Influence of allopurinol on thiopurine associated toxicity: A retrospective population-based cohort study

Letter: Thioguanine, an underutilised option in inflammatory bowel disease?

This article is linked to Vasudevan et al papers. To view these articles, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.17831 and https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.17957

Prognostic factors for liver, blood and kidney adverse events from glucocorticoid sparing immune-suppressing drugs in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: a prognostic systematic review

BACKGROUND

Immune-suppressing drugs can cause liver, kidney or blood toxicity. Prognostic factors for these adverse-events are poorly understood.

PURPOSE

To ascertain prognostic factors associated with liver, blood or kidney adverse-events in people receiving immune-suppressing drugs.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, Web of Science, EMBASE and the Cochrane library (01 January 1995 to 05 January 2023), and supplementary sources.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Data were extracted by one reviewer using a modified CHARMS-PF checklist and validated by another. Two independent reviewers assessed risk of bias using Quality in Prognostic factor Studies tool and assessed the quality of evidence using a Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation-informed framework.

RESULTS

Fifty-six studies from 58 papers were included. High-quality evidence of the following associations was identified: elevated liver enzymes (6 studies) and folate non-supplementation (3 studies) are prognostic factors for hepatotoxicity in those treated with methotrexate; that mercaptopurine (vs azathioprine) (3 studies) was a prognostic factor for hepatotoxicity in those treated with thiopurines; that mercaptopurine (vs azathioprine) (3 studies) and poor-metaboliser status (4 studies) were prognostic factors for cytopenia in those treated with thiopurines; and that baseline elevated liver enzymes (3 studies) are a prognostic factor for hepatotoxicity in those treated with anti-tumour necrosis factors. Moderate and low quality evidence for several other demographic, lifestyle, comorbidities, baseline bloods/serologic or treatment-related prognostic factors were also identified.

LIMITATIONS

Studies published before 1995, those with less than 200 participants and not published in English were excluded. Heterogeneity between studies included different cut-offs for prognostic factors, use of different outcome definitions and different adjustment factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Prognostic factors for target-organ damage were identified which may be further investigated for their potential role in targeted (risk-stratified) monitoring.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42020208049.

Current status and future perspectives on the use of therapeutic drug monitoring of thiopurine metabolites in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

INTRODUCTION

Despite new treatment options for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), conventional thiopurines remain a common treatment option for maintaining remission, particularly in non-Westernized countries. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is advised in standard care for optimizing therapy strategies to improve effectiveness, reveal nonadherence and reduce toxicity. Still, the rationale of TDM is debated.

AREAS COVERED

Key insights on TDM of thiopurine metabolites are discussed. The pharmacology of thiopurines is described, emphasizing the interindividual differences in pharmacogenetics, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Pharmacological differences between conventional thiopurines and tioguanine are outlined. Finally, several optimization strategies for thiopurine therapy in IBD are discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

TDM has been a useful, but limited, tool to individualize thiopurine therapy. Pharmacokinetic data on the active thiopurine metabolites, derived from measurements in erythrocytes, associated with clinical response only partially predict effectiveness and toxicity. An additional pharmacodynamic marker, such as Rac1/pSTAT3 expression in leukocytes, may improve applicability of TDM in the future.

Influence of allopurinol on thiopurine associated toxicity: A retrospective population-based cohort study

Aims

Thiopurines are important for treating inflammatory bowel disease, but are often discontinued due to adverse effects. Concomitant use of allopurinol might lower the risk of these unwanted effects, but large studies in the general population are lacking. The aims of this study were to evaluate rates of hepatotoxicity, myelotoxicity, pancreas toxicity and therapy persistence in adult thiopurine users with or without allopurinol.

Methods

A retrospective population‐based cohort study was conducted within current thiopurine users (Clinical Practice Research Datalink). Among these patients, co‐use of allopurinol was compared to non‐use. Hazard ratios (HRs) for hepatotoxicity, myelotoxicity and pancreatitis were derived using time‐dependent Cox proportional hazards models, and were adjusted for potential confounders. Persistence of thiopurine use was evaluated using Log‐rank statistics.

Results

Patients using thiopurines (n = 37 360) were identified of which 1077 were concomitantly taking allopurinol. A 58% decreased risk of hepatotoxicity was observed in those concomitantly taking allopurinol (HR 0.42; 95% CI 0.30–0.60; NNT 46). Rate of myelotoxicity (HR 0.96; 95% CI 0.89–1.03) was not influenced. Risk of pancreatitis was increased (HR 3.00; 95% CI 1.01–8.93; NNH 337), but was only seen in those with active gout (suggesting confounding by indication). Finally, allopurinol co‐users were able to maintain thiopurine therapy over twice as long as those not on allopurinol (3.9 years vs. 1.8 years, P < 0.0001).

Conclusion

In thiopurine users, allopurinol is associated with a 58% reduced risk of hepatotoxicity. In addition, thiopurine persistence was prolonged by 2.1 years in allopurinol users. These data support the use of allopurinol in individuals requiring thiopurine therapy.