Who prescribes quetiapine in Denmark?

Minor tranquillizers for short-term treatment of newly onset symptoms of anxiety and distress: a systematic review with network meta-analysis of randomized trials

Unspecific symptoms of anxiety and distress are frequently encountered in patients in both general practice and acute psychiatric services. Minor tranquillizers may be a treatment option when non-pharmacological interventions are insufficient or unavailable. We conducted a systematic review with network meta-analysis of the evidence for short-term (1-4 weeks) pharmacological treatment of newly onset symptoms of anxiety and distress. We searched the PsycInfo, MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases and extracted data following a predefined hierarchy of outcomes. We assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and the certainty of the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework (GRADE). We included 34 randomized trials comprising a total of 7044 patients with adjustment disorders or anxiety spectrum disorders. The network meta-analysis showed that regarding the critical outcome symptoms of anxiety within 1-4 weeks benzodiazepines (SMD - 0.58, 95% CI - 0.77 to - 0.40), quetiapine (SMD - 0.51, 95% CI - 0.90 to - 0.13) and pregabalin (SMD - 0.58, 95% CI - 0.87 to - 0.28) all performed better than placebo with no statistically significant difference between the drugs. Data on other important outcomes were inconsistently reported. Adverse effects varied, but overall, it was uncertain whether adverse effects differed between interventions. The evidence regarding the risk of dependence was uncertain, but dependence may be a concern in susceptible individuals even with short-term treatment. Overall, the certainty of the evidence according to GRADE was rated as low to very low across outcomes. Despite the limitations in the evidence, the results of this review can inform treatment guidelines, supporting clinicians in the choice of minor tranquillizer in this prevalent and help-seeking, clinically heterogeneous population.

Impact of low-dose quetiapine-use on glycosylated hemoglobin, triglyceride and cholesterol levels

OBJECTIVE

Quetiapine use at standard doses has been associated with hyperglycemia and dyslipidemia. However, whether even frequently prescribed low-dose quetiapine results in significant metabolic disturbances remains unclear. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the association between off-label, low-dose quetiapine and changes in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels/lipid parameters.

METHODS

We identified new users of low-dose quetiapine (≤50 mg tablets) in Denmark 2008-2018 with measurements of HbA1c, total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), or fasting triglycerides (fTG) within 365 days before and after quetiapine initiation. Mixed-effects linear regression models were used to estimate coefficients (β) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) for change in cardiometabolic parameters after quetiapine initiation. Inverse probability weighting was used to mitigate selection bias. Higher doses of quetiapine (>50 mg) were included in sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

Among 106,711 eligible new low-dose quetiapine users (median age = 45 years, females = 55%), low-dose quetiapine initiation was associated with increased fTG (β = 1.049[95%CI:1.027-1.072]) and decreased HDL-C (β = 0.982[0.978-0.986]). Although HbA1c did not change significantly and TC and LDL-C even decreased considering all subjects, all three metabolic parameters increased significantly among individuals with normal pre-quetiapine initiation levels. The adverse metabolic effect of quetiapine on HbA1c, TC, LDL-C, and HDL-C was dose-dependent, which was not the case for fTG.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose quetiapine was associated with a significant increase in fTG and decreases in HDL-C in all subjects, as well as with significant increases in HbA1c, TC, and LDL-C among those with normal baseline values. The risk of metabolic worsening with quetiapine was dose-dependent, except for fTG.

Characteristics and predictors of off-label use of antipsychotics in general population sample

OBJECTIVE

Increasing number of people have been prescribed antipsychotics (APs) off-label in recent decades. This study aimed to identify the characteristics and predictors of receiving prescription of antipsychotics off-label.

METHODS

The study sample was part of the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966 (n = 7071). Data included questionnaires and national register data. Information on prescribed medications was extracted from the national register. The sample was divided into three groups: Persons who had been prescribed APs off-label (n = 137), individuals with non-psychotic mental disorders without APs off label (n = 1478) and individuals who had been diagnosed with psychosis or bipolar disorder and who had been prescribed APs (n = 151). We compared sociodemographic, lifestyle and clinical characteristics between the off-label and the comparison groups using logistic regression.

RESULTS

The most common diagnoses in the off-label group were depression (n = 96, 70.1%) and anxiety (n = 55, 40.1%). Compared with individuals with non-psychotic mental disorders who were not prescribed APs off-label, individuals with prescribed off-label APs had a lower level of education, lower socioeconomic status, were less often married, had a higher level of somatic and psychiatric morbidity, were more often smokers and more often had a substance abuse disorder and heavy alcohol consumption. When comparing the off-label group to individuals with psychosis or bipolar disorder who used APs, there were less differences, though individuals with psychosis or bipolar disorder had more markers of morbidity and a lower level of education.

CONCLUSION

Individuals who had been prescribed APs off label had a higher level of mental and somatic morbidity and poorer socioeconomic status than individuals with non-psychotic mental disorders who did not use APs.