Population pharmacokinetics of rifampicin in adult patients with osteoarticular infections: interaction with fusidic acid

Pancytopenia in a patient treated with fusidic acid and niraparib: a case report

Fusidic acid is an antibiotic used in the treatment of staphylococcal infections. Niraparib is an anticancer drug indicated for the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer. The interaction between these two drugs has not been studied and is not referenced in drug databases. We present the case of a patient with pancytopenia who had been treated with fusidic acid and niraparib. No other treatment was taken by this patient. According to the literature, both substances can cause haematological toxicity. It seems unlikely that this is due to niraparib alone because it had been well tolerated by the patient for over a year before the pancytopenia was diagnosed. It was also perfectly well tolerated when it was reintroduced. We cannot determine whether this pancytopenia is due to fusidic acid alone or to a drug interaction between the two treatments. We therefore recommend caution in patients treated with this combination.

Dual-Drug Delivery via the Self-Assembled Conjugates of Choline-Functionalized Graft Copolymers

Graft copolymers based on a choline ionic liquid (IL), [2-(methacryloyloxy)ethyl]-trimethylammonium chloride (TMAMA), were obtained by atom transfer radical polymerization. The presence of chloride counterions in the trimethylammonium groups promoted anion exchange to introduce fusidate anions (FUS, 32−55 mol.%) as the pharmaceutical anions. Both the choline-based IL copolymers and their ionic drug-carrier conjugates (FUS systems as the first type, 26−208 nm) formed micellar structures (CMC = 0.011−0.025 mg/mL). The amphiphilic systems were advantageous for the encapsulation of rifampicin (RIF, 40−67 mol.%), a well-known antibiotic, resulting in single-drug (RIF systems as the second type, 40−95 nm) and dual-drug systems (FUS/RIF as the third type, 31−65 nm). The obtained systems released significant amounts of drugs (FUS > RIF), which could be adjusted by the content of ionic units and the length of the copolymer side chains. The dual-drug systems released 31−55% FUS (4.3−5.6 μg/mL) and 19−31% RIF (3.3−4.0 μg/mL), and these results were slightly lower than those for the single-drug systems, reaching 45−81% for FUS (3.8−8.2 μg/mL) and 20−37% for RIF (3.4−4.0 μg/mL). The designed polymer systems show potential as co-delivery systems for combined therapy against drug-resistant strains using two drugs in one formula instead of the separate delivery of two drugs.

Model-Informed Precision Dosing of Antibiotics in Osteoarticular Infections

As a heterogeneous and wide inflammation, osteoarticular infection (OAI) shows an increasing incidence in recent years. Staphylococcus aureus is the most important pathogen causing OAI. The antibiotic treatment will affect the outcomes of OAI patients, and the drug selection and dosage regimen highly rely on patients’ variability, pathogen susceptibility, and drug property like bone permeability. Model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) provides options to describe and quantify the pharmacokinetic (PK) variability of the OAI population using different models, such as the population pharmacokinetic (PPK) model and physiological-based pharmacokinetic (PB/PK) model. In the present review, we highlighted that the MIPD of antibiotics played a critical role in OAI and listed the dose regimen recommended by the model. Collectively, our current study provided a valuable reference for the treatment of patients and improved the safety and efficiency of drug use.

Impact of rifampicin dose in bone and joint prosthetic device infections due to Staphylococcus spp: a retrospective single-center study in France

BACKGROUND

Prosthetic joint infections (PJI) are a major cause of morbidity and mortality burden worldwide. While surgical management is well defined, rifampicin (RIF) dose remains controversial. The aim of our study was to determine whether Rifampicin dose impact infection outcomes in PJI due to Staphylococcus spp.

METHODS

single-center retrospective study including 411 patients with PJI due to Rifampicin-sensitive Staphylococcus spp. Rifampicine dose was categorized as follow: < 10 mg/kg/day, 10-20 mg/kg/day or > 20 mg/kg/day. The primary endpoint was patient recovery, defined as being free of infection during 12 months after the end of the initial antibiotic course.

RESULTS

321 (78%) received RIF for the full antibiotic course. RIF dose didn't affect patients recovery rate with 67, 76 and 69% in the < 10, 10-20 and > 20 mg/kg/day groups, respectively (p = 0.083). In univariate analysis, recovery rate was significantly associated with gender (p = 0.012) but not to RIF dose, or Staphylococcus phenotype (aureus or coagulase-negative). In multivariate analysis, age (p = 0.01) and treatment duration (p <  0.01) were significantly associated with recovery rate.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that lower doses of RIF are as efficient and safe as the recommended high-dose French regimen in the treatment of PJI.

A population approach of rifampicin pharmacogenetics and pharmacokinetics in Mexican patients with tuberculosis

The aim of this study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic model of rifampicin (RMP) in Mexican patients with tuberculosis (TB) to evaluate the influence of anthropometric and clinical covariates, as well as genotypic variants associated with MDR1 and OATP1B1 transporters. A prospective study approved by Research Ethics Committee was performed at Hospital Central in San Luis Potosí, Mexico. TB patients under DOTS scheme and who signed informed consent were consecutively included. Anthropometric and clinical information was retrieved from medical records. Single nucleotide polymorphisms in MDR1 (C3435T) and SLCO1B1 (A388G and T521C) genes were evaluated. RMP plasma concentrations and time data were assessed with NONMEM software. A total of 71 Mexican TB patients from 18 to 72 years old were included for RMP quantification from 0.3 to 12 h after dose; 329 and 97 plasma concentrations were available for model development and validation, respectively. Sequential process includes a typical lag time of 0.25 h prior to absorption start with a Ka of 1.24 h^-1 and a zero-order absorption of 0.62 h to characterize the gradual increase in RMP plasma concentrations. Final model includes total body weight in volume of distribution (0.7 L/kg, CV = 26.8%) and a total clearance of 5.96 L/h (CV = 38.5%). Bioavailability was modified according to time under treatment and generic formulation administration. In conclusion, a population pharmacokinetic model was developed to describe the variability in RMP plasma concentrations in Mexican TB patients. Genetic variants evaluated did not showed significant influence on pharmacokinetic parameters. Final model will allow therapeutic drug monitoring at early stages.

Amikacin nomogram for treatment of adult cystic fibrosis exacerbations based on an external evaluation of a population pharmacokinetic model

BACKGROUND

In patients with cystic fibrosis (CF), amikacin is the alternative for the treatment of acute pulmonary exacerbations associated with pathogens resistant to tobramycin. Population pharmacokinetic (PK) models of amikacin in adult patients with CF have been previously published. However, current dosing recommendations remain disputed (Illamola et al. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2018;57(10):1217-1228). We perform here the first external evaluation of a published amikacin adult CF population PK model and propose a dosing nomogram for initial dosing.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected demographic, biological, and clinical data from the medical records of adult patients who had received intravenous amikacin. To assess the predictive performance of this model we applied visual comparison of predictions to observations, calculation of bias and inaccuracy, and simulation-based diagnostics. Monte Carlo simulations from the evaluated model were used to compare maximum concentration/minimum inhibitory concentration achieved with different dosing regimens.

RESULTS

A total of 91 concentrations from 19 adult patients with CF were collected for external evaluation. The model predicted amikacin concentrations with reasonable bias (7.2% [95% confidence interval, CI: -0.7% to 15.0%]) and inaccuracy (18.2% [95% CI: 12.0%-24.4%]). Our simulations with this model suggest that administered amikacin doses must be adjusted to creatinine clearance and also adjusted to body weight (doses from 20 to 45 mg/kg/d). According to these simulations, we developed the Montreal amikacin nomogram to optimize amikacin dosing regimens in patients with CF.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, we developed the first nomogram to optimize initial amikacin dosing regimens in patients with CF based on this external evaluation of a recently published amikacin population PK model.

Evaluation of current dosing guidance for oral rifampicin treatment in adult patients with osteoarticular infections

For management of osteoarticular infections, rifampicin appears to be the key antibiotic. We aimed to evaluate the actual rifampicin dosing regimens using a population pharmacokinetic model of rifampicin in patients with osteoarticular infections. A Monte Carlo simulation study was performed to simulate steady-state plasma concentrations for 1000 randomly sampled subjects using a total daily dose between 600 and 1200 mg (600 and 900 mg once daily, 450 and 600 mg twice daily, or 300 mg 3 times daily). When rifampicin was administered with fusidic acid, the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target (area under the curve/minimum inhibitory concentration ≥952) was achieved with all tested dosing regimen, except 600 mg once daily for Staphylococcus epidermidis infections. Without coadministration of fusidic acid, none of tested dosing regimens achieved this PK/PD target. Most recommended drug-dosing regimens allow attaining the fixed area under the curve/minimum inhibitory concentration target for Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococcal osteoarticular infections. In future studies, PK/PD target for osteoarticular infections in human should also be confirmed.

Evaluation of linezolid or trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole in combination with rifampicin as alternative oral treatments based on an in vitro pharmacodynamic model of staphylococcal biofilm

Combinations of linezolid (LZD) or trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (SXT) plus rifampicin (RIF) are alternative oral treatments for staphylococcal prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) when fluoroquinolones are not possible to use, but there is limited evidence regarding their activity. This study evaluated the efficacy of LZD and SXT, alone and in combination with RIF, against Staphylococcus aureus in an in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic biofilm model. Using the CDC Biofilm Reactor^® system, simulated regimens of LZD (600 mg every 12 h), SXT (160/800 mg every 8 h) and levofloxacin (LVX) (750 mg/day), alone and in combination with RIF (600 mg/day), were evaluated against one methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) and one methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strain. Antibiotic efficacy was evaluated by the decrease in planktonic bacterial counts from medium and biofilm-embedded bacteria from coupons over 56 h. Resistant strains were screened. In both strains, SXT alone was ineffective and LZD presented low activity, but no resistance emerged. Combinations with RIF significantly increased the antibiofilm efficacy against MSSA (Δlog CFU/mL 56h-0h: SXT + RIF, -2.9 and LZD + RIF, -3.1), but RIF-resistant strains appeared with SXT + RIF. Against MRSA, LZD + RIF (-3.1) protected against the emergence of resistance and was more effective than SXT + RIF (-0.6; P <0.05), in which RIF-resistant strains were again detected. LVX + RIF confirmed its high efficacy against biofilm-embedded bacteria, this being the most effective therapy (-5.1 against MSSA). The emergence of RIF-resistant strains with SXT + RIF poses serious concerns for its use in clinical practice. Interestingly, LZD + RIF appears to be an appropriate alternative for PJI caused by LVX-resistant S. aureus.

Population pharmacokinetics of rifampicin in adult patients with osteoarticular infections: interaction with fusidic acid

AIMS

Rifampicin represents the key antibiotic for the management of osteoarticular infections. An important pharmacokinetic variability has already been described, particularly for absorption and metabolism. All previous pharmacokinetic studies have been focused only on patients treated for tuberculosis. The objective of the present study was to describe a population pharmacokinetic model of rifampicin in patients with staphylococcal osteoarticular infections, which has not been investigated to date.

METHOD

Rifampicin concentrations were collected retrospectively from 62 patients treated with oral rifampicin 300 mg three times daily. Plasma concentration-time data were analysed using NONMEM to estimate population pharmacokinetic parameters. Demographic data, infection characteristics and antibiotics taken in addition to rifampicin antibiotics were investigated as covariates.

RESULTS

A one-compartment model, coupled to a transit absorption model, best described the rifampicin data. Fusidic acid coadministration was identified as a covariate in rifampicin pharmacokinetic parameters. The apparent clearance and apparent central volume of distribution mean values [95% confidence interval (CI)] were 5.1 1 h^-1 (1.2, 8.2 1 h^-1 )/23.8 l (8.9, 38.7 l) and 13.7 1 h^-1 (10.6, 18.0 1 h^-1 )/61.1 1 (40.8, 129.0 1) for patients with and without administration of fusidic acid, respectively. Interindividual variability (95% CI) in the apparent clearance and apparent central volume of distribution were 72.9% (49.5, 86.0%) and 59.1% (5.5, 105.4%), respectively. Residual variability was 2.3 mg l^-1 (1.6, 2.6 mg l^-1 ).

CONCLUSION

We developed the first population pharmacokinetic model of rifampicin in patients with osteoarticular infections. Our model demonstrated that fusidic acid affects rifampicin pharmacokinetics, leading to potential high drug exposure. This finding suggests that fusidic acid dosing regimens should be reconsidered.