Changes in oral corticosteroid use in asthma treatment-A 20-year Danish nationwide drug utilisation study

Beyond direct costs: individual and societal financial burden of asthma in young adults in a Danish nationwide study

INTRODUCTION

As a common chronic disease seen across all ages, asthma has the potential to incur high societal and individual costs from both direct healthcare costs and loss of productivity. Most previous studies use smaller, selected populations to assess the cost of asthma, possibly reducing generalisability. We, therefore, aimed to assess the total, nationwide economic burden of asthma by severity from both an individual and a societal perspective.

METHODS

The annual cost of asthma was assessed in a Danish nationwide cohort of patients aged 18-45 during 2014-2016 as excess healthcare costs, loss of income and welfare expenditure compared with controls (matched 1:4) using national registries. Asthma severity was defined as mild-to-moderate (steps 1-3 or step 4 without exacerbations) or severe (step 4 with exacerbations or step 5).

RESULTS

Across 63 130 patients (mean age 33, 55% female), the annual excess cost of asthma compared with controls was predicted to €4095 (95% CI €3856 to €4334) per patient. Beyond direct costs related to treatment and hospitalisations (€1555 (95% CI €1517 to €1593)), excess indirect costs related to loss of income (€1060 (95% CI €946 to €1171)) and welfare expenditure (eg, sick pay and disability pensions) (€1480 (95% CI €1392 to €1570)) were seen. Crude pooling of excess costs resulted in an annual societal cost of €263 million for all included patients.Severe asthma (4.5%) incurred 4.4 times higher net costs (€15 749 (95% CI 13 928 to €17 638)) compared with mild-to-moderate disease (€3586 (95% CI €3349 to €3824)). Furthermore, patients with severe asthma experienced an annual loss of income of €3695 (95% CI €4106 to €3225) compared with controls.

CONCLUSION

In young adults with asthma, a significant societal and individual financial burden of disease was seen across severities. Expenditure was mainly driven by loss of income and welfare utilisation, rather than direct healthcare costs.

Trends and predictors of specialist assessments in oral corticosteroid treated asthma among young adults

Background

Repeated oral corticosteroid use indicates uncontrolled disease among asthma patients and referral for asthma specialist assessment is recommended. We aimed to describe trends and predictors associated with specialist contacts among young adults with asthma and repeated oral corticosteroid use.

Methods

Individuals aged 18–45 years with ≥2 dispensed asthma medication prescriptions and two dispended oral corticosteroid prescriptions (including short-term and long-term treatments) within 12 months during 1999–2018 were identified by use of Danish healthcare registers. The frequency of specialist contacts within 1 year of follow-up was assessed among individuals without previous specialist contacts within 5 years of inclusion. Factors associated with specialist contact were identified by logistic regression models. Furthermore, oral corticosteroid prescriber sources were assessed.

Results

For the 11 223 individuals included, 2444 (22%) had previous specialist contacts care within 5 years prior of inclusion and additionally 926 (8.3%) within 1 year of follow-up. Among those without previous specialist contacts (n 8779), the frequency of incident specialist contacts within 1 year of follow-up increased from 6.3% in 1999 to 18% in 2017. Factors associated with incident specialist contacts included dispensing ≥12 SABA canisters and previous asthma-related emergency department visits and hospitalisations. The majority of oral corticosteroid prescriptions at baseline (71%) were prescribed by general practitioners, though with decreasing proportions from 1999–2018.

Conclusions

The majority (70%) of young adults with asthma and repeated oral corticosteroid use do not seem to receive specialist assessment in Denmark. This highlights a potential room for improvement in the patient referral pathway for at-risk asthma patients.

Low dose oral corticosteroids in asthma associates with increased morbidity and mortality

Long-term oral corticosteroid (OCS) treatment for severe asthma is known to cause significant adverse effects, but knowledge on effects of lower exposures in general asthma populations is limited. We aimed to explore this in a nationwide Danish asthma population.Users of asthma medication aged 18-45 were identified in the Danish nationwide registers during 1999-2018 and followed prospectively in an open cohort design. Incident OCS-users were matched 1:4 to non-users by propensity scores with replacement. Associations between OCS use and incident comorbidities were examined by Cox regression. Mortality rates, causes of death, and rates of unscheduled hospital visits were assessed.OCS-users (n 30,352) had, compared to non-users (n 121,408), an increased risk of all outcomes with evident dose-response relationships starting at cumulative doses of ≤500 mg (prednisolone equivalents). Hazard ratios ranged from 1.24 (95% CI 1.18-1.30) for fractures to 8.53 (95% CI 3.97-18.33) for adrenal insufficiency. Depression/anxiety had the highest incidence rate difference at 4.3 (95% CI 3.6-5.0) per 1000 person years. Asthma-specific mortality rates were generally low at 0.15 (95% CI 0.11-0.20) and 0.04 (95% CI 0.02-0.06) per 1000 person years for OCS-users and non-users, respectively. Mortality rates and unscheduled hospital visits increased with increasing OCS exposure.The study findings should be interpreted with their observational nature in mind. However, we found that even at low cumulative exposure, OCS use in asthma management was associated with increased risk of comorbidities, mortality, and unscheduled hospital visits. Effective strategies for optimising asthma control and reducing OCS use are pivotal in asthma management.

Socioeconomic status is associated with healthcare seeking behaviour and disease burden in young adults with asthma - A nationwide cohort study

Introduction

Specialist management of asthma has been shown to associate with socioeconomic status (SES). However, little is known about the influence of SES on care burden in universal healthcare settings.

Methods

Patients aged 18–45 years using inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) were followed in national databases. Impact of asthma was investigated using negative binomial regression adjusted for age, sex, comorbidity, and GINA 2020 Step. Uncontrolled asthma was defined as >600 annual SABA puffs, ≥2 prednisolone courses and/or ≥1 hospitalization.

Results

A total of 60,534 (55% female, median age 33 (IQR 25–39)) patients were followed for 10.1 years (IQR 5.2–14.3)). Uncontrolled asthma resulted in 6.5 and 0.51 additional annual contacts to primary care and pulmonologists, respectively.

Unscheduled and primary care burden was dependent on SES, increasing with rural residence, lower education, income and receiving welfare. Differences in planned respiratory care were slight, only seen among divorced, low income- or welfare recipients. Lower SES was consistently associated with an increased utilization of SABA and prednisolone. No dose–response relationship between ICS use and SES could be identified.

Conclusion

Lower SES in asthma is a risk factor for a predominance of unscheduled care and adverse outcomes, warranting further attention to patients’ background when assessing asthma care.