Limited sampling strategy for determining metformin area under the plasma concentration-time curve

Utilization of Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Modeling in Pharmacoepidemiological Studies: A Systematic Review on Antiarrhythmic and Glucose-Lowering Medicines

Introduction: In human pharmacology, there are two important scientific branches: clinical pharmacology and pharmacoepidemiology. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modeling is important in preclinical studies and randomized control trials. However, it is rarely used in pharmacoepidemiological studies on the effectiveness and medication safety where the target population is heterogeneous and followed for longer periods. The objective of this literature review was to investigate how far PK/PD modeling is utilized in observational studies on glucose-lowering and antiarrhythmic drugs.

Method: A systematic literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science was conducted from January 2010 to 21 February 2020. To calculate the utilization of PK/PD modeling in observational studies, we followed two search strategies. In the first strategy, we screened a 1% random set from 95,672 studies on glucose-lowering and antiarrhythmic drugs on inclusion criteria. In the second strategy, we evaluated the percentage of studies in which PK/PD modeling techniques were utilized. Subsequently, we divided the total number of included studies in the second search strategy by the total number of eligible studies in the first search strategy.

Results: The comprehensive search of databases and the manual search of included references yielded a total of 29 studies included in the qualitative synthesis of our systematic review. Nearly all 29 studies had utilized a PK model, whereas only two studies developed a PD model to evaluate the effectiveness of medications. In total, 16 out of 29 studies (55.1%) used a PK/PD model in the observational setting to study effect modification. The utilization of PK/PD modeling in observational studies was calculated as 0.42%.

Conclusion: PK/PD modeling techniques were substantially underutilized in observational studies of antiarrhythmic and glucose-lowering drugs during the past decade.

Oral and intravenous pharmacokinetics of metformin with and without oral codeine intake in healthy subjects: A cross-over study

The aim of the study was to investigate if there is a clinically relevant drug interaction between metformin and codeine. Volunteers were randomized to receive on four separate occasions: (A) orally administered metformin (1 g), (B) intravenously administered metformin (0.5 g), (C) five doses of tablet codeine 25 mg; the last dose was administered together with oral metformin (1 g), and (D) five doses of tablet codeine 25 mg; the last dose was administered together with metformin (0.5 g) intravenously. Blood samples were drawn for 24 h after administration of metformin, and for 6 h after administration of codeine and analyzed using liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry. Healthy volunteers genotyped as CYP2D6 normal metabolizers (*1/*1) without known reduced function variants in the OCT1 gene (rs12208357, rs34130495, rs34059508, and rs72552763) were invited. The median absorption fraction of metformin was 0.31 and was not influenced by codeine intake. The median time to maximum concentration (Tmax) after oral intake of metformin was 2 h without, and 3 h with codeine (p = 0.06). The geometric mean ratios of the areas under the plasma concentration time‐curve (AUCs) for morphine and its metabolites M3G and M6G for oral intake of metformin‐to‐no metformin were 1.21, 1.31, and 1.27, respectively, and for i.v. metformin‐to‐no metformin 1.28, 1.34, and 1.30, respectively. Concomitant oral and i.v. metformin increased the plasma levels of morphine, M3G and M6G. These small pharmacokinetic changes may well contribute to an increased risk of early discontinuation of metformin. Hence, a clinically relevant drug‐drug interaction between metformin and codeine seems plausible.

A Whole-Body Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model Characterizing Interplay of OCTs and MATEs in Intestine, Liver and Kidney to Predict Drug-Drug Interactions of Metformin with Perpetrators

Transmembrane transport of metformin is highly controlled by transporters including organic cation transporters (OCTs), plasma membrane monoamine transporter (PMAT), and multidrug/toxin extrusions (MATEs). Hepatic OCT1, intestinal OCT3, renal OCT2 on tubule basolateral membrane, and MATE1/2-K on tubule apical membrane coordinately work to control metformin disposition. Drug–drug interactions (DDIs) of metformin occur when co-administrated with perpetrators via inhibiting OCTs or MATEs. We aimed to develop a whole-body physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model characterizing interplay of OCTs and MATEs in the intestine, liver, and kidney to predict metformin DDIs with cimetidine, pyrimethamine, trimethoprim, ondansetron, rabeprazole, and verapamil. Simulations showed that co-administration of perpetrators increased plasma exposures to metformin, which were consistent with clinic observations. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that contributions of the tested factors to metformin DDI with cimetidine are gastrointestinal transit rate > inhibition of renal OCT2 ≈ inhibition of renal MATEs > inhibition of intestinal OCT3 > intestinal pH > inhibition of hepatic OCT1. Individual contributions of transporters to metformin disposition are renal OCT2 ≈ renal MATEs > intestinal OCT3 > hepatic OCT1 > intestinal PMAT. In conclusion, DDIs of metformin with perpetrators are attributed to integrated effects of inhibitions of these transporters.

Using a limited sampling strategy to investigate the interindividual pharmacokinetic variability in metformin: A large prospective trial

AIMS

Recently a limited sampling strategy (LSS) for determination of metformin' pharmacokinetics was developed. The LSS utilizes the plasma concentration of metformin 3 and 10 hours after oral intake of a single dose to estimate the area under the concentration-time curve up to 24 hours (AUC_0-24h ). The main purpose of this study was to support the feasibility of this strategy in a large prospective trial.

METHODS

Volunteers orally ingested two 500-mg tablets of metformin hydrochloride. A blood sample was drawn three and ten hours after the ingestion. Urine was collected for 0-10 and 10-24 hours and urine volumes recorded. The AUC_0-24h was calculated using the equation AUC_0-24h = 4.779 * C₃ + 13.174 * C₁₀ . Additionally, all participants were genotyped for the single-nucleotide polymorphism A270S in OCT2, g.-66 T > C in MATE1, R61C, G465R, G401S and the deletion M420del in OCT1.

RESULTS

In total, 212 healthy volunteers participated. The median (25th - 75th interquartile range) AUC_{0 - 24h} , CL_renal , C₃ and C₁₀ , were 10 600 (8470-12 500) ng* hr* mL^-1 , 29 (24-34) L* hour^-1 , 1460 (1180-1770) and 260 (200-330) ng* mL^-1 , respectively, which is in agreement with our previous results. GFR_i was correlated with metformin AUC and CL_renal (P < .001). As expected, we found a great pharmacokinetic interindividual variability among the volunteers and no effect of the OCT1 genotype on the AUC_{0 - 24h} . We were unable to reproduce our previous finding of a gene-gene interaction (OCT2 and MATE1) effect on CL_renal in this cohort.

CONCLUSION

This study further supports the use of the 2-point LSS algorithm in large pharmacokinetic trials.

Influence of pharmacogenetic polymorphisms and demographic variables on metformin pharmacokinetics in an admixed Brazilian cohort

AIMS

To identify pharmacogenetic and demographic variables that influence the systemic exposure to metformin in an admixed Brazilian cohort.

METHODS

The extreme discordant phenotype was used to select 106 data sets from nine metformin bioequivalence trials, comprising 256 healthy adults. Eleven single-nucleotide polymorphisms in SLC22A1, SLC22A2, SLC47A1 SLC47A2 and in transcription factor SP1 were genotyped and a validated panel of ancestry informative markers was used to estimate the individual proportions of biogeographical ancestry. Two-step (univariate followed by multivariate) regression modelling was developed to identify covariates associated with systemic exposure to metformin, accessed by the area under the plasma concentration-time curve, between 0 and 48 h (AUC_0-48h ), after single oral doses of metformin (500 or 1000 mg).

RESULTS

The individual proportions of African, Amerindian and European ancestry varied widely, as anticipated from the structure of the Brazilian population The dose-adjusted, log-transformed AUC_0-48h 's (ng h ml^-1  mg^-1 ) differed largely in the two groups at the opposite ends of the distribution histogram, namely 0.82, 0.79-0.85 and 1.08, 1.06-1.11 (mean, 95% confidence interval; P = 6.10^-26 , t test). Multivariate modelling revealed that metformin AUC_0-48h increased with age, food and carriage of rs12208357 in SLC22A1 but was inversely associated with body surface area and individual proportions of African ancestry.

CONCLUSIONS

A pharmacogenetic marker in OCT1 (SLC22A1 rs12208357), combined with demographic covariates (age, body surface area and individual proportion of African ancestry) and a food effect explained 29.7% of the variability in metformin AUC_0-48h .

Limited sampling strategy for determining metformin area under the plasma concentration-time curve

AIM

The aim was to develop and validate limited sampling strategy (LSS) models to predict the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) for metformin.

METHODS

Metformin plasma concentrations (n = 627) at 0-24 h after a single 500 mg dose were used for LSS development, based on all subsets linear regression analysis. The LSS-derived AUC(0,24 h) was compared with the parameter 'best estimate' obtained by non-compartmental analysis using all plasma concentration data points. Correlation between the LSS-derived and the best estimated AUC(0,24 h) (r(2) ), bias and precision of the LSS estimates were quantified. The LSS models were validated in independent cohorts.

RESULTS

A two-point (3 h and 10 h) regression equation with no intercept estimated accurately the individual AUC(0,24 h) in the development cohort: r(2)  = 0.927, bias (mean, 95% CI) -0.5, -2.7-1.8% and precision 6.3, 4.9-7.7%. The accuracy of the two point LSS model was verified in study cohorts of individuals receiving single 500 or 1000 mg (r(2)  = -0.933-0.934) or seven 1000 mg daily doses (r(2)  = 0.918), as well as using data from 16 published studies covering a wide range of metformin doses, demographics, clinical and experimental conditions (r(2)  = 0.976). The LSS model reproduced previously reported results for effects of polymorphisms in OCT2 and MATE1 genes on AUC(0,24 h) and renal clearance of metformin.

CONCLUSIONS

The two point LSS algorithm may be used to assess the systemic exposure to metformin under diverse conditions, with reduced costs of sampling and analysis, and saving time for both subjects and investigators.