Comparison of the efficacy and safety of different doses of nifekalant in the instant cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation during radiofrequency ablation

Failure of intravenous nifekalant cardioversion as an independent predictor for persistent atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation

AIMS

Nifekalant is a class III antiarrhythmic drug that exerts antiarrhythmic effects by inhibiting rapid rectifying potassium channels and extending the effective refractory period of cardiomyocytes. It has a high success rate in converting atrial fibrillation (AF) to sinus rhythm. Whether the failure of intravenous nifekalant cardioversion is an independent predictor for persistent AF recurrence after catheter ablation has not been reported.

METHODS

A total of 92 patients with drug-refractory persistent AF were retrospectively enrolled. After all ablations, intravenous nifekalant was administrated. Patients were assigned to the success group (group 1) and failure group (group 2) based on nifekalant cardioversion results and followed for 12 months to note any episode of atrial arrhythmia recurrence.

RESULTS

Each group included 46 patients. After 12 months of follow-up, nine (19.6%) patients from group 1 and 23 (50.0%) patients from group 2 had a recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia (P = 0.002). AF duration and type 2 diabetes were strongly associated with failure of intravenous nifekalant cardioversion. Univariable Cox proportional hazard regression showed that failure of intravenous nifekalant cardioversion, AF duration, and type 2 diabetes were potential risk factors. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression showed that failure of nifekalant cardioversion was statistically associated with AF recurrence (adjusted RR = 2.257, 95% CI: 1.006-5.066, P = 0.048). Failure of intravenous nifekalant cardioversion could bring a positive effect on the prognostic differentiation when added into the multivariable model (0.767 ± 0.042 vs. 0.774 ± 0.045, P = 0.025).

CONCLUSION

Failure of nifekalant cardioversion is an independent predictor for persistent AF recurrence after catheter ablation.

Meta‑analysis of the efficacy and safety of nifekalant in the conversion of atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common type of supraventricular tachyarrhythmia. Nifekalant is a new class III antiarrhythmic drug approved for the treatment of ventricular tachyarrhythmias, but its effectiveness in converting AF to sinus rhythm remains unclear. The present analysis aimed to investigate the effect of nifekalant in the conversion of AF. PubMed, Cochrane Library and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases were systematically used to search relevant studies published between 1999 (data at which the drug was first approved for marketing in Japan) and 2022. Randomized clinical trials, prospective studies and retrospective studies on the use of nifekalant for AF were screened. The study metrics included the success rate of the conversion of AF, the mean time to conversion, the success rate of 12 months after a single AF catheter ablation procedure and the incidence of adverse events. The eligible studies screened included six randomized clinical trials, three prospective studies and three retrospective studies, totalling 12 studies with 1,162 patients. The risk ratio (RR) for successful conversion in the nifekalant and control groups was 1.95 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.23-3.08; P=0.005] and the mean difference for the mean time to conversion was -1.73 [95% CI, -2.69-(-0.77); P=0.0004]. Statistically significant differences were observed between nifekalant and control groups. Subgroup analysis revealed a statistically significant difference in the success rate of conversion following catheter ablation in the nifekalant group compared with the amiodarone group and the RR value was 1.95 (95% CI, 1.37-2.77; P=0.0002). Statistically significant difference was observed compared with the electrical cardioversion group and the RR value was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.84-0.98; P=0.01). However, the combined RR values for the two groups were 1.18 (95% CI, 0.85-1.65; P<0.0002). The RR value for adverse events was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.51-1.43; P=0.55), with no statistically significant differences between nifekalant and control groups. In conclusion, the results demonstrated that the success rate and time to conversion in the nifekalant group were improved compared with those in the control group, particularly after catheter ablation, and the conversion effect with nifekalant was significantly improved compared with that in the control group.