Pharmacokinetics of oral fludrocortisone in septic shock

The effect of hydrocortisone versus hydrocortisone plus fludrocortisone on duration of shock: A propensity score-weighted analysis

Background

The 2021 Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines recommend the use of hydrocortisone in patients who remain hemodynamically unstable despite adequate fluid resuscitation and vasopressor therapy. Fludrocortisone has been used concomitantly with hydrocortisone in some studies without a clearly defined role or known clinical benefit. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of fludrocortisone added to hydrocortisone on shock-free days for septic shock.

Methods

A single-center, retrospective propensity score-weighted study was conducted to compare hydrocortisone versus hydrocortisone plus fludrocortisone for septic shock. Adults admitted to the medical intensive care unit (ICU) from 2015 to 2020 were included in the study. All patients received ≥200 mg/day hydrocortisone for at least 24 h ± fludrocortisone initiated within 72 h of vasopressors. The primary outcome was shock-free days by day 14. The secondary outcomes included duration of shock, change in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, hospital and ICU length of stay, and all-cause inhospital mortality.

Results

A total of 228 patients met inclusion criteria with 212 patients retained after propensity score weighting. There was no difference between groups in 14-day shock-free days (6.3 vs. 6.1 days; P = 0.781). Furthermore, no significant differences were observed for the secondary outcomes of ICU/hospital length of stay, duration of shock, change in SOFA score, and all-cause inhospital mortality.

Conclusion

The addition of fludrocortisone to hydrocortisone in septic shock did not increase shock-free days by day 14. These results suggest that the use of hydrocortisone alone may be an adequate adjunctive therapy in septic shock. A prospective randomized controlled trial is needed to confirm results.

Glucocorticoids with or without fludrocortisone in septic shock: a narrative review from a biochemical and molecular perspective

Two randomised controlled trials have reported a reduction in mortality when adjunctive hydrocortisone is administered in combination with fludrocortisone compared with placebo in septic shock. A third trial did not support this finding when hydrocortisone administered in combination with fludrocortisone was compared with hydrocortisone alone. The underlying mechanisms for this mortality benefit remain poorly understood. We review the clinical implications and potential mechanisms derived from laboratory and clinical data underlying the beneficial role of adjunctive fludrocortisone with hydrocortisone supplementation in septic shock. Factors including distinct biological effects of glucocorticoids and mineralocorticoids, tissue-specific and mineralocorticoid receptor-independent effects of mineralocorticoids, and differences in downstream signalling pathways between mineralocorticoid and glucocorticoid binding at the mineralocorticoid receptor could contribute to this interaction. Furthermore, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic disparities exist between aldosterone and its synthetic counterpart fludrocortisone, potentially influencing their effects. Pending publication of well-designed, randomised controlled trials, a molecular perspective offers valuable insights and guidance to help inform clinical strategies.

Fludrocortisone Plus Hydrocortisone Versus Hydrocortisone Alone as Adjunctive Therapy in Septic Shock: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Trials evaluating hydrocortisone (HC) for septic shock are conflicting with all finding decreased time to shock reversal but few with mortality difference. Those with improved mortality included fludrocortisone (FC), but it is unknown if FC affected the outcome or is coincidental as there are no comparative data.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness and safety of FC + HC versus HC alone as adjunctive therapy in septic shock.

METHODS

A single-center, retrospective cohort study was conducted of medical intensive care unit (ICU) patients with septic shock refractory to fluids and vasopressors. Patients receiving FC + HC were compared with those receiving HC. Primary outcome was time to shock reversal. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital, 28-, and 90-day mortality; ICU and hospital length of stay (LOS); and safety.

RESULTS

There were 251 patients included (FC + HC, n = 114 vs HC, n = 137). There was no difference in time to shock reversal (65.2 vs 71 hours; P = 0.24). Cox proportional hazards model showed time to first corticosteroid dose, full-dose HC duration, and use of FC + HC were associated with shorter shock duration, while time to vasopressor therapy was not. However, in 2 multivariable models controlling for covariates, use of FC + HC was not an independent predictor of shock reversal at greater than 72 hours and in-hospital mortality. No differences were seen in hospital LOS or mortality. Hyperglycemia occurred more frequently with FC + HC (62.3% vs 45.6%; P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

FC + HC was not associated with shock reversal at greater than 72 hours or decreased in-hospital mortality. These data may be useful for determining corticosteroid regimen in patients with septic shock refractory to fluids and vasopressors. Future prospective, randomized studies are needed to further evaluate the role of FC in this patient population.

Assessing treatment adherence is crucial to determine adequacy of mineralocorticoid therapy

Background

There is no consensus strategy for mineralocorticoid (MC) therapy titration in patients with primary adrenal insufficiency (PAI). We aim to measure serum fludrocortisone (sFC) and urine fludrocortisone (uFC) levels and to determine their utility, alongside clinical/biochemical variables and treatment adherence to guide MC replacement dose titration.

Methods

Multi-centre, observational, cross-sectional study on 41 patients with PAI on MC replacement therapy. sFC and uFC levels (measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry), plasma renin concentration (PRC), electrolytes (Na+, K+), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), total daily glucocorticoid (dGC) and MC (dMC) dose, and assessment of treatment adherence were incorporated into statistical models.

Results

We observed a close relationship between sFC and uFC (r = 0.434, P = 0.005) and between sFC and the time from the last fludrocortisone dose (r = -0.355, P = 0.023). Total dMC dose was related to dGC dose (r = 0.556, P < 0.001), K+ (r = -0.388, P = 0.013) as well as sFC (r = 0.356, P = 0.022) and uFC (r = 0.531, P < 0.001). PRC was related to Na+ (r = 0.517, P < 0.001) and MAP (r = -0.427, P = 0.006), but not to MC dose, sFC or uFC. Regression analyses did not support a role for sFC, uFC or PRC measurements and confirmed K+ (B = -44.593, P = 0.005) as the most important variable to guide dMC titration. Of the patients, 32% were non-adherent with replacement therapy. When adherence was inserted into the regression model, it was the only factor affecting dMC.

Conclusions

sFC and uFC levels are not helpful in guiding dMC titration. Treatment adherence impacts on clinical variables used to assess MC replacement and should be included as part of routine care in patients with PAI.

Bioavailability of Orally Administered Drugs in Critically Ill Patients

Critically ill patients managed in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) suffer from several pathophysiological alterations due to critical illness resulting in potential changes in the pharmacokinetics of drugs including systemic absorption. Nevertheless, these patients are still given some medications in unadjusted doses thereby putting the patients at a risk for therapy failure. The objective for this study was to summarize the available evidence regarding oral drug absorption in the ICU. A literature search of the databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed was conducted on (February 24, 2020). Articles discussing the rate and/or extent of orally administered drugs in critically ill patients were included. A total of 58 studies were found: 17 interventional studies, 33 observational studies (30 prospective, 3 retrospective) and 8 case reports. A total of 43 articles reported altered drug absorption in critically ill patients suggesting the need for alternative measures to facilitate treatment success. The absorption of orally administered drugs may be altered in critically ill patients. Measures for altered drug absorption in critically ill patients were suggested such as holding tube feeding before and after medication administration, increasing doses of orally administrated drugs and using alternate routes of administration.

Are synthetic glucocorticoids in the aquatic environment a risk to fish?

The glucocorticosteroid, or glucocorticoid (GC), system is largely conserved across vertebrates and plays a central role in numerous vital physiological processes including bone development, immunomodulation, and modification of glucose metabolism and the induction of stress-related behaviours. As a result of their wide-ranging actions, synthetic GCs are widely prescribed for numerous human and veterinary therapeutic purposes and consequently have been detected extensively within the aquatic environment. Synthetic GCs designed for humans are pharmacologically active in non-mammalian vertebrates, including fish, however they are generally detected in surface waters at low (ng/L) concentrations. In this review, we assess the potential environmental risk of synthetic GCs to fish by comparing available experimental data and effect levels in fish with those in mammals. We found the majority of compounds were predicted to have insignificant risk to fish, however some compounds were predicted to be of moderate and high risk to fish, although the dataset of compounds used for this analysis was small. Given the common mode of action and high level of inter-species target conservation exhibited amongst the GCs, we also give due consideration to the potential for mixture effects, which may be particularly significant when considering the potential for environmental impact from this class of pharmaceuticals. Finally, we also provide recommendations for further research to more fully understand the potential environmental impact of this relatively understudied group of commonly prescribed human and veterinary drugs.

What Is the Role of Steroids for Septic Shock in 2021?

Corticosteroids have been used for decades in the adjunctive treatment of severe infections in intensive care. The most frequent scenario in intensive care is in septic shock, where low doses of glucocorticoids appear to restore vascular responsiveness to norepinephrine. There is a strong body of evidence suggesting that hydrocortisone reduces time on vasopressor, and may modulate the immune response. In this review, we explore the current evidence supporting the use of corticosteroids in septic shock, its benefits, and potential harms. In addition to landmark clinical trials, we will also describe new frontiers for the use of corticosteroids in septic shock which should be explored in future studies.

Dysfunction of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in critical illness: a narrative review for emergency physicians

The stress response to acute disease is characterized by activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis and the sympathoadrenal system, increased serum cortisol levels, increased percentage of its free fraction and increased nuclear translocation of the glucocorticoid-receptor complex, even though many pathways may be inhibited by poorly understood mechanisms. There is no consensus about the cutoff point of serum cortisol levels for defining adrenal insufficiency. Furthermore, recent data point to the participation of tissue resistance to glucocorticoids in acute systemic inflammatory processes. In this review, we evaluate the evidence on HPA axis dysfunction during critical illness, particularly its action on the inflammatory response, during acute severe injury and some pitfalls surrounding the issue. Critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency was defined as a dynamic condition characterized by inappropriate cellular activity of corticosteroids for the severity of the disease, manifested by persistently elevated proinflammatory mediators. There is no consensus regarding the diagnostic criteria and treatment indications of this syndrome. Therefore, the benefits of administering corticosteroids to critically ill patients depend on improvements in our knowledge about the possible disruption of its fragile signalling structure in the short and long term.

Mineralocorticoid Dysfunction during Critical Illness: A Review of the Evidence

The recent demonstration of the significant reduction in mortality in patients with septic shock treated with adjunctive glucocorticoids combined with fludrocortisone and the effectiveness of angiotensin II in treating vasodilatory shock have renewed interest in the role of the mineralocorticoid axis in critical illness. Glucocorticoids have variable interactions at the mineralocorticoid receptor. Similarly, mineralocorticoid receptor-aldosterone interactions differ from mineralocorticoid receptor-glucocorticoid interactions and predicate receptor-ligand interactions that differ with respect to cellular effects. Hyperreninemic hypoaldosteronism or selective hypoaldosteronism, an impaired adrenal response to increasing renin levels, occurs in a subgroup of hemodynamically unstable critically ill patients. The suggestion is that there is a defect at the level of the adrenal zona glomerulosa associated with a high mortality rate that may represent an adaptive response aimed at increasing cortisol levels. Furthermore, cross-talk exists between angiotensin II and aldosterone, which needs to be considered when employing therapeutic strategies.

Interaction between accumulated 21-deoxysteroids and mineralocorticoid signaling in 21-hydroxylase deficiency

21-Hydroxylase deficiency (21OHD) is a rare genetic disorder in which salt-wasting syndrome occurs in 75% of cases, due to inability to synthesize cortisol and aldosterone. Recent mass spectrometry progress allowed identification of 21-deoxysteroids, i.e., 17-hydroxyprogesterone (17OHP), 21-deoxycortisol (21DF), and 21-deoxycorticosterone (21DB). We hypothesized that they may interfere with mineralocorticoid signaling and fludrocortisone therapy in patients with congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) without effective glucocorticoid replacement and ACTH suppression. Our goal was to quantify circulating 21-deoxysteroids in a pediatric cohort with CAH related to 21OHD and to examine their impact on mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) activation. Twenty-nine patients with salt-wasting phenotype were classified in two groups according to their therapeutic control. During routine follow-up, 17OHP, 21DF, 21DB, and cortisol levels were quantified by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry before hydrocortisone intake and 1 and 2.5 h following treatment administration. Luciferase reporter gene assays were performed on transfected HEK293T cells while in silico modeling examined structural interactions between these steroids within ligand-binding domain of MR. Plasma 17OHP, 21DF, and 21DB accumulate in uncontrolled patients reaching micromolar concentrations even after hydrocortisone intake. 21DF and 21DB act as partial MR agonists with antagonist features similar to 17OHP, consistent with altered anchoring to Asn⁷⁷⁰ and unfavorable contact with Ala⁷⁷³ in ligand-binding pocket of MR. Our results demonstrate a complex interaction between all accumulating 21-deoxysteroids in uncontrolled 21OHD patients and mineralocorticoid signaling and suggest that appropriate steroid profiling should optimize management and follow-up of such patients, as keeping those steroids to low plasma levels should attest therapeutic efficacy and prevent interference with MR signaling.

Low-dose corticosteroids in septic shock: Has the pendulum shifted?

PURPOSE

The utility of low-dose corticosteroids in septic shock is reviewed.

SUMMARY

Low-dose corticosteroids are suggested as treatment for septic shock patients who remain hemodynamically unstable despite adequate fluid resuscitation and vasopressor therapy. However, the risks and benefits of corticosteroids are unclear in this patient population. Previous multicenter trials have yielded conflicting results on the survival benefits of corticosteroids. The recently published Adjunctive Corticosteroid Treatment in Critically Ill Patients with Septic Shock (ADRENAL) and Activated Protein C and Corticosteroids for Human Septic Shock (APROCCHSS) trials provide valuable but opposing insight into this ongoing debate. Discordant findings related to mortality in these trials are likely related to differences in study design, corticosteroid regimen, and baseline characteristics among enrolled patients. The utility of adding fludrocortisone to hydrocortisone compared with using hydrocortisone alone is unclear. There does not appear to be an advantage to administering corticosteroids as a continuous infusion to reduce the rate of hyperglycemia or providing a taper to prevent rebound hypotension.

CONCLUSION

The mortality benefit of corticosteroids appears to be greatest in septic shock patients with high vasopressor requirements, evidence of multiorgan failure, and primary lung infections. Corticosteroids consistently lead to a faster reversal of shock and may shorten the duration of mechanical ventilation. Corticosteroids do not seem to increase the risk of superinfection at low doses but frequently lead to a higher frequency of hyperglycemia. We recommend the administration of corticosteroids to septic shock patients with escalating doses of vasopressors and evidence of multiorgan dysfunction.

Hydrocortisone Compared with Placebo in Patients with Septic Shock Satisfying the Sepsis-3 Diagnostic Criteria and APROCCHSS Study Inclusion Criteria

Editor’s Perspective

What We Already Know about This Topic

What This Article Tells Us That Is New

Background

Two recent randomized controlled trials (Adjunctive Glucocorticoid Therapy in Patients with Septic Shock [ADRENAL] and Activated Protein C and Corticosteroids for Human Septic Shock [APROCCHSS]) of corticosteroids in patients with septic shock reported different treatment effects on 90-day mortality. Both trials enrolled patients who met the criteria for septic shock using the second international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-2), but the APROCCHSS trial mandated a greater severity of shock as an inclusion criterion.

Methods

The authors conducted post hoc sensitivity analyses of the ADRENAL trial to determine the effects of hydrocortisone versus placebo in subgroups selected using third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3) diagnostic criteria or APROCCHSS inclusion criteria.

Results

There were 1,950 subjects (973 hydrocortisone and 977 placebo) who met the Sepsis-3 criteria (ADRENAL–Sepsis-3 cohort) and 905 patients (455 hydrocortisone and 450 placebo) who met the APROCCHSS criteria (ADRENAL–APROCCHSS cohort). At 90 days after randomization, in the ADRENAL–Sepsis-3 cohort, 312 of 963 (32.4%) and 337 of 958 (35.2%) patients assigned to hydrocortisone and placebo, respectively, had died (odds ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.06; P = 0.166). The corresponding figures for the ADRENAL–APROCCHSS cohorts were 187 of 453 (41.3%) and 200 of 445 (44.9%), respectively (odds ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.60 to 1.17; P = 0.303). There was no statistically significant difference in the time to death between the groups during the 90 days after randomization (hazard ratio = 0.87; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.02; P = 0.082 for ADRENAL–Sepsis-3; and hazard ratio = 0.86; 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.06; P = 0.156 for ADRENAL–APROCCHSS cohorts). In both cohorts, patients assigned to hydrocortisone had faster resolution of shock. In the ADRENAL–Sepsis-3 cohort, patients assigned to hydrocortisone had an increase in the number of days alive and free of mechanical ventilation (57.0 ± 37.2 vs. 53.7 ± 38.2 days; 95% CI, 0.40 to 7.04; P = 0.028) and the number of days alive and free of the intensive care unit (54.3 ± 36.0 vs. 51.0 ± 37.1; 95% CI, 0.82 to 7.24; P = 0.014).

Conclusions

In a post hoc analysis of the ADRENAL trial participants who fulfilled either the Sepsis-3 or the APROCCHSS inclusion criteria, a continuous infusion of hydrocortisone did not result in a lower 90-day mortality than placebo in septic shock.

Effect of adjunctive corticosteroid on 28-day mortality in neutropenic patients with septic shock

The role of adjunctive corticosteroid in septic shock remains debatable, and its role has not been assessed in neutropenic patients. We evaluated whether hydrocortisone reduces 28-day mortality in neutropenic patients with septic shock. We conducted a retrospective cohort study between January 2012 and May 2017 at a tertiary care center in South Korea. Patients who developed septic shock treated with at least one vasopressor and whose absolute neutrophil count was < 1000 cells/μL were included. Patients were classified into a steroid and a no-steroid group. The primary outcome of the study was 28-day mortality. Propensity score matching was used to adjust baseline characteristics and disease severity between the groups. Of the 287 patients analyzed, 189 were classified in the no-steroid group and 98 in the steroid group. Fifty propensity score-matched pairs were compared for the study outcomes. We found no significant difference in 28-day mortality between patients treated with and without steroid after propensity score matching (38.0% and 42.0%, respectively; p = 0.838). Incidences of pneumonia and gastrointestinal bleeding were more frequent in the steroid group, but it was not statistically significant after matching. In conclusion, adjunctive hydrocortisone was not associated with reduced 28-day mortality in neutropenic patients with septic shock.

Adjunctive Corticosteroid Treatment in Septic Shock

Two recent randomized controlled trials have provided new data to inform opinion on the use of corticosteroids in septic shock. This article discusses the background and rationale for corticosteroid use, compares the findings and methodologies of the new trials, and provides suggestions for practice.

A Critical Review of Analytical Methods in Pharmaceutical Matrices for Determination of Corticosteroids

Corticosteroids are a class of hormones released by the adrenal cortex, which includes glucocorticoids and mineralocorticoids. Glucocorticoids have an important role in the metabolism of carbohydrates, proteins and calcium and effective anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive activity. Due to their intense immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory activity, glucocorticoids are used in the treatment of various inflammatory, malignant, allergic conditions such as rhinitis, asthma, dermatological, rheumatic, ophthalmic and neurological diseases, as well as after organ transplants. They are the most widely prescribed drugs in the world. The objective of this review is to provide an overview of the analytical methods in pharmaceutical matrices for determination of corticosteroids. In this study, the predominance of liquid chromatography methods for the analysis of corticosteroids from pharmaceutical products is evident for both liquid and semisolid dosage forms as well as for solids. The same can be said for topical, oral and parenteral formulations. Methods such as spectrophotometry are also used, but given the advantages of chromatographic methods such as better selectivity and sensitivity, they have become the choice for analysis of these drugs, however, most methods still do not meet the credentials of "green chemistry."

Hydrocortisone in Vasodilatory Shock

Vasodilatory shock is the most common type of circulatory shock in critically ill patients; sepsis the predominant cause. Steroid use in septic shock gained favor in the 1970s; however, studies of high-dose steroids demonstrated excess morbidity and mortality. Lower dosage steroid use was driven by trials demonstrating improved hemodynamic status and the possibility of relative adrenal insufficiency; however, divergent results led to uncertainty about hydrocortisone treatment. Two recent trials are likely to reinforce the role of steroids in septic shock and change the recommendation in future clinical practice guidelines. Future work could include elucidating mechanisms of shock reversal, interaction of hydrocortisone with other agents, identifying steroid responsiveness using biochemical or gene signatures, and clarifying the role of fludrocortisone.

Utilization of data below the analytical limit of quantitation in pharmacokinetic analysis and modeling: promoting interdisciplinary debate

Traditionally, bioanalytical laboratories do not report actual concentrations for samples with results below the LOQ (BLQ) in pharmacokinetic studies. BLQ values are outside the method calibration range established during validation and no data are available to support the reliability of these values. However, ignoring BLQ data can contribute to bias and imprecision in model-based pharmacokinetic analyses. From this perspective, routine use of BLQ data would be advantageous. We would like to initiate an interdisciplinary debate on this important topic by summarizing the current concepts and use of BLQ data by regulators, pharmacometricians and bioanalysts. Through introducing the limit of detection and evaluating its variability, BLQ data could be released and utilized appropriately for pharmacokinetic research.

Immune Effects of Corticosteroids in Sepsis

Sepsis, a life-threatening organ dysfunction, results from a dysregulated host response to invading pathogens that may be characterized by overwhelming systemic inflammation or some sort of immune paralysis. Sepsis remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Treatment is nonspecific and relies on source control and organ support. Septic shock, the most severe form of sepsis is associated with the highest rate of mortality. Two large multicentre trials, undertaken 15 years apart, found that the combination of hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone significantly reduces mortality in septic shock. The corticosteroids family is composed of several molecules that are usually characterized according to their glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid power, relative to hydrocortisone. While the immune effects of glucocorticoids whether mediated or not by the intracellular glucocorticoid receptor have been investigated for several decades, it is only very recently that potential immune effects of mineralocorticoids via non-renal mineralocorticoid receptors have gained popularity. We reviewed the respective role of glucocorticoids and mineralocorticoids in counteracting sepsis-associated dysregulated immune systems.

The role of glucocorticoids as adjunctive treatment for sepsis in the modern era

Glucocorticoids have been used as adjunctive therapy in patients with sepsis and septic shock for more than four decades. The rationale for the use of glucocorticoids is that this class of drugs downregulates the proinflammatory response and limits the anti-inflammatory response while preserving innate immunity. Between 1976 and 2017, 22 randomised placebo-controlled trials have been published evaluating the benefit of glucocorticoids in patients with community-acquired pneumonia, sepsis, and septic shock. These studies produced conflicting results. In 2018, two large randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were published evaluating the role of hydrocortisone in patients with septic shock. The Activated Protein C and Corticosteroids for Human Septic Shock (APROCCHSS) trial reported a reduction in 90-day mortality whereas the Adjunctive Corticosteroid Treatment in Critically Ill Patients with Septic Shock (ADRENAL) trial reported no mortality benefit. This Viewpoint critically appraises these two RCTs and evaluates the use of glucocorticoids in the treatment of sepsis and septic shock in the modern era.

Clinical safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and effects on urinary electrolyte excretion of AZD9977, a novel, selective mineralocorticoid receptor modulator

AIMS

AZD9977 is the first mineralocorticoid receptor modulator in clinical development exerting similar organ protection as eplerenone with minimal urinary electrolyte effects in preclinical studies. The aim was to perform the initial clinical assessment of AZD9977.

METHODS

A first-in-human trial explored doses from 5 to 1200 mg. To study effects on urinary electrolyte excretion an additional randomized placebo controlled cross-over four-period clinical trial was performed. Twenty-three healthy volunteers were administered fludrocortisone alone or in combination with AZD9977, eplerenone or both. AZD9977/eplerenone combination was given to assess if AZD9977 can attenuate eplerenone induced natriuresis.

RESULTS

AZD9977 at doses from 5 to 1200 mg was safe and well tolerated and pharmacokinetics were compatible with further development. AZD9977 exhibited similar effects on urinary ln [Na+ ]/[K+ ] as eplerenone when using fludrocortisone as mineralocorticoid receptor agonist, and the combination had an additive effect on ln [Na+ K+ ].

CONCLUSIONS

The results in man contradict the results in rodent models driven by aldosterone, in which AZD9977 has minimal electrolyte effects. Future clinical studies with AZD9977 should be performed in presence of endogenous or exogenous aldosterone to assess potential benefit of AZD9977 in patients.

Hydrocortisone plus Fludrocortisone for Adults with Septic Shock

BACKGROUND

Septic shock is characterized by dysregulation of the host response to infection, with circulatory, cellular, and metabolic abnormalities. We hypothesized that therapy with hydrocortisone plus fludrocortisone or with drotrecogin alfa (activated), which can modulate the host response, would improve the clinical outcomes of patients with septic shock.

METHODS

In this multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial with a 2-by-2 factorial design, we evaluated the effect of hydrocortisone-plus-fludrocortisone therapy, drotrecogin alfa (activated), the combination of the three drugs, or their respective placebos. The primary outcome was 90-day all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included mortality at intensive care unit (ICU) discharge and hospital discharge and at day 28 and day 180 and the number of days alive and free of vasopressors, mechanical ventilation, or organ failure. After drotrecogin alfa (activated) was withdrawn from the market, the trial continued with a two-group parallel design. The analysis compared patients who received hydrocortisone plus fludrocortisone with those who did not (placebo group).

RESULTS

Among the 1241 patients included in the trial, the 90-day mortality was 43.0% (264 of 614 patients) in the hydrocortisone-plus-fludrocortisone group and 49.1% (308 of 627 patients) in the placebo group (P=0.03). The relative risk of death in the hydrocortisone-plus-fludrocortisone group was 0.88 (95% confidence interval, 0.78 to 0.99). Mortality was significantly lower in the hydrocortisone-plus-fludrocortisone group than in the placebo group at ICU discharge (35.4% vs. 41.0%, P=0.04), hospital discharge (39.0% vs. 45.3%, P=0.02), and day 180 (46.6% vs. 52.5%, P=0.04) but not at day 28 (33.7% and 38.9%, respectively; P=0.06). The number of vasopressor-free days to day 28 was significantly higher in the hydrocortisone-plus-fludrocortisone group than in the placebo group (17 vs. 15 days, P<0.001), as was the number of organ-failure-free days (14 vs. 12 days, P=0.003). The number of ventilator-free days was similar in the two groups (11 days in the hydrocortisone-plus-fludrocortisone group and 10 in the placebo group, P=0.07). The rate of serious adverse events did not differ significantly between the two groups, but hyperglycemia was more common in hydrocortisone-plus-fludrocortisone group.

CONCLUSIONS

In this trial involving patients with septic shock, 90-day all-cause mortality was lower among those who received hydrocortisone plus fludrocortisone than among those who received placebo. (Funded by Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique 2007 of the French Ministry of Social Affairs and Health; APROCCHSS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00625209 .).

Pharmacokinetics of oral fludrocortisone in septic shock

AIM

The combination of hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone improved outcomes in septic shock. However, the specific role of fludrocortisone remains controversial and its pharmacokinetics (PK) has never been investigated in septic shock. This study aimed at characterizing the PK of fludrocortisone in septic shock.

METHODS

This was a single-centre ancillary PK study of a large multinational trial of crystalloids versus colloids for acute hypovolemia in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. In 21 adults with septic shock, fludrocortisone plasma concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry tandem analysis, before and repeatedly until 18 h after an oral dose of 50 μg. PK parameters were estimated using a nonlinear mixed-effects modelling.

RESULTS

Undetectable plasma concentrations were observed in 7 out of 21 patients. In the remaining 14 patients, plasma fludrocortisone concentrations were best described by a one-compartmental model with first-order absorption, a lag time (T_lag ) before the absorption phase, and first-order elimination. Severity of illness, as quantified by Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, significantly increased T_lag and apparent clearance. There was a large inter-individual variability in PK parameters. The population estimates of PK parameters (inter-individual variability) were: T_lag 0.65 h (98%), apparent clearance 40 l h^-1 (49%) and apparent volume of distribution 78 l (75%). Plasma half-life was estimated at 1.35 h (95% CI, 0.84-2.03) and area under the curve of plasma concentrations was estimated at 1.25 μg h l^-1 (95% CI, 1.09-1.46).

CONCLUSIONS

A single oral dose of fludrocortisone yielded undetectable plasma concentrations in one-third of adults with septic shock. Fludrocortisone PK showed a short plasma elimination half-life and a large inter-individual variability.