Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modelling to predict oprozomib CYP3A drug-drug interaction potential in patients with advanced malignancies

Advancements in Virtual Bioequivalence: A Systematic Review of Computational Methods and Regulatory Perspectives in the Pharmaceutical Industry

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

The rise of virtual bioequivalence studies has transformed the pharmaceutical landscape, enabling more efficient drug development processes. This systematic review aims to explore advancements in physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling, its regulatory implications, and its role in achieving virtual bioequivalence, particularly for complex drug formulations.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of clinical trials using computational methods, particularly PBPK modeling, to carry out bioequivalence assessments. Eligibility criteria are emphasized during in silico modeling and pharmacokinetic simulations. Comprehensive literature searches were performed across databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library. A search strategy using key terms and Boolean operators ensured that extensive coverage was achieved. We adhered to the PRISMA guidelines in regard to the study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment, focusing on key characteristics, methodologies, outcomes, and regulatory perspectives from the FDA and EMA.

RESULTS

Our findings indicate that PBPK modeling significantly enhances the prediction of pharmacokinetic profiles, optimizing dosing regimens, while minimizing the need for extensive clinical trials. Regulatory agencies have recognized this utility, with the FDA and EMA developing frameworks to integrate in silico methods into drug evaluations. However, challenges such as study heterogeneity and publication bias may limit the generalizability of the results.

CONCLUSIONS

This review highlights the critical need for standardized protocols and robust regulatory guidelines to facilitate the integration of virtual bioequivalence methodologies into pharmaceutical practices. By embracing these advancements, the pharmaceutical industry can improve drug development efficiency and patient outcomes, paving the way for innovative therapeutic solutions. Continued research and adaptive regulatory frameworks will be essential in navigating this evolving field.

The Effect of Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Irritable Bowel Syndrome on Pravastatin Oral Bioavailability: In vivo and in silico evaluation using bottom-up wbPBPK modeling

The common disorders irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) can modify the drugs' pharmacokinetics via their induced pathophysiological changes. This work aimed to investigate the impact of these two diseases on pravastatin oral bioavailability. Rat models for IBS and IBD were used to experimentally test the effects of IBS and IBD on pravastatin pharmacokinetics. Then, the observations made in rats were extrapolated to humans using a mechanistic whole-body physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (wbPBPK) model. The rat in vivo studies done herein showed that IBS and IBD decreased serum albumin (> 11% for both), decreased PRV binding in plasma, and increased pravastatin absolute oral bioavailability (0.17 and 0.53 compared to 0.01) which increased plasma, muscle, and liver exposure. However, the wbPBPK model predicted muscle concentration was much lower than the pravastatin toxicity thresholds for myotoxicity and rhabdomyolysis. Overall, IBS and IBD can significantly increase pravastatin oral bioavailability which can be due to a combination of increased pravastatin intestinal permeability and decreased pravastatin gastric degradation resulting in higher exposure. This is the first study in the literature investigating the effects of IBS and IBD on pravastatin pharmacokinetics. The high interpatient variability in pravastatin concentrations as induced by IBD and IBS can be reduced by oral administration of pravastatin using enteric-coated tablets. Such disease (IBS and IBD)-drug interaction can have more drastic consequences for narrow therapeutic index drugs prone to gastric degradation, especially for drugs with low intestinal permeability.

A Reliable and Effective UPLC-MS/MS Method for the Determination of Oprozomib in Rat Plasma

Oprozomib, as a second-generation orally bioavailable protease inhibitor (PI), is undergoing clinical evaluation for the treatment of haematological malignancies. In relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients, oprozomib has shown good efficacy as a single agent or combination therapy. In this experiment, our purpose was to validate a sensitive and rapid method for the determination of oprozomib concentration in rat plasma by ultraperformance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS). The samples were treated with acetonitrile as the precipitant and separated by gradient elution using a Waters Acquity UPLC BEH C18 column (2.1 mm × 50 mm, 1.7 μm). Using the selective reaction monitoring (SRM) method, the measurement was finished with the ion transitions of m/z 533.18 ⟶ 199.01 for oprozomib and m/z 493.03 ⟶ 112.03 for tepotinib (internal standard, IS), respectively. Meanwhile, acetonitrile and 0.1% formic acid aqueous solution were used as the mobile phase, and the flow rate was 0.3 mL/min. The lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) of the method was 1.0 ng/mL, and the linear relationship was good in the range of 1.0-100 ng/mL. In addition, the precision of four concentration levels was determined with the values of 3.1-7.3% and the accuracy was from -14.9% to 12.9%. Moreover, the recovery was determined to be from 85.1% to 96.1%, and the values of matrix effect were no more than 110.4%. The optimized UPLC-MS/MS method was also suitable for the pharmacokinetic study of rats after a single oral administration of 21 mg/kg oprozomib.

Evaluation of Concomitant Use of Anticancer Drugs and Herbal Products: From Interactions to Synergic Activity

CAM is used by about 40% of cancer patients in Western Countries, with peaks of 80% for breast cancer patients. Cancer patients use CAM to boost immune function, to control cancer symptoms and treatment-related side effects, and to improve health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) and survival. Unfortunately, self-prescription of natural remedies in cancer patients can lead to unexpected toxicities and can reduce the effectiveness of cancer therapy. Although CAM usually refers to all the "natural or organic" products/methods that are generally considered less toxic, there are concerns about drug interactions, especially in patients participating in clinical trials with experimental agents. Despite the claims of the promising and potential benefits made by prescribers, many CAMs lack clear scientific evidence of their safety and efficacy. Given the widespread use of CAM-both clearly declared and overt-in this review, we focused on the most important known data on the risk of interactions between biologics and oncology drugs with the goal of opening up CAM in accordance with the meaning of integrative medicine.

Enhancing Atorvastatin In Vivo Oral Bioavailability in the Presence of Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Irritable Bowel Syndrome Using Supercritical Fluid Technology Guided by wbPBPK Modeling in Rat and Human

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) are common disorders that can change the body's physiology and drugs pharmacokinetics. Solid dispersion (SD) preparation using supercritical fluid technology (SFT) has many advantages. Our study aimed to explore the effect of IBS and IBD on atorvastatin (ATV) pharmacokinetics, enhance ATV oral bioavailability (BCS II drug) using SFT, and analyze drug-disease-formulation interaction using a whole-body physiologically based pharmacokinetic (wbPBPK) model in rat and human. A novel ATV formulation was prepared using SFT and characterized in vitro and in vivo in healthy, IBS, and IBD rats. The resulting ATV plasma levels were analyzed using a combination of conventional and wbPBPK approaches. The novel formulation increased ATV solubility by 20-fold and resulted in a zero-order release of up to 95%. Both IBS and IBD increased ATV exposure after oral and intravenous administration by more than 30%. The novel SFT formulation increased ATV bioavailability by 28, 14, and 18% in control, IBD, and IBD rat groups and resulted in more consistent exposure as compared to raw ATV solution. Higher improvements in ATV bioavailability of more than 2-fold upon receiving the novel SFT formulation were predicted by the human wbPBPK model as compared to receiving the conventional tablets. Finally, the established wbPBPK model could describe ATV ADME in the presence of IBS and IBD after oral administration of raw ATV and using the novel SFT formula and can help scale the optimized ATV dosing regimens in the presence of IBS and IBD from rats to humans.

Proteasome Inhibitors and Their Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Metabolism

The proteasome is responsible for mediating intracellular protein degradation and regulating cellular function with impact on tumor and immune effector cell biology. The proteasome is found predominantly in two forms, the constitutive proteasome and the immunoproteasome. It has been validated as a therapeutic drug target through regulatory approval with 2 distinct chemical classes of small molecular inhibitors (boronic acid derivatives and peptide epoxyketones), including 3 compounds, bortezomib (VELCADE), carfilzomib (KYPROLIS), and ixazomib (NINLARO), for use in the treatment of the plasma cell neoplasm, multiple myeloma. Additionally, a selective inhibitor of immunoproteasome (KZR-616) is being developed for the treatment of autoimmune diseases. Here, we compare and contrast the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and metabolism of these 2 classes of compounds in preclinical models and clinical studies. The distinct metabolism of peptide epoxyketones, which is primarily mediated by microsomal epoxide hydrolase, is highlighted and postulated as a favorable property for the development of this class of compound in chronic conditions.

Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model for alectinib, ruxolitinib, and panobinostat in the presence of cancer, renal impairment, and hepatic impairment

Renal (RIP) and hepatic (HIP) impairments are prevalent conditions in cancer patients. They can cause changes in gastric emptying time, albumin levels, hematocrit, glomerular filtration rate, hepatic functional volume, blood flow rates, and metabolic activity that can modify drug pharmacokinetics. Performing clinical studies in such populations has ethical and practical issues. Using predictive physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models in the evaluation of the PK of alectinib, ruxolitinib, and panobinostat exposures in the presence of cancer, RIP, and HIP can help in using optimal doses with lower toxicity in these populations. Verified PBPK models were customized under scrutiny to account for the pathophysiological changes induced in these diseases. The PBPK model-predicted plasma exposures in patients with different health conditions within average 2-fold error. The PBPK model predicted an area under the curve ratio (AUCR) of 1, and 1.8, for ruxolitinib and panobinostat, respectively, in the presence of severe RIP. On the other hand, the severe HIP was associated with AUCR of 1.4, 2.9, and 1.8 for alectinib, ruxolitinib, and panobinostat, respectively, in agreement with the observed AUCR. Moreover, the PBPK model predicted that alectinib therapeutic cerebrospinal fluid levels are achieved in patients with non-small cell lung cancer, moderate HIP, and severe HIP at 1-, 1.5-, and 1.8-fold that of healthy subjects. The customized PBPK models showed promising ethical alternatives for simulating clinical studies in patients with cancer, RIP, and HIP. More work is needed to quantify other pathophysiological changes induced by simultaneous affliction by cancer and RIP or HIP.

Pharmacology differences among proteasome inhibitors: Implications for their use in clinical practice

Preclinical and clinical investigation on proteasome as a druggable target in cancer has led to the development of proteasome inhibitors (PIs) with different pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties. For example, carfilzomib has a better safety profile and a lower risk of clinically relevant drug-drug interactions than bortezomib, whereas ixazomib can be orally administered on a weekly basis due to a very long elimination half-life and high systemic exposure. The purpose of this review article is to elucidate the quantitative and qualitative differences in potency, selectivity, pharmacokinetics, safety and drug-drug interactions of clinically validated PIs to provide useful information for their clinical use in real life setting.

Oral Proteasomal Inhibitors Ixazomib, Oprozomib, and Delanzomib Upregulate the Function of Organic Anion Transporter 3 (OAT3): Implications in OAT3-Mediated Drug-Drug Interactions

Organic anion transporter 3 (OAT3) is mainly expressed at the basolateral membrane of kidney proximal tubules, and is involved in the renal elimination of various kinds of important drugs, potentially affecting drug efficacy or toxicity. Our laboratory previously reported that ubiquitin modification of OAT3 triggers the endocytosis of OAT3 from the plasma membrane to intracellular endosomes, followed by degradation. Oral anticancer drugs ixazomib, oprozomib, and delanzomib, as proteasomal inhibitors, target the ubiquitin-proteasome system in clinics. Therefore, this study investigated the effects of ixazomib, oprozomib, and delanzomib on the expression and transport activity of OAT3 and elucidated the underlying mechanisms. We showed that all three drugs significantly increased the accumulation of ubiquitinated OAT3, which was consistent with decreased intracellular 20S proteasomal activity; stimulated OAT3-mediated transport of estrone sulfate and p-aminohippuric acid; and increased OAT3 surface expression. The enhanced transport activity and OAT3 expression following drug treatment resulted from an increase in maximum transport velocity of OAT3 without altering the substrate binding affinity, and from a decreased OAT3 degradation. Together, our study discovered a novel role of anticancer agents ixazomib, oprozomib, and delanzomib in upregulating OAT3 function, unveiled the proteasome as a promising target for OAT3 regulation, and provided implication of OAT3-mediated drug-drug interactions, which should be warned against during combination therapies with proteasome inhibitor drugs.

An Open-Label Phase 1 Study to Determine the Effect of Lenvatinib on the Pharmacokinetics of Midazolam, a CYP3A4 Substrate, in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Lenvatinib is a multikinase inhibitor that inhibits enzyme activity but induces gene expression of cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4), an important enzyme for drug metabolism. We evaluated the impact of lenvatinib on CYP3A4 using midazolam as a probe substrate in patients with advanced solid tumors. The primary objective was to determine the pharmacokinetic effects of lenvatinib on midazolam, and the secondary objective was to assess the safety of lenvatinib.

METHODS

This multicenter, open-label, nonrandomized, phase 1 study involved patients with advanced cancer that progressed after treatment with approved therapies or for which no standard therapies were available.

RESULTS

Compared with baseline, coadministration of lenvatinib decreased the geometric mean ratio of the area under the concentration-time curve for midazolam on day 1 to 0.914 (90% confidence interval [CI] 0.850-0.983) but increased it on day 14 to 1.148 (90% CI 0.938-1.404). Coadministration of lenvatinib also decreased the geometric mean ratio of the maximum observed concentration for midazolam on day 1 to 0.862 (90% CI 0.753-0.988) but increased it on day 14 to 1.027 (90% CI 0.852-1.238). There was little change in the terminal elimination phase half-life of midazolam when administered with lenvatinib. The most common treatment-related adverse events were hypertension (20.0%), fatigue (16.7%), and diarrhea (10.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Coadministration of lenvatinib had no clinically relevant effect on the pharmacokinetics of midazolam, a CYP3A4 substrate. The adverse events were consistent with the known safety profile of lenvatinib, and no new safety concerns were identified. CLINICALTRIALS.

GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT02686164.

Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modelling to predict oprozomib CYP3A drug-drug interaction potential in patients with advanced malignancies

AIMS

Oprozomib is an oral, second-generation, irreversible proteasome inhibitor currently in clinical development for haematologic malignancies, including multiple myeloma and other malignancies. Oprozomib is a rare example of a small molecule drug that demonstrates cytochrome P450 (CYP) mRNA suppression. This unusual property elicits uncertainty regarding the optimal approach for predicting its drug-drug interaction (DDI) risk. The current study aims to understand DDI potential during early clinical development of oprozomib.

METHODS

To support early development of oprozomib (e.g. inclusion/exclusion criteria, combination study design), we used human hepatocyte data and physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modelling to predict its CYP3A4-mediated DDI potential. Subsequently, a clinical DDI study using midazolam as the substrate was conducted in patients with advanced malignancies.

RESULTS

The clinical DDI study enrolled a total of 21 patients, 18 with advanced solid tumours. No patient discontinued oprozomib due to a treatment-related adverse event. The PBPK model prospectively predicted oprozomib 300 mg would not cause a clinically relevant change in exposure to CYP3A4 substrates (≤30%), which was confirmed by the results of this clinical DDI study.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate oprozomib has a low potential to inhibit the metabolism of CYP3A4 substrates in humans. The study shows that cultured human hepatocytes are a more reliable system for DDI prediction than human liver microsomes for studying this class of compounds. Developing a PBPK model prior to a clinical DDI study has been valuable in supporting clinical development of oprozomib.