Randomized study of the effect of gadopiclenol, a new gadolinium-based contrast agent, on the QTc interval in healthy subjects

A Comprehensive Overview of the Efficacy and Safety of Gadopiclenol: A New Contrast Agent for MRI of the CNS and Body

ABSTRACT

This review describes the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of gadopiclenol, a new macrocyclic gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration at the dose of 0.05 mmol/kg. Gadopiclenol is a high relaxivity contrast agent that shares similar pharmacokinetic characteristics with other macrocyclic GBCAs, including a predominant renal excretion. In pediatric patients aged 2-17 years, the pharmacokinetic parameters (assessed through a population pharmacokinetics model) were comparable to those observed in adults, indicating no need for age-based dose adjustment. For contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the central nervous system (CNS) and body indications, gadopiclenol at 0.05 mmol/kg was shown to be noninferior to gadobutrol at 0.1 mmol/kg in terms of 3 lesion visualization parameters (ie, lesion border delineation, internal morphology, and contrast enhancement). Moreover, for contrast-enhanced MRI of the CNS, compared with gadobenate dimeglumine at 0.1 mmol/kg, gadopiclenol exhibited superior contrast-to-noise ratio at 0.1 mmol/kg and comparable contrast-to-noise ratio at 0.05 mmol/kg. A pooled safety analysis of 1047 participants showed a favorable safety profile for gadopiclenol. Comparative studies showed that the incidence and nature of adverse drug reactions with gadopiclenol were comparable to those observed with other GBCAs. Importantly, no significant safety concerns were identified in pediatric and elderly patients, as well as in patients with renal impairment. Overall, these findings support the clinical utility and safety of gadopiclenol for MRI in adult and pediatric patients aged 2 years and older in CNS and body indications.

Preclinical Safety Assessment of Gadopiclenol: A High-Relaxivity Macrocyclic Gadolinium-Based MRI Contrast Agent

OBJECTIVE

Gadopiclenol is a new high-relaxivity macrocyclic gadolinium-based contrast agent for magnetic resonance imaging of the central nervous system and other body regions. The product has been approved by US Food and Drug Administration and is currently being evaluated by European Medicines Agency. For risk assessment of the single diagnostic use in humans, the safety profile of gadopiclenol was evaluated with a series of preclinical studies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

With exception of dose-ranging studies, all safety pharmacology and toxicology studies were performed in compliance with Good Laboratory Practice principles. Safety pharmacology studies were conducted to assess potential effects on cardiovascular (in vitro and in dogs), respiratory (in rats and guinea pigs), neurological (in rats), and renal endpoints (in rats). Toxicology studies were also performed to investigate acute toxicity (in rats and mice), extended single-dose (in rats and dogs) and repeated-dose toxicity (in rats and dogs), reproductive (in rats), developmental (in rats and rabbits) and juvenile toxicity (in rats), as well as genotoxicity (in vitro and in rats), local tolerance (in rabbits), potential immediate hypersensitivity (in guinea pigs), and potential tissue retention of gadolinium (in rats).

RESULTS

Safety pharmacology studies conducted at high intravenous (IV) doses showed a satisfactory tolerance of gadopiclenol in the main body systems. After either single or repeated IV dosing (14 and 28 days) in rats and dogs, gadopiclenol was well tolerated even at high doses. The no-observed-adverse-effect level values (ie, the highest experimental dose without adverse effects) representing between 8 times in rats and 44 times in dogs (based on the exposure), the exposure achieved in humans at the intended diagnostic dose, provide a high safety margin. No or only minor and reversible effects on body weight, food consumption, clinical signs, clinical pathology parameters, or histology were observed at the highest doses. The main histological finding consists in renal tubular vacuolations (exacerbated after repeated exposure), which supports a well-known finding for this class of compounds that has no physiological consequence on kidney function. Reproductive toxicity studies showed no evidence of effects on reproductive performance, fertility, perinatal and postnatal development in rats, or reproductive development in rats or rabbits. The safety profile of gadopiclenol in juvenile rats was satisfactory like in adults. Gadopiclenol was not genotoxic in vitro in the Ames test, a mouse lymphoma assay, and a rat in vivo micronucleus test. There were no signs of local intolerance at the injection site after IV and intra-arterial administration in rabbits. However, because of minor signs of intolerance after perivenous administration, misadministration must be avoided. Gadopiclenol exhibited no signs of potential to induce immediate hypersensitivity in guinea pigs.

CONCLUSIONS

High safety margins were observed between the single diagnostic dose of 0.05 mmol/kg in humans and the doses showing effects in animal studies. Gadopiclenol is, therefore, well tolerated in various species (mice, rats, dogs, rabbits, and guinea pigs). All observed preclinical data support the clinical approval.

Update on Gadolinium Based Contrast Agent Safety, From the AJR Special Series on Contrast Media

Since its introduction 35 years ago, gadolinium-enhanced MRI has fundamentally changed medical practice. While extraordinarily safe, gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) may have side effects. Four distinct safety considerations include: acute allergic-like reactions, nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF), gadolinium deposition, and symptoms associated with gadolinium exposure. Acute reactions after GBCA administration are uncommon-far less than with iodinated contrast agents-and, while rare, serious reactions can occur. NSF is a rare, but serious, scleroderma-like condition occurring in patients with kidney failure after exposure to American College of Radiology (ACR) Group 1 GBCAs. Group 2 and 3 GBCAs are considered lower risk, and, through their use, NSF has largely been eliminated. Unrelated to NSF, retention of trace amounts of gadolinium in the brain and other organs has been recognized for over a decade. Deposition occurs with all agents, although linear agents appear to deposit more than macrocyclic agents. Importantly, to date, no data demonstrate any adverse biologic or clinical effects from gadolinium deposition, even with normal kidney function. This article summarizes the latest safety evidence of commercially available GBCAs with a focus on new agents, discusses updates to the ACR NSF GBCA safety classification, and describes approaches for strengthening the evidence needed for regulatory decisions.

Review of the Efficacy and Safety of Gadopiclenol: A Newly Emerging Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agent

Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) are one of the most commonly used agents in magnetic resonance imaging. Gadopiclenol is a new GBCA aimed at providing improved diagnostic efficacy with a favorable safety profile. The proposed advantages are due to its specific pharmacological properties, one of which is high relaxivity values. The aim of this review is to assess the efficacy, diagnostic accuracy, and safety of gadopiclenol in comparison to other currently used gadolinium-based contrast agents. PubMed and other database systems were used to identify relevant studies. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were followed, resulting in 10 articles that were included in the review. The outcomes were reviewed according to several factors regarding efficacy and accuracy in terms of qualitative and quantitative descriptors relative to properties of enhancement provided by the contrast agent. In terms of safety profile, a number of outcomes were assessed such as the occurrence of serious adverse effects, severe kidney injury, and organ-based contrast retention. Gadopiclenol was found to provide outcomes comparable to other commonly used GBCAs at lower doses with further favorable results at higher doses while maintaining an acceptable safety profile. However, it was found to have high rates of retention within the liver and can cause nonsignificant QT prolongation in healthy individuals, which arguably creates the need for further research regarding more long-term implications of these possible adverse effects.

Design of Bifunctional Pyclen-Based Lanthanide Luminescent Bioprobes for Targeted Two-Photon Imaging

In the past, Lanthanide Luminescent Bioprobes (LLBs) based on pyclen-bearing π-extended picolinate antennas were synthesized and demonstrated well-adapted optical properties for biphotonic microscopy. The objective of this work is to develop a strategy to design bifunctional analogues of the previously studied LLBs presenting an additional reactive chemical group to allow their coupling to biological vectors to reach deep in vivo targeted two-photon bioimaging. Herein, we elaborated a synthetic scheme allowing the introduction of a primary amine on the para position of the macrocyclic pyridine unit. The photophysical and bioimaging studies demonstrate that the introduction of the reactive function does not alter the luminescent properties of the LLBs paving the way for further applications.

Efficacy and Safety of Half-Dose Gadopiclenol versus Full-Dose Gadobutrol for Contrast-enhanced Body MRI

Background Gadopiclenol is a macrocyclic gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) with higher relaxivity compared with standard GBCAs, potentially allowing gadolinium dose reduction without decreasing efficacy. Purpose To investigate whether gadopiclenol at 0.05 mmol/kg is noninferior to gadobutrol at 0.1 mmol/kg for lesion visualization in body MRI. Materials and Methods A randomized, double-blind, crossover, phase 3 study was conducted between August 2019 and December 2020 at 33 centers in 11 countries. Adults with at least one suspected focal lesion in one of three different body regions (head and neck; breast, thorax, abdomen, or pelvis; or musculoskeletal system) underwent two contrast-enhanced MRI examinations, randomized to start with either gadopiclenol or gadobutrol. MRI examinations were read by three blinded expert readers for each respective body region. Readers rated border delineation, internal morphologic characteristics, and visual contrast enhancement. Three additional blinded readers assessed reader preference. For safety analysis, adverse events were recorded. The differences between gadopiclenol- and gadobutrol-enhanced MRI in terms of lesion visualization were analyzed with a generalized linear mixed model using a two-sided paired t test. Results Among 273 participants (mean age, 57 years ± 13 [SD]; 162 women) who underwent both gadopiclenol- and gadobutrol-enhanced MRI and had at least one correlating lesion, 260 participants without major protocol deviations were analyzed for noninferiority. Gadopiclenol was noninferior to gadobutrol for all qualitative visualization parameters and for all readers (lower limit 95% CI of the difference of at least -0.10, which was above the noninferiority margin [-0.35]; P < .001). For most participants (75%-83% [206-228 of 276]), readers reported no preference between gadopiclenol- and gadobutrol-enhanced images. Adverse events did not differ in frequency, intensity, type, or association with GBCA injection (12 of 288 participants receiving gadopiclenol and 16 of 290 receiving gadobutrol). Conclusion Gadopiclenol at 0.05 mmol/kg was comparable with gadobutrol at 0.1 mmol/kg for lesion evaluation at contrast-enhanced body MRI and had a similar safety profile. Clinical trial registration no. NCT03986138 Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Bashir and Thomas in this issue.

Efficacy and Safety of Gadopiclenol for Contrast-Enhanced MRI of the Central Nervous System: The PICTURE Randomized Clinical Trial

OBJECTIVES

Developing new high relaxivity gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) allowing dose reduction while maintaining similar diagnostic efficacy is needed, especially in the context of gadolinium retention in tissues. This study aimed to demonstrate that contrast-enhanced MRI of the central nervous system (CNS) with gadopiclenol at 0.05 mmol/kg is not inferior to gadobutrol at 0.1 mmol/kg, and superior to unenhanced MRI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PICTURE is an international, randomized, double-blinded, controlled, cross-over, phase III study, conducted between June 2019 and September 2020. Adult patients with CNS lesions were randomized to undergo 2 MRIs (interval, 2-14 days) with gadopiclenol (0.05 mmol/kg) then gadobutrol (0.1 mmol/kg) or vice versa. The primary criterion was lesion visualization based on 3 parameters (border delineation, internal morphology, and contrast enhancement), assessed by 3 off-site blinded readers. Key secondary outcomes included lesion-to-background ratio, enhancement percentage, contrast-to-noise ratio, overall diagnostic preference, and adverse events.

RESULTS

Of the 256 randomized patients, 250 received at least 1 GBCA administration (mean [SD] age, 57.2 [13.8] years; 53.6% women). The statistical noninferiority of gadopiclenol (0.05 mmol/kg) to gadobutrol (0.1 mmol/kg) was achieved for all parameters and all readers (n = 236, lower limit 95% confidence interval of the difference ≥-0.06, above the noninferiority margin [-0.35], P < 0.0001), as well as its statistical superiority over unenhanced images (n = 239, lower limit 95% confidence interval of the difference ≥1.29, P < 0.0001).Enhancement percentage and lesion-to-background ratio were higher with gadopiclenol for all readers ( P < 0.0001), and contrast-to-noise ratio was higher for 2 readers ( P = 0.02 and P < 0.0001). Three blinded readers preferred images with gadopiclenol for 44.8%, 54.4%, and 57.3% of evaluations, reported no preference for 40.7%, 21.6%, and 23.2%, and preferred images with gadobutrol for 14.5%, 24.1%, and 19.5% ( P < 0.001).Adverse events reported after MRI were similar for gadopiclenol (14.6% of patients) and gadobutrol (17.6%). Adverse events considered related to gadopiclenol (4.9%) and gadobutrol (6.9%) were mainly injection site reactions, and none was serious.

CONCLUSIONS

Gadopiclenol at 0.05 mmol/kg is not inferior to gadobutrol at 0.1 mmol/kg for MRI of the CNS, confirming that gadopiclenol can be used at half the gadolinium dose used for other GBCAs to achieve similar clinical efficacy.

Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Efficacy of Gadopiclenol in Pediatric Patients Aged 2 to 17 Years

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile, safety, and efficacy of gadopiclenol, a new high-relaxivity gadolinium-based contrast agent, in children aged 2 to 17 years.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Children scheduled to undergo contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the central nervous system (CNS cohort) or other organs (body cohort) were included sequentially into 3 age groups (12-17, 7-11, and 2-6 years). Gadopiclenol was administered at the dose of 0.05 mmol/kg. A sparse sampling approach was applied, with 4 blood samples per child collected up to 8 hours postinjection. Population PK modeling was used for the analysis, including the CNS cohort and adult subjects from a previous study. Adverse events were recorded, and efficacy was assessed for all children.

RESULTS

Eighty children were included, 60 in the CNS cohort and 20 in the body cohort. The 2-compartment model with linear elimination from the central compartment developed in adults was also suitable for children. Pharmacokinetic parameters were very similar between adults and children. Terminal elimination half-life was 1.82 hours for adults and 1.77 to 1.29 hours for age groups 12-17 to 2-6 years. The median clearance ranged from 0.08 L/h/kg in adults and 12-17 years to 0.12 L/h/kg in 2-6 years. The median central and peripheral volumes of distribution were 0.11 to 0.12 L/kg and 0.06 L/kg, respectively, for both adults and children. Simulations of plasma concentrations showed minor differences, and median area under the curve was 590 mg·h/L for adults and 582 to 403 mg·h/L for children. Two patients (2.5%) experienced nonserious adverse events considered related to gadopiclenol: a mild QT interval prolongation and a moderate maculopapular rash. Despite the limited number of patients, this study showed that gadopiclenol improved lesion detection, visualization, and diagnostic confidence.

CONCLUSIONS

The PK profile of gadopiclenol in children aged 2 to 17 years was similar to that observed in adults. Thus, there is no indication for age-based dose adaptation, and comparable plasma gadopiclenol concentrations are predicted to be achieved with body weight-based dosing in this population. Gadopiclenol at 0.05 mmol/kg seems to have a good safety profile in these patients and could improve lesion detection and visualization, therefore providing better diagnostic confidence.

How the Chemical Properties of GBCAs Influence Their Safety Profiles In Vivo

The extracellular class of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) is an essential tool for clinical diagnosis and disease management. In order to better understand the issues associated with GBCA administration and gadolinium retention and deposition in the human brain, the chemical properties of GBCAs such as relative thermodynamic and kinetic stabilities and their likelihood of forming gadolinium deposits in vivo will be reviewed. The chemical form of gadolinium causing the hyperintensity is an open question. On the basis of estimates of total gadolinium concentration present, it is highly unlikely that the intact chelate is causing the T1 hyperintensities observed in the human brain. Although it is possible that there is a water-soluble form of gadolinium that has high relaxitvity present, our experience indicates that the insoluble gadolinium-based agents/salts could have high relaxivities on the surface of the solid due to higher water access. This review assesses the safety of GBCAs from a chemical point of view based on their thermodynamic and kinetic properties, discusses how these properties influence in vivo behavior, and highlights some clinical implications regarding the development of future imaging agents.

Safety and Gadolinium Distribution of the New High-Relaxivity Gadolinium Chelate Gadopiclenol in a Rat Model of Severe Renal Failure

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the toxicological profile of gadopiclenol, a new high-relaxivity macrocyclic gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA), in renally impaired rats, in comparison with 2 other macrocyclic GBCAs, gadoterate meglumine and gadobutrol, and 1 linear and nonionic GBCA, gadodiamide.

METHODS

Renal failure was induced by adding 0.75% wt/wt adenine to the diet for 3 weeks. During the second week of adenine-enriched diet, the animals (n = 8/group × 5 groups) received 5 consecutive intravenous injections of GBCA at 2.5 mmol/kg per injection, resulting in a cumulative dose of 12.5 mmol/kg or saline followed by a 3-week treatment-free period after the last injection. The total (elemental) gadolinium (Gd) concentration in different tissues (brain, cerebellum, femoral epiphysis, liver, skin, heart, kidney, spleen, plasma, urine, and feces) was measured by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Transmission electron microscopy (and electron energy loss spectroscopy analysis of metallic deposits) was used to investigate the presence and localization of Gd deposits in the skin. Relaxometry was used to evaluate the presence of dissociated Gd in the skin, liver, and bone. Skin histopathology was performed to investigate the presence of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis-like lesions.

RESULTS

Gadodiamide administrations were associated with high morbidity-mortality but also with macroscopic and microscopic skin lesions in renally impaired rats. No such effects were observed with gadopiclenol, gadoterate, or gadobutrol. Overall, elemental Gd concentrations were significantly higher in gadodiamide-treated rats than in rats treated with the other GBCAs for all tissues except the liver (where no significant difference was found with gadopiclenol) and the kidney and the heart (where statistically similar Gd concentrations were observed for all GBCAs). No plasma biochemical abnormalities were observed with gadopiclenol or the control GBCAs. Histopathology revealed a normal skin structure in the rats treated with gadopiclenol, gadoterate, and gadobutrol, contrary to those treated with gadodiamide. No evidence of Gd deposits on collagen fibers and inclusions in fibroblasts was found with gadopiclenol and its macrocyclic controls, unlike with gadodiamide. Animals of all test groups had Gd-positive lysosomal inclusions in the dermal macrophages. However, the textures differed for the different products (speckled texture for gadodiamide and rough-textured appearance for the 2 tested macrocyclic GBCAs).

CONCLUSIONS

No evidence of biochemical toxicity or pathological abnormalities of the skin was observed, and similar to other macrocyclic GBCAs, gadoterate and gadobutrol, tissue retention of Gd was found to be low (except in the liver) in renally impaired rats treated with the new high-relaxivity GBCA gadopiclenol.

Pharmacokinetics, Dialysability, and Safety of Gadopiclenol, a New Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agent, in Patients With Impaired Renal Function

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of gadopiclenol, a new macrocyclic gadolinium based-contrast agent, in subjects with impaired renal function, and to assess its dialysability in subjects with end-stage renal disease (ESRD).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This 2-center, open-label, phase 1 study included 5 successive cohorts of 8 adult subjects: healthy subjects (cohort 1), subjects with mild (cohort 2), moderate (cohort 3), severe (cohort 4) renal impairment, or ESRD (cohort 5), who received a single intravenous injection of gadopiclenol (0.1 mmol/kg). Blood and urine samples were collected at different time points in cohorts 1 to 4, and blood and dialysate samples were collected at each hemodialysis session (4-hour session on day 1, day 3, and day 5) in cohort 5. Gadopiclenol elimination and safety were assessed for up to 6 months. Pharmacokinetics parameters were calculated using noncompartmental analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 40 subjects were included, with a mean age of 51.5 years (range, 18-71 years). No significant difference in the mean maximum concentration values and the distribution volume was observed among cohorts 1 to 4. Urinary excretion of unchanged gadopiclenol was delayed with the degree of renal impairment and ranged between 96% and 84% in subjects with mild to severe renal impairment. Compared with that of healthy subjects, the mean area under the plasma concentration curve was 54%, 148%, and 769% higher in subjects with mild, moderate, or severe renal impairment, respectively. The mean terminal half-life was prolonged with the degree of renal impairment (1.9, 3.3, 3.8, and 11.7 hours for cohorts 1-4). In ESRD subjects, gadopiclenol was effectively removed from the plasma (95% to 98%) after the first hemodialysis session. Gadopiclenol concentration in plasma was below the limit of quantification for all subjects after the second hemodialysis session. Gadopiclenol concentration was below limit of quantification in all plasma and urine samples collected at 1, 3, and 6 months. Five subjects (12.5%) experienced adverse events related to gadopiclenol, none serious and all resolved. Laboratory measurements, vital signs, and electrocardiography did not raise any safety concern.

CONCLUSIONS

Gadopiclenol elimination half-life was prolonged in subjects with mild to severe renal impairment, yet its renal clearance remains complete or nearly complete. In ESRD subjects, gadopiclenol was effectively removed from the plasma after 1 hemodialysis session, and up to 3 hemodialysis sessions were sufficient to completely clear it. No safety concern was raised. Therefore, no dose adjustment seems necessary in this patient population.

Randomized study of the effect of gadopiclenol, a new gadolinium-based contrast agent, on the QTc interval in healthy subjects

AIMS

We investigated the effect of gadopiclenol, a new gadolinium-based contrast agent, on the QTc interval at clinical and supraclinical dose, considering the relative hyperosmolarity of this product.

METHODS

This was a single centre, randomized, double-blind, placebo- and positive-controlled, 4-way crossover study. Forty-eight healthy male and female subjects were included to receive single intravenous (i.v.) administrations of gadopiclenol at the clinical dose of 0.1 mmol kg^-1 , standard for current gadolinium-based contrast agents, the supraclinical dose of 0.3 mmol kg^-1 , placebo and a single oral dose of 400 mg moxifloxacin.

RESULTS

The largest time-matched placebo-corrected, mean change from-baseline in QTcF (ΔΔQTcF) was observed 3 hours after administration of 0.1 mmol kg^-1 gadopiclenol (2.39 ms, 90% confidence interval [CI]: 0.35, 4.43 ms) and 5 minutes after administration of 0.3 mmol kg^-1 (4.81 ms, 90%CI: 2.84, 6.78 ms). The upper limit of the 90% CI was under the threshold of 10 ms, demonstrating no significant effect of gadopiclenol on QTc interval. From 1.5 to 4 hours postdose moxifloxacin, the lower limit of the 90% CI of ΔΔQTcF exceeded 5 ms demonstrating assay sensitivity. Although there was a positive slope, the concentration-response analysis estimated that the values of ΔΔQTcF at the maximal concentration of gadopiclenol at 0.1 and 0.3 mmol kg^-1 were 0.41 and 2.23 ms, respectively, with the upper limit of the 90% CI not exceeding 10 ms. No serious or severe adverse events or treatment discontinuations due to adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSION

This thorough QT/QTc study demonstrated that gadopiclenol did not prolong the QT interval at clinical and supraclinical doses and was well tolerated in healthy volunteers. The positive slope of the QTc prolongation vs concentration relationship suggests that hyperosmolarity could be associated with QTc prolongation. However, the amplitude of this effects is unlikely to be associated with proarrhythmia.