846 (3.6%) were hospitalized. The following were independently associated with intravenous rehydration: higher Clinical Dehydration Scale score (mild to moderate vs none, odds ratio [OR], 8.73; 95% CI, 5.81-13.13; and severe vs none, OR, 34.15; 95% CI, 13.45-86.73); country (US vs Canada, OR, 6.76; 95% CI, 3.15-14.49); prior health care visit with intravenous fluids (OR, 4.55; 95% CI, 1.32-15.72); and frequency of vomiting (per 5 episodes, OR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.39-1.99). The following were independently associated with hospitalization: higher Clinical Dehydration Scale score (mild to moderate vs none, OR, 11.10; 95% CI, 5.05-24.38; and severe vs none, OR, 23.55; 95% CI, 7.09-78.25) and country (US vs Canada, OR, 3.37; 95% CI, 1.36-8.40). Oral ondansetron was associated with reduced odds of intravenous rehydration (OR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.13-0.32) and hospitalization (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.21-0.89).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Intravenous rehydration and hospitalization were associated with clinical evidence of dehydration and lack of an oral ondansetron-supported oral rehydration period. Strategies focusing on oral ondansetron administration followed by oral rehydration therapy in children with dehydration may reduce the reliance on intravenous rehydration and hospitalization.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT01853124 (PERC) and NCT01773967 (PECARN).

Referral rates for children with acute gastroenteritis: a retrospective cohort study

Background

Hospital admission rates are increasing for children with acute gastroenteritis. However, it is unknown whether this increase is accompanied by an increase in referral rates from GPs due to increased workloads in primary care out-of-hours (OOH) services.

Aim

To assess trends in referral rates from primary care OOH services to specialist emergency care for children presenting with acute gastroenteritis.

Design & setting

This retrospective cohort study covered a period from September 2007–September 2014. Children aged 6 months to 6 years presenting with acute gastroenteritis to a primary care OOH service were included.

Method

Pseudonymised data were obtained, and children were analysed overall and by age category. Χ² trend tests were used to assess rates of acute gastroenteritis, referrals, face-to-face contacts, and oral rehydration therapy (ORT) prescriptions.

Results

The data included 12 455 children (6517 boys), with a median age of 20.2 months (interquartile range [IQR] 11.6 to 36.0 months). Over 7 years, incidence rates of acute gastroenteritis decreased significantly, and face-to-face contact rates increased significantly (both, P<0.01). However, there was no significant trend for referral rates (P = 0.87) or prescription rates for ORT (P = 0.82). Subgroup analyses produced comparable results, although there was an increase in face-to-face contact rates for the older children.

Conclusion

Incidence rates for childhood acute gastroenteritis presenting in OOH services decreased and referral rates did not increase significantly. These findings may be useful as a reference for the impact of new interventions for childhood acute gastroenteritis.

A pragmatic randomized controlled trial of multi-dose oral ondansetron for pediatric gastroenteritis (the DOSE-AGE study): statistical analysis plan

Background

Acute gastroenteritis is a leading cause of emergency department visits and hospitalizations among children in North America. Oral-rehydration therapy is recommended for children with mild-to-moderate dehydration, but children who present with vomiting are frequently offered intravenous rehydration in the emergency department (ED). Recent studies have demonstrated that the anti-emetic ondansetron can reduce vomiting, intravenous rehydration, and hospitalization when administered in the ED to children with dehydration. However, there is little evidence of additional benefit from prescribing ondansetron beyond the initial ED dose. Moreover, repeat dosing may increase the frequency of diarrhea. Despite the lack of evidence and potential adverse side effects, many physicians across North America provide multiple doses of ondansetron to be taken following ED disposition. Thus, the Multi-Dose Oral Ondansetron for Pediatric Gastroenteritis (DOSE-AGE) trial will evaluate the effectiveness of prescribing multiple doses of ondansetron to treat acute gastroenteritis-associated vomiting. This article specifies the statistical analysis plan (SAP) for the DOSE-AGE trial and was submitted before the outcomes of the study were available for analysis.

Methods/design

The DOSE-AGE study is a phase III, 6-center, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel design randomized controlled trial designed to determine whether participants who are prescribed multiple doses of oral ondansetron to administer, as needed, following their ED visit have a lower incidence of experiencing moderate-to-severe gastroenteritis, as measured by the Modified Vesikari Scale score, compared with a placebo. To assess safety, the DOSE-AGE trial will investigate the frequency and maximum number of diarrheal episodes following ED disposition, and the occurrence of palpitations, pre-syncope/syncope, chest pain, arrhythmias, and serious adverse events. For the secondary outcomes, the DOSE-AGE trial will investigate the individual elements of the Modified Vesikari Scale score and caregiver satisfaction with the therapy.

Discussion

The DOSE-AGE trial will provide evidence on the effectiveness of multiple doses of oral ondansetron, taken as needed, following an initial ED dose in children with acute gastroenteritis-associated vomiting. The data from the DOSE-AGE trial will be analyzed using this SAP. This will reduce the risk of producing data-driven results and bias in our reported outcomes. The DOSE-AGE study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov on February 22, 2019.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03851835. Registered on 22 February 2019.

Effect of ondansetron on vomiting associated with acute gastroenteritis in a developing country: a meta-analysis

In high-income countries. ondansetron is an effective antiemetic in children with gastroenteritis, but data from low- and middle-income countries are sparse. This study aimed to evaluate evidences of the effectiveness of ondansetron in preventing vomiting and reducing the use of intravenous fluids in children with gastroenteritis in developing countries. A total of nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 2313 participants met the inclusion criteria. Compared with placebo, ondansetron reduced the use of intravenous rehydration (three RCTs, n = 1126, relative risk (RR) 0.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.38-0.95, no significant heterogeneity, I² = 43%), the risk of failure of oral rehydration therapy among children with gastroenteritis-associated vomiting and dehydration (four RCTs, n = 1370, RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.43-0.79; no significant heterogeneity was found, I² = 39%) and risk of hospitalization (2 RCTs, n = 264, RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.09-0.73, no heterogeneity, I² = 0).Conclusions: Compared with placebo, ondansetron reduced the use of intravenous fluids in children with gastroenteritis and dehydration. It has no effect on children with gastroenteritis who do not present with dehydration in developing countries. While ondansetron is effective in controlling vomiting and reducing the rate of hospitalization, there is no evidence that it is effective in reducing the rate of readmission. What is Known: • In high-income countries, ondansetron can reduce the use of intravenous fluids in children with gastroenteritis and dehydration. • No systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials were done in a developing country setting. What is New: • In developing countries, ondansetron reduces the use of intravenous fluids in children with gastroenteritis and dehydration. • It has no effect on children with gastroenteritis but without dehydration.

Single-dose of ondansetron for vomiting in children and adolescents with acute gastroenteritis-an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

This review aimed to meta-analyze evidence of efficacy and safety of one single dose of ondansetron for vomiting in children and adolescents with acute gastroenteritis. Database searches of MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus (Elsevier), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials.gov up to November 2019 were performed. Only randomized clinical trials versus placebo were considered. Fixed and random effect models were used for the analyses of pooled data. Thirteen randomized clinical trials (2146 patients) were finally included. One single dose of ondansetron showed to produce (1) higher chance of vomiting cessation within 8 h (RR 1.41, 95% CI 1.19-1.68; low-quality evidence); (2) lower chances of oral rehydration therapy failure (RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.34-0.55; high-quality evidence), intravenous hydration needs (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.34-0.57; high-quality evidence), and hospitalization rates within 8 h (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.32-0.75; high-quality evidence); and (3) no statistically significant differences in return visits to emergency department (RR 1.14, 95% CI 0.74-1.76; high-quality evidence) compared with placebo. Further studies are necessary to better assess long term efficacy and safety of ondansetron in this context.Conclusions: Mixed evidence was found via few studies about the efficacy and safety of a single dose of ondansetron in the pediatric population.What is known:• Ondansetron use for vomiting in pediatric acute gastroenteritis is increasing worldwide.• Actual convictions come from studies evaluating one and more than one dose of the drug.What is new:• This is the first review to collect data about the effects of one single dose of ondansetron on strong and temporally homogeneous clinical outcomes.• This study supports the use of one dose of ondansetron in pediatric acute gastroenteritis.• Further studies are necessary to assess its long-term efficacy and safety.

Trends and Variation in Care and Outcomes for Children Hospitalized With Acute Gastroenteritis

OBJECTIVES

Assess trends in inpatient acute gastroenteritis (AGE) management across children's hospitals and identify elements of AGE management associated with resource use.

METHODS

We examined inpatient stays for children 6 months to 18 years hospitalized with AGE from 2009 to 2018 using the Pediatric Health Information System database. We characterized demographics, hospital-level resource use (ie, medications, laboratories, and imaging), and outcomes (ie, cost per case, 14-day revisit rates, and length of stay [LOS]). We compared demographic characteristics and resource use between 2009 to 2013 and 2014 to 2018 using χ² and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. We grouped hospitals on the basis of 2009 use of each resource and trended use over time using logistic regression. Annual change in mean cost and LOS were estimated by using models of log-transformed data.

RESULTS

Across 32 354 hospitalizations at 38 hospitals, there was a high use of electrolyte testing (85.4%) and intravenous fluids (84.1%) without substantial changes over time. There were significant reductions in the majority of laboratory, medication, and imaging resources across hospitals over the study period. The most notable reductions were for rotavirus and stool testing. Many hospitals saw a decrease in LOS, with only 3 noting an increased revisit rate. Reductions in cost per case over time were most associated with decreases in imaging, laboratory testing, and LOS.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant variation in resource use for children hospitalized with AGE coupled with high use of resources discouraged in AGE guidelines highlights potential opportunities to improve resource use that may be addressed in future AGE guidelines and quality improvement initiatives.

Multi-dose Oral Ondansetron for Pediatric Gastroenteritis: study Protocol for the multi-DOSE oral ondansetron for pediatric Acute GastroEnteritis (DOSE-AGE) pragmatic randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

There are limited treatment options that clinicians can provide to children presenting to emergency departments with vomiting secondary to acute gastroenteritis. Based on evidence of effectiveness and safety, clinicians now routinely administer ondansetron in the emergency department to promote oral rehydration therapy success. However, clinicians are also increasingly providing multiple doses of ondansetron for home use, creating unquantified cost and health system resource use implications without any evidence to support this expanding practice.

METHODS/DESIGN

DOSE-AGE is a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, six-center, pragmatic clinical trial being conducted in six Canadian pediatric emergency departments (EDs). In September 2019 the study began recruiting children aged 6 months to 18 years with a minimum of three episodes of vomiting in the 24 h preceding enrollment, <72 h of gastroenteritis symptoms and who were administered a dose of ondansetron during their ED visit. We are recruiting 1030 children (1:1 allocation via an internet-based, third-party, randomization service) to receive a 48-h supply (i.e., six doses) of ondansetron oral solution or placebo, administered on an as-needed basis. All participants, caregivers and outcome assessors will be blinded to group assignment. Outcome data will be collected by surveys administered to caregivers 24, 48 and 168 h following enrollment. The primary outcome is the development of moderate-to-severe gastroenteritis in the 7 days following the ED visit as measured by a validated clinical score (the Modified Vesikari Scale). Secondary outcomes include duration and frequency of vomiting and diarrhea, proportions of children experiencing unscheduled health care visits and intravenous rehydration, caregiver satisfaction with treatment and safety. A preplanned economic evaluation will be conducted alongside the trial.

DISCUSSION

Definitive data are lacking to guide the clinical use of post-ED visit multidose ondansetron in children with acute gastroenteritis. Usage is increasing, despite the absence of supportive evidence. The incumbent additional costs associated with use, and potential side effects such as diarrhea and repeat visits, create an urgent need to evaluate the effect and safety of multiple doses of ondansetron in children focusing on post-emergency department visit and patient-centered outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03851835. Registered on 22 February 2019.

Oral Ondansetron Administration to Dehydrated Children in Pakistan: A Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Ondansetron is an effective antiemetic employed to prevent vomiting in children with gastroenteritis in high-income countries; data from low- and middle-income countries are sparse.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled superiority trial in 2 pediatric emergency departments in Pakistan. Dehydrated children aged 6 to 60 months with ≥1 diarrheal (ie, loose or liquid) stool and ≥1 vomiting episode within the preceding 4 hours were eligible to participate. Participants received a single weight-based dose of oral ondansetron (8-15 kg: 2 mg; >15 kg: 4 mg) or identical placebo. The primary outcome was intravenous administration of ≥20 mL/kg over 4 hours of an isotonic fluid within 72 hours of random assignment.

RESULTS

All 918 (100%) randomly assigned children completed follow-up. Intravenous rehydration was administered to 14.7% (68 of 462) and 19.5% (89 of 456) of those administered ondansetron and placebo, respectively (difference: -4.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -9.7% to 0.0%). In multivariable logistic regression analysis adjusted for other antiemetic agents, antibiotics, zinc, and the number of vomiting episodes in the preceding 24 hours, children administered ondansetron had lower odds of the primary outcome (odds ratio: 0.70; 95% CI, 0.49 to 1.00). Fewer children in the ondansetron, relative to the placebo group vomited during the observation period (difference: -12.9%; 95% CI, -18.0% to -7.8%). The median number of vomiting episodes (P < .001) was lower in the ondansetron group.

CONCLUSIONS

Among children with gastroenteritis-associated vomiting and dehydration, oral ondansetron administration reduced vomiting and intravenous rehydration use. Ondansetron use may be considered to promote oral rehydration therapy success among dehydrated children in low- and middle-income countries.

Oral Ondansetron Administration to Nondehydrated Children With Diarrhea and Associated Vomiting in Emergency Departments in Pakistan: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Study objective

We determine whether single-dose oral ondansetron administration to children with vomiting as a result of acute gastroenteritis without dehydration reduces administration of intravenous fluid rehydration.

Methods

In this 2-hospital, double-blind, placebo-controlled, emergency department–based, randomized trial conducted in Karachi Pakistan, we recruited children aged 0.5 to 5.0 years, without dehydration, who had diarrhea and greater than or equal to 1 episode of vomiting within 4 hours of arrival. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1), through an Internet-based randomization service using a stratified variable-block randomization scheme, to single-dose oral ondansetron or placebo. The primary endpoint was intravenous rehydration (administration of ≥20 mL/kg of an isotonic fluid during 4 hours) within 72 hours of randomization.

Results

Participant median age was 15 months (interquartile range 10 to 26) and 59.4% (372/626) were male patients. Intravenous rehydration use was 12.1% (38/314) and 11.9% (37/312) in the placebo and ondansetron groups, respectively (odds ratio 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60 to 1.61; difference 0.2%; 95% CI of the difference –4.9% to 5.4%). Bolus fluid administration occurred within 72 hours of randomization in 10.8% (34/314) and 10.3% (27/312) of children administered placebo and ondansetron, respectively (odds ratio 0.95; 95% CI 0.56 to 1.59). A multivariable regression model fitted with treatment group and adjusted for antiemetic administration, antibiotics, zinc prerandomization, and vomiting frequency prerandomization yielded similar results (odds ratio 0.91; 95% CI 0.55 to 1.53). There was no interaction between treatment group and age, greater than or equal to 3 stools in the preceding 24 hours, or greater than or equal to 3 vomiting episodes in the preceding 24 hours.

Conclusion

Oral administration of a single dose of ondansetron did not result in a reduction in intravenous rehydration use. In children without dehydration, ondansetron does not improve clinical outcomes.

Bromopride, metoclopramide, or ondansetron for the treatment of vomiting in the pediatric emergency department: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of a single intramuscular dose of bromopride, metoclopramide, or ondansetron for treating vomiting.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trial including children 1-12 years of age presenting with acute vomiting at the pediatric emergency department.

OUTCOMES

Number of children that stopped vomiting at one, six, and 24h following treatment; episodes of diarrhea; acceptance of oral liquids; intravenous rehydration; return to hospital and side effects.

RESULTS

There were 175 children who completed the study. Within the first hour after treatment, all drugs were equally effective, with ondansetron preventing vomiting in 100%, bromopride in 96.6%, and metoclopramide in 94.8% of children (p=0.288). Within six hours, ondansetron was successful in preventing vomiting in 98.3% of children, compared to bromopride and metoclopramide, which were successful in 91.5% and 84.4% of patients, respectively (p=0.023). Within 24h, ondansetron was superior to both other agents, as it remained efficacious in reducing vomiting in 96.6% of children, as opposed to 67.8% and 67.2% with bromopride and metoclopramide, respectively (p=0.001). The ondansetron group showed better acceptance of oral liquids (p=0.05) when compared to the bromopride and metoclopramide. The ondansetron group did not show any side effects in 75.9% of cases, compared to 54.2% and 53.5% in the bromopride and metoclopramide groups, respectively. Somnolence was the most common side effect.

CONCLUSIONS

A single dose of ondansetron is superior to bromopride and metoclopramide in preventing vomiting six hours and 24h following treatment. Oral fluid intake after receiving medication was statistically better with Ondansetronwhile also having less side effects compared to the other two agents.

Clinical Practice: Nausea and vomiting in acute gastroenteritis: physiopathology and management

Currently recommended management of acute gastroenteritis is supportive. Although the affected children habitually have vomiting, recommendations do not focus on the correction of this symptom. In this condition, elevated ketone bodies and stimuli initiated by gut mucosa damage produced by the enteral pathogen likely underlay nausea and vomiting. As compared to 0.9% saline, intravenous administration of a dextrose-containing bolus of 0.9% saline is associated with a greater reduction of circulating ketones and a shorter duration of nausea and vomiting. Nonetheless, this treatment strategy is not followed by a lower rate of hospitalization.

CONCLUSION

Well-designed investigations suggest that antagonists of the type 3 serotonin receptor, most frequently oral ondansetron, reduce the rate of vomiting, improve the tolerance of oral rehydration, and reduce the need for intravenous rehydration. What is Known: • Although children with gastroenteritis habitually have vomiting, current recommendations do not focus on the correction of this symptom. What is New: • Recently acquired evidence supports the prescription of ondansetron, an antagonist of the type 3 serotonin receptor, to increase the success rate of oral rehydration therapy.

Management of Ebola Virus Disease in Children

The West African outbreak of 2013 to 2016 was the largest Ebola epidemic in history. With tens of thousands of patients treated during this outbreak, much was learned about how to optimize clinical care for children with Ebola. In anticipation of inevitable future outbreaks, a firsthand summary of the major aspects of pediatric Ebola case management in austere settings is presented. Emphasis is on early and aggressive critical care, including fluid resuscitation, electrolyte repletion, antimicrobial therapy, and nutritional supplementation.