Effect of pre-milking teat disinfection on clinical mastitis incidence in a dairy herd in Northern Queensland, Australia

Assessment of sensitivity and specificity of bacterial culture and the VetMAX™ MastiType Multi Kit in detecting Streptococcus uberis and Escherichia coli in milk samples from dairy cows with clinical mastitis in subtropical Australia

Mastitis, a prevalent and economically important disease in the dairy industry, poses substantial challenges to dairy cow health, milk quality, and farm profitability worldwide. Mastitis is predominantly caused by bacterial infections. The objective of this study was to estimate the sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) of bacterial culture and the VetMAX™ MastiType Multi Kit PCR in identified clinical mastitis pathogens. A total of 396 quarter-level milk samples were collected from 396 cows with clinical mastitis on 29 farms in the subtropical dairy region of Australia between March and December 2021. These samples were cultured and tested by PCR, and analysed using Bayesian latent class analysis under the assumption of one population two tests and also of three populations two tests, by dividing the population into subpopulations based on regions. Informative priors used in the analysis were calculated from published evidence. Models were compared using the Deviance Information Criterion (DIC). Sensitivity analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of changes in priors. The most common isolates cultured and detected by PCR were Streptococcus uberis (17.4 % and 27.3 %, respectively) and Escherichia coli (12.6 % and 25.0 %, respectively). Under the assumption of one population two tests, the Se of PCR (at cycle threshold (Ct) ≤ 37) was higher than that of bacterial culture for both pathogens: for E. coli, the Se was 50.2 % (95 % posterior probability interval (PPI): 37.4; 74.1) for bacterial culture, and 93.7 % (95 % PPI: 85.5; 98.4) for PCR. For S. uberis, the Se was 50.4 % (95 % PPI: 40.9; 61.3) for bacterial culture, and 81.5 % (73.0; 88.9) for PCR. Conversely, the Sp of bacterial culture was higher than that of PCR for both pathogens: for E. coli, the Sp was 99.2 % (97.8; 100) for bacterial culture, and 95.1 % (87.8; 99.4) for PCR. For S. uberis, the Sp was 99.2 % (95 % PPI: 97.6; 100) for bacterial culture, and 96.7 % (95 % PPI: 92.1; 99.2) for PCR. Bayesian latent class analysis with three populations two tests was only performed for S. uberis. For E. coli, this could not be performed because there were no PCR-positive results in one subpopulation. Under the assumption of three populations two tests, for S. uberis, the Se was 49.6 % (40.6; 59.4) for bacterial culture, and 81.1 % (72.6; 88.6) for PCR; and the Sp for bacterial culture was 99.1 % (97.7; 100), and for PCR was 96.9 % (93.0; 99.3). The DIC for the one population two tests model was lower than the DIC for the three populations two tests model. The sensitivity analysis for the one population two tests model demonstrated that a 10 % reduction in priors led to substantial changes in Se of both bacterial culture and PCR tests for E. coli and S. uberis, with overlap percentages ranging from 80.6 % to 92.2 %. In contrast, the Sp of bacterial culture and PCR tests remained relatively stable despite changes in priors, except for the Sp of PCR test for E. coli. In summary, the VetMAX™ MastiType Multi Kit demonstrated higher Se compared to bacterial culture, suggesting its potential as a routine test for identifying mastitis pathogens in milk samples from cows with clinical mastitis. While the bacterial culture method offered higher Sp in pathogen detection; results obtained following bacterial culture and subsequent susceptibility testing remain valuable, particularly in guiding antimicrobial treatment for mastitis.

Virulence Determinants and Plasmid-Mediated Colistin Resistance mcr Genes in Gram-Negative Bacteria Isolated From Bovine Milk

A major increase of bacterial resistance to colistin, a last-resort treatment for severe infections, was observed globally. Using colistin in livestock rearing is believed to be the ground of mobilized colistin resistance (mcr) gene circulation and is of crucial concern to public health. This study aimed to determine the frequency and virulence characteristics of colistin-resistant Gram-negative bacteria from the milk of mastitic cows and raw unpasteurized milk in Egypt. One hundred and seventeen strains belonging to Enterobacteriaceae (n = 90), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 10), and Aeromonas hydrophila (n = 17) were screened for colistin resistance by antimicrobial susceptibility testing. The genetic characteristics of colistin-resistant strains were investigated for mcr-1-9 genes, phylogenetic groups, and virulence genes. Moreover, we evaluated four commonly used biocides in dairy farms for teat disinfection toward colistin-resistant strains. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensive drug-resistant (XDR) phenotypes were detected in 82.91% (97/117) and 3.42% (4/117) of the isolates, respectively. Of the 117 tested isolates, 61 (52.14%) were colistin resistant (MIC >2 mg/L), distributed as 24/70 (34.29%) from clinical mastitis, 10/11 (90.91%) from subclinical mastitis, and 27/36 (75%) from raw milk. Of these 61 colistin-resistant isolates, 47 (19 from clinical mastitis, 8 from subclinical mastitis, and 20 from raw milk) harbored plasmid-borne mcr genes. The mcr-1 gene was identified in 31.91%, mcr-2 in 29.79%, mcr-3 in 34.04%, and each of mcr-4 and mcr-7 in 2.13% of the colistin-resistant isolates. Among these isolates, 42.55% (20/47) were E. coli, 21.28% (10/47) A. hydrophila, 19.12% (9/47) K. pneumoniae, and 17.02% (8/47) P. aeruginosa. This is the first report of mcr-3 and mcr-7 in P. aeruginosa. Conjugation experiments using the broth-mating technique showed successful transfer of colistin resistance to E. coli J53-recipient strain. Different combinations of virulence genes were observed among colistin-resistant isolates with almost all isolates harboring genes. Hydrogen peroxide has the best efficiency against all bacterial isolates even at a low concentration (10%). In conclusion, the dissemination of mobile colistin resistance mcr gene and its variants between MDR- and XDR-virulent Gram-negative isolates from dairy cattle confirms the spread of mcr genes at all levels; animals, humans, and environmental, and heralds the penetration of the last-resort antimicrobial against MDR bacteria. Consequently, a decision to ban colistin in food animals is urgently required to fight XDR and MDR bacteria.

Bacteria Isolated From Milk of Dairy Cows With and Without Clinical Mastitis in Different Regions of Australia and Their AMR Profiles

Mastitis is the most common disease in dairy cattle worldwide. The objectives of this study were to estimate the prevalence of different bacterial species associated with mastitis from dairy herds located in geographically and climatically distinct zones in Australia, and to evaluate the antimicrobial susceptibility of the isolated bacteria. Quarter-level milk samples (n = 419) were collected from 151 mastitis cases and 268 healthy controls originating from 18 dairy herds located in tropical (Northern Queensland), subtropical (Southeast Queensland) and temperate zones (Victoria) between March and June 2019. Milk samples were cultured, and the isolated bacteria were grouped into six groups: Enterobacteriaceae spp.; Streptococcus spp.; Staphylococcus aureus, non-aureus staphylococci (NAS); Bacillus spp.; and Others. Mixed effects conditional logistic regression models were applied to quantify the association between the prevalence of each bacterial group and the herd zone and bulk milk tank somatic cell counts (BMTSCC). Of the 205 isolates, 102 (50%) originated from mastitis cases, and 103 (50%) from controls. Staphylococci were the most prevalent (NAS 32% and S. aureus 11%). Contagious mastitis bacteria were more prevalent in Victoria compared to Queensland dairy herds. NAS species (P < 0.001) were less prevalent in herds with BMTSCC >300,000 cells/mL compared with herds with low BMTSCC ≤150,000 cells/mL. Enterobacteriaceae and Streptococcus spp. groups showed high resistance rates to 1 (51 and 47%, respectively), and 2 (11 and 23%, respectively), antimicrobials. More than one third of the Enterobacteriaceae (48%) and Others (43%) groups spp. were resistant to at least three antimicrobials. This study provided a unique opportunity to investigate the prevalence of mastitis-associated bacteria in clinical cases and in apparently healthy controls. The findings of this study help inform mastitis control and antimicrobial stewardship programs aimed to reduce the prevalence of mastitis and antimicrobial resistance in dairy herds.

Effect of Pre-Milking Teat Foam Disinfection on the Prevention of New Mastitis Rates in Early Lactation

Simple Summary

The benefits of pre-milking teat disinfection have varied depending on management, practices and bacterial strains present in the environment, with some studies stating a reduction in the incidence of new infections and other studies stating little benefit of pre-milking teat disinfection. Furthermore, the effectiveness of pre-milking teat disinfection using foam has not previously been evaluated in a pasture-based dairy herd. This study has shown little benefit of applying a foaming pre-milking teat disinfectant in early lactation in a pasture-based dairy herd. However, the foaming teat disinfectant reduced bacterial counts on teat skin and may reduce the bacterial contamination of milk.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the benefit of pre-milking teat foam disinfection on the prevention of new infections by contagious and environmental bacteria in two spring calving herds managed outdoors (Herd 1 [H1]; 331 cows and Herd 2 [H2]; 142 cows). Four pre-milking teat preparation treatments were applied post calving; with each herd receiving two treatments; using a split udder design (for approx. 15 weeks). These treatments included; (1) ‘water wash, foam application and dry wipe (WFD) in H1′; (2) ‘water wash and dry wipe (WD)’ in H1; (3) ‘foam application and dry wipe (FD)’ in H2; (4) ‘no teat cleaning preparation (NP)’ in H2. Individual quarter foremilk samples were collected on four occasions and all clinical and sub-clinical cases were recorded. The mean SCC of quarter foremilk samples was 134 × 10³ cells/mL and 127 × 10³ cells/mL for WD and WFD, respectively, and 109 × 10³ cells/mL and 89 × 10³ cells/mL for NP and FD, respectively (p > 0.05). Lower bacterial counts were observed on teat skin that received a foaming treatment. Pre-milking teat disinfection using a foaming product may be of little benefit, in early lactation, for a pasture-based dairy herd.

Longitudinal study of herd udder hygiene and its association with clinical mastitis in pasture-based dairy cows

The objectives of this exploratory study were to (1) describe the association between herd-level udder hygiene and clinical mastitis and (2) investigate how sample size and milking stage affect the accuracy and precision of herd udder hygiene assessments made at milking time. A prospective longitudinal study was conducted in a dairy herd in Northern Australia as part of a previously published clinical trial of premilking teat disinfection. Video footage from 35 afternoon milkings was used to conduct 12,544 udder hygiene scores from 504 cows during an 89-d period and measure udder hygiene of the herd (proportion of cows with udder hygiene ≥3 out of 4). Linear interpolation was used to estimate herd udder hygiene on the days that were not scored, such that a herd-level udder hygiene measure was available for all cow-days in the study. Clinical mastitis events occurring during the study period were detected and recorded by farm staff according to a standardized definition. The relationship between herd udder hygiene on each of 1, 2, and 3 d before each study day (d -1, -2, and -3, respectively) and clinical mastitis at the cow level on each study day (each in turn being set as d 0) was determined using multivariable generalized estimating equations (family = Poisson, link = log), with the unit of analysis being the cow-day, adjusting for potential confounders and the clustering within the data. In addition, sampling strategies were evaluated by simulating herd udder hygiene assessments using a subset of cows in the herd. Herd udder hygiene from d -1, -2, and -3 was positively associated with clinical mastitis on d 0 (incidence rate ratio = 1.4 per 10-point increase in the percentage of cows with poor udder hygiene). Sampling strategy simulation found that at least 80 cows needed to be scored to achieve sufficiently precise estimations of herd udder hygiene. Furthermore, cows scored later during milking were slightly more likely to have poor udder hygiene than those scored earlier (risk ratio = 1.02 for cows that were 10% later in the milking order). More research is needed to evaluate risk factors for poor udder hygiene and potential interventions in pasture-based dairy cows.

Efficacy of a Lactobacillus-Based Teat Spray on Udder Health in Lactating Dairy Cows

Teat disinfection is a common pre- and post-milking mastitis prevention practice that is part of a mastitis control program in dairy herds. Commercially available teat disinfectants are generally chemical-based products. The use of these products has occasionally raised concerns about the risk of chemical residues in milk. An alternative treatment or prevention strategy based on probiotics has the potential to circumvent this risk. Two treatments were compared in a cross-over clinical trial in a single herd: a lactobacillus-based, post-milking teat spray (LACT), and a commercial iodine-based post-milking teat disinfectant product as (positive control, PC). The effect of the two treatments on cow somatic cell counts was quantified using a multivariate mixed-effects linear regression model with cow fitted as a random effect. The odds of teat end scores increasing from a low to a high score tended to be lower (OR = 0.74, 95% CI 0.54-1.01, P = 0.06) for cows receiving LACT treatment. On average, there was also a tendency for a lower somatic cell counts in the LACT treated cows (antilog of coefficient = 0.91, 95% CI 0.80-1.03, P = 0.13) compared with the PC treated cows. The application of the lactobacillus-based product to teats could reduce the rate of teat end scores progression from low to higher scores, and potentially improve teat end sphincter functions and udder health. Further, larger scale validation work is required to support the findings of the current study.