Smoking at diagnosis significantly decreases 5-year cancer-specific survival in a population-based cohort of 18 166 colon cancer patients

Mortality risk according to smoking trajectories after cancer diagnosis among Korean male cancer survivors: A population-based cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Previous research on post-diagnosis smoking among cancer survivors mainly relied on smoking status, which may not fully reflect the impact of changes in smoking levels. This study aimed to evaluate mortality risk according to smoking trajectories among Korean male cancer survivors, using a trajectory approach to comprehensively capture smoking patterns.

METHODS

The study included 110555 men diagnosed with cancer between 2002 and 2018 from the Korean National Health Information Database. Group-based trajectory modelling was used to identify post-diagnosis smoking trajectories among pre-diagnosis current smokers (n=45331). Cox hazards models were fitted to evaluate mortality risk according to smoking trajectories for pooled cancers, pooled smoking-related cancers, smoking-unrelated cancers, and gastric, colorectal, liver, and lung cancers.

RESULTS

Smoking trajectories included light-smoking quitters, heavy-smoking quitters, consistent moderate smokers, and decreasing heavy smokers. Smoking significantly increased all-cause and cancer mortality risks in cancer patients for pooled cancers, pooled smoking-related cancers, and pooled smoking-unrelated cancers. Compared to non-smokers, all-cause mortality risk for pooled cancers significantly increased according to smoking trajectories:(AHR=1.33; 95% CI: 1.27-1.40), (AHR=1.39; 95% CI: 1.34-1.44), (AHR=1.44; 95% CI: 1.34-1.54), and (AHR=1.47; 95% CI: 1.36-1.60), respectively. Smoking increased all-cause and cancer mortality risks in gastric and colorectal cancer patients and cancer-specific mortality in lung cancer patients. The significant associations of smoking trajectories with all-cause and cancer mortality risks were primarily observed in 5-year survivors but not in short-term survivors. Among heavy smokers, smoking cessation significantly reduced all-cause mortality risk in the long-term.

CONCLUSIONS

The post-diagnosis smoking trajectory independently predicts cancer prognosis among male cancer patients. Proactive cessation support should be strengthened, particularly for those who smoke heavily.

Prehabilitation versus no prehabilitation to improve functional capacity, reduce postoperative complications and improve quality of life in colorectal cancer surgery

BACKGROUND

Surgery is the cornerstone in curative treatment of colorectal cancer. Unfortunately, surgery itself can adversely affect patient health. 'Enhanced Recovery After Surgery' programmes, which include multimodal interventions, have improved patient outcomes substantially. However, these are mainly applied peri- and postoperatively. Multimodal prehabilitation includes multiple preoperative interventions to prepare patients for surgery with the aim of increasing resilience, thereby improving postoperative outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effects of multimodal prehabilitation programmes on functional capacity, postoperative complications, and quality of life in adult patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO in January 2021. We also searched trial registries up to March 2021.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in adult patients with non-metastatic colorectal cancer, scheduled for surgery, comparing multimodal prehabilitation programmes (defined as comprising at least two preoperative interventions) with no prehabilitation. We focused on the following outcomes: functional capacity (i.e. 6-minute walk test, VO2peak, handgrip strength), postoperative outcomes (i.e. complications, mortality, length of hospital stay, emergency department visits, re-admissions), health-related quality of life, compliance, safety of prehabilitation, and return to normal activities.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently selected studies, extracted data, assessed risk of bias and used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence. Any disagreements were solved with discussion and consensus. We pooled data to perform meta-analyses, where possible.

MAIN RESULTS

We included three RCTs that enrolled 250 participants with non-metastatic colorectal cancer, scheduled for elective (mainly laparoscopic) surgery. Included trials were conducted in tertiary care centres and recruited patients during periods ranging from 17 months to 45 months. A total of 130 participants enrolled in a preoperative four-week trimodal prehabilitation programme consisting of exercise, nutritional intervention, and anxiety reduction techniques. Outcomes of these participants were compared to those of 120 participants who started an identical but postoperative programme. Postoperatively, prehabilitation may improve functional capacity, determined with the 6-minute walk test at four and eight weeks (mean difference (MD) 26.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) -13.81 to 65.85; 2 studies; n = 131; and MD 26.58, 95% CI -8.88 to 62.04; 2 studies; n = 140); however, the certainty of evidence is low and very low, respectively, due to serious risk of bias, imprecision, and inconsistency. After prehabilitation, the functional capacity before surgery improved, with a clinically relevant mean difference of 24.91 metres (95% CI 11.24 to 38.57; 3 studies; n = 225). The certainty of evidence was moderate due to downgrading for serious risk of bias. The effects of prehabilitation on the number of complications (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.29; 3 studies; n = 250), emergency department visits (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.32; 3 studies; n = 250) and re-admissions (RR 1.20, 95% CI 0.54 to 2.65; 3 studies; n = 250) were small or even trivial. The certainty of evidence was low due to downgrading for serious risk of bias and imprecision. The effects on VO2peak, handgrip strength, length of hospital stay, mortality rate, health-related quality of life, return to normal activities, safety of the programme, and compliance rate could not be analysed quantitatively due to missing or insufficient data. The included studies did not report a difference between groups for health-related quality of life and length of hospital stay. Data on remaining outcomes were not reported or were reported inadequately in the included studies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Prehabilitation may result in an improved functional capacity, determined with the 6-minute walk test both preoperatively and postoperatively. A solid effect on the number of omplications, postoperative emergency department visits and re-admissions could not be established. The certainty of evidence ranges from moderate to very low, due to downgrading for serious risk of bias, imprecision and inconsistency. In addition, only three heterogeneous studies were included in this review. Therefore, the findings of this review should be interpreted with caution. Numerous relevant RCTs are ongoing and will be included in a future update of this review.

Gender differences in smoking-induced changes in the tumor immune microenvironment

Both gender and smoking are correlated with prevalence and outcomes in many types of cancers. Tobacco smoke is a known carcinogen through its genotoxicity but can also affect cancer progression through its effect on the immune system. In this study, we aim to evaluate the hypothesis that the effects of smoking on the tumor immune microenvironment will be influenced differently by gender using large-scale analysis of publicly available cancer datasets. We used The Cancer Genomic Atlas (TCGA) datasets (n = 2724) to analyze effects of smoking on different cancer immune subtypes and the relative abundance of immune cell types between male and female cancer patients. We further validated our results by analyzing additional datasets, including Expression Project for Oncology (expO) bulk RNA-seq dataset (n = 1118) and single-cell RNA-seq dataset (n = 14). Results of our study indicate that in female patients, two immune subtypes, C1 and C2, are respectively over and under abundant in smokers vs. never smokers. In males, the only significant difference is underabundance of the C6 subtype in smokers. We identified gender-specific differences in the population of immune cell types between smokers and never smokers in all TCGA and expO cancer types. Increased plasma cell population was identified as the most consistent feature distinguishing smokers and never smokers, especially in current female smokers based on both TCGA and expO data. Our analysis of existing single-cell RNA-seq data further revealed that smoking differentially affects the gene expression profile of cancer patients based on the immune cell type and gender. In our analysis, female and male smokers show different smoking-induced patterns of immune cells in tumor microenvironment. Besides, our results suggest cancer tissues directly exposed to tobacco smoke undergo the most significant changes, but all other cancer types are affected as well. Findings of current study also indicate that changes in the populations of plasma cells and their correlations to survival outcomes are stronger in female current smokers, with implications for cancer immunotherapy of women smokers. In conclusion, results of this study can be used to develop personalized treatment plans for cancer patients who smoke, particularly women smokers, taking into account the unique immune cell profile of their tumors.

The prognostic impact of the smoking status of cancer patients receiving systemic treatment, radiation therapy, and surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Cigarette smoking represents the main risk factor for cancer development; however, less is known about the effects of active smoking on the outcome of cancer patients receiving systemic treatment, radiation therapy, or surgery.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted searching the PubMed® and Web of Science® Library databases using specific Medical Subject Headings terms. Studies reporting on the prognostic impact of the smoking status concerning survival endpoints in cancer patients treated with systemic treatment, radiation therapy, or surgery were eligible for inclusion.

RESULTS

Of 1.380 articles reviewed, 12 reports including data from 31.785 patients with six different cancer types were considered eligible for inclusion. According to the meta-analysis of the overall effect, active smoking during cancer treatment was associated with an impaired overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific mortality (CSM) as compared to former or never smokers (OS: hazard ratio (HR) = 1.61, 95% CI: 1.19-2.17, p = 0.007; CSM: HR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.01-1.54, p = 0.046). Moreover, smoking cessation led to a similar OS and CSM when comparing former to never smoking patients (OS: HR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.87-1.18, p = 0.818; CSM: HR = 1.04, 95% CI: 0.91-1.20, p = 0.324).

CONCLUSION

These results underline active smoking during cancer treatment as an independent adverse prognostic factor, while smoking cessation can result in similar outcomes compared to never smokers. Limitations of the study were a substantial study heterogeneity concerning different cancer entities and variations of treatment modalities.

Prehabilitation versus no prehabilitation to improve functional capacity, reduce postoperative complications and improve quality of life in colorectal cancer surgery

BACKGROUND

Surgery is the cornerstone in curative treatment of colorectal cancer. Unfortunately, surgery itself can adversely affect patient health. 'Enhanced Recovery After Surgery' programmes, which include multimodal interventions, have improved patient outcomes substantially. However, these are mainly applied peri- and postoperatively. Multimodal prehabilitation includes multiple preoperative interventions to prepare patients for surgery with the aim of increasing resilience, thereby improving postoperative outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effects of multimodal prehabilitation programmes on functional capacity, postoperative complications, and quality of life in adult patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO in January 2021. We also searched trial registries up to March 2021.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in adult patients with non-metastatic colorectal cancer, scheduled for surgery, comparing multimodal prehabilitation programmes (defined as comprising at least two preoperative interventions) with no prehabilitation. We focused on the following outcomes: functional capacity (i.e. 6-minute walk test, VO2peak, handgrip strength), postoperative outcomes (i.e. complications, mortality, length of hospital stay, emergency department visits, re-admissions), health-related quality of life, compliance, safety of prehabilitation, and return to normal activities.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently selected studies, extracted data, assessed risk of bias and used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence. Any disagreements were solved with discussion and consensus. We pooled data to perform meta-analyses, where possible.

MAIN RESULTS

We included three RCTs that enrolled 250 participants with non-metastatic colorectal cancer, scheduled for elective (mainly laparoscopic) surgery. Included trials were conducted in tertiary care centres and recruited patients during periods ranging from 17 months to 45 months. A total of 130 participants enrolled in a preoperative four-week trimodal prehabilitation programme consisting of exercise, nutritional intervention, and anxiety reduction techniques. Outcomes of these participants were compared to those of 120 participants who started an identical but postoperative programme. Postoperatively, prehabilitation may improve functional capacity, determined with the 6-minute walk test at four and eight weeks (mean difference (MD) 26.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) -13.81 to 65.85; 2 studies; n = 131; and MD 26.58, 95% CI -8.88 to 62.04; 2 studies; n = 140); however, the certainty of evidence is low and very low, respectively, due to serious risk of bias, imprecision, and inconsistency. After prehabilitation, the functional capacity before surgery improved, with a clinically relevant mean difference of 24.91 metres (95% CI 11.24 to 38.57; 3 studies; n = 225). The certainty of evidence was moderate due to downgrading for serious risk of bias. Prehabilitation may also result in fewer complications (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.29; 3 studies; n = 250) and fewer emergency department visits (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.32; 3 studies; n = 250). The certainty of evidence was low due to downgrading for serious risk of bias and imprecision. On the other hand, prehabilitation may also result in a higher re-admission rate (RR 1.20, 95% CI 0.54 to 2.65; 3 studies; n = 250). The certainty of evidence was again low due to downgrading for risk of bias and imprecision. The effect on VO2peak, handgrip strength, length of hospital stay, mortality rate, health-related quality of life, return to normal activities, safety of the programme, and compliance rate could not be analysed quantitatively due to missing or insufficient data. The included studies did not report a difference between groups for health-related quality of life and length of hospital stay. Data on remaining outcomes were not reported or were reported inadequately in the included studies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Prehabilitation may result in an improved functional capacity, determined with the 6-minute walk test both preoperatively and postoperatively. Complication rates and the number of emergency department visits postoperatively may also diminish due to a prehabilitation programme, while the number of re-admissions may be higher in the prehabilitation group. The certainty of evidence ranges from moderate to very low, due to downgrading for serious risk of bias, imprecision and inconsistency. In addition, only three heterogeneous studies were included in this review. Therefore, the findings of this review should be interpreted with caution. Numerous relevant RCTs are ongoing and will be included in a future update of this review.

Smoking is a Risk Factor for Endogenous Peritonitis in Patients Undergoing Peritoneal Dialysis

BACKGROUND

Peritonitis is one of the most common complications in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis, (PD) but it is difficult to predict or prevent. In this study, we analyzed the risk of endogenous peritonitis in patients receiving PD.

METHODS

We included all patients who underwent PD at our hospital from April 2015 to March 2020. There were 22 cases of peritonitis, including 18 cases of endogenous peritonitis without evidence of exit-site infection or technical failure. We evaluated older age, female sex, obesity, diabetes, diverticulosis, and constipation as potential important risk factors for endogenous peritonitis and included these as confounding factors, along with a current or previous history of smoking, in univariate logistic regression models.

RESULTS

A previous or current history of smoking (p = 0.0065) was the most significant risk factor for endogenous peritonitis in the univariate logistic regression model. In addition, smoking was the most significant independent risk factor for endogenous peritonitis (p = 0.0034) in multivariate logistic regression models. Diabetes was also significant in univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Smoking is a significant independent risk factor for endogenous peritonitis in patients undergoing PD. Cessation of smoking may lower the risk of endogenous peritonitis in this patient group.

Long Noncoding RNA MALAT1 Promotes the Development of Colon Cancer by Regulating miR-101-3p/STC1 Axis

Purpose

Colon cancer (CC) is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. This study aimed to clarify the effect of long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) metastasis-associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1 (MALAT1) on CC progression and the potential mechanism.

Methods

CC cell lines HCT116 and HT29 were selected for functional analysis. The expression of MALAT1, microRNA (miR)-101-3p, and stanniocalcin 1 (STC1) in CC tissues and cells were measured by quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR). Cell proliferation, apoptosis, migration and invasion were measured by Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8), flow cytometry, wound scratch and transwell assay, respectively. The target relationships (MALAT1 and miR-101-3p, miR-101-3p and STC1) were validated by dual-luciferase reporter and RNA pull-down assay.

Results

The expression of MALAT1 was elevated in CC tissues compared with adjacent normal tissues and was associated with lymph node metastasis, depth of invasion and tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage. Up-regulation of MALAT1 promoted the proliferation, migration, and invasion and inhibited the apoptosis of CC cells; while MALAT1 knockdown exhibited opposite results. MiR-101-3p was a target of MALAT1, which was negatively regulated by MALAT1. Silencing of miR-101-3p reverses the anti-tumor effect of MALAT1 knockdown on CC cells. STC1 was a target of miR-101-3p, which was negatively regulated by miR-101-3p. Silencing of STC1 reverses the tumor promoting effects of MALAT1 up-regulation and miR-101-3p down-regulation on CC cells.

Conclusion

MALAT1 may function as an oncogene in CC progression by affecting the miR-101-3p/STC1 axis, providing a hopeful therapeutic option for CC.

Smoking and Smoking Cessation Among Persons with Tobacco- and Non-tobacco-Associated Cancers

PURPOSE

To examine smoking and use of smoking cessation aids among tobacco-associated cancer (TAC) or non-tobacco-associated cancer (nTAC) survivors. Understanding when and if specific types of cessation resources are used can help with planning interventions to more effectively decrease smoking among all cancer survivors, but there is a lack of research on smoking cessation modalities used among cancer survivors.

METHODS

Kentucky Cancer Registry data on incident lung, colorectal, pancreatic, breast, ovarian, and prostate cancer cases diagnosed 2007-2011, were linked with health administrative claims data (Medicaid, Medicare, private insurers) to examine the prevalence of smoking and use of smoking cessation aids 1 year prior and 1 year following the cancer diagnosis. TACs included colorectal, pancreatic, and lung cancers; nTAC included breast, ovarian, and prostate cancers.

RESULTS

There were 10,033 TAC and 13,670 nTAC survivors. Smoking before diagnosis was significantly higher among TAC survivors (p < 0.0001). Among TAC survivors, smoking before diagnosis was significantly higher among persons who: were males (83%), aged 45-64 (83%), of unknown marital status (84%), had very low education (78%), had public insurance (89%), Medicaid (85%) or were uninsured (84%). Smoking cessation counseling and pharmacotherapy were more common among TAC than nTAC survivors (p < 0.01 and p = 0.05, respectively).

DISCUSSION

While smoking cessation counseling and pharmacotherapy were higher among TAC survivors, reducing smoking among all cancer survivors remains a priority, given cancer survivors are at increased risk for subsequent chronic diseases, including cancer. Tobacco cessation among all cancer survivors (not just those with TAC) can help improve prognosis, quality of life and reduce the risk of further disease. Health care providers can recommend for individual, group and telephone counseling and/or pharmacotherapy recommendations. These could also be included in survivorship care plans.

Internet-based self-help smoking cessation and alcohol moderation interventions for cancer survivors: a study protocol of two RCTs

Background

Brief interventions for smoking cessation and alcohol moderation may contribute considerably to the prevention of cancer among populations at risk, such as cancer survivors, in addition to improving their general wellbeing. There is accumulating evidence for the effectiveness of internet-based brief health behaviour interventions. The objective of this study is to assess the effectiveness, patient-level cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of two new online theory-based self-help interventions among adult cancer survivors in the Netherlands. One of the interventions focuses on alcohol moderation, the other on smoking cessation. Both interventions are tailored to cancer survivors.

Methods

Effectiveness will be assessed in two separate, nearly identical 2-armed RCTs: alcohol moderation (AM RCT) and smoking cessation (SC RCT). Participants are randomly allocated to either the intervention groups or the control groups. In the intervention groups, participants have access to one of the newly developed interventions. In the control groups, participants receive an online static information brochure on alcohol (AM RCT) or smoking (SC RCT). Main study outcome parameters are the number of drinks post-randomisation (AM RCT) and tobacco abstinence (SC RCT). In addition, cost-data and possible effect moderators and mediators will be assessed. Both treatments are internet-based minimally guided self-help interventions: MyCourse – Moderate Drinking (in Dutch: MijnKoers – Minderen met Drinken) and MyCourse – Quit Smoking (MijnKoers – Stoppen met Roken). They are based on cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT), motivational interviewing (MI) and acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT). Both interventions are optimized in collaboration with the target population of cancer survivors in focus groups and interviews, and in collaboration with several experts on eHealth, smoking cessation, alcohol misuse and cancer survivorship.

Discussion

The present study will add to scientific knowledge on the (cost-)effectiveness of internet-based self-help interventions to aid in smoking cessation or alcohol moderation, working mechanisms and impact on quality of life of cancer survivors. If found effective, these interventions can contribute to providing evidence-based psychosocial oncology care to a growing population of cancer survivors.

Trial registration

Trials are prospectively registered in The Netherlands Trial Register (NTR): NTR6011 (SC RCT), NTR6010 (AM RCT) on 1 September 2016.

Do smoking and alcohol behaviours influence GI cancer survival?

Little is known about the role of alcohol and smoking in GI cancer survival compared to GI cancer development. We systematically reviewed the evidence for a role of smoking and alcohol in prognosis among GI cancer patients and inform whether smoking or alcohol cessation interventions or guidelines for GI cancer patients are likely to improve prognosis. A total of 84 relevant studies were identified. Continued smokers, particularly heavy smokers, had worse prognosis than never smokers in most GI cancers. However, more evidence is needed to establish the likely impact of smoking cessation interventions amongst GI cancer patients. Heavy alcohol drinkers had worse prognosis in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Light alcohol consumption was not associated with worse prognosis from any GI cancer, though further studies are needed. UK guidelines for the general population recommending under 14 units (∼7 drinks) per week may be sufficient for GI cancer patients, until further evidence is available.

Lifestyle after Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis in Relation to Survival and Recurrence: A Review of the Literature

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review summarizes the evidence regarding diet, physical activity, smoking, and body composition after colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosis in relation to all-cause and CRC-specific mortality and disease recurrence and gives suggestions for future research directions.

RECENT FINDINGS

Overall, this review suggests that some, albeit not all, of the well-known modifiable risk factors for cancer incidence might also be associated with CRC survival. CRC prognosis appears to be worse with increased physical inactivity, smoking, or being underweight after CRC diagnosis. Emerging evidence suggests that diets associated with a positive energy balance, e.g., high consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages, may negatively impact survival in CRC survivors. In contrast, there is currently little evidence to support the recommendation to limit red and processed meat or alcohol intake after CRC diagnosis. Whether being overweight and obese after CRC diagnosis improves or worsens CRC prognosis remains controversial and may depend on the measure used to assess body fatness.

SUMMARY

Further research on post-diagnosis lifestyle patterns is needed to understand the multifactorial influence on CRC prognosis. Disease recurrence and the development of comorbidities should be included as key outcomes in future studies and lifestyle should preferably be repeatedly measured.