Therapeutic drug monitoring of small molecule kinase inhibitors in oncology in a real-world cohort study: does age matter?

Individualized Dosing Patterns in the Treatment of Older Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Results of a Registry-Based Observational National Cohort Study Including 871 Patients

BACKGROUND

While the effectiveness of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) seems similar in older patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) compared with younger patients, toxicities in older patients treated with TKIs more often lead to discontinuation of treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To better understand the age-related pharmacology and pharmacodynamic differences in patients with GIST treated with TKIs, the primary aim of this study was to evaluate TKI dosing patterns in older patients with GIST, while the secondary aims were to evaluate differences in imatinib trough plasma concentrations between age groups and to compare the overall survival (OS) in patients with and without dose reductions in all treatment lines in a palliative setting.

METHODS

Patients (18 years of age or older) with histologically proven GIST diagnosed between January 2009 and June 2021 and treated with one or more lines of TKIs were selected from the Dutch GIST Registry (DGR) database. Age groups were divided into younger patients (age <70 years) and older patients (age ≥70 years). All imatinib trough plasma concentrations of blood withdrawals taken from initiation of imatinib until a maximum of 1 year of treatment with imatinib were collected. Reasons for first adjustment of treatment were classified as adverse event, dose modification, progressive disease and other reasons. The next treatment steps after first adjustment of treatment were defined as dose escalation, dose reduction, dose interruption, or end of treatment. The association of dose reduction and OS was analyzed using the landmark approach.

RESULTS

Overall, 871 patients were included in this study, including 577 younger patients and 294 older patients. Older patients more often had an adverse event as the reason for first adjustment of treatment with both imatinib (45.6%; p < 0.001) and sunitinib (58.6%; p = 0.224) compared with younger patients (19.5% and 42.7%, respectively). Adjustment of imatinib and sunitinib after starting on a standard dose because of an adverse event most often resulted in dose reduction in both age groups. Median trough plasma concentrations of all samples taken within the first year after initiation of imatinib were higher in older patients (1228 ng/mL, interquartile range [IQR] 959-1687) compared with younger patients (1035 ng/mL [IQR 773-1377]; p < 0.001). No significant differences were seen between OS in patients with or without dose reduction in all treatment lines (imatinib: p = 0.270; sunitinib: p = 0.547; and regorafenib: p = 0.784).

CONCLUSION

Older patients showed higher imatinib trough plasma concentrations compared with younger patients and also had earlier and more often adverse events as the reason for first adjustment of treatment with imatinib followed by dose reduction. However, in a landmark analysis, patients with imatinib dose reductions had no poorer outcomes compared with patients not requiring a dose reduction.

Validation of Liquid Chromatography Coupled with Tandem Mass Spectrometry for the Determination of 12 Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs) and Their Application to Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Adult and Pediatric Populations

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are used as targeted cancer therapies in adults and have an off-label pediatric application for the treatment of Langerhans cell histiocytosis. A multitarget LC-MS/MS method was developed and validated for the determination of alectinib, alectinib-M4, binimetinib, cobimetinib, crizotinib, dabrafenib, encorafenib, imatinib, lorlatinib, osimertinib, AZ5104, and trametinib. A total of 150 µL of internal standard methanolic solution was added to 50 µL of plasma sample to precipitate proteins. After centrifugation, 10 µL of the supernatant was injected into the chromatographic system. The chromatographic separation was conducted on a Kinetex C18 Polar column with a gradient of 2 mM ammonium formate in 0.1% formic acid and acetonitrile over 5 min. Limits of detection and quantification, linearity, accuracy, precision, selectivity, carryover, matrix effect, recovery, and stability were evaluated and satisfied EMA guidelines on bioanalytical methods. This method has been successfully applied to the therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of adults with melanoma and lung cancer, as well as children with histiocytosis, to improve the pharmacokinetic data for these drugs, with the aim of enhancing the therapeutic management and follow-up of patients. Blood concentrations of trametinib and binimetinib were different in the two groups, highlighting the age-related inter-individual variability of these molecules and the need for TDM.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Imatinib and N-Desmethyl Imatinib in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients Using LC-MS/MS in a Cohort Study

Imatinib is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) and first-line therapy for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). There is a positive correlation between serum imatinib concentrations and treatment response. However, the specific relationship between the blood concentration of imatinib and its influencing factors remains unclear. This study collected basic information from 102 patients using imatinib as first-line treatment for CML. Further, we analyzed the individual differences in imatinib concentration and explored its influencing factors. Through intra-day and inter-day precision studies, we found that the precision for the imatinib assay methodology was within ±13% and that the recovery rate was above 85%. There is notable individual variation in the blood concentration of imatinib; the recommended treatment concentration is 860-1500 ng/mL, with only 41.40% of patients achieving this concentration. Also, there was a negative correlation between age and imatinib trough concentration (Ctrough ), as is observed between age and N-desmethyl imatinib. Moreover, compared with the adolescent group, the serum imatinib Ctrough for groups aged 17-47 and 48-68 years was significantly reduced. Further analysis shows that imatinib Ctrough values reaching therapeutic concentrations (59%) increased dramatically for patients with CML aged 17-47 years. Moreover, groups dosed with 400 mg/day resulted in therapeutic imatinib concentrations for 68% of patients with CML, which was the best performance. The established method was validated, with acceptable accuracy, precision, linearity, and stability, as required, and then successfully applied to the therapeutic drug monitoring of imatinib. Age, dose, and metabolites can influence the imatinib concentration and its therapeutic effect in patients with CML.

Representation of older patients in the safety analysis of protein kinase inhibitor registration studies

INTRODUCTION

Older patients (≥65 years old) make up the majority of the cancer population. Older patients seem to experience more adverse events (AEs) from protein kinase inhibitors (PKIs) in clinical practice. Yet they are underrepresented in clinical trials. We aimed to evaluate whether age-related safety differences were described at authorization of PKIs. Representation of older patients in registration studies was also evaluated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

European Public Assessment Reports (EPARs) of PKIs authorized between 2010 and 2015 were evaluated for the description of age-related safety- and pharmacokinetic differences. The International Council for Harmonization of Technical Requirement for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) E7 guideline was applied to EPARs to assess the representation of older patients. Study results were presented descriptively.

RESULTS

Eighteen PKIs with 19 EPARs were analyzed. Age-related safety differences were described in 14 out of 19 EPARs, and age-related pharmacokinetic differences in 1 out of 19 EPARs. More than 100 older patients were included in half of the studies. Older patients were not excluded solely by age, although other inclusion and exclusion criteria negatively influenced enrollment of older patients. None of the PKIs met all criteria from the ICH E7 guideline.

DISCUSSION

Age-related safety differences are described for most PKIs. Older patients were underrepresented in PKI registration studies. Adequate representation of older patients in clinical trials for PKIs is vital, since they make up most of the cancer population.

Monitoring of plasma concentrations of dabrafenib and trametinib in advanced BRAFV600mut melanoma patients

BACKGROUND

Dabrafenib (D) and trametinib (T) improved survival in patients with BRAFV600^mut melanoma. High plasma concentration of D (PCD) is weakly associated with adverse events (AE). We investigated the relationship between PCD/T and tumour control or AE.

METHODS

We analysed PCD/T in patients treated with D+T for metastatic melanoma. We collected data of tumour response (RECIST 1.1) and AE (CTCAE 4.0) blinded to PCD/T results.

RESULTS

We analysed 71 D and 58T assays from 34 patients. High inter-individual variability of PCD (median: 65.0ng/mL; interquartile range (IQR) [4-945]) and of PCT (median: 8.6ng/mL; IQR [5-39]) was observed. We found a weak relationship between PCD and progression-free survival, taking follow-up time into account (hazard ratio 0.991; 95%CI, 0.981 to 1.000; P=0.06). However, no difference was observed between mean PCD/T of progressing patients (n=21; 125±183ng/mL and 9.3±3.6ng/mL, respectively) and responders (complete, partial or stable response) (n=13; 159±225ng/mL, P=0.58 and 10.6±24.4ng/mL, P=0.29, respectively). No significant relationship was found between PCD/T and most common AEs (fever, lymphopenia, CPK increase, and hepatic cytolysis), body mass index, or age. Mean CPT (n=16) was significantly higher for female subjects (n=18; 11.5±4.8ng/mL) than for male subjects (8.8ng/mL±2.9, P=0.01), but no difference was observed between sex and CPD (P=0.32).

CONCLUSION

Our study showed a weak relationship between PCD and progression-free survival, but no relationship between PCD/T and AE was found. Monitoring PCD and PCT alone is unlikely to be useful in assessing response to treatment.

Dabrafenib and trametinib exposure-efficacy and tolerance in metastatic melanoma patients: a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic real-life study

PURPOSE

Dabrafenib plus trametinib combination has greatly improved survival in BRAFV600^mut metastatic melanoma patients. However, data regarding the influence of pharmacokinetic markers in real-life patients are lacking. In this study, we aimed to explore dabrafenib and trametinib pharmacokinetic impact on progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DOR) or all grades treatment-related adverse events (ARAE) occurrence in routine care patients.

METHODS

BRAFV600^mut metastatic melanoma patients initiating standard doses of dabrafenib 150 mg BID plus trametinib 2 mg QD were included. Clinical data were collected via the French biobank MelBase, prospectively enrolling unresectable stage III or IV melanoma. Clinical response evaluation, ARAE reporting and dabrafenib and trametinib plasma quantification were performed. Association of individual Bayesian-estimated pharmacokinetic markers (AUC_0-τ and C_trough) and baseline clinical variables with DOR, PFS, clinical response, and ARAE was then assessed.

RESULTS

Fifty patients (comprising 4 AJCC stage IIIc and 46 stage IV) were included. Median PFS reached 11.4 months, and overall response rate 70%. Fifty percent of patients experienced ARAE (G3 n = 10, G4 n = 0). In univariate analysis, median dabrafenib C_trough within intermediate range was associated with a significantly higher PFS (HR [95% CI] = 0.41 [0.18; 0.91], p = 0.029) and DOR (HR [95% CI] = 0.39 [0.16; 0.94], p = 0.024), and association with DOR remained significant in multivariate analysis (HR [95% CI] = 0.34 [0.12; 0.95], p = 0.040). Trametinib pharmacokinetic markers were significantly higher in patients experiencing ARAE compared to patients without ARAE.

CONCLUSION

In this study, exposure-efficacy and tolerance analysis highlighted the interest of therapeutic drug monitoring to optimize therapeutic management in BRAFV600^mut metastatic melanoma patients based on trough concentrations of dabrafenib and trametinib.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Targeted Anticancer Protein Kinase Inhibitors in Routine Clinical Use: A Critical Review

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic response to oral targeted anticancer protein kinase inhibitors (PKIs) varies widely between patients, with insufficient efficacy of some of them and unacceptable adverse reactions of others. There are several possible causes for this heterogeneity, such as pharmacokinetic (PK) variability affecting blood concentrations, fluctuating medication adherence, and constitutional or acquired drug resistance of cancer cells. The appropriate management of oncology patients with PKI treatments thus requires concerted efforts to optimize the utilization of these drug agents, which have probably not yet revealed their full potential.

METHODS

An extensive literature review was performed on MEDLINE on the PK, pharmacodynamics, and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of PKIs (up to April 2019).

RESULTS

This review provides the criteria for determining PKIs suitable candidates for TDM (eg, availability of analytical methods, observational PK studies, PK-pharmacodynamics relationship analysis, and randomized controlled studies). It reviews the major characteristics and limitations of PKIs, the expected benefits of TDM for cancer patients receiving them, and the prerequisites for the appropriate utilization of TDM. Finally, it discusses various important practical aspects and pitfalls of TDM for supporting better implementation in the field of cancer treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Adaptation of PKIs dosage regimens at the individual patient level, through a rational TDM approach, could prevent oncology patients from being exposed to ineffective or unnecessarily toxic drug concentrations in the era of personalized medicine.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Sunitinib in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors and Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma in Adults-A Review

BACKGROUND

Sunitinib is an inhibitor of multiple receptor tyrosine kinases and is a standard-of-care treatment for advanced and metastatic renal cell carcinoma and a second-line treatment in locally advanced inoperable and metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors. A fixed dose of the drug, however, does not produce a uniform therapeutic outcome in all patients, and many face adverse effects and/or toxicity. One of the possible causes of the interindividual variability in the efficacy and toxicity response is the highly variable systemic exposure to sunitinib and its active metabolite. This review aims to summarize all available clinical evidence of the treatment of adult patients using sunitinib in approved indications, addressing the necessity to introduce proper and robust therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of sunitinib and its major metabolite, N-desethylsunitinib.

METHODS

The authors performed a systematic search of the available scientific literature using the PubMed online database. The search terms were "sunitinib" AND "therapeutic drug monitoring" OR "TDM" OR "plasma levels" OR "concentration" OR "exposure." The search yielded 520 journal articles. In total, 447 publications were excluded because they lacked sufficient relevance to the reviewed topic. The remaining 73 articles were, together with currently valid guidelines, thoroughly reviewed.

RESULTS

There is sufficient evidence confirming the concentration-efficacy and concentration-toxicity relationship in the indications of gastrointestinal stromal tumors and metastatic renal clear-cell carcinoma. For optimal therapeutic response, total (sunitinib + N-desethylsunitinib) trough levels of 50-100 ng/mL serve as a reasonable target therapeutic range. To avoid toxicity, the total trough levels should not exceed 100 ng/mL.

CONCLUSIONS

According to the current evidence presented in this review, a TDM-guided dose modification of sunitinib in selected groups of patients could provide a better treatment outcome while simultaneously preventing sunitinib toxicity.

VOTRAGE study: Phase I dose-escalation study of pazopanib in unfit older patients

BACKGROUND

Pazopanib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor given at the approved dose of 800 mg orally once daily (OD), but often requiring individual dose adjustment due to toxicity. Limited data is available to guide prescription in older patients especially the unfit according to geriatric assessment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

VOTRAGE is a 3 + 3 dose-escalation, open-label phase I trial of continuous OD oral administration of pazopanib to evaluate safety, PK and PD data in unfit older patients with advanced solid tumors. The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). PK data were compared with those obtained in younger adult patients in a population PK analysis.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients with a median age of 82.5 years (range 75-91) were included in three dosing cohorts (400, 600, and 800 mg daily). Three dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) were observed in five patients at 800 mg and one DLT at 600 mg in six evaluable patients. MTD was defined as level 2 dose (600 mg). Individual oral clearance was not correlated with age. A relationship was observed between the occurrence of DLT and pazopanib plasma exposure. Decreased oral bioavailability of pazopanib when given with proton-pump inhibitors was confirmed in this group of patients.

CONCLUSION

We recommend performing geriatric assessment in patients older than 75 and starting pazopanib at 600 mg per day in unfit older patients. Therapeutic drug monitoring appears very helpful in this population.

Pharmacokinetic considerations in geriatric cancer patients

Pharmacological anticancer therapy in elderly people has to account for pharmacokinetic aspects in view of age-related changes in organ function and disease-related alterations. Age-related changes in organ function might still be physiological and have to be discriminated from concomitant diseases and their pharmacotherapy. Although efficacy is retained with pharmacological anticancer therapies in elderly patients, plasma drug concentrations and the incidence of adverse reactions often increase. Thus, altered organ function in elderly will be reviewed with respect to clinically relevant outcomes. Furthermore, possible consequences of therapeutic drug monitoring will be discussed focusing on novel targeted therapies with small molecules. Examples of therapeutic drug monitoring during targeted therapies may represent an easy tool to overcome the individual pharmacokinetic situation of elderly cancer patients and may contribute to enhanced safety, when implemented in clinical routine.

Individualized Management of Blood Concentration in Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common mesenchymal tumor, and surgical resection is the first choice for the treatment of the disease, but since the advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as imatinib (IM), the prognosis of the disease has undergone revolutionary changes. According to the current version of the guidelines, most GIST patients receive a fixed dose without taking into account their own individual differences, resulting in a wide difference in blood concentration, adverse reactions and prognosis. With more studies on the relationship between blood drug concentrations and prognosis, the concept of individualized therapy has been paid more attention by researchers. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has also been made available for the research field of GIST targeted therapy. How to reduce the incidence of drug resistance and adverse reactions in patients with GISTs has become the focus of the current research. This article reviews the common monitoring methods and timing of TKIs blood concentration, the reasonable range of blood drug concentration, the toxic or adverse effects caused by high blood drug concentration, some possible factors affecting blood drug concentration and recent research progress, in order to discuss and summarize the treatment strategy of individual blood drug concentration, improve the prognosis of patients and reduce the adverse effects as much as possible.

Adherence to Adjuvant Imatinib Therapy in Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor in Clinical Practice: A Cross-Sectional Study

BACKGROUND

Adherence to imatinib therapy has been significantly associated with disease progression and direct medical costs in gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) patients. However, adherence to oral anticancer drugs is frequently hindered by the influence of various factors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of imatinib adherence and its influencing factors among GIST patients in the adjuvant setting.

METHODS

Adherence of GIST patients (receiving imatinib for ≥1 month) was assessed using the 8-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS), with a score <8 indicating nonadherence. Quality of life and social support were evaluated by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (EORTC QLQ C30) and Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS). Factors associated with nonadherence were identified by multivariate logistic regression analysis. Imatinib plasma concentrations were determined and compared between adherent and nonadherent groups.

RESULTS

A total of 158 GIST patients were enrolled, 92 (58.2%) patients were considered nonadherent. Intentional nonadherence, especially feeling hassled by treatment plan (34.2% of patients), was common. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, gender (OR 2.68, 95% CI 1.33-5.41; p = 0.0058), place of residence (OR 3.20, 95% CI 1.39-7.35; p = 0.0061), and global health status (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.00-1.04; p = 0.0378) were significantly associated with nonadherence. Moreover, imatinib plasma concentrations in nonadherent patients were significantly lower than that in the good adherence group (p = 0.0338).

CONCLUSIONS

Poor adherence to imatinib is a notable problem in Chinese GIST patients in the adjuvant therapy setting. The predominant indicators of nonadherence in this study were gender (female), living in a rural area, and harboring a low global health status score. These indicators may aid clinicians in determining where increased efforts in promoting adherence may be beneficial.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of small molecule kinase inhibitors in oncology in a real-world cohort study: does age matter?

AIM

Pharmacokinetics of small molecule kinase inhibitors (KIs) used in cancer treatment may alter with increasing age, but results are conflicting. This study aims to compare exposure to KIs between older and younger patients (≥70 and <70 years) in clinical practice.

METHODS

KI plasma concentrations of routinely treated patients were measured using validated assays. Calculated trough concentrations were compared in both age groups. For KIs with a clinically meaningful target concentration (erlotinib, imatinib, pazopanib, sunitinib and vemurafenib), influence of older age on target attainment was assessed.

RESULTS

We analysed 616 samples from 454 patients (median age: 61; range 20-93 years), treated with dabrafenib (n = 105), erlotinib (n = 49), imatinib (n = 165), pazopanib (n = 63), sunitinib (n = 87), trametinib (n = 95) and vemurafenib (n = 52). Older age did not significantly influence exposure to erlotinib, imatinib, pazopanib, sunitinib, trametinib and vemurafenib. Elderly patients had significantly higher dabrafenib trough concentrations than younger patients (P = 0.02; 62 ng ml^-1 (coefficient of variation [CV] 41%), vs. 53 ng ml^-1 (CV 46%), respectively). For KIs with a predefined target concentration, 68% of older and 61% of younger patients reached target.

CONCLUSIONS

In this real-world study, exposure to most included KIs was comparable in older and younger patients, except for dabrafenib, which showed higher exposure in older patients. In the absence of an absolute target for this KI, clinical relevance remains unclear. For all other included KIs, our data suggest no clinically relevant influence of older age on KI exposure.