AJM300, a novel oral antagonist of α4-integrin, sustains an increase in circulating lymphocytes: A randomised controlled trial in healthy male subjects

Effects of rifampicin on the pharmacokinetics and safety of carotegrast methyl in healthy subjects: A randomized 2 × 2 crossover study

AIMS

To evaluate the effect of the combination of carotegrast methyl with rifampicin, a potent inhibitor of organic anion transporter polypeptide, on the pharmacokinetics (PKs), safety and tolerability of carotegrast methyl.

METHODS

In this 2 × 2 crossover study in 20 healthy Japanese adults, 10 subjects received carotegrast methyl 960 mg and rifampicin 600 mg on day 1 and received carotegrast methyl 960 mg on day 8. The subjects in the other sequence received the same treatments but in the opposite order. The 90% confidence interval (CI) of the geometric mean ratio of the Cmax and AUC0-t for carotegrast, the main active metabolite of carotegrast methyl, with/without rifampicin was calculated. If the 90% CI fell within the range of 0.80-1.25, this indicated the absence of any drug-drug interaction. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored.

RESULTS

The geometric mean ratios (90% CI) of the Cmax and AUC0-t for carotegrast with/without rifampicin were 4.78 (3.64-6.29) and 5.59 (4.60-6.79), respectively, indicating that carotegrast has a PK interaction with rifampicin. The combination with rifampicin increased the exposure of carotegrast and also that of its metabolites. The incidence of any AEs with/without rifampicin was five (25.0%) and one (5.0%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Coadministration of carotegrast methyl with rifampicin significantly increased the exposure of carotegrast compared with carotegrast methyl administration alone. In this single dose study, the incidence of AEs of carotegrast methyl with rifampicin increased compared with carotegrast methyl alone, but the incidence of adverse drug reactions did not increase with combination administration.

Evaluation of the potential drug-drug interactions of carotegrast methyl with midazolam, prednisolone or atorvastatin in healthy adults

AIMS

This study evaluated drug-drug interactions between the CYP3A4 inhibitor carotegrast methyl and the other CYP3A4 substrates, midazolam, atorvastatin and prednisolone.

METHODS

A total of 88 healthy volunteers orally received carotegrast methyl 960 mg 3 times daily for 14 days. A single oral (5 mg) or intravenous (0.017 mg kg-1 ) midazolam, oral (5 mg) prednisolone or oral (10 mg) atorvastatin was administered before, with and after carotegrast methyl treatment. When the 90% confidence interval (CI) for the geometric mean ratios of the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters with coadministration with carotegrast methyl (Day 14) to those before carotegrast methyl administration was between 0.80 and 1.25, no PK interaction were deemed.

RESULTS

The Cmax and AUC0-t of oral midazolam before administration of carotegrast methyl were 30.9 ± 9.8 ng mL-1 and 74.5 ± 21.9 ng h mL-1 , respectively. The geometric mean ratio of the Cmax and AUC0-t of midazolam on Day 14 to those on Day -1 was 1.86 (90% CI, 1.64-2.11) and 3.07 (90% CI, 2.81-3.35), which did not fall within the range of 0.80-1.25, suggesting that carotegrast methyl had a PK interaction with midazolam. Similar PK interactions were found for intravenous midazolam and atorvastatin, but not for prednisolone. The inhibitory effect of carotegrast methyl on CYP3A4-mediated metabolism of midazolam and atorvastatin had almost disappeared by 14 days after the end of administration.

CONCLUSION

Carotegrast methyl was classified as a moderate CYP3A4 inhibitor in humans. Carotegrast methyl might enhance the action of drugs that are metabolized by CYP3A4.

Novel and emerging drugs for the treatment of Crohn's disease: a review of phase II and III trials

INTRODUCTION

Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease characterized by unpredictable flare-ups and periods of remission. While several therapeutic options, such as anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF), anti-integrin, and interleukin (IL) 12/23 inhibitors, as well as IL-23 and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, have been approved for CD treatment, a substantial number of patients fail to respond adequately or experience a loss of response over time. In recent years, the scientific community has been actively investigating novel agents to address these challenges and improve the management of CD.

AREAS COVERED

This comprehensive narrative review provides an overview of recent developments in CD treatment, summarizing phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trial data. We delve into the clinical efficacy and safety profiles of emerging therapies, encompassing JAK inhibitors, IL-23 inhibitors, anti-adhesion molecules, S1P1 receptor modulators, and combined targeted treatments.

EXPERT OPINION

The armamentarium of CD therapeutic agents is constantly expanding. We analyze pivotal findings from phase 2 and phase 3 CD treatment trials. We also underscore the existing gaps in therapy and the paramount role of ongoing research and innovation in CD management.

Targeting T-cell integrins in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases

The recruitment of T cells to tissues and their retention there are essential processes in the pathogenesis of many autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. The mechanisms regulating these processes have become better understood over the past three decades and are now recognized to involve temporally and spatially specific interactions between cell-adhesion molecules. These include integrins, which are heterodimeric molecules that mediate in-to-out and out-to-in signalling in T cells, other leukocytes, and most other cells of the body. Integrin signalling contributes to T-cell circulation through peripheral lymph nodes, immunological synapse stability and function, extravasation at the sites of inflammation, and T-cell retention at these sites. Greater understanding of the contribution of integrin signalling to the role of T cells in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases has focused much attention on the development of therapeutics that target T-cell integrins. This literature review describes the structure, activation, and function of integrins with respect to T cells, then discusses the use of integrin-targeting therapeutics in inflammatory bowel disease, multiple sclerosis, and psoriasis. Efficacy and safety data from clinical trials and post-marketing surveillance are presented for currently approved therapeutics, therapeutics that have been withdrawn from the market, and novel therapeutics currently in clinical trials. This literature review will inform the reader of the current means of targeting T-cell integrins in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases, as well as recent developments in the field.

Exploring the Pipeline of Novel Therapies for Inflammatory Bowel Disease; State of the Art Review

Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), known as inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), are characterized by chronic inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract. Over the last two decades, numerous medications have been developed and repurposed to induce and maintain remission in IBD patients. Despite the approval of multiple drugs, the major recurring issues continue to be primary non-response and secondary loss of response, as well as short- and long-term adverse events. Most clinical trials show percentages of response under 60%, possibly as a consequence of strict inclusion criteria and definitions of response. That is why these percentages appear to be more optimistic in real-life studies. A therapeutic ceiling has been used as a term to define this invisible bar that has not been crossed by any drug yet. This review highlights novel therapeutic target agents in phases II and III of development, such as sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators, selective Janus kinase inhibitors, anti-interleukins, and other small molecules that are currently under research until 1 January 2023. Emerging treatments for CD and UC that have just received approval or are undergoing phase III clinical trials are also discussed in this review.

Targeting integrin pathways: mechanisms and advances in therapy

Integrins are considered the main cell-adhesion transmembrane receptors that play multifaceted roles as extracellular matrix (ECM)-cytoskeletal linkers and transducers in biochemical and mechanical signals between cells and their environment in a wide range of states in health and diseases. Integrin functions are dependable on a delicate balance between active and inactive status via multiple mechanisms, including protein-protein interactions, conformational changes, and trafficking. Due to their exposure on the cell surface and sensitivity to the molecular blockade, integrins have been investigated as pharmacological targets for nearly 40 years, but given the complexity of integrins and sometimes opposite characteristics, targeting integrin therapeutics has been a challenge. To date, only seven drugs targeting integrins have been successfully marketed, including abciximab, eptifibatide, tirofiban, natalizumab, vedolizumab, lifitegrast, and carotegrast. Currently, there are approximately 90 kinds of integrin-based therapeutic drugs or imaging agents in clinical studies, including small molecules, antibodies, synthetic mimic peptides, antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, imaging agents, etc. A serious lesson from past integrin drug discovery and research efforts is that successes rely on both a deep understanding of integrin-regulatory mechanisms and unmet clinical needs. Herein, we provide a systematic and complete review of all integrin family members and integrin-mediated downstream signal transduction to highlight ongoing efforts to develop new therapies/diagnoses from bench to clinic. In addition, we further discuss the trend of drug development, how to improve the success rate of clinical trials targeting integrin therapies, and the key points for clinical research, basic research, and translational research.

Carotegrast Methyl: First Approval

Carotegrast methyl (Carogra^®) is a small-molecule α4 integrin antagonist being developed by EA Pharma (formerly Ajinomoto Pharmaceuticals) and Kissei Pharmaceutical for the treatment of ulcerative colitis. The active metabolite of carotegrast methyl exerts an anti-inflammatory effect by blocking the interaction of α4β1 or α4β7 integrins and their ligands, VCAM-1 and MAd-CAM-1, thereby inhibiting the adhesion of inflammatory cells, including T cells, to vascular endothelial cells and extravasation into inflammatory sites. In March 2022, carotegrast methyl received its first approval in Japan for the treatment of moderate ulcerative colitis in patients who had inadequate response to 5-aminosalicylic acid. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of carotegrast methyl leading to this first approval for the treatment of moderate ulcerative colitis.

Emerging therapeutic opportunities for integrin inhibitors

Integrins are cell adhesion and signalling proteins crucial to a wide range of biological functions. Effective marketed treatments have successfully targeted integrins αIIbβ3, α4β7/α4β1 and αLβ2 for cardiovascular diseases, inflammatory bowel disease/multiple sclerosis and dry eye disease, respectively. Yet, clinical development of others, notably within the RGD-binding subfamily of αv integrins, including αvβ3, have faced significant challenges in the fields of cancer, ophthalmology and osteoporosis. New inhibitors of the related integrins αvβ6 and αvβ1 have recently come to the fore and are being investigated clinically for the treatment of fibrotic diseases, including idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. The design of integrin drugs may now be at a turning point, with opportunities to learn from previous clinical trials, to explore new modalities and to incorporate new findings in pharmacological and structural biology. This Review intertwines research from biological, clinical and medicinal chemistry disciplines to discuss historical and current RGD-binding integrin drug discovery, with an emphasis on small-molecule inhibitors of the αv integrins.

Integrins are key signalling molecules that are present on the surface of subsets of cells and are therefore good potential therapeutic targets. In this Review, Hatley and colleagues discuss the development of integrin inhibitors, particularly the challenges in developing inhibitors for integrins that contain an αv-subunit, and suggest how these challenges could be addressed.

Anti-integrin drugs in clinical trials for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD): insights into promising agents

INTRODUCTION

Despite huge and increasing developments in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), a significant percentage of patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) is still in need of an effective and safe therapeutic option. Tackling the trafficking of leukocytes specifically within or directed to the inflamed gut appears to be a particularly promising strategy, and several new anti-integrin agents are currently under investigation in clinical trials.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes efficacy and safety data from phase 1, 2 and 3 clinical trials on investigational drugs, including monoclonal antibodies (etrolizumab, abrilumab, ontamalimab) and oral small molecules (AJM300, PTG-100). It also discusses the future perspectives for the treatment of IBD patients with this class of agents.

EXPERT OPINION

The pipeline of anti-integrin agents is well assorted, and it is reasonable to expect that some will be introduced in the market soon. Among the most exciting features of this class are the gut selectivity, the convenient subcutaneous and oral administrations and the reassuring safety profiles. Most of the new anti-integrins seem to improve outcomes in UC but not in CD, however these data are far from definitive and several pivotal trials are still under way.

Anti-Integrins for the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Current Evidence and Perspectives

Leukocyte trafficking to the gastrointestinal tract is recognized to play a role in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Integrins are expressed on immune cells and interact with cell adhesion molecules (CAM) to mediate leukocyte trafficking. Blockade of the gut-tropic integrin α4β7 and its subunits has been exploited as a therapeutic target in IBD. Natalizumab (anti-α4) is approved for moderate to severe Crohn's disease (CD), but its use is limited due to potential risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. Vedolizumab (anti-α4β7) is approved for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) and CD. It is the most widely used anti-integrin therapy in IBD and has been shown to be effective in both induction and maintenance therapy, with a favorable safety profile. Several models incorporating clinical, genetic, immune, gut microbial, and vitamin D markers to predict response to vedolizumab in IBD have been developed. Etrolizumab (anti-β7) blocks leukocyte trafficking via α4β7 and cell adhesion via αEβ7 integrins. Large phase 3 clinical trials evaluating efficacy of etrolizumab in the induction and maintenance of patients with IBD are underway. Other investigational anti-integrin therapies include abrilumab (anti-α4β7 IgG2), PN-943 (orally administered and gut-restricted α4β7 antagonist peptide), AJM300 (orally active small molecule inhibitor of α4), and ontamalimab (anti-MAdCAM-1 IgG).

Ulcerative colitis: shedding light on emerging agents and strategies in preclinical and early clinical development

INTRODUCTION

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is an inflammatory disease of the large intestine. Progress in preclinical therapeutic target discovery and clinical trial design has resulted in the approval of new therapies. Nonetheless, remission rates remain below 30% thus underlining the need for novel, more effective therapies.

AREAS COVERED

This paper reviews current experimental techniques available for drug testing in intestinal inflammation and examines new therapies in clinical development for the treatment of UC. The authors searched the literature for 'ulcerative colitis' AND 'preclinical' OR 'drug target/drug name' (i.e. infliximab, vedolizumab, IL-12, IL-23, JAK, etc.). Studies that included preclinical in vivo or in vitro experiments are discussed. The clinicaltrial.gov site was searched for 'ulcerative colitis' AND 'Recruiting' OR 'Active, not recruiting' AND 'Interventional (Clinical Trial)' AND 'early phase 1' OR 'phase 1' OR 'phase 2' OR 'phase 3.'

EXPERT OPINION

Using in vivo, ex vivo, and/or in vitro models could increase the success rates of drugs moving to clinical trials, and hence increase the efficiency of this costly process. Selective JAK1 inhibitors, S1P modulators, and anti-p19 antibodies are the most promising options to improve treatment effectiveness. The development of drugs with gut-restricted exposure may provide increased efficacy and an improved safety.

Betulinic acid hydroxamate prevents colonic inflammation and fibrosis in murine models of inflammatory bowel disease

Intestinal fibrosis is a common complication of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and is defined as an excessive accumulation of scar tissue in the intestinal wall. Intestinal fibrosis occurs in both forms of IBD: ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. Small-molecule inhibitors targeting hypoxia-inducing factor (HIF) prolyl-hydroxylases are promising for the development of novel antifibrotic therapies in IBD. Herein, we evaluated the therapeutic efficacy of hydroxamate of betulinic acid (BHA), a hypoxia mimetic derivative of betulinic acid, against IBD in vitro and in vivo. We showed that BAH (5-20 μM) dose-dependently enhanced collagen gel contraction and activated the HIF pathway in NIH-3T3 fibroblasts; BAH treatment also prevented the loss of trans-epithelial electrical resistance induced by proinflammatory cytokines in Caco-2 cells. In two different murine models (TNBS- and DSS-induced IBD) that cause colon fibrosis, oral administration of BAH (20, 50 mg/kg·d, for 17 days) prevented colon inflammation and fibrosis, as detected using immunohistochemistry and qPCR assays. BAH-treated animals showed a significant reduction of fibrotic markers (Tnc, Col1a2, Col3a1, Timp-1, α-SMA) and inflammatory markers (F4/80⁺, CD3⁺, Il-1β, Ccl3) in colon tissue, as well as an improvement in epithelial barrier integrity and wound healing. BHA displayed promising oral bioavailability, no significant activity against a panel of 68 potential pharmacological targets and was devoid of genotoxicity and cardiotoxicity. Taken together, our results provide evidence that oral administration of BAH can alleviate colon inflammation and colitis-associated fibrosis, identifying the enhancement of colon barrier integrity as a possible mechanism of action, and providing a solid rationale for additional clinical studies.

Application of a PBPK model to elucidate the changes of systemic and liver exposures for rosuvastatin, carotegrast, and bromfenac followed by OATP inhibition in monkeys

The impact of organic anion‐transporting polypeptide (OATP) inhibition on systemic and liver exposures of three OATP substrates was investigated in cynomolgus monkeys. A monkey physiologically‐based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was constructed to describe the exposure changes followed by OATP functional attenuation. Rosuvastatin, bromfenac, and carotegrast were administered as a single intravenous cassette dose (0.5 mg/kg each) in monkeys with and without predosing with rifampin (RIF; 20 mg/kg) orally. The plasma exposure of rosuvastatin, bromfenac, carotegrast, and OATP biomarkers, coproporphyrin I (CP‐I) and CP‐III were increased 2.3, 2.1, 9.1, 5.4, and 8.8‐fold, respectively, when compared to the vehicle group. The liver to plasma ratios of rosuvastatin and bromfenac were reduced but the liver concentration of the drugs remained unchanged by RIF treatment. The liver concentrations of carotegrast, CP‐I, and CP‐III were unchanged at 1 h but increased at 6 h in the RIF‐treated group. The passive permeability, active uptake, and biliary excretion were characterized in suspended and sandwich‐cultured monkey hepatocytes and then incorporated into the monkey PBPK model. As demonstrated by the PBPK model, the plasma exposure is increased through OATP inhibition while liver exposure is maintained by passive permeability driven from an elevated plasma level. Liver exposure is sensitive to the changes of metabolism and biliary clearances. The model further suggested the involvement of additional mechanisms for hepatic uptakes of rosuvastatin and bromfenac, and of the inhibition of biliary excretion for carotegrast, CP‐I, and CP‐III by RIF. Collectively, impaired OATP function would not reduce the liver exposure of its substrates in monkeys.

Targeting Immune Cell Trafficking - Insights From Research Models and Implications for Future IBD Therapy

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), including Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) are multifactorial diseases with still unknown aetiology and an increasing prevalence and incidence worldwide. Despite plentiful therapeutic options for IBDs, the lack or loss of response in certain patients demands the development of further treatments to tackle this unmet medical need. In recent years, the success of the anti-α4β7 antibody vedolizumab highlighted the potential of targeting the homing of immune cells, which is now an important pillar of IBD therapy. Due to its complexity, leukocyte trafficking and the involved molecules offer a largely untapped resource for a plethora of potential therapeutic interventions. In this review, we aim to summarise current and future directions of specifically interfering with immune cell trafficking. We will comment on concepts of homing, retention and recirculation and particularly focus on the role of tissue-derived chemokines. Moreover, we will give an overview of the mode of action of drugs currently in use or still in the pipeline, highlighting their mechanisms and potential to reduce disease burden.

AJM300, a novel oral antagonist of α4-integrin, sustains an increase in circulating lymphocytes: A randomised controlled trial in healthy male subjects

Aims

AJM300 is an oral antagonist of α4‐integrin that reduces inflammation by blocking leucocyte trafficking. This study aimed to investigate safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of AJM300 in healthy male subjects.

Methods

A total of 23 subjects were randomised to receive 240 mg (n = 6), 480 mg (n = 5), 960 mg (n = 6) of AJM300 or the corresponding placebo (n = 2 per group). The study drugs were taken orally 3 times daily after each meal on the first day followed by a 4‐day washout period. Thereafter, multiple‐dose administration was conducted for 6 consecutive days. The pharmacokinetic parameters of AJM300 and its active metabolite (HCA2969) were assessed, and total white blood cells and the differential cell count were used to determine the pharmacodynamic effects. Adverse events (AEs) were also monitored.

Results

The plasma AJM300 and HCA2969 concentration–time curves displayed a triphasic pattern on Day 1 (single‐day administration) and Day 10 (last day of multiple dosing), whereas the concentration of HCA2969 was much higher than that of AJM300. A significant but transient increase in lymphocyte count was observed after AJM300 dosing at all dosages tested compared with the placebo. The increase was sustained over a 24‐h period only at the 960‐mg dosage. In particular, a significant increase in the lymphocyte count compared to placebo (mean, 50.58%; 95% confidence intervals, 20.40–80.76) was observed at the first 960‐mg dose on Day 10. Six (26.1%) subjects reported ≥1 AEs, all of which were mild and resolved spontaneously.

Conclusion

The maximal and 24‐h sustained pharmacodynamic effects were demonstrated at the 960‐mg dosage after oral administration of AJM300 3 times daily for 6 days, which was also found to be safe and well tolerated.

Food Effect on a Single High Dose of Carotegrast Methyl, an Oral Antagonist of α4-Integrin, in Healthy Male Subjects: A Randomised, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study

Background and Objectives

Carotegrast methyl, a novel prodrug, oral antagonist of α4-integrin, is in development for the treatment of active ulcerative colitis. This randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover study evaluated the effect of food on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics as well as the safety profile after a single dose of carotegrast methyl in healthy male subjects.

Methods

Subjects were randomised to receive a single dose of carotegrast methyl (240, 480 or 960 mg) or placebo in a 6:2 ratio and received the study drug under both fed and fasted conditions separated by an 8-day washout. The pharmacokinetic profiles of carotegrast methyl and its active metabolite, carotegrast, were assessed. The pharmacodynamic profile was evaluated according to a change in the peripheral lymphocyte count. Safety was monitored throughout.

Results

Based on the area under the time curve from zero to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUC_last), food reduced systemic exposure to both carotegrast methyl and carotegrast by 21–57% and 5–29%, respectively. The fed-to-fasted ratio of least square means for the increase in the lymphocyte count was almost at unity in each dose, indicating no food effect on pharmacodynamics. The time  ≥ 90% of maximum effect was prolonged dose dependently, suggesting that a 960 mg-dose can provide a long-lasting effect. Reported adverse events were all mild.

Conclusions

Despite the reduced systemic exposure to both carotegrast methyl and carotegrast, food had no effect on the increase in lymphocyte count. A single administration of carotegrast methyl up to 960 mg was found to be safe.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s40261-019-00879-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.