1
|
Close E, Jeanneret R, Downie J, Willmott L, White BP. A qualitative study of experiences of institutional objection to medical assistance in dying in Canada: ongoing challenges and catalysts for change. BMC Med Ethics 2023; 24:71. [PMID: 37735387 PMCID: PMC10512474 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-023-00950-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In June 2016, Canada legalized medical assistance in dying (MAiD). From the outset, some healthcare institutions (including faith-based and non-faith-based hospitals, hospices, and residential aged care facilities) have refused to allow aspects of MAiD onsite, resulting in patient transfers for MAiD assessments and provision. There have been media reports highlighting the negative consequences of these "institutional objections", however, very little research has examined their nature and impact. METHODS This study reports on findings from 48 semi-structured qualitative interviews conducted with MAiD assessors and providers, MAiD team members (working to coordinate care and lead MAiD programs in institutions and health authorities), and family caregivers on their experiences with institutional objection. Participants were recruited from the Canadian provinces of British Columbia, Ontario, and Nova Scotia. Data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS Themes identified were: (1) basis for institutional objection (with objections commonly rooted in religious values and a particular philosophy of palliative care); (2) scope of objection (demonstrating a wide range of practices objected to); (3) lack of transparency regarding institutional position; (4) impacts on patients; (5) impacts on health practitioners; and (6) catalysts for change. Participants reported that many institutions' objections had softened over time, lessening barriers to MAiD access and adverse impacts on patients and health practitioners. Participants attributed this positive change to a range of catalysts including advocacy by health practitioners and family members, policymaking by local health authorities, education, and relationship building. Nevertheless, some institutions, particularly faith-based ones, retained strong objections to MAiD, resulting in forced transfers and negative emotional and psychological impacts on patients, family members, and health practitioners. CONCLUSIONS This paper adds to the limited evidence base about the impacts of institutional objection and can inform practical and regulatory solutions in Canada and abroad. Reform is needed to minimize the negative impacts on patients, their caregivers, and health practitioners involved in MAiD practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eliana Close
- Australian Centre for Health Law Research, Faculty of Business and Law, Queensland University of Technology, GPO Box 2434, Brisbane, QLD, 4000, Australia.
| | - Ruthie Jeanneret
- Australian Centre for Health Law Research, Faculty of Business and Law, Queensland University of Technology, GPO Box 2434, Brisbane, QLD, 4000, Australia
| | - Jocelyn Downie
- Australian Centre for Health Law Research, Faculty of Business and Law, Queensland University of Technology, GPO Box 2434, Brisbane, QLD, 4000, Australia
- Health Law Institute, Faculties of Law and Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
| | - Lindy Willmott
- Australian Centre for Health Law Research, Faculty of Business and Law, Queensland University of Technology, GPO Box 2434, Brisbane, QLD, 4000, Australia
| | - Ben P White
- Australian Centre for Health Law Research, Faculty of Business and Law, Queensland University of Technology, GPO Box 2434, Brisbane, QLD, 4000, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Close E, Willmott L, Keogh L, White BP. Institutional Objection to Voluntary Assisted Dying in Victoria, Australia: An Analysis of Publicly Available Policies. JOURNAL OF BIOETHICAL INQUIRY 2023; 20:467-484. [PMID: 37428353 PMCID: PMC10624699 DOI: 10.1007/s11673-023-10271-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2022] [Accepted: 12/21/2022] [Indexed: 07/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Victoria was the first Australian state to legalize voluntary assisted dying (elsewhere known as physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia). Some institutions indicated they would not participate in voluntary assisted dying. The Victorian government issued policy approaches for institutions to consider OBJECTIVE: To describe and analyse publicly available policy documents articulating an institutional objection to voluntary assisted dying in Victoria. METHODS Policies were identified using a range of strategies, and those disclosing and discussing the nature of an institutional objection were thematically analysed using the framework method. RESULTS The study identified fifteen policies from nine policymakers and developed four themes: (1) extent of refusal to participate in VAD, (2) justification for refusal to provide VAD, (3) responding to requests for VAD, and (4) appeals to state-sanctioned regulatory mechanisms. While institutional objections were stated clearly, there was very little practical detail in most documents to enable patients to effectively navigate objections in practice. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates that despite having clear governance pathways developed by centralized bodies (namely, the Victorian government and Catholic Health Australia), many institutions' public-facing policies do not reflect this guidance. Since VAD is contentious, laws governing institutional objection could provide greater clarity and regulatory force than policies alone to better balance the interests of patients and non-participating institutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eliana Close
- Australian Centre for Health Law Research, Faculty of Business and Law, Queensland University of Technology, GPO Box 2434, Brisbane, QLD, 4001, Australia.
| | - Lindy Willmott
- Australian Centre for Health Law Research, Faculty of Business and Law, Queensland University of Technology, GPO Box 2434, Brisbane, QLD, 4001, Australia
| | - Louise Keogh
- Centre for Health Equity, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia
| | - Ben P White
- Australian Centre for Health Law Research, Faculty of Business and Law, Queensland University of Technology, GPO Box 2434, Brisbane, QLD, 4001, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
White BP, Jeanneret R, Close E, Willmott L. The impact on patients of objections by institutions to assisted dying: a qualitative study of family caregivers' perceptions. BMC Med Ethics 2023; 24:22. [PMID: 36915087 PMCID: PMC10009962 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-023-00902-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2022] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 03/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Voluntary assisted dying became lawful in Victoria, the first Australian state to permit this practice, in 2019 via the Voluntary Assisted Dying Act 2017 (Vic). While conscientious objection by individual health professionals is protected by the Victorian legislation, objections by institutions are governed by policy. No research has been conducted in Victoria, and very little research conducted internationally, on how institutional objection is experienced by patients seeking assisted dying. METHODS 28 semi-structured interviews were conducted with 32 family caregivers and one patient about the experience of 28 patients who sought assisted dying. Participants were interviewed during August-November 2021. Data from the 17 interviews (all with family caregivers) which reported institutional objection were analysed thematically. RESULTS Participants reported institutional objection affecting eligibility assessments, medication access, and taking the medication or having it administered. Institutional objection occurred across health settings and was sometimes communicated obliquely. These objections resulted in delays, transfers, and choices between progressing an assisted dying application and receiving palliative or other care. Participants also reported objections causing adverse emotional experiences and distrust of objecting institutions. Six mediating influences on institutional objections were identified: staff views within objecting institutions; support of external medical practitioners and pharmacists providing assisted dying services; nature of a patient's illness; progression or state of a patient's illness; patient's geographical location; and the capability and assertiveness of a patient and/or caregiver. CONCLUSIONS Institutional objection to assisted dying is much-debated yet empirically understudied. This research found that in Victoria, objections were regularly reported by participants and adversely affected access to assisted dying and the wider end-of-life experience for patients and caregivers. This barrier arises in an assisted dying system that is already procedurally challenging, particularly given the limited window patients have to apply. Better regulation may be needed as Victoria's existing policy approach appears to preference institutional positions over patient's choice given existing power dynamics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben P White
- Faculty of Business and Law, Australian Centre for Health Law Research, Queensland University of Technology, PO Box 2434, Brisbane, QLD, 4000, Australia.
| | - Ruthie Jeanneret
- Faculty of Business and Law, Australian Centre for Health Law Research, Queensland University of Technology, PO Box 2434, Brisbane, QLD, 4000, Australia
| | - Eliana Close
- Faculty of Business and Law, Australian Centre for Health Law Research, Queensland University of Technology, PO Box 2434, Brisbane, QLD, 4000, Australia
| | - Lindy Willmott
- Faculty of Business and Law, Australian Centre for Health Law Research, Queensland University of Technology, PO Box 2434, Brisbane, QLD, 4000, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
McDougall RJ, White BP, Ko D, Keogh L, Willmott L. Junior doctors and conscientious objection to voluntary assisted dying: ethical complexity in practice. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS 2022; 48:517-521. [PMID: 34127526 PMCID: PMC9340035 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2020-107125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2020] [Revised: 04/12/2021] [Accepted: 04/16/2021] [Indexed: 05/09/2023]
Abstract
In jurisdictions where voluntary assisted dying (VAD) is legal, eligibility assessments, prescription and administration of a VAD substance are commonly performed by senior doctors. Junior doctors' involvement is limited to a range of more peripheral aspects of patient care relating to VAD. In the Australian state of Victoria, where VAD has been legal since June 2019, all health professionals have a right under the legislation to conscientiously object to involvement in the VAD process, including provision of information about VAD. While this protection appears categorical and straightforward, conscientious objection to VAD-related care is ethically complex for junior doctors for reasons that are specific to this group of clinicians. For junior doctors wishing to exercise a conscientious objection to VAD, their dependence on their senior colleagues for career progression creates unique risks and burdens. In a context where senior colleagues are supportive of VAD, the junior doctor's subordinate position in the medical hierarchy exposes them to potential significant harms: compromising their moral integrity by participating, or compromising their career progression by objecting. In jurisdictions intending to provide all health professionals with meaningful conscientious objection protection in relation to VAD, strong specific support for junior doctors is needed through local institutional policies and culture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosalind J McDougall
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ben P White
- Australian Centre for Health Law Research, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Danielle Ko
- Department of Palliative Care, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Quality and Patient Safety, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Louise Keogh
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lindy Willmott
- Australian Centre for Health Law Research, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kirby J. Should Institutional Conscientious Objection to Assisted Dying be Accommodated? CANADIAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS 2021. [DOI: 10.7202/1077623ar] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The contentious, topical debate about whether faith-based health care organizations should be granted accommodation on the basis of institutional conscientious objection to medical assistance is dying (MAiD) is addressed through a comparative analysis of arguments on both sides of the issue that references such relevant considerations as: claimed ‘moral-authority’, competing rights-based claims, obligations arising from patient welfare principles, formal justice, dissimilarity in consequences, and two illustrative arguments from analogy. The analysis leads to the conclusion that nonconditional accommodation on the basis of institutional conscientious objection to MAiD is not ethically acceptable in Canada. A compromise mechanism, consisting of a suggested set of pragmatic conditions, is proposed that could effectively balance the competing moral responsibilities that arise from this conclusion and a core assumption of the paper, i.e., that some dominant faith-based health institutions can legitimately request, and expect, that provincial/territorial governments pay them a measure of respect in their operational, health-care-delivery decision making because of these institutions’ long history of providing high quality, health care in Canada. It is further suggested that provincial/territorial governments only allow large, publicly funded, faith-based health care organizations to enact a conditional version of accommodation on the basis of institutional conscientious objection to MAiD in circumstances where the organization has entered into a formal agreement with the relevant health department to meet the proposed, compromise conditions (or a relevantly-similar set of conditions).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey Kirby
- Department of Bioethics, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
McDougall R, Pratt B. Too much safety? Safeguards and equal access in the context of voluntary assisted dying legislation. BMC Med Ethics 2020; 21:38. [PMID: 32404097 PMCID: PMC7222560 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-020-00483-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2019] [Accepted: 05/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In June 2019, the Australian state of Victoria joined the growing number of jurisdictions around the world to have legalised some form of voluntary assisted dying. A discourse of safety was prominent during the implementation of the Victorian legislation. MAIN TEXT In this paper, we analyse the ethical relationship between legislative "safeguards" and equal access. Drawing primarily on Ruger's model of equal access to health care services, we analyse the Victorian approach to voluntary assisted dying in terms of four dimensions: horizontal equity, patient agency, high quality care, and supportive social norms. We argue that some provisions framed as safeguards in the legislation create significant barriers to equal access for eligible patients. CONCLUSIONS While safety is undoubtedly ethically important, we caution against an overemphasis on safeguarding in voluntary assisted dying legislation given the implications for equal access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosalind McDougall
- Centre for Health Equity, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Level 4, 207 Bouverie St, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia.
| | - Bridget Pratt
- Centre for Health Equity, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Level 4, 207 Bouverie St, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia
| |
Collapse
|