Safety of topical medications in the management of paediatric atopic dermatitis: An updated systematic review

An evaluation of the recently approved drugs for treating atopic dermatitis in the context of their safety and efficacy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The present paper aimed to conduct an updated systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the safety and efficacy of crisaborole, delgocitinib, and ruxolitinib in treating mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis (AD).

METHODS

MEDLINE and Google Scholar databases were utilized to search articles published during the years 2015-2024. The review was limited to randomized controlled studies that measured specific outcomes for safety and efficacy aspects, including adverse events (AEs) or treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) to evaluate safety and Investigator's static global assessment (ISGA) or improvement of at least 75% of Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75) to evaluate efficacy.

RESULTS

The review included 17 articles in the analysis. The safety odds ratios (ORs) among participants using crisaborole, delgocitinib, and ruxolitinib were 1.14, 95% CI [0.97-1.36], 1.18, 95% CI [0.84-1.67], and 0.72, 95% CI [0.55-0.94], respectively, when compared to control groups. The three studied topical AD treatments were found to be significantly more effective compared to control groups (crisaborole, OR = 1.78, 95% CI [1.51-2.10], delgocitinib, OR = 6.34, 95% CI [3.57-11.27], and ruxolitinib, OR = 7.30, 95% CI [5.10-10.44]).

CONCLUSION

Delgocitinib and ruxolitinib demonstrated favorable safety and effectiveness profiles across various age cohorts, whereas crisaborole raised concerns over its safety and efficacy, particularly in children.

Nonsteroidal Approaches for Atopic Dermatitis®: A Clinical Update

Topical corticosteroids (TCSs) are the most widely used treatment for atopic Dermatitis® (AD), but they can have adverse effects such as skin atrophy, telangiectasias, and hypopigmentation, especially with prolonged use of higher potency steroids. Many patients also have a fear of using TCSs, known as "corticophobia." With the development of biologics and Janus kinase inhibitors, a nonsteroidal approach to the treatment of AD may be possible and may be preferred by certain patients. Given what is known about these nonsteroidal therapies, we propose a structured treatment ladder and action plan that can guide clinicians and patients on the use of these therapies for the treatment of AD. The ladder divides nonsteroidal medication classes into treatments for exacerbation versus maintenance therapies in an escalating order of increasing potential for adverse effects, both real and perceived. This treatment algorithm proposal paves the way for a potential nonsteroidal approach to managing AD.

Safety of topical tacrolimus and corticosteroids in young children with atopic dermatitis: a 5-year questionnaire-based follow-up study

We previously conducted a randomized double-blinded clinical cohort study on topical tacrolimus safety issues in 1–3-year-old children with atopic dermatitis. Five years on, the participants were contacted via a postal questionnaire to obtain long-term data. There were no significant differences regarding infections, growth parameters (height, weight, body mass index), quality of life and disease severity between use of topical tacrolimus and topical corticosteroids.