Laparoscopic Toupet Fundoplication using an Air Seal Intelligent Flow System and Anchor Port in a 1.8-kg infant: A Technical Report

The Usefulness of AirSeal™ Intelligent Flow System in Gas Insufflation Total Endoscopic Thyroidectomy

Total endoscopic thyroidectomy (TET) using low CO2 insufflation provides cosmetic advantage, excellent working space and visibility. On the contrary, suctioning blood or mist/smoke produced by energy device application causes narrowing of working space especially in neck surgery. In this regard, AirSeal intelligent flow system would be particularly suitable in TET. However, the benefit of AirSeal is unknown in TET unlike abdominal surgery. Therefore, the impact of AirSeal was evaluated in TET in this study. Twenty patients who underwent total endoscopic hemithyroidectomy were retrospectively analyzed. Insufflation was conducted by either conventional or AirSeal system according to the surgeon's preference. Short-term surgical outcomes including operation time, bleeding, frequency of scope cleaning, and disappearance of subcutaneous emphysema were compared as well as actual visibility. AirSeal application dramatically reduced obstacle smoke/mist and prevented narrowing working space by suctioning. Frequency of scope cleaning was significantly less in AirSeal group than that in conventional group (p = 0.016). In patients with nodule < 5 cm, intraoperative hemorrhage was less in AirSeal group than that in the counterpart (p = 0.077) regardless of larger nodule size in AirSeal group (p = 0.058). Notably, subcutaneous emphysema around surgical cavity disappeared significantly earlier in AirSeal group than in the counter parts (p = 0.019). On the contrary, AirSeal application did not shorten operation time in the current study. AirSeal provided excellent visibility and seamless operation. AirSeal has great potential to decrease not only surgeon's stress but surgical invasion on patients. The results in this study give rational to AirSeal application to TET.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12070-022-03257-0.

Laparoscopic gynaecological surgery in the context of maintaining normal intracranial pressure

A nulliparous patient in her early 20s was referred to a fertility specialist for fertility preservation, before commencing chemo-radiation therapy for a recently diagnosed malignant brain tumour. Two weeks prior, she had presented with seizures and undergone emergency craniotomy and tumour resection. Taking into consideration of the tight time frame and her comorbidities, several measures were undertaken to minimise the potential increase in intracranial pressure that may lead to cerebral oedema during laparoscopy. Preoperatively, the anaesthetist administered 8 mg dexamethasone as prophylaxis. Intraoperatively, the degree of head-down tilt was minimised to 10, which was just adequate to displace bowel cranially for visualisation of pelvic structures. Finally, a shorter operative time was achieved by ensuring the most senior surgeon performed the operation, and the procedure itself was altered from the standard approach of ovarian harvesting to unilateral oophorectomy. The patient made a quick recovery and was discharged home day 1 postoperatively.

Pneumoperitoneum and hemodynamic stability during pediatric laparoscopic appendectomy

BACKGROUND

Conventional pneumoperitoneum (CP) and automatically maintained pneumoperitoneum using AirSeal Intelligent Flow System (AiFS) were compared during pediatric laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) using intraperitoneal pressure (IPP) and hemodynamic parameters.

METHODS

A prospective review of 39 children aged 3-14years who had standard 3-trocar LA was performed. Pneumoperitoneum was either AiFS (n=18) or CP (n=21) according to the surgeon's preference. IPP during insertion of trocars in all subjects was initially 8-10mmHg, which was reduced to 5mmHg then maintained until LA was completed. Data were collected every 5min during pneumoperitoneum.

RESULTS

Subject demographics were similar for both groups. During pneumoperitoneum, average IPP (AiFS: 7.9; CP: 9.0mmHg), average systolic blood pressure (AiFS: 100.4; CP: 106.9mmHg), and average end-tidal CO₂ (EtCO₂; AiFS: 35.7; CP: 38.5mmHg) were significantly different (p<.05, respectively), while pulse (AiFS: 92.1; CP: 96.4bpm), oxygen saturation (AiFS: 98.8; CP: 98.8%), body temperature (AiFS: 37.2; CP: 37.4), urine output (AiFS: 2.7; CP: 2.4mL/kg per hour), operative time (AiFS: 72.2; CP: 76.2mins), blood loss (AiFS: 3.6; CP: 3.5mL), recommencement of oral intake (AiFS: 1.3; CP: 1.4days), and postoperative hospitalization (AiFS: 4.3; CP: 3.8days) were not.

CONCLUSION

Because IPP was significantly lower during LA with AiFS, EtCO₂ and BP were significantly lower.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Treatment study; prospective comparative study - level II.

Robotic partial nephrectomy performed with Airseal versus a standard CO2 pressure pneumoperitoneum insufflator: a prospective comparative study

BACKGROUND

Airseal represents a new generation of valveless and barrier-free surgical trocars that enable a stable pneumoperitoneum with continuous smoke evacuation and carbon dioxide (CO₂) recirculation during surgery. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the potential advantages of the Airseal compared to a standard CO₂ insufflator in the field of robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN).

METHODS

Between October 2012 and April 2015, two cohorts of 122 consecutive patients with clinically localized renal cell carcinoma underwent RPN by a single surgeon, with the use of a standard CO₂ pressure insufflator (Group A, 55 patients) or Airseal (Group B, 67 patients) and were prospectively compared.

RESULTS

The two groups were similar in baseline, preoperative characteristics. The mean dimension of the lesion, as evaluated by contrast-enhanced CT scan, was 30 (median 28; IQR 2) and 39 mm (median 40; IQR 2) for Groups A and B, respectively (p < 0.05). The complexity of the treated tumors was similar, as indicated by the mean RENAL nephrometry score. Positive surgical margins rate was similar in both groups (3.6 vs 4.5 %, p = 0.8) as well as the need for postoperative blood transfusion (9.1 vs 4.5 %, p = 0.3) and the development of postoperative acute kidney injury (16.4 vs 10.4 %, p = 0.3). Mean operative time and warm ischemia time were significantly shorter in Group B. Moreover, a significant increase in the cases performed as "zero ischemia" was observed in Group B (7.3 vs 30 %, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study comparing the Airseal with a standard CO₂ insufflator system in the field of the RPN. The preliminary outcomes in terms of overall operative time, warm ischemia time and cases performed as "zero ischemia" are better with respect to standard insufflators. The feasibility, safety and efficacy of combining laser tumor enucleation with the valve-free insufflation systems should be evaluated.