Joint modelling and simulation of M-protein dynamics and progression-free survival for alternative isatuximab dosing with pomalidomide/dexamethasone

Model-based simulation to support the approval of isatuximab alone or with dexamethasone for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in Japanese patients

This study aimed to support dosing regimen selection for isatuximab as a single agent or in combination with dexamethasone for Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). A joint model characterizing the dynamics of serum M-protein kinetics and its association with progression-free survival (PFS) was developed using data from 201 evaluable Japanese and non-Japanese patients with RRMM enrolled in two monotherapy phase I/II trials, where Japanese patients (n = 31) received isatuximab at 10 or 20 mg/kg once weekly (qw) for 4 weeks then every 2 weeks (q2w) in subsequent cycles (10 or 20 mg/kg qw-q2w). Among non-Japanese patients, 38 received isatuximab 20 mg/kg qw-q2w in combination with dexamethasone. Trial simulations were then performed to evaluate the effect of the isatuximab dosing regimens on both serum M-protein and PFS with and without dexamethasone. The model identified instantaneous changes in serum M-protein as the best on-treatment predictor for PFS. Trial simulations demonstrated that 20 mg/kg qw-q2w induced a greater decrease (30% vs. 22%) of serum M-protein at week 8 and prolonged median PFS by 2.4 weeks compared with 10 mg/kg qw-q2w. Although Japanese patients did not receive isatuximab plus dexamethasone in the phase I/II trial, simulations predicted that isatuximab 20 mg/kg qw-q2w plus dexamethasone would induce a greater decrease (67% vs. 43%) of serum M-protein and a prolonged median PFS by 7.2 weeks compared with isatuximab alone. Trial simulations support the approved isatuximab 20 mg/kg qw-q2w regimen when administered as a single agent and in combination with dexamethasone in Japanese patients.

Efficacy and safety of isatuximab plus bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma ineligible/with no immediate intent for autologous stem cell transplantation

Patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) ineligible for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) have lower survival rates and may benefit from frontline regimens that include novel agents. This Phase 1b study (NCT02513186) evaluated preliminary efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of isatuximab, an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody, combined with bortezomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (Isa-VRd) in patients with NDMM ineligible for/with no intent for immediate ASCT. Overall, 73 patients received four 6-week induction cycles of Isa-VRd, then maintenance with Isa-Rd in 4-week cycles. In the efficacy population (n = 71), the overall response rate was 98.6%, with 56.3% achieving a complete response or better (sCR/CR), and 36/71 (50.7%) patients reaching minimal residual disease negativity (10-5 sensitivity). Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 79.5% (58/73) of patients but TEAEs leading to permanent study treatment discontinuation were reported in 14 (19.2%) patients. Isatuximab PK parameters were within the previously reported range, suggesting that VRd does not alter the PK of isatuximab. These data support additional studies of isatuximab in NDMM, such as the Phase 3 IMROZ study (Isa-VRd vs VRd).

Population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic joint modeling of ixazomib efficacy and safety using data from the pivotal phase III TOURMALINE‐MM1 study in multiple myeloma patients

Ixazomib is an oral proteasome inhibitor approved in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Approval in the United States, Europe, and additional countries was based on results from the phase III TOURMALINE‐MM1 (C16010) study. Here, joint population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic time‐to‐event (TTE) and discrete time Markov models were developed to describe key safety (rash and diarrhea events, and platelet counts) and efficacy (myeloma protein [M‐protein] and progression‐free survival [PFS]) outcomes observed in TOURMALINE‐MM1. Models reliably described observed safety and efficacy results; prior immunomodulatory drug therapy and race were significant covariates for diarrhea and rash events, respectively, whereas M‐protein dynamics were sufficiently characterized using TTE models of relapse and dropout. Moreover, baseline M‐protein was identified as a significant covariate for observed PFS. The developed framework represents an integrated approach to describing safety and efficacy with MM therapy, enabling the simulation of prospective trials and potential alternate dosing regimens.