Laparoscopic surgery in patients with interstitial lung disease: A single-center retrospective observational cohort study

Secondary analysis of preoperative predictors for acute postoperative exacerbation in interstitial lung disease

This study assessed whether perioperative management is associated with postoperative acute exacerbations (AEs) in interstitial lung disease (ILD) patients. Using secondary data from the study "Postoperative acute exacerbation of interstitial lung disease: a case-control study," we compared the perioperative clinical management of the AE and non-AE groups (1:4 case-control matching) selected by sex, year of surgery (2009-2011, 2012-2014, and 2015-2017), and multiple surgeries within 30 days. We compared 27 and 108 patients with and without AEs, respectively. Rates of one lung ventilation (OLV) cases (70 vs. 29%; OR, 5.9; 95%CI, 2.34-14.88; p < 0.001) and intraoperative steroid administration (48 vs. 26%; OR, 2.65; 95%CI, 1.11-6.33; p = 0.028), and average mean inspiratory pressure (9.2 [1.8] vs. 8.3 [1.7] cmH2O; OR, 1.36; 95%CI, 1.04-1.79; p = 0.026), were significantly higher in the AE group. There was a significant difference in OLV between the groups (OR, 4.99; 95%CI, 1.90-13.06; p = 0.001). However, the fraction of inspired oxygen  > 0.8 lasting > 1 min (63 vs. 73%, p = 0.296) was not significantly different between the groups. OLV was significantly associated with postoperative AEs in patients with ILD undergoing both pulmonary and non-pulmonary surgeries. Thus, preoperative risk considerations are more important in patients who require OLV.

Restrictive Pulmonary Dysfunction May Increase Blood Loss During Liver Resection

BACKGROUND

Restrictive pulmonary dysfunction (RPD) is a risk factor for perioperative complications during gastrointestinal surgery. We hypothesized that high airway pressure due to RPD results in increased intraoperative blood loss during liver surgery. Thus, we investigated the effects of RPD on perioperative outcomes for liver resection.

METHODS

This study included 496 patients who underwent curative liver resection at our hospital between April 2009 and April 2020. Perioperative outcomes for the RPD and control groups were compared. Restrictive pulmonary dysfunction was defined as % vital capacity <80%.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients (8.3%) had RPD. No significant differences were observed in intraoperative blood losses (440 mL vs 320 mL, P = .340), overall complication rates (29.3% vs 31.2%, P = .797), or pulmonary complication rates (4.9% vs 9.0%, P = .286) between the RPD and control groups. In the 256 patients who underwent anatomical liver resection, 18 patients (7.0%) had RPD. The intraoperative blood loss was significantly higher in the RPD group (925 mL vs 456 mL, P = .013), but no differences in the overall complication rates (44.4% vs 37.3%, P = .528) or pulmonary complication rates (11.1% vs 10.5%, P = .589) between the two groups were detected. A multivariate analysis showed that RPD was an independent risk factor for intraoperative blood loss ≥500 mL during anatomical liver resection (odds ratio 4.132; 95% confidence interval 1.135-15.045; P = .031).

DISCUSSION

Restrictive pulmonary dysfunction may be a risk factor for intraoperative blood loss during anatomical liver resection, which requires exposure of the main hepatic vein.

Laparoscopic surgery in patients with cystic fibrosis: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic surgery may be advantageous for cystic fibrosis (CF) patients because it leads to fewer complications than open surgery. However, it could still lead to pulmonary and cardiovascular complications in CF patients. We aimed to systematically review the use of laparoscopic surgery in CF patients.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed in compliance with PRISMA guidelines. A literature search was performed using PubMed/MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, EMBASE, and Google Scholar, with "cystic fibrosis and laparoscopic surgery" and "cystic fibrosis and minimally invasive surgery" used as the search terms. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria were applied. The protocol was registered with the PROSPERO register.

RESULTS

Six studies met the predetermined inclusion criteria; accordingly, two studies provided high-quality evidence and four provided moderate-quality evidence. The interrater correlation was convincing (r_s  = .95, P = .02, two-tailed). Therefore, three quantitative studies and three qualitative studies were assessed and evidence-graded in accordance with the GRADE protocol.

CONCLUSION

The benefits of laparoscopic surgical interventions for patients with CF were supported with good evidential value and recognized as a safe and suitable surgical option.