Pharmaceutical care for adult asthma patients: A controlled intervention one-year follow-up study

Cost-Effectiveness and Impact on Health Care Utilization of Interventions to Improve Medication Adherence and Outcomes in Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Poor adherence to asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease maintenance therapies impairs health outcomes. Proven and cost-effective programs to promote adherence and persistence are not yet in regular widespread use. Implementation costs are a potential barrier to uptake of such programs.

OBJECTIVE

We undertook a systematic literature review and narrative synthesis of studies investigating the cost-effectiveness of treatment adherence-promoting programs or that determined their impact on health care budget directly or via health care resource use (HCRU).

METHODS

We identified relevant publications using Medline and PreMEDLINE (PubMed), Embase (Embase.com, Elsevier), and EconLit for publications between January 2000 and July 2021. We also searched clinical trial databases and selected conference proceedings.

RESULTS

Of 1,910 potentially relevant articles, 26 met prespecified inclusion criteria and underwent data extraction. Eleven reported a direct assessment of adherence, 15 included economic evaluations, and 17 described HCRU. None included an analysis of biologic medication use. When they were studied, interventions were often found to be highly cost-effective, with dominant incremental cost-effectiveness ratios in some cases. Reductions in direct costs and HCRU (health care visits, hospital admissions, and/or the use of medications, including add-on/reliever treatment and antibiotics) were frequently reported. Reported use of maintenance treatments improved in some studies. Counseling and/or digitally informed programs were used in all cases in which favorable outcomes were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence-promoting interventions are mostly cost-effective and often result in reduced HCRU and associated costs. Multidisciplinary care involving one-to-one advice and digitally enhanced communications appear to offer the greatest benefit.

The Saudi initiative for asthma - 2024 update: Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma in adults and children

The Saudi Initiative for Asthma 2024 (SINA-2024) is the sixth version of asthma guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma for adults and children that was developed by the SINA group, a subsidiary of the Saudi Thoracic Society. The main objective of the SINA is to have guidelines that are up-to-date, simple to understand, and easy to use by healthcare workers dealing with asthma patients. To facilitate achieving the goals of asthma management, the SINA Panel approach is mainly based on the assessment of symptom control and risk for both adults and children. The approach to asthma management is aligned for age groups: adults, adolescents, children aged 5-12 years, and children aged <5 years. SINA guidelines have focused more on personalized approaches reflecting a better understanding of disease heterogeneity with the integration of recommendations related to biologic agents, evidence-based updates on treatment, and the role of immunotherapy in management. The medication appendix has also been updated with the addition of recent evidence, new indications for existing medication, and new medications. The guidelines are constructed based on the available evidence, local literature, and the current situation at national and regional levels. There is also an emphasis on patient-doctor partnership in the management that also includes a self-management plan.

Evaluation of the impact of pharmacist-led educational intervention on knowledge and skills of cancer patients with totally implantable venous access port: a single-centre, non-randomised controlled study

BACKGROUND

Totally implantable venous access port (TIVAP) is a type of implantable medical device that enables repetitive access to the intravenous system through use of a Huber needle. This device facilitates the administration of aggressive or long-term treatments while ensuring the comfort and safety of the patient. To ensure proper use of the medical device and lower the risk of complications, it is essential that patients acquire the necessary knowledge and skills regarding TIVAP.

OBJECTIVE

The main objective of the study was to assess the impact of a pharmaceutical interview on patients' knowledge and skills for patients with TIVAP.

METHODS

To achieve this goal, a pharmaceutical interview guide and an 18-item questionnaire were developed, based on a three-part competency framework (knowledge, know-how and attitudes) previously constructed by a multidisciplinary team. The intervention consisted of a pharmacist-led interview with every patient on the day of the TIVAP insertion. Patients in the control group received usual care. Patients included were interviewed by telephone 14 days after implantation. χ2 tests were conducted to compare the scores obtained by each group.

RESULTS

The average score obtained by the control group (n=30) was 8.97, while the intervention group (n=59) achieved an average score of 12.66 (p<0.001). The intervention group demonstrated increases in correct responses for all items, with eight questions displaying significantly higher scores. Six of these pertained to theoretical knowledge, one to know-how and one to attitudes.

CONCLUSION

The interviews had a clear impact on the knowledge and skills of TIVAP patients.

Acceptance and Dropout Rates of Individuals with Asthma Approached in Self-management Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Objective

The objectives of this systematic review were to assess the acceptability of self-management interventions for people with asthma and identify contributing factors.

Methods

A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE (OVIDWEB), CINAHL and Cochrane databases. Clinical trials design was included if they met specified criteria. A random-effect meta-regression analysis was conducted to estimate the overall acceptance and drop-out rates and to assess the potential factors that may influence the outcomes.

Results

A total of 64 studies were included and 8,092 participants were recruited and participated in the trials. The estimated acceptance rate was 51.1%, while the estimated drop-out rates in the intervention and control groups were 18.2% and 15.6%, respectively. Lack of interest was the main reported reason for refusing to participate and dropping out from the program. Study-related and program-related factors influenced the acceptance and drop-out rates statistically and clinically.

Conclusion

The acceptance rate of self-management programs among asthmatic people was not high and the dropout rate was somewhat low. The review suggests optimizing the design of self-management studies and modifying the implemented self-management programs to increase the acceptance rate and decrease the dropout rate.

Assessment of quality of life in asthmatic children and adolescents: A cross sectional study in West Bank, Palestine

Background

Asthma is one of the most common chronic illnesses among children and adolescents. It can severely affect their quality of life (QoL). Our study assessed the QoL and analyzed potential risk factors for poor QoL among asthmatic children and adolescents.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional comparative study. Pediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (PAQLQ) was used to measure the QoL and Asthma Control Test (ACT) was used to evaluate asthma control. The Chi-square test and independent t-test were used to compare variables. We used Multivariate logistic regression to identify the association between determinants and outcomes. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05.

Results

We recruited 132 participants. We found that 47 patients (35.6%) had controlled Asthma and 85 patients (64.3%) had uncontrolled Asthma. When compared to uncontrolled asthma individuals, participants with controlled asthma had improved QoL and scored significantly higher in the symptom domain (P = 0.002), activity domain (P = 0.004), emotional domain (P = 0.002), and overall PAQoL scores (P = 0.002). Hospital admission affects significantly all domains of PAQOL (P<0.05). Poor QoL was significantly associated with hospitalization for asthma (OR = 3.4; CI: 2.77–3.94, P = 0.01), disease severity (OR = 3.0; CI: 2.41–3.61, P = 0.01), uncontrolled asthma (OR = 2.88; CI: 2.21–3.41, P = 0.019), and male gender (OR = 2.55; CI: 1.88–2.91, P = 0.02).

Conclusions

The results of the present study showed that in children and adolescents, uncontrolled asthma, disease severity, and previously hospitalized patients were associated with poor QoL. These factors must be considered when planning a comprehensive care plan for a better quality of life.

Comparative Efficacy of Strategies to Support Self-Management in Patients with Asthma: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

There is limited evidence about which composite feature of asthma self-management strategies is the best and should be adopted into practice.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of different strategies to support self-management, based on the newly developed framework, in patients with asthma.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, and PsycInfo from 1993 to December 2019. We identified randomized controlled trials that explored effects of strategies to support self-management in adult patients with asthma. We conducted network meta-analyses using a random effects model with usual care as the common comparator. Surface under the cumulative ranking curve methods were used to rank different support strategies.

RESULTS

Thirty-five trials (5195 patients) were included and classified on the basis of our newly created TIP framework: Theme, Intensity, and Provider/Platform. We identified 6 features from the included trials, each represented by 1 element of the TIP framework: (1) behavioral support more than once a month by e-Health; (2) behavioral support more than once a month by health care personnel (HCP); (3) behavioral support less often than or equal to once a month by HCP; (4) education support less often than or equal to once a month by e-Health; (5) education support less often than or equal to once a month by HCP; and (6) psychosocial support less often than or equal to once a month by HCP. Behavioral support more than once a month by e-Health showed significant improvement in asthma control when compared with the other 2 support strategies, which was confirmed by the highest surface under the cumulative ranking of 97.6%. However, the surface under the cumulative ranking for behavioral support less often than or equal to once a month by HCP suggested that it has the potential to be the best intervention to reduce the risk of hospitalization (89.1%) and emergency department visit (84.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

Different features of asthma self-management support strategies work best on unique outcomes.

Hospital-Initiated Care Bundle, Posthospitalization Care, and Outcomes in Adults with Asthma Exacerbation

BACKGROUND

Hospitalization for asthma exacerbation is an opportune setting for initiating preventive efforts. However, hospital-initiated preventive asthma care remains underdeveloped and its effectiveness is uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effectiveness of a hospital-initiated asthma care bundle on posthospitalization asthma care and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Prospective multicenter study of adults (18-54 years) hospitalized for asthma exacerbation in 2017 to 2019. During the hospitalization, we implemented an asthma-care bundle (inpatient laboratory testing, asthma education, and discharge care), and prospectively measured chronic asthma care (eg, immunoglobulin E testing, specialist care) and asthma exacerbation (ie, systemic corticosteroid use, emergency department [ED] visit, hospitalizations) outcomes. By applying a self-controlled case series method, we examined within-person changes in these outcomes before (2-year period) and after (1-year period) the bundle implementation.

RESULTS

Of 103 adults hospitalized for asthma exacerbation, the median age was 40 years and 72% were female. Compared with the preimplementation period, the postimplementation period had improved posthospitalized asthma care, including serum specific immunoglobulin E testing (rate ratio [RR] 2.18; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.99-4.84; P = .051) and evaluation by asthma specialist (RR 2.66; 95% CI 1.77-4.04; P < .001). Likewise, after care bundle implementation, patients had significantly lower annual rates of systemic corticosteroid use (4.2 vs 2.9 per person-year; RR 0.70; 95% CI 0.61-0.80; P < .001), ED visits (3.2 vs 2.7 per person-year; RR 0.83; 95% CI 0.72-0.95; P = .008), and hospitalizations (2.1 vs 1.8 per person-year; RR 0.82; 95% CI 0.69-0.97; P = .02). Stratified analyses by sex, race/ethnicity, and health insurance yielded consistent results.

CONCLUSIONS

After hospital-initiated care bundle implementation, patients had improved posthospitalization care and reduced rates of asthma exacerbation.