Immune modulator therapy for microscopic colitis in a case series of 73 patients

Efficacy and Safety of Vedolizumab and Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors in the Treatment of Steroid-refractory Microscopic Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α) inhibitors and the α4β7 integrin antagonist, vedolizumab, have been investigated as treatment options for patients with steroid-refractory microscopic colitis.

AIMS

To evaluate the benefit of vedolizumab and TNF-α inhibitors in patients with steroid-refractory microscopic colitis.

METHODS

Retrospective studies and case series involving patients with steroid-refractory MC who either received vedolizumab, adalimumab, or infliximab were eligible for inclusion. Pooled proportional meta-analyses were used to calculate the rate of clinical remission at induction, clinical response, maintenance of remission, histologic remission, and overall medication related adverse effects. Statistical analysis was performed in R using the metafor and meta packages.

RESULTS

A total of 14 studies involving 164 patients were included. Pooled analysis showed a clinical remission rate of 63.5% [95% CI (0.483; 0.776), I 2 =43% P =0.08], 57.8% [95% CI (0.3895; 0.7571), I 2 =0%, P =0.7541], and 39.3% [95% CI (0.0814; 0.7492), I 2 =66%, P =0.02] for vedolizumab, infliximab, and adalimumab, respectively. The maintenance of remission rates were 65.9% [95% CI (0.389; 0.889), I 2 =67%, P =0.02], 45.3% [95% CI (0.1479; 0.7747), I 2 =0%, P =0.36] and 32.5% [95% CI (0.000; 0.8508), I 2 =53%, P =0.14] in patients who received vedolizumab, infliximab, and adalimumab, respectively. Rate of biological-related adverse events warranting discontinuation of therapy was 12.2%, 32.9%, and 23.0% for the vedolizumab, infliximab, and adalimumab groups, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Vedolizumab and anti-TNF-α agents demonstrated a clinical benefit in the treatment of steroid-refractory microscopic colitis and with a tolerable safety profile. Future randomized controlled trials are needed to compare vedolizumab with TNF-α inhibitors and examine treatment effect on patients' quality of life.

Effectiveness of Bile Acid Sequestrants in Microscopic Colitis and Utility of Bile Acid Testing: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Bile acid sequestrants (BAS) are an option for microscopic colitis (MC) refractory or intolerant to budesonide. There are inconsistent data on the prevalence of bile acid malabsorption (BAM) and utility of bile acid testing in MC. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate these outcomes.

METHODS

A systematic search of randomized control trials and observational studies of adults with MC treated with BAS was conducted using MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and Scopus from inception to January 22, 2024. Data were extracted on (i) prevalence of BAM, (ii) clinical response and adverse events, and (iii) recurrence after BAS discontinuation. Data were pooled using random-effects models to determine weighted pooled estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

We included 23 studies (1 randomized control trial, 22 observational), with 1,011 patients with MC assessed for BAM and 771 treated with BAS. The pooled prevalence of BAM was 34% (95% CI 0.26-0.42, I2 = 81%). The pooled response rate with BAS induction for all patients with MC, irrespective of BAM, was 62% (95% CI 0.55-0.70, I2 = 71%). There was a higher pooled response rate in patients with BAM compared with those without BAM ( P < 0.0001). The pooled rate of BAS-related adverse effects was 9% (95% CI 0.05-0.14, I2 = 58%).

DISCUSSION

One-third of patients with MC had BAM, and almost two-thirds of all patients responded to BAS with limited side effects. Patients with MC and BAM were more likely to respond to therapy, supporting the value of bile acid testing.

Diagnosis and Pharmacological Management of Microscopic Colitis in Geriatric Care

Microscopic colitis, a diagnosis under the umbrella term of inflammatory bowel disease, is a prevalent cause of watery diarrhea, often with symptoms of urgency and bloating, typically observed in older adults aged ≥ 60 years. Its incidence has been reported to exceed those of ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease in some geographical areas. Although nonpathognomonic endoscopic abnormalities, including changes of the vascular mucosal pattern; mucosal erythema; edema; nodularity; or mucosal defects, e.g., "cat scratches" have been reported, a colonoscopy is typically macroscopically normal. As reliable biomarkers are unavailable, colonoscopy using random biopsies from various parts of the colon is compulsory. Based on the histological examination under a microscope, the disease is divided into collagenous (with a thickened subepithelial collagenous band) and lymphocytic (with intraepithelial lymphocytosis) colitis, although incomplete forms exist. In routine clinical settings, the disease has a high risk of being misdiagnosed as irritable bowel syndrome or even overlooked. Therefore, healthcare providers should be familiar with clinical features and rational management strategies. A 6-8-week oral budesonide treatment course (9 mg/day) is considered the first-line therapy, but patients often experience relapse when discontinued, or might become intolerant, dependent, or even fail to respond. Consequently, other therapeutic options (e.g., bismuth subsalicylate, biologics, loperamide, bile acid sequestrants, and thiopurines) recommended by available guidelines may be prescribed. Herein, clinically meaningful data is provided based on the latest evidence that may aid in reaching a diagnosis and establishing rational therapy in geriatric care to control symptoms and enhance the quality of life for those affected.

Effectiveness of Non-Budesonide Therapies in Management of Microscopic Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Budesonide is accepted as first-choice therapy for microscopic colitis (MC); however, symptoms often recur and some patients may be dependent, intolerant, or even fail budesonide. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the effectiveness of non-budesonide therapies (thiopurines, bismuth subsalicylate [BSS], bile acid sequestrants [BAS], loperamide and biologics) for MC suggested by international guidelines.

METHODS

We searched the CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases from their inception to 18 April 2023 for the above-mentioned therapeutics in MC. We pooled the response and remission rates by medication using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Twenty-five studies comprising 1475 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Treatment with BSS showed the highest response rate of 75% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.65-0.83; I² = 70.12%), with 50% achieving remission of symptoms (95% CI 0.35-0.65; I² = 71.06%). Treatment with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors (infliximab and adalimumab) demonstrated a response rate of 73% (95% CI 0.63-0.83; I² = 0.00%), with a remission rate of 44% (95% CI 0.32-0.56; I² = 0.00%). The response rate for those treated with vedolizumab was similar; 73% responded to treatment (95% CI 0.57-0.87; I² = 35.93%), with a remission rate of 56% (95% CI 0.36-0.75; I² = 46.30%). Loperamide was associated with response and remission rates of 62% (95% CI 0.43-0.80; I² = 92.99%) and 14% (95% CI 0.07-0.25), respectively, whereas BAS use was associated with response and remission rates of 60% (95% CI 0.51-0.68; I² = 61.65%) and 29% (95% CI 0.12-0.55), respectively. Finally, the outcomes for thiopurine use were 49% (95% CI 0.27-0.71; I² = 81.45%) and 38% (95% CI 0.23-0.54; I² = 50.05%), respectively DISCUSSION: The present systematic review and meta-analysis provides rates of effectiveness of non-budesonide therapies for MC based on available data in the field. Studies in the meta-analysis showed a large amount of heterogeneity due to the variability in assessing the clinical effects of intervention between the studies caused by differences in the definitions of response or remission rates between the studies included. This may likely result in overestimating the benefit of a treatment. Furthermore, the number of participants and drug dosages varied, and only a few studies applied disease-specific activity indices. Only one randomized controlled trial (RCT) was identified. All other 24 included studies were either case series or (retrospective) cohort studies, which complicated efforts to perform further sensitivity analyses to adjust for potential confounders and risk of bias. In addition, the overall evidence on the effect of these treatment options was judged as low, mostly due to comparability bias and the observational nature of the available studies, which limited statistically robust comparisons of rates of effectiveness of the different non-budesonide agents ranked against each other. However, our observational findings may inform clinicians regarding the most rational selection of non-budesonide therapies to patients with MC.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

PROSPERO protocol #CRD42020218649.

Medically Refractory Lymphocytic Colitis Successfully Treated With Upadacitinib

Lymphocytic colitis is a microscopic colitis characterized endoscopically by nearly normal-appearing colonic mucosa and histology demonstrating intraepithelial lymphocytosis. Microscopic colitis that is refractory to conventional therapies, including budesonide, is rare but challenging and with scarce evidence. Upadacitinib is a novel Janus kinase 1 selective inhibitor approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for atopic dermatitis, rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, and moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. We present the first case of lymphocytic colitis refractory to conventional and immunosuppressive therapies, which responded promptly to upadacitinib.

Mucosa associated invariant T and natural killer cells in active and budesonide treated collagenous colitis patients

Introduction

Collagenous colitis (CC) is an inflammatory bowel disease, which usually responds to budesonide treatment. Our aim was to study the immunological background of the disease.

Methods

Analyses of peripheral and mucosal MAIT (mucosa associated invariant T cells) and NK (natural killer) cells were performed with flow cytometry. Numbers of mucosal cells were calculated using immunohistochemistry. We studied the same patients with active untreated CC (au-CC) and again while in remission on budesonide treatment. Budesonide refractory patients and healthy controls were also included. The memory marker CD45R0 and activation marker CD154 and CD69 were used to further study the cells. Finally B cells, CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells were also analysed.

Results

The percentages of circulating CD56^dimCD16⁺ NK cells as well as MAIT cells (CD3⁺TCRVa7.2⁺CD161⁺) were decreased in au-CC compared to healthy controls. This difference was not seen in the mucosa; where we instead found increased numbers of mucosal CD4⁺ T cells and CD8⁺ T cells in au-CC. Mucosal immune cell numbers were not affected by budesonide treatment. In refractory CC we found increased mucosal numbers of MAIT cells, CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells compared to au-CC.

Discussion

Patients with active collagenous colitis have lower percentages of circulating MAIT and NK cells. However, there was no change of these cells in the colonic mucosa. Most mucosal cell populations were increased in budesonide refractory as compared to au-CC patients, particularly the number of MAIT cells. This may indicate that T cell targeting therapy could be an alternative in budesonide refractory CC.

Biologic Therapy for Budesonide-refractory, -dependent or -intolerant Microscopic Colitis: a Multicentre Cohort Study from the GETAID

BACKGROUND

Budesonide remains the backbone therapy for microscopic colitis [MC]; however, relapses are frequent, and some patients are intolerant or dependent. Anti-TNF therapy is increasingly used to treat these patients, but available evidence is still limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of anti-TNF therapy in MC patients failing budesonide.

METHODS

In a multicentre retrospective cohort study, budesonide-refractory, -dependent, or -intolerant MC patients treated with anti-TNF agents were included. Clinical remission was defined as fewer than three bowel movements per day, and clinical response was defined as an improvement in stool frequency of at least 50%.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients were included. Median age was 58.5 years, median disease duration was 25 months, and median follow-up was 29.5 months. Seven patients were treated with infliximab [IFX], and seven with adalimumab. Clinical remission without steroids at 12 weeks was reached in 5/14 [35.7%] patients; all of these received IFX. Clinical response at 12 and 52 weeks, was obtained in 9/14 [64.3%] and 7/14 [50%] patients, respectively. Five patients switched to another anti-TNF agent. When considering both first- and second-line anti-TNF therapies, 7 [50%] patients were in clinical remission at Week 52. Mild to moderate adverse events were reported in six ptients. Two patients were treated with vedolizumab, of whom one had clinical response; one patient treated with ustekinumab had no response.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first multicentre cohort study showing that half of patients treated with anti-TNF therapy for MC achieved clinical remission in case of budesonide failure.

Efficacy and safety of biologic therapy in microscopic colitis: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of biologic therapy in the treatment of steroid-refractory microscopic colitis (MC).

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central to identify articles and abstracts reporting efficacy or safety data on biologic use (infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab, golimumab, vedolizumab, ustekinumab, and tofacitinib) for induction and maintenance of remission in MC. We assessed clinical remission and response rates and all reported adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

A total of 376 studies were screened yielding 13 articles (including four abstracts) with a combined information on 78 patients for efficacy and safety outcomes. Most studies were case series. Vedolizumab was used in five studies, adalimumab in three, and a combination of infliximab and adalimumab in five studies. The rates of remission were 66.08% (95% CI, 36.79-95.37%; I2 , 71%) at weeks 3-6 and 54.20% (95% CI, 39.39-69.01%; I2 , 0%) at weeks 12-16. Clinical response rates were 100% (95% CI, 88.04-100%; I2 , 0%) at weeks 3-6 and 67.20% (95% CI, 47.72-86.69%; I2 , 52%) at weeks 12-16. Most frequent AE was medication discontinuation with a pooled incidence of 16.1% (95% CI, 5.9-37.5%). No deaths attributable to biologic use were reported. The overall quality of evidence was very low due to the high risk of biases.

CONCLUSION

Low-quality evidence supports the short-term efficacy of biologics in budesonide refractory MC. While our findings represent the most comprehensive evaluation of biologic therapy in severe MC, further research including randomized clinical trials is needed to better define the role of specific agents and long-term therapy.

Rheumatologic Associations of Microscopic Colitis: A Narrative Review

Extra-intestinal manifestations are frequent complications of the classical inflammatory bowel diseases, Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. However, in addition to the classical diseases, there is a spectrum of conditions, often termed "microscopic colitis", in which extra-intestinal manifestations are less well described. Our objective was to review the literature regarding the extra-intestinal manifestations complicating microscopic colitis and describe the association with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases. A comprehensive search and review of peer-reviewed English-language and international journals and reports was completed based on key terms, including "microscopic colitis", "lymphocytic colitis", "collagenous colitis", "inflammatory bowel disease", "extraintestinal manifestations", and the specific disease associations utilizing the PubMed Central database and MEDLINE. A broad spectrum of rheumatologic manifestations has been reported in patients with microscopic colitis. The identification of rheumatoid arthritis and limited scleroderma as co-morbidities with microscopic colitis was noteworthy. Inflammatory arthropathy was frequently seen in microscopic colitis, usually preceding or occurring in conjunction with the onset of gastrointestinal symptoms. A variety of presentations of associated arthritis were reported: migratory, symmetric or asymmetric, peripheral or axial, oligoarticular or polyarticular, erosive or non-erosive. There was a high incidence of autoantibodies in these patients, supporting a potential autoimmune association. On the basis of these anecdotal reports, we would suggest development of a clinical registry to help define the incidence of extra-intestinal manifestations and systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases among microscopic colitis patients to help elucidate shared predispositions, pathogenic mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities.

Microscopic colitis: Etiopathology, diagnosis, and rational management

Microscopic colitis is an inflammatory bowel disease divided into two subtypes: collagenous colitis and lymphocytic colitis. With an increasing incidence of microscopic colitis exceeding those of ulcerative and Crohn's disease among elderly people in some countries, microscopic colitis is a debilitating life experience. Therefore, physicians should be familiar with its clinical features and management strategies because the disease deserves the same attention as the classical inflammatory bowel diseases. Here, state-of-the-art knowledge of microscopic colitis is provided from a global perspective with reference to etiopathology and how to establish the diagnosis with the overall aim to create awareness and improve rational management in clinical practice. The immune system and a dysregulated immune response seem to play a key role combined with risk factors (e.g. cigarette smoking) in genetically predisposed individuals. The symptoms are characterized by recurrent or chronic nonbloody, watery diarrhea, urgency, weight loss, and a female preponderance. As biomarkers are absent, the diagnosis relies on colonoscopy with a histological assessment of biopsy specimens from all parts of the colon. Although the disease is not associated with a risk of colorectal cancer, a recent nationwide, population-based cohort study found an increased risk of lymphoma and lung cancer. Budesonide is the first-line therapy for management, whereas immunomodulatory drugs (including biologics) and drugs with antidiarrheal properties may be indicated in those failing, dependent, or intolerant to budesonide. In microscopic colitis induced by checkpoint inhibitors, a drug class used increasingly for a wide range of malignancies, a more aggressive therapeutic approach with biologics introduced early seems reasonable. However, particular attention needs to be drawn to the existence of incomplete forms of microscopic colitis with the risk of being overlooked in routine clinical settings.

Diagnosis and Management of Microscopic Colitis in Pediatric Patients

Microscopic colitis (MC) is an inflammatory disease of the colon, characterized by chronic watery diarrhea with distinguishing histologic findings despite normal endoscopic appearance of the colonic mucosa. MC is a common cause of diarrhea in older adults, though it has been infrequently reported in children and adolescents. As MC is rare in the pediatric population, and the clinical presentation is non-specific, increased awareness of this disease amongst pediatric clinicians and pathologists is essential for timely diagnosis, which requires performing colonoscopy with biopsy. The etiology of MC is incompletely understood, but current theories in pathogenesis inform management strategies. The goals of management in pediatric MC should be to achieve symptomatic improvement while minimizing adverse effects of treatment. Many patients who achieve clinical response have symptomatic recurrence after discontinuation of initial therapy, and may require maintenance medication therapy to sustain remission. This review aims to summarize the epidemiology and risk factors, clinical features, diagnosis, theories regarding pathogenesis, and suggested management approaches for MC in the pediatric population.

Proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for the treatment of collagenous colitis

The role of surgery for collagenous colitis (CC) is unexplored. Either diverting stoma, subtotal colectomy with ileo-rectal anastomosis, and proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) have been proposed. However, the optimal surgical strategy still needs to be defined. The aim of this short report is to report our experience with two cases of IPAA for CC. Two patients affected by histologically proven CC with watery diarrhea refractory to several lines of medical treatment underwent a laparoscopic proctocolectomy with IPAA at a tertiary referral hospital for the treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Belgium. A longer rectal cuff was left in place because of the absence of macroscopic inflammation of the rectal mucosa and the consequent negligible risk of cuffitis. No postoperative complications (90 days) occurred. Definitive pathological examination confirmed the diagnosis of CC. At six months, pouchoscopy revealed no signs of inflammation. One year after surgery, mean Öresland and Pouch Functional Score were 10.5 (8-13) and 11.5 (9-14). Functional outcomes after IPAA for CC were barely satisfactory. A high stool frequency not responding to high doses of anti-diarrheals was observed. This has also previously been reported for CC patients receiving a diverting stoma. Proctocolectomy and IPAA for medical refractory CC leads to acceptable short-term gastrointestinal functional outcomes which seems to be particularly affected by high stool frequency. For this reason, pouch surgery might not be the optimal indication for collagenous colitis.

Bile Acid Sequestrant Therapy in Microscopic Colitis

GOALS

There is an unmet need in investigating corticosteroid-sparing treatments for induction and maintenance of remission in microscopic colitis (MC). The authors' aim was to evaluate the outcomes of patients with MC treated with bile acid sequestrants (BAS).

BACKGROUND

MC is a common chronic diarrheal illness. Budesonide is effective induction therapy, but relapses are high after cessation of treatment.

STUDY

Our cohort consisted of patients enrolled in our institutional MC registry, a biorepository of histology-confirmed diagnoses of MC. Patients receiving BAS for the treatment of MC were reviewed at each clinical visit for efficacy or ability to decrease budesonide maintenance dosing.

RESULTS

The authors included 79 patients (29 collagenous colitis and 50 lymphocytic colitis) with a median follow-up period of 35 months (range, 1 to 120). Most patients were female individuals (78%) and the median age was 69 years (range, 29 to 87). BAS therapy was used in 21 patients who were budesonide-naive, with a response rate of 76% (16/21). In patients treated previously with budesonide, 46 patients were budesonide-dependent and given BAS as maintenance therapy. Of these patients, 23 (50%) were able to decrease their budesonide dosing and 9 (20%) were able to stop budesonide completely. Seven of 46 patients (15%) stopped BAS because of intolerance, perceived lack of benefit, or treatment of concomitant diarrhea illness.

CONCLUSIONS

BAS may be an effective corticosteroid-sparing option in the treatment of MC and should be considered after budesonide induction. Larger controlled studies are needed to confirm the efficacy for long-term maintenance and tolerability of BAS in patients with MC.

Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Response in Microscopic Colitis Based on Age at Diagnosis: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Microscopic colitis (MC) primarily affects older adults; thus, data in younger patients are scarce.

AIMS

To compare clinical characteristics and treatment response by age at diagnosis.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was performed at Mayo Clinic and Massachusetts General Hospital. Patients were chosen consecutively using established databases. Patients were 'younger' if age at diagnosis was ≤ 50 years and 'older' if age > 50 years. Treatment outcomes were captured for induction (12 ± 4 weeks), based on the total number of daily stools, and defined as remission (complete resolution), response (≥ 50% improvement), non-response (< 50% improvement), and intolerance. Patients were considered 'responders' if they had remission or response and 'non-responders' if they had non-response or intolerance.

RESULTS

We included 295 patients (52 younger, 243 older). There were no differences in sex, race, MC subtype, and diarrhea severity between groups (all P > 0.05). Younger patients were more likely to have celiac disease (17.3% vs. 5.8%, P = 0.01), while older patients had higher BMI (mean 25.0 vs. 23.8 kg/m², P = 0.04) were more likely smokers (53.9% vs. 34.6%, P = 0.01) and use NSAIDs (48.6% vs. 15.4%, P < 0.01) and statins (22.6% vs. 3.8%, P < 0.01). Overall treatment response was highest for budesonide (88.3%) and did not differ when comparing older to younger patients (90.6% vs. 77.8%, P = 0.12) or by MC subtype (LC, 81.5% vs. CC, 92.9%, P = 0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

There are no significant differences in MC treatment response based on age or disease subtype. These findings support treating patients with MC based on symptom severity rather than age.

Controversials of Microscopic Colitis

Microscopic colitis (MC) has become a disease with increased awareness due to the availability of new data about the pathogenesis, diagnosis and therapy of this disease. The incidence of MC is increasing, reaching the incidence of the inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in some populations. However, some aspects of MC are still controversial. It is unknown whether the changes of microbiome play a role in the pathogenesis and what is in the background of the different subtypes of disease that can transform into each other. Is there a connection between MC and IBD or why the histological changes do not follow the clinical activity? We do not know what the etiology of the incomplete MC is, and what its natural course is. The association of MC with celiac disease is well-known- is there a common pathogenesis? The MC treatment is budesonide. Its effectiveness is high, but the relapse rate is high, as well. Why would biologics be effective in these cases when budesonide is not? This mini-review makes an attempt to summarize the data about MC and highlight that there are still unanswered questions in the pathogenesis, diagnosis and therapy of the disease, which can initiate further investigations in the future.

Microscopic colitis

Microscopic colitis (MC) is an inflammatory disease of the large intestine associated with urgent watery diarrhoea. MC may occur in people of all ages, although the disease primarily affects older women. Once believed to be rare, MC is now known to be a common cause of chronic watery diarrhoea in high-income countries, affecting 1 in 115 women and 1 in 286 men during their lifetime in Swedish population-based estimates. An inappropriate immune response to disturbances in the gut microenvironment is implicated in the pathogenesis of MC. Evidence also supports an underlying genetic basis for disease. The diagnosis of MC relies on clinical symptoms and microscopic assessment of colonic biopsy samples. MC is categorized histologically into collagenous colitis, lymphocytic colitis and their incomplete forms. The mainstay of treatment includes the use of budesonide, with or without adjunctive therapies, and withdrawal of offending drugs. Emerging studies suggest a role for biologicals and immunosuppressive therapies for the management of budesonide-refractory or budesonide-dependent disease. MC can have a substantial negative effect on patient quality of life. The outlook for MC includes a better understanding of the immune response, genetics and the microbiome in disease pathogenesis along with progress in disease management through robust clinical trials.

Microscopic Colitis: A Concise Review for Clinicians

Microscopic colitis (MC) is an inflammatory disease of the colon and a common cause of chronic watery diarrhea, predominantly in older patients. Microscopic colitis encompasses 2 different subtypes, lymphocytic colitis and collagenous colitis. The colon typically appears normal endoscopically in MC, and the diagnosis requires histologic evaluation. Whereas recent studies suggest that the incidence of MC has plateaued, given the aging of the population, the prevalence of MC will likely increase. Risk factors for MC include increasing age; female sex; presence of other autoimmune diseases; and possibly use of certain medications, including proton pump inhibitors, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and statins. The clinical presentation of MC is nonspecific and includes watery nonbloody diarrhea, nocturnal stools, fecal urgency, abdominal pain, arthralgias, and weight loss. The disease course of MC is variable; some patients experience occasional, intermittent symptoms, and others demonstrate more chronic and even progressive symptoms. The approach to treatment is similar for both lymphocytic colitis and collagenous colitis and should be guided by the severity of the patient's symptoms. Offending medications highly associated with MC should be eliminated as clinically possible. In patients with mild symptoms, antidiarrheals such as loperamide are the initial choice; for moderate-severe disease, budesonide is recommended for induction of clinical remission. In those with recurrent symptoms, low-dose budesonide may be required for maintenance therapy with close monitoring for potential adverse effects. In rare cases, immunomodulators may be required.

European guidelines on microscopic colitis: United European Gastroenterology and European Microscopic Colitis Group statements and recommendations

INTRODUCTION

Microscopic colitis is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease characterised by normal or almost normal endoscopic appearance of the colon, chronic watery, nonbloody diarrhoea and distinct histological abnormalities, which identify three histological subtypes, the collagenous colitis, the lymphocytic colitis and the incomplete microscopic colitis. With ongoing uncertainties and new developments in the clinical management of microscopic colitis, there is a need for evidence-based guidelines to improve the medical care of patients suffering from this disorder.

METHODS

Guidelines were developed by members from the European Microscopic Colitis Group and United European Gastroenterology in accordance with the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument. Following a systematic literature review, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology was used to assess the certainty of the evidence. Statements and recommendations were developed by working groups consisting of gastroenterologists, pathologists and basic scientists, and voted upon using the Delphi method.

RESULTS

These guidelines provide information on epidemiology and risk factors of microscopic colitis, as well as evidence-based statements and recommendations on diagnostic criteria and treatment options, including oral budesonide, bile acid binders, immunomodulators and biologics. Recommendations on the clinical management of microscopic colitis are provided based on evidence, expert opinion and best clinical practice.

CONCLUSION

These guidelines may support clinicians worldwide to improve the clinical management of patients with microscopic colitis.

Treatment of microscopic colitis: the role of budesonide and new alternatives for refractory patients

Microscopic colitis is a common cause of chronic watery diarrhea with a great impact on patient quality of life. Microscopic colitis includes two histological subtypes: collagenous colitis and lymphocytic colitis. Due to the increasing incidence and awareness of this disease over the last decades, several international guidelines have been recently published. However, there is still significant heterogeneity in the management of these patients, and treatments without solid scientific evidence support are often used in clinical practice. This article reviews the therapeutic role of budesonide in microscopic colitis and summarizes the current evidence regarding other treatments available for this disease, especially for the management of refractory patients. Finally, an updated treatment algorithm is proposed.

Overview of microscopic colitis

Microscopic colitis encompasses both collagenous and lymphocytic colitis and is a relatively common condition with rising incidence. Diagnosis is by colonoscopy (which is usually normal but may show some mild changes) and biopsies which reveal characteristic histological findings. Symptoms include non-bloody diarrhoea with urgency which may be associated with faecal incontinence and abdominal pain. Microscopic colitis is associated with a reduced health-related quality of life, and treatment is aimed at symptom control. Medications linked with the development of microscopic colitis, including proton pump inhibitors, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors, should be discontinued. If symptoms persist, budesonide is a licensed treatment for microscopic colitis which has been shown to be effective in clinical trials and real-world practice.

Microscopic colitis: pathophysiology and clinical management

Microscopic colitis is a chronic inflammatory disease of the colon that frequently causes chronic watery diarrhoea that might be accompanied by abdominal pain, nocturnal diarrhoea, urgency, and faecal incontinence. These symptoms lead to poor quality of life and increased health-care costs. Diagnosis relies on histological examination of multiple biopsy samples from the colonic mucosa, which often show no or only few abnormalities on endoscopy. Two major histological subtypes can be distinguished-collagenous colitis and lymphocytic colitis-but incomplete and variant forms with fewer characteristic features have been reported. Here we summarise the latest evidence on epidemiology, pathogenesis, and risk factors, and discuss established and novel therapeutic options for clinical remission. Finally, we propose an updated treatment algorithm. Further prospective studies are needed to clarify the natural history of microscopic colitis, supported by validated criteria for the assessment of disease activity.

Single-centre experience with anti-tumour necrosis factor treatment in budesonide-refractory microscopic colitis patients

Background

Microscopic colitis is an inflammatory bowel disease that causes chronic, watery diarrhoea. Microscopic colitis is usually effectively treated with budesonide, but some patients are refractory. Data on alternative treatments are sparse.

Aims

The purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate outcome of microscopic colitis patients receiving anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy at our centre.

Methods

Treatment results, including side effects, for all microscopic colitis patients receiving anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy were registered at week 12 and at end of follow-up. Clinical remission was defined as a mean of <3 stools and <1 watery stools/day/week and clinical response as a 50% reduction of mean stool frequency/day/week. Induction and maintenance treatment was either adalimumab or infliximab.

Results

The study cohort comprised 18 patients; mean age at diagnosis was 47 years (range 19-77). Ten and eight patients, respectively, received adalimumab and infliximab as first-line anti-tumour necrosis factor; seven patients received second-line anti-tumour necrosis factor due to non-response, loss of response or side effects. At week 12, 9/18 patients had achieved remission, 6/18 were responders and 3/18 were non-responders. Of the nine remission patients, 3/18 (16%) had long-lasting clinical remission post-induction therapy alone. Five patients (28%) (one first-line, four second-line anti-tumour necrosis factor) were in remission and one patient (6%) responded to maintenance treatment; follow-up was mean 22 (range 4-60) months. Six patients (33%) had minor, reversible side effects.

Conclusions

Over half of budesonide-refractory microscopic colitis patients can achieve clinical remission or response on anti-tumour necrosis factor agents. Prospective studies are mandatory to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anti-tumour necrosis factor treatments in budesonide-refractory microscopic colitis.

Budesonide treatment for microscopic colitis: systematic review and meta-analysis

Microscopic colitis (MC), encompassing lymphocytic and collagenous colitis, is a common cause for chronic nonbloody diarrhoea, which impacts significantly on the quality of life for patients. Despite increasing awareness of the condition and its treatment, there is considerable variation in therapeutic approaches. To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of budesonide in the treatment of MC. We searched Medline, Embase and Central databases using predefined search methodology for randomised trials using budesonide in the treatment of MC. We extracted data, on the efficacy and safety of budesonide, from studies identified that met the feasibility for analysis criteria. These data were pooled with a fixed effects model. Nine studies met the inclusion criteria for analysis. The pooled odds ratios (ORs) for a response to budesonide therapy at induction and maintenance were 7.34 [95% confidence interval (CI): 4.08-13.19] and 8.35 (95% CI: 4.14-16.85) respectively. Histological response rates were superior in budesonide-treated patients compared to placebo following induction (OR: 11.52; 95% CI: 5.67-23.40) and maintenance treatment (OR: 5.88; 95% CI: 1.90-18.17). There was no difference in adverse events. Significant relapse rates (>50%) were observed following treatment cessation with no difference noted between the budesonide or the placebo-treated patients. Budesonide is an effective treatment option for MC for achieving induction and maintenance of both clinical and histological response. High relapse rates on treatment cessation were observed.

Management of microscopic colitis: challenges and solutions

Microscopic colitis (MC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease characterized by nonbloody diarrhea in the setting of normal appearing colonic mucosa. MC has two main subtypes based on histopathologic features, collagenous colitis and lymphocytic colitis. Management of both subtypes is the same, with treatment goal of reducing the number of bowel movements and improving consistency. First-line treatment involves counseling the patient about decreasing their risk factors, like discontinuing smoking and avoiding medications with suspected association such as NSAIDs, proton pump inhibitor, ranitidine, and sertraline. Starting loperamide for immediate symptomatic relief is used as an adjunct to therapy with glucocorticoids. Budesonide is considered first-line treatment for MC given its favorable side effect profile and good efficacy, though relapse rates are high. Systemic glucocorticoids should be reserved to patients unable to take budesonide. In glucocorticoid refractory disease, medications that have been tried include cholestyramine, bismuth salicylate, antibiotics, probiotics, aminosalicylates, immunomodulators, and anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors. More research is needed for the creation of a systematic stepwise approach for relapsing and refractory disease.

Case report: Pentoxifylline treatment in microscopic colitis

RATIONALE

Microscopic colitis is a common cause of diarrhea. Pentoxifylline, a xanthine derivative with anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha properties, is prescribed for intermittent claudication and other disorders. Our goal was to evaluate the outcomes of patients with microscopic colitis treated with pentoxifylline.

PATIENT CONCERNS

Nine patients with microscopic colitis (8 collagenous colitis and 1 lymphocytic colitis) seen at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, between January 1, 1997 and November 30, 2016, were included. The median age was 56.9 years (range 51.6-60.2), 8 were female (89%), and the median disease duration was 64.8 months (range 60-109). The indications for treatment were budesonide refractoriness in 7 patients, budesonide dependence in 1 patient, and budesonide intolerance in 1 patient.

DIAGNOSES

A histological diagnosis of microscopic colitis was confirmed in all patients.

INTERVENTIONS

Pentoxifylline 400 mg three times a day was used for a median of 3 months (range 2.5-8.3).

OUTCOMES

Complete response occurred in 1 patient (11%) and partial response in 3 patients (33%). The patient who achieved complete response was treated with pentoxifylline due to budesonide intolerance, and completed 43 months of successful maintenance therapy. There were no adverse effects reported.

LESSONS

The majority of budesonide-experienced patients with active microscopic colitis did not respond to pentoxifylline. However, it was well-tolerated, with 1 patient achieving long-term remission and one-third of the cohort having a partial response. Larger controlled studies are required to evaluate the efficacy of pentoxifylline and predictors of response in microscopic colitis. In particular, patients who are not budesonide-refractory may be more likely to respond.