Effects of ovarian structures identified at Ovsynch™ enrolment, disease history and lactation variables on odds of pregnancy to a fixed-time artificial insemination after Ovsynch™

Ovarian and Energy Status in Lame Dairy Cows at Puerperium and Their Responsiveness in Protocols for the Synchronization of Ovulation

The purpose of this study was to assess the ovarian and energy status of multiparous lame dairy cows at the end of puerperium and investigate their responsiveness to estrous synchronization treatment regimens. Initial lameness scoring was performed at 28 ± 5 and 37 ± 5 d post partum, followed by lesion documentation and treatment. Cows were blocked by lameness severity and were randomly allocated to an estrous synchronization treatment regimen with seven days of progesterone supplementation (group LP, n = 26) or with an administration of PGF_2α twice, 14 d apart (group LC, n = 26). Non-lame cows served as controls (group C, n = 27) and the same treatment regimen was imposed as that for group LC. Twelve days after estrous presynchronization, an Ovsynch treatment regimen and timed AI were imposed. Ultrasonography of the ovaries and blood sampling for progesterone were used to assess cyclicity status, whereas β-hydroxybutyrate (BHBA) and non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA) were used to assess energy status. Lame cows were to a greater proportion non-cycling (36.5% vs. 11.1%; p = 0.02), had greater overall NEFA concentrations (0.32 ± 0.02 vs. 0.26 ± 0.02 mEq/L; p = 0.02) and a greater incidence of elevated NEFA concentrations (53.9% vs. 29.6%, p = 0.04) compared to control cows. However, no interaction between energy and lameness status was evident regarding non-cycling cows. The percentage of cows responding to the presynchronization, synchronization and ovulating did not differ between groups LP, LC, and C. The first-service conception rate (FSCR) tended to be greater for group C (37.0%) compared to group LP (16.0%; p = 0.08). Long-term reproductive performance did not differ between lame and control cows, although culling rates did (21.2% vs. 0%, respectivly; p = 0.01). The severity of lameness had an effect on culling rates (30.6% vs. 0% for cows with marked vs. moderate lameness; p = 0.01), whereas the type of lesion largely explained poor reproductive performance (FSCR 13.9% vs. 40.0% for cows with claw horn disruptions vs. infectious lesions; p = 0.04). Conclusively, cows that were lame during puerperium are at a greater risk of not cycling irrespective of energy status. Treatment regimens for the synchronization of ovulation seem to be efficient at resuming ovarian cyclicity. Marked lameness was detrimental to survivability, whereas cows with claw horn lesions had compromised reproductive capacity.

A randomized controlled clinical trial on the effect of acupuncture therapy in dairy cows affected by pyometra

Pyometra (PYO) is a reproductive disease characterized by the accumulation of purulent or mucopurulent material within the uterine lumen, in the presence of an active corpus luteum (CL). As the CL continues secreting progesterone, PYO would develop following endometritis. Due to prohibited use of artificial luteolytic hormones in US certified organic dairies, conventional therapies consisting of administration of prostaglandin F2α, are not applicable. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of two acupuncture procedures on the treatment of persistent CL in cows with PYO. We hypothesized that acupuncture would reduce CL diameter and serum progesterone (P4) concentrations, leading to regression of PYO. Holstein cows with PYO, at an USDA certified organic dairy farm in Northern Colorado, were enrolled in a randomized controlled clinical trial and assigned to 1 of 3 treatments: (1) control pyometra (CP; no treatment; n = 17); (2) electroacupuncture (EAP; n = 15); and (3) laser acupuncture (LAP; n = 15). Each cow received three 9-min (EAP) or 20-min (LAP) acupuncture sessions in alternate days. All study cows had blood samples collected for determination of serum progesterone concentration at d0, and at d2, d4, d11, d18, and d25 after first treatment. The ovaries were scanned by transrectal ultrasonography at -3d, d0, d2, d4, d11, and d18 to determine the diameter of the CL. The effect of treatment in the outcome variables was evaluated by ANOVA and by repeated measures analyses, accounting for baseline data (CL diameter and progesterone serum concentration). Average ± SE change in CL diameter from d0 to d18 were 0.94 ± 1.0 mm, 0 ± 1.0 mm, and - 0.33 ± 1.0 mm for CP, EAP, and LAP, respectively. The repeated measures analysis indicated no significant differences for CL diameter among groups. None of the study cows had serum progesterone values <1 ng/ml by the end of the monitoring period (d25) and average ± SE change from d0 to d25 were - 4.0 ± 1.97 ng/ml, -0.76 ± 2.1 ng/ml, and 3.24 ± 1.9 ng/ml for CP, EAP, and LAP, respectively. The repeated measures analysis indicated no significant differences for serum progesterone concentrations among groups. On farm cow records reviewed 150 d after treatment indicated that 2 cows in EAP and 1 cow in LAP conceived 38 d, 68 d, and 38 d, after treatment completion. In conclusion, acupuncture was not an effective treatment for persistent CL in cows with PYO, during the monitoring period.

Treatment of cows that fail to respond to pre-synchronization treatments with a CIDR-Ovsynch regimen improves the overall pregnancy percentage after a double Ovsynch treatment regimen

In this study, there was evaluation of pregnancy per AI (P/AI) as a result of the first postpartum AI following four ovulation-synchronization treatments. Treatment regimens were Ovsynch-56 (OVS, n = 875; GnRH1-7d-PGF_2α-56h-GnRH2-16h-FTAI), CIDR-OVS (n = 1001; OVS plus CIDR inserts between GnRH1 and PGF_2α), Double-Ovsynch (DOVS, n = 663; imposing Pre-OVS followed by breeding-OVS 7 days later), and Modified-DOVS (M-DOVS, n = 1397; imposing Pre-OVS followed either by breeding-OVS or CIDR-OVS based upon the ovarian structure at GnRH1). Cows with a corpus luteum were assigned to a breeding-OVS treatment regimen and those that did not have a corpus luteum were assigned to the CIDR-OVS treatment regimen. Compared with OVS, the P/AI of the cows in the M-DOVS (OR = 1.5, P = 0.001) and CIDR-OVS (OR = 1.4, P = 0.017) was greater at day 30. At day 70, only in the M-DOVS group was there a greater P/AI compared with the OVS group (OR = 1.7, P < 0.001). Pregnancy loss between days 30 and 70 was greater in cows of the CIDR-OVS (OR = 1.9, P = 0.014) compared with those of the OVS group. In cows of the M-DOVS, the dominant ovarian structures (follicle, corpus luteum or cyst) at different time-points of the pre-synchronization period and occurrence of estrus at the end of this period were not associated with P/AI at day 30 post-AI. In conclusion, imposing CIDR-OVS in cows that did not respond to pre-synchronization treatments, resulted in an enhanced pregnancy percentage with the use of the DOVS.

Probability of pregnancy and risk factors of the Ovsynch program and its modification in dairy cows – a review

The Ovsynch programme is one of the most frequently used procedures in managing dairy cattle reproduction. There are many studies evaluating the effectiveness of the Ovsynch programme. However, few of them assess the impact of factors that can lead to a decrease in the pregnancy rate and thus, reduce the success of the Ovsynch programme. This review aims to examine the impact of both individual and environmental factors on the likelihood of pregnancy. The risk factors described include: the body condition, age, number and stage of lactation, production level, occurrence of diseases and postpartum complications, functional status of the ovaries, oestrous cycle phase, temperature, season and year, and program start-up after calving. Possible modifications of the Ovsynch programme are presented in order to increase its effectiveness and to determine the best time to start it. Additionally, attention was paid to pregnancy losses during the Ovsynch programme which ultimately decrease pregnancy rates. The impact of this many factors on the efficiency of the Ovsynch suggests the need to adjust the synchronization program each time to the individual situation of the herd.