Real-world multicentre observational study including population pharmacokinetic modelling to evaluate the exposure-response relationship of vedolizumab in inflammatory bowel disease: ERELATE Study

Proactive Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Is Associated With Increased Drug Persistence in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease Treated With Intravenous Vedolizumab

BACKGROUND

There are limited data regarding therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of non-anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of proactive TDM in IBD patients treated with intravenous (iv) vedolizumab (VDZ).

METHODS

This single-center retrospective cohort study included consecutive IBD patients treated with maintenance iv VDZ therapy undergoing TDM from November 2016 to March 2023. Patients were followed through June 2023 and were divided in to 2 groups: those who had at least 1 proactive TDM vs those who underwent only reactive TDM. A survival analysis was performed to evaluate drug persistence, defined as no need for drug discontinuation due to loss of response, serious adverse event, or an IBD-related surgery.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 94 patients (proactive TDM, n = 72) with IBD (ulcerative colitis, n = 53). Patients undergoing at least 1 proactive TDM compared with patients having only reactive TDM demonstrated a higher cumulative probability of drug persistence (Log-rank P < .001). In multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis, at least 1 proactive TDM was the only factor associated with drug persistence (hazard ratio, 14.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.8-50; P < .001). A ROC analysis identified a VDZ concentration of 12.5 µg/mL as the optimal drug concentration threshold associated with drug persistence (area under the ROC curve: 0.691; 95% CI, 0.517-0.865; P = .049).

CONCLUSION

In this single-center retrospective study reflecting real-life clinical practice, proactive TDM was associated with increased drug persistence in patients with IBD treated with iv VDZ.

Vedolizumab Efficacy Is Associated With Decreased Intracolonic Dendritic Cells, Not Memory T Cells

BACKGROUND

Vedolizumab, an antibody blocking integrin α4β7, is a safe and effective therapy for Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Blocking α4β7 from binding its cognate addressin MAdCAM-1 on intestinal blood vessel endothelial cells prevents T cells from migrating to the gut mucosa in animal models. However, data supporting this mechanism of action in humans is limited.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional case-control study to evaluate the effect of vedolizumab on intestinal immune cell populations while avoiding the confounding effect of resolving inflammation on the cellularity of the colonic mucosa in treatment-responsive patients. Colon biopsies from 65 case subjects receiving vedolizumab were matched with biopsies from 65 control individuals, similar in disease type, medications, anatomic location, and inflammation. Biopsies were analyzed by flow cytometry and full messenger RNA transcriptome sequencing of sorted T cells.

RESULTS

No difference was seen between vedolizumab recipients and control individuals in the quantity of any antigen-experienced T lymphocyte subset or in the quality of the transcriptome in any experienced T cell subset. Fewer naïve colonic B and T cells were seen in vedolizumab recipients than control individuals, regardless of response. However, the most striking finding was a marked reduction in CD1c+ (BDCA1+) dendritic cells exclusively in vedolizumab-responsive patients. In blood, these dendritic cells ubiquitously express high levels of α4β7, which is rapidly downregulated upon vedolizumab exposure.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical effects of vedolizumab reveal integrin α4β7-dependent dendritic cell migration to the intestinal mucosa to be central to inflammatory bowel disease pathogenesis.

ENTERPRET: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Vedolizumab Dose Optimization in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis Who Have Early Nonresponse

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) may experience nonresponse to biologics, possibly as a result of low drug exposure. This trial assessed the efficacy of dose optimization in patients with UC who have early nonresponse to vedolizumab and high drug clearance.

METHODS

ENTERPRET was a phase 4, open-label, randomized, controlled trial that included patients with moderate to severe UC who had high drug clearance at week 5 (serum concentration, <50 μg/mL) and nonresponse to standard vedolizumab treatment at week 6. At week 6, eligible patients were randomized 1:1 to receive standard dosing (300 mg every 8 weeks) or dose-optimized vedolizumab (600 mg at week 6, then 300 mg every 4 weeks; or 600 mg at week 6, then 600 mg every 4 weeks [based on week 5 serum concentration]). The primary end point was endoscopic improvement at week 30.

RESULTS

Of 278 enrolled patients, 132 (47.5%) had a clinical response at week 6. From week 6, 108 patients received standard (n = 53) or dose-optimized vedolizumab (n = 55); among patients with nonresponse at week 6, 86.5% had high drug clearance. At week 30, 10 patients (18.9%) who received standard vedolizumab had endoscopic improvement vs 8 patients (14.5%) who received dose-optimized vedolizumab. Five patients (9.4%) who received standard vedolizumab had clinical remission at week 30 vs 5 patients (9.1%) who received dose-optimized vedolizumab; clinical response was observed in 17 (32.1%) and 17 patients (30.9%), respectively. Safety event rates were similar among treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with early nonresponse and high drug clearance, vedolizumab dose optimization is probably not required. A proportion of patients benefited from continued treatment irrespective of the dose received.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov: NCT03029143.

"Getting the Dose Right"-Revisiting the Topic With Focus on Biologic Agents

Nearly two decades after the Peck and Cross article '"Getting the dose right: facts, a blueprint, and encouragements" was published, a review of dose recommendations for biologics shows that the success in getting the dose right appears to have improved given the relatively low incidence of drug withdrawals and dosing/label changes. However, the clinical experience with monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) following approval has been less than perfect. In inflammatory diseases, the disease burden changes with time and high treatment failure rates have been reported. In addition, the use of concomitant steroids and immunosuppressant drugs with MAbs is common. These concomitant agents have their own safety issues and many immunosuppressant agents are not well-tolerated although they have been shown to reduce the incidence of anti-drug antibodies (ADA). This same complexity is seen in MAbs used in oncology as well, although with these agents the doses appear to be higher than needed, which results in high treatment costs and incidence of adverse events. Given the complexity of MAb pharmacokinetics, which makes providing a detailed description of dose options difficult, product labeling should include the options for alternative dose strategies and potentially include the use of therapeutic drug monitoring with dose individualization which have been shown to improve clinical response and reduce the incidence of ADA. So, while the recommended dosing for biologics seems improved over the issues noted 17 years ago, we still have some work to do.

Efficacy and Safety of Vedolizumab in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Association with Vedolizumab Drug Levels

BACKGROUND

Vedolizumab (VDZ) is a well-established and important therapeutic option in the treatment of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, the significance of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) with VDZ remains a contradictory field in daily clinical practice. Our study aims to clarify the predictive impact of VDZ drug levels in long-term clinical outcomes in a real-world cohort.

METHODS

Patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) from a tertiary IBD referral center at the University Hospital Augsburg, Germany, were enrolled in this single-center retrospective data analysis. Clinical and endoscopic data were collected at month 6, month 12, and at the last time of follow-up, and outcomes were correlated with VDZ levels at week 6.

RESULTS

This study included 95 patients, 68.4% (n = 65) with UC, 24.2% (n = 23) with CD, and 7.4% (n = 7) with indeterminate colitis (CI). Patients with a mean VDZ treatment time of 17.83 months ± 14.56 showed clinical response in 29.5% (n = 28) and clinical remission in 45.3% (n = 43) at the end of the study. Endoscopic response occurred in 20.0% (n = 19) and endoscopic remission in 29.5% (n = 28) at the end of the study. The sustained beneficial effect of VDZ was also reflected in a significant change in biomarker levels. VDZ trough level at week 6 was determined in 48.4% (n = 46) with a mean of 41.79 µg/mL ± 24.58. A significant association between VDZ level at week 6 and both short and long-term outcomes could not be demonstrated. However, numerically higher VDZ levels were seen in patients with endoscopic and clinical improvement at month 6 and at the time of last follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated efficacy and safety for VDZ in a real-world cohort. Although, for some parameters, a clear trend for higher VDZ levels at week 6 was seen, the efficacy of VDZ was not significantly correlated to VDZ level at week 6, which questions the predictive value of VDZ levels in the real world.

Precision medicine in inflammatory bowel disease

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is an incurable disease characterized by remission-relapse cycles throughout its course. Both Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), the two main forms of IBD, exhibit tendency to develop complications and substantial heterogeneity in terms of frequency and severity of relapse, thus posing great challenges to the clinical management for IBD. Current treatment strategies are effective in different ways in induction and maintenance therapies for IBD. Recent advances in studies of genetics, pharmacogenetics, proteomics and microbiome provide a strong driving force for identifying molecular markers of prognosis and treatment response, which should help clinicians manage IBD patients more effectively, and then, improve clinical outcomes and reduce treatment costs of patients. In this review, we summarize and discuss precision medicine in IBD, focusing on predictive markers of disease course and treatment response, and monitoring indices during therapeutic drug monitoring.

Drug Clearance in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease Treated with Biologics

Biological therapy is very effective for treating patients with moderate to severe inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, up to 40% can have primary non-response, and up to 50% of the patients can experience a loss of response to anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy. These undesirable outcomes can be attributed to either a mechanistic failure or pharmacokinetic (PK) issues characterized by an inadequate drug exposure and a high drug clearance. There are several factors associated with accelerated clearance of biologics including increased body weight, low serum albumin and immunogenicity. Drug clearance has gained a lot of attention recently as cumulative data suggest that there is an association between drug clearance and therapeutic outcomes in patients with IBD. Moreover, clearance is used by model informed precision dosing (MIDP) tools, or PK dashboards, to adjust the dosing for reaching a target drug concentration threshold towards a more personalized application of TDM. However, the role of drug clearance in clinical practice is yet to be determined. This comprehensive review aims to present data regarding the variables affecting the clearance of specific biologics, the association of clearance with therapeutic outcomes and the role of clearance monitoring and MIPD in patients with IBD.

Systemic immune-inflammation index as a potential biomarker to monitor ulcerative colitis

OBJECTIVE

The treat-to-target strategy is recommended by Selecting Therapeutic Targets in Inflammatory Bowel Disease II (STRIDE-II) for treating ulcerative colitis (UC), and monitoring remission status is crucial during this management. The systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), defined as platelet * neutrophil/lymphocyte, is a complete blood count-based index reflecting the balance of immune and inflammatory status. This study aims to investigate the feasibility of SII for diagnosing UC and monitoring UC disease activity.

METHODS

This study retrospectively analyzed patients with UC and controls. Relationships between SII and Mayo clinical score, Mayo Endoscopic Score (MES), and Nancy Histological Index (NHI) were evaluated.

RESULTS

167 patients with UC and 106 controls were included. SII significantly increased in patients with UC and was closely correlated with the Mayo clinical score, MES, and NHI. SII diagnosed UC with a cut-off value of 619.1 × 109/L (area under the curve = 0.861, p < 0.0001, sensitivity 79.64%, specificity 77.36%), evaluated clinical remission status with a cut-off value of 1068 × 109/L (area under the curve = 0.691, p < 0.05, sensitivity 55.71%, specificity 81.48%), endoscopic improvement with a cut-off value of 981.3 × 109/L (area under the curve = 0.819, p < 0.0001, sensitivity 65.22%, specificity 89.66%), and histological healing with a cut-off value of 689.3 × 109/L (area under the curve = 0.898, p < 0.0001, sensitivity 88.89%, specificity 95.83%).

CONCLUSION

SII is a potential biomarker for diagnosing UC and monitoring UC disease severity, especially in evaluating mucosal and histological healing during the long-term management in treat-to-target strategy. However, further research is needed to confirm its usefulness and optimize its clinical application.

An update on the safety of long-term vedolizumab use in inflammatory bowel disease

INTRODUCTION

Vedolizumab (Entyvio) is a humanized monoclonal antibody that disrupts the interaction between α4β7 integrin on circulating T-lymphocytes and MAdCAM-1 on the vascular endothelium to prevent their egress to sites of gut inflammation. It has proven therapeutic efficacy for the treatment of moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, and pouchitis.

AREAS COVERED

This narrative review assesses the safety profile of vedolizumab from the registration trial programs, open-label extension studies, observational real-world data, and pooled safety analyses. This includes an evaluation of the long-term overall safety in special populations typically underrepresented in clinical trials.

EXPERT OPINION

Vedolizumab is an effective therapy for inflammatory bowel disease with a well-established safety profile. No unexpected long-term safety signals have been identified. Safety data in pregnancy, in pediatric and elderly populations, in patients undergoing surgery, and in patients with a prior history of cancer are reassuring. Due to its safety merits, we propose that vedolizumab is an excellent candidate for advanced combination treatment with an anti-cytokine approach using another biologic or novel small molecule inhibitor. This is important in patients with medically refractory IBD, in patients at high risk of developing disease-related complications, or in patients with concomitant uncontrolled immune-mediated inflammatory diseases.

Do Vedolizumab trough Levels Predict the Outcome of Subsequent Therapy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease?

Background: Vedolizumab trough serum levels have been associated with clinical and endoscopic response in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). A recent study demonstrated that higher trough levels before dose escalation are associated with favorable outcomes. Objectives: We aimed to identify whether vedolizumab trough levels predict outcome of subsequent therapy. Methods: This retrospective study included IBD patients consecutively receiving vedolizumab therapy between November 2014 and June 2021. Only patients with a loss of response (LOR) to vedolizumab and available trough drug levels prior to therapy cessation were included. Clinical and endoscopic scores were recorded at 6 and 12 months post switching therapy. Results: Overall, 86 IBD patients (51 Crohn's disease, 35 ulcerative colitis) who discontinued vedolizumab were included; of those, 72 (83.7%) were due to LOR. Upon vedolizumab discontinuation, 66.3% of patients were switched to another biologic therapy. Trough vedolizumab levels at discontinuation due to LOR did not differ between patients with clinical response and LOR regarding subsequent therapy at 6 months [median 33.8 μg/mL (IQR 13.2-51.6) versus 31.7 μg/mL (IQR 9.1-64.8), p = 0.9] and at 12 months [median 29.6 μg/mL (IQR 14.3-51.6) versus 34.1 μg/mL (IQR 12.2-64.7), p = 0.6]. Patients progressing to subsequent surgery had numerically lower vedolizumab trough levels at LOR compared with patients who were treated with an additional medical therapy (median 14.3, IQR 4-28.2 μg/mL versus 33.5, IQR 13-51.6 μg/mL, p = 0.08). Conclusions: Vedolizumab trough levels upon LOR do not predict response to subsequent medical therapy; however, lower drug levels may suggest a more aggressive disease pattern and future need for surgery.

Measuring Serum Vedolizumab and Vedolizumab Antibodies: Comparison of Commercial Assays with the Vedolizumab Clinical Development Assay

BACKGROUND

Vedolizumab (VDZ) is an anti-α 4 β 7 integrin monoclonal antibody approved for inflammatory bowel disease treatment. VDZ serum and antidrug antibody (ADA) concentrations may be used for treatment optimization. In this article, the results of 5 commercial assays (Grifols, Immundiagnostik, Progenika, Sanquin, and Theradiag) measuring VDZ concentration and ADA were compared with those of the reference assays used in VDZ clinical studies. Our findings will assist clinicians in interpreting commercial assay results in the context of VDZ clinical trial data.

METHODS

VDZ-treated patient samples were used to evaluate the agreement between commercial assays and the reference VDZ serum concentration assay, based on linear regression, Bland-Altman, and qualitative agreement analyses. VDZ ADAs were detected using qualitative assays. Specificity, selectivity, accuracy, and precision were assessed using serum samples from healthy donors or patients with IBD (VDZ serum concentration <0.5 mcg/mL) spiked with VDZ, with/without other biologics (identical sample sets per assay).

RESULTS

All assays were specific and selective for VDZ. Overall, the commercial assay results for VDZ-spiked samples correlated well with those of the reference serum concentration assay (R 2 ≥ 0.98). Compared with the Immundiagnostik and Theradiag assays, the Grifols, Sanquin, and Progenika assays had the best reference assay agreement (based on regression analysis, Bland-Altman plots, and qualitative agreement [Cohen's kappa ≥0.92]). All immunogenicity assays detected VDZ ADAs; only the reference assay detected VDZ ADAs in the presence of 15 mcg/mL VDZ, advising caution with commercial ADA assays if VDZ is present.

CONCLUSIONS

All 5 commercial assays are suitable for VDZ therapeutic monitoring and ADA testing. However, the absolute values from the reference assays and the different commercial assays were not comparable, indicating that the same assay must be used for repeated monitoring of VDZ serum concentrations.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Vedolizumab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients during Maintenance Treatment—TUMMY Study

There are limited data on therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients treated with vedolizumab (VDZ). Although an exposure–response relation has been demonstrated in the post-induction phase, this relationship is more uncertain in the maintenance phase of treatment. The aim of our study was to determine whether there is an association between VDZ trough concentration and clinical and biochemical remission in the maintenance phase. A prospective, observational multicenter study has been performed on patients with IBD on VDZ in the maintenance treatment (≥14 weeks). Patient demographics, biomarkers, and VDZ serum trough concentrations were collected. Clinical disease activity was scored by the Harvey Bradshaw Index (HBI) for Crohn’s disease (CD) and the Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index (SCCAI) for ulcerative colitis (UC). Clinical remission was determined as HBI < 5 and SCCAI < 3. Biochemical remission was defined as fecal calprotectin <250 mg/kg and serum CRP <5 mg/L. A total of 159 patients (59 CD, 100 UC) were included. In none of the patient groups, a statistically significant correlation between trough VDZ concentration and clinical remission was observed. Patients in biochemical remission had higher VDZ trough concentrations (p = 0.019). In this population, higher trough VDZ concentrations were associated with biochemical remission but not with clinical remission.

Real world population pharmacokinetic study in children and young adults with inflammatory bowel disease discovers novel blood and stool microbial predictors of vedolizumab clearance

BACKGROUND

Vedolizumab for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is often intensified based on distinct pharmacokinetics in children. Prior adult-specific population pharmacokinetic models have identified limited covariates of drug clearance.

AIMS

To establish a population pharmacokinetic model for children and young adults to identify novel covariates of drug clearance to better account for paediatric-specific inter-patient variability in vedolizumab pharmacokinetics; a key secondary exploratory aim was to identify microbial signatures of pharmacokinetic outcomes in a subset of patients.

METHODS

The study included data from 463 observed vedolizumab concentrations (59 peaks and 404 troughs) from 74 patients with IBD (52 with Crohn's disease and 22 with ulcerative colitis or unclassified IBD, median age 16 years). Pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted with non-linear mixed effects modelling. For the evaluation of the exposure-response relationship, clinical outcomes were evaluated by trough levels, clearance and vedolizumab exposure. Whole-genome metagenomic sequencing was conducted at baseline and week 2.

RESULTS

A two-compartment population pharmacokinetic model was identified with a clear correlation between CL and weight, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and hypoalbuminemia. Trough concentrations before infusion 3 (37 μg/ml) and before infusion 4 (20 μg/ml) best predicted steroid-free clinical remission at infusion 4. Using faecal metagenomics, we identified an early (baseline and week 2) abundance of butyrate-producing species and pathways that were associated with an infusion 4 trough concentration >20 μg/ml.

CONCLUSIONS

This novel paediatric vedolizumab pharmacokinetic model could inform precision dosing. While additional studies are needed, an abundance of faecal butyrate producers is associated with early response to vedolizumab, suggesting that microbial analysis may be beneficial to biological selection.

Real-World Study on Vedolizumab Serum Concentration, Efficacy, and Safety after the Transition from Intravenous to Subcutaneous Vedolizumab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients: Single-Center Experience

Little is known about how the change from intravenous to subcutaneous vedolizumab in a real-life setting in inflammatory bowel disease patients on stable maintenance therapy affects clinical outcomes. We compared the data on vedolizumab serum trough concentration, efficacy, and safety prior to and six months after the switch from intravenous to subcutaneous vedolizumab. In total, 24 patients, 13 with ulcerative colitis (UC) and 11 with Crohn’s disease (CD), were included. Mean serum trough concentration of intravenous vedolizumab was significantly lower than mean serum trough concentration of subcutaneous vedolizumab (p = 0.002). There was no significant difference between C-reactive protein levels, fecal calprotectin levels or clinical scores (Harvey–Bradshaw index or Partial Mayo score) prior to transition to subcutaneous vedolizumab and after 6 months. In four (16.7%) patients, two CD and two UC, therapy was discontinued during the follow-up period with a median of 5 months (minimum–maximum: 4–6). In all patients, therapy was discontinued due to loss of response. In total, 13 adverse events were reported by 11 patients, and the most common adverse event was COVID-19. No serious adverse events were reported. In conclusion, subcutaneous vedolizumab has shown to be effective and safe in patients on previously established maintenance therapy with intravenous vedolizumab.