Early stage development of the glycine-1 re-uptake inhibitor SCH 900435: central nervous system effects compared with placebo in healthy men

Efficacy and safety of the novel GlyT1 inhibitor BI 425809 in Alzheimer's dementia: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

This phase II proof-of-concept study assessed the efficacy and safety of BI 425809, a novel selective glycine transporter-1 inhibitor, for the treatment of cognitive impairment associated with probable Alzheimer's disease dementia.

METHODS

This 12-week, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study randomized (1:1:1:1:1) patients with mild-to-moderate probable Alzheimer's disease dementia to BI 425809 2, 5, 10, and 25 mg or placebo once daily. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change from baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale 11-item total score after 12 weeks of treatment. Safety was also assessed.

RESULTS

Six hundred and ten male and female patients were randomized to BI 425809 2 mg (n = 123), 5 mg (n = 122), 10 mg (n = 122), and 25 mg (n = 123) or placebo (n = 120). Approximately 47% (n = 286) were male; the mean (standard deviation) age was 72.9 (7.7) years. Treatment compliance was above 97% for all dose groups. The Mini-Mental State Examination category on the median score was < 22 in 47% (n = 287) of patients and ≥ 22 in 53% (n = 322) of patients. No significant, non-flat dose-response relationship was detected for the primary endpoint (adjusted p-value > 0.76 for all models). BI 425809 was generally well-tolerated. Overall, 47.9% (n = 292) of patients reported at least one adverse event during the trial; the frequency of patients with investigator-defined drug-related adverse events was similar in all treatment groups, ranging from 15.4 to 19.5% across the BI 425809 treatment groups and 15.8% for placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

No clinically meaningful changes from baseline were observed following treatment with BI 425809 in patients with mild-to-moderate probable Alzheimer's disease dementia.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02788513 (1346-0023). Registered on June 2, 2016. EU Clinical Trials Register 2015-005438-24. Registered on May 6, 2016.

An Overview of Glycine Transporter Subtype 1 Inhibitors Under Preclinical and Clinical Evaluation for the Treatment of Alcohol Abuse

Abstract:

Being a historical issue that withstands multiple societal control measures, alcohol abuse remains a major healthcare problem. Despite worldwide efforts to limit consumption and educate people about its effects, consumption rates remain unchanged. Alcohol abuse arises from chronic alcohol exposure-caused permanent synaptic plasticity changes in the brain. These manifest in life-threatening withdrawal symptoms and drive relapse even after detoxification and treatment. Since ethanol has multiple targets in the human brain, it warrants a multiapproach therapy; here we introduce the potential therapeutic effects of glycine transporter subtype 1 inhibitors. We have listed the various glycine transporter 1 inhibitors used in studies of alcoholism and how they influenced glycine release from rat hippocampus was demonstrated in a preliminary study. Glycine transporters modulate both glutamatergic and glycinergic pathways: (i) glutamatergic neurotransmission plays an important role in the development of chronic changes in alcoholism as daily alcohol administration was shown to increase N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor activity long-term, and (ii) ethanol has access to the dopaminergic reward system via glycine receptors, being an allosteric modulator of glycine receptors. This manuscript summarises the progress and development of glycine transporter 1 inhibitors, characterizing them by their mode of action, adverse effects, and discusses their clinical applicability. Furthermore, we highlight the progress in the latest clinical trials, outline currently applied treatment methods, and offer suggestions for implementing glycine transporter 1 inhibitors into the long-term treatment of alcohol abuse.

Effect of the glycine transporter 1 inhibitor ALX-5407 on dyskinesia, psychosis-like behaviours and parkinsonism in the MPTP-lesioned marmoset

Dyskinesia and psychosis are complications encountered in advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) following long-term therapy with L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA). Disturbances in the glutamatergic system have been associated with both dyskinesia and psychosis, making glutamatergic modulation a potential therapeutic approach for these. Treatments thus far have sought to dampen glutamatergic transmission, for example through blockade of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors or modulation of metabotropic glutamate receptors 5. In contrast, activation of the glycine-binding site on NMDA receptors is required for their physiological response. Here, we investigated whether indirectly enhancing glutamatergic transmission through inhibition of glycine re-uptake would be efficacious in diminishing both dyskinesia and psychosis-like behaviours (PLBs) in the 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP)-lesioned common marmoset. Six marmosets were rendered parkinsonian by MPTP injection. Following repeated administration of L-DOPA to induce dyskinesia and PLBs, they underwent acute challenges of the glycine transporter 1 (GlyT₁) inhibitor ALX-5407 (0.01, 0.1 and 1 mg/kg) or vehicle, in combination with L-DOPA, after which the severity of dyskinesia, PLBs and parkinsonian disability was evaluated. In combination with L-DOPA, ALX-5407 0.1 and 1 mg/kg significantly reduced the severity of dyskinesia, by 51% and 41% (both P < 0.001), when compared to vehicle. ALX-5407 0.01, 0.1 and 1 mg/kg also decreased the severity of global PLBs, by 25%, 51% and 38% (all P < 0.001), when compared to vehicle. The benefits on dyskinesia and PLBs were achieved without compromising the therapeutic effect of L-DOPA on parkinsonism. Our results suggest that GlyT₁ inhibition may be a novel strategy to attenuate dyskinesia and PLBs in PD, without interfering with L-DOPA anti-parkinsonian action.

Multiple Rising Doses of Oral BI 425809, a GlyT1 Inhibitor, in Young and Elderly Healthy Volunteers: A Randomised, Double-Blind, Phase I Study Investigating Safety and Pharmacokinetics

Background and Objective

Schizophrenia and Alzheimer’s disease are characterised by abnormalities in glutamatergic pathways related to N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor hypofunction. Glycine is an N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor co-agonist; inhibition of glycine transporter 1 may improve N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor function. This phase I, randomised, two-part study evaluated the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetic profile of BI 425809, a novel glycine transporter 1 inhibitor, in healthy male and female volunteers.

Methods

Part 1 evaluated BI 425809 10, 25, 50 or 75 mg once daily or 75 mg twice daily in young subjects, and 25 mg or 50 mg once daily in elderly subjects. Each dose group comprised 12 subjects who received BI 425809 (n = 9) or placebo (n = 3) for 14 days (day 1: single dose; days 4–14: multiple dosing). Part 2 compared pharmacokinetic profiles in 12 subjects who received a single dose of BI 425809 25 mg in the morning and evening.

Results

Pharmacokinetic profiles were similarly shaped for all dose groups. Median time to maximum plasma concentration was 3.0–4.5 h with steady state being reached between days 6 and 10. Pharmacokinetic parameters demonstrated dose linearity at the predicted therapeutic exposure range of BI 425809 ≤ 25 mg once daily, but increased less than dose proportionally for ≥ 50 mg once daily. All reported adverse events were of mild-to-moderate intensity, 51/84 (61%; part 1) subjects had one or more treatment-related adverse event, no serious adverse events occurred and no dose dependency was observed.

Conclusions

Pharmacokinetic properties support both morning and evening dosing. BI 425809 was generally well tolerated at all tested doses.

Clinicaltrials.gov identifier

NCT02337283.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s40261-018-0660-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Medications for alcohol use disorders: An overview

Patients who suffer from alcohol use disorders (AUDs) usually go through various socio-behavioral and pathophysiological changes that take place in the brain and other organs. Recently, consumption of unhealthy food and excess alcohol along with a sedentary lifestyle has become a norm in both developed and developing countries. Despite the beneficial effects of moderate alcohol consumption, chronic and/or excessive alcohol intake is reported to negatively affect the brain, liver and other organs, resulting in cell death, organ damage/failure and death. The most effective therapy for alcoholism and alcohol related comorbidities is alcohol abstinence, however, chronic alcoholic patients cannot stop drinking alcohol. Therefore, targeted therapies are urgently needed to treat such populations. Patients who suffer from alcoholism and/or alcohol abuse experience harmful effects and changes that occur in the brain and other organs. Upon stopping alcohol consumption, alcoholic patients experience acute withdrawal symptoms followed by a protracted abstinence syndrome resulting in the risk of relapse to heavy drinking. For the past few decades, several drugs have been available for the treatment of AUDs. These drugs include medications to reduce or stop severe alcohol withdrawal symptoms during alcohol detoxification as well as recovery medications to reduce alcohol craving and support abstinence. However, there is no drug that completely antagonizes the adverse effects of excessive amounts of alcohol. This review summarizes the drugs which are available and approved by the FDA and their mechanisms of action as well as the medications that are under various phases of preclinical and clinical trials. In addition, the repurposing of the FDA approved drugs, such as anticonvulsants, antipsychotics, antidepressants and other medications, to prevent alcoholism and treat AUDs and their potential target mechanisms are summarized.

Further characterization of the GlyT-1 inhibitor Org25935: anti-alcohol, neurobehavioral, and gene expression effects

The glycine transporter-1 inhibitor Org25935 is a promising candidate in a treatment concept for alcohol use disorder targeting the glycine system. Org25935 inhibits ethanol-induced dopamine elevation in brain reward regions and reduces ethanol intake in Wistar rats. This study aimed to further characterise the compound and used ethanol consumption, behavioral measures, and gene expression as parameters to investigate the effects in Wistar rats and, as pharmacogenetic comparison, Alko-Alcohol (AA) rats. Animals were provided limited access to ethanol in a two-bottle free-choice paradigm with daily drug administration. Acute effects of Org25935 were estimated using locomotor activity and neurobehavioral status. Effects on gene expression in Wistar rats were measured with qPCR. The higher but not the lower dose of Org25935 reduced alcohol intake in Wistar rats. Unexpectedly, Org25935 reduced both ethanol and water intake and induced strong CNS-depressive effects in AA-rats (withdrawn from further studies). Neurobehavioral effects by Org25935 differed between the strains (AA-rats towards sedation). Org25935 did not affect gene expression at the mRNA level in the glycine system of Wistar rats. The data indicate a small therapeutic range for the anti-alcohol properties of Org25935, a finding that may guide further evaluations of the clinical utility of GlyT-1 inhibitors. The results point to the importance of pharmacogenetic considerations when developing drugs for alcohol-related medical concerns. Despite the lack of successful clinical outcomes, to date, the heterogeneity of drug action of Org25935 and similar agents and the unmet medical need justify further studies of glycinergic compounds in alcohol use disorder.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between almorexant, a dual orexin receptor antagonist, and desipramine

Almorexant is a dual orexin receptor antagonist (DORA) with sleep-enabling effects in humans. Insomnia is often associated with mental health problems, including depression. Hence, potential interactions with antidepressants deserve attention. Desipramine was selected as a model drug because it is mainly metabolized by CYP2D6, which is inhibited by almorexant in vitro. A single-center, randomized, placebo-controlled, two-way crossover study in 20 healthy male subjects was conducted to evaluate the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between almorexant and desipramine. Almorexant 200mg or matching placebo (double-blind) was administered orally once daily in the morning for 10 days, and a single oral dose of 50mg desipramine (open-label) was administered on Day 5. Almorexant increased the exposure to desipramine 3.7-fold, suggesting that almorexant is a moderate inhibitor of desipramine metabolism through inhibition of CYP2D6. Conversely, desipramine showed no relevant effects on the pharmacokinetics of almorexant. Pharmacodynamic evaluations indicated that almorexant alone reduced visuomotor coordination, postural stability, and alertness, and slightly increased calmness. Desipramine induced a reduction in subjective alertness and an increase in pupil/iris ratio. Despite the increase in exposure to desipramine, almorexant and desipramine in combination showed the same pharmacodynamic profile as almorexant alone, except for prolonging reduced alertness and preventing the miotic effect of almorexant. Co-administration also prolonged the mydriatic effect of desipramine. Overall, repeated administration of almorexant alone or with single-dose desipramine was well tolerated. The lack of a relevant interaction with antidepressants, if confirmed for other DORAs, would be a key feature for a safer class of hypnotics.