1
|
Park Y, Chang W. A Personalized Dose-Finding Algorithm Based on Adaptive Gaussian Process Regression. Pharm Stat 2024. [PMID: 39119879 DOI: 10.1002/pst.2417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2023] [Revised: 04/22/2024] [Accepted: 06/18/2024] [Indexed: 08/10/2024]
Abstract
Dose-finding studies play a crucial role in drug development by identifying the optimal dose(s) for later studies while considering tolerability. This not only saves time and effort in proceeding with Phase III trials but also improves efficacy. In an era of precision medicine, it is not ideal to assume patient homogeneity in dose-finding studies as patients may respond differently to the drug. To address this, we propose a personalized dose-finding algorithm that assigns patients to individualized optimal biological doses. Our design follows a two-stage approach. Initially, patients are enrolled under broad eligibility criteria. Based on the Stage 1 data, we fit a regression model of toxicity and efficacy outcomes on dose and biomarkers to characterize treatment-sensitive patients. In the second stage, we restrict the trial population to sensitive patients, apply a personalized dose allocation algorithm, and choose the recommended dose at the end of the trial. Simulation study shows that the proposed design reliably enriches the trial population, minimizes the number of failures, and yields superior operating characteristics compared to several existing dose-finding designs in terms of both the percentage of correct selection and the number of patients treated at target dose(s).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yeonhee Park
- Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Won Chang
- Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zang Y, Guo B, Qiu Y, Liu H, Opyrchal M, Lu X. Adaptive phase I-II clinical trial designs identifying optimal biological doses for targeted agents and immunotherapies. Clin Trials 2024; 21:298-307. [PMID: 38205644 PMCID: PMC11132954 DOI: 10.1177/17407745231220661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2024]
Abstract
Targeted agents and immunotherapies have revolutionized cancer treatment, offering promising options for various cancer types. Unlike traditional therapies the principle of "more is better" is not always applicable to these new therapies due to their unique biomedical mechanisms. As a result, various phase I-II clinical trial designs have been proposed to identify the optimal biological dose that maximizes the therapeutic effect of targeted therapies and immunotherapies by jointly monitoring both efficacy and toxicity outcomes. This review article examines several innovative phase I-II clinical trial designs that utilize accumulated efficacy and toxicity outcomes to adaptively determine doses for subsequent patients and identify the optimal biological dose, maximizing the overall therapeutic effect. Specifically, we highlight three categories of phase I-II designs: efficacy-driven, utility-based, and designs incorporating multiple efficacy endpoints. For each design, we review the dose-outcome model, the definition of the optimal biological dose, the dose-finding algorithm, and the software for trial implementation. To illustrate the concepts, we also present two real phase I-II trial examples utilizing the EffTox and ISO designs. Finally, we provide a classification tree to summarize the designs discussed in this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong Zang
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Sciences, School of Medicine, Indiana University
- Center for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, School of Medicine, Indiana University
| | - Beibei Guo
- Department of Experimental Statistics, Louisiana State University
| | - Yingjie Qiu
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Sciences, School of Medicine, Indiana University
| | - Hao Liu
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University
| | | | - Xiongbin Lu
- Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, School of Medicine, Indiana University
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Celum C, Conaway M. A model-assisted design for partially or completely ordered groups. Pharm Stat 2024. [PMID: 38769904 DOI: 10.1002/pst.2396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2023] [Revised: 04/11/2024] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024]
Abstract
This paper proposes a trial design for locating group-specific doses when groups are partially or completely ordered by dose sensitivity. Previous trial designs for partially ordered groups are model-based, whereas the proposed method is model-assisted, providing clinicians with a design that is simpler. The proposed method performs similarly to model-based methods, providing simplicity without losing accuracy. Additionally, to the best of our knowledge, the proposed method is the first paper on dose-finding for partially ordered groups with convergence results. To generalize the proposed method, a framework is introduced that allows partial orders to be transferred to a grid format with a known ordering across rows but an unknown ordering within rows.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Connor Celum
- Department of Statistics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Mark Conaway
- Department of Statistics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Division of Translational Research and Applied Statistics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kakizume T, Takeda K, Taguri M, Morita S. BOIN-ETC: A Bayesian optimal interval design considering efficacy and toxicity to identify the optimal dose combinations. Stat Methods Med Res 2024; 33:716-727. [PMID: 38444354 DOI: 10.1177/09622802241236936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/07/2024]
Abstract
One of the primary objectives of a dose-finding trial for novel anti-cancer agent combination therapies, such as molecular targeted agents and immune-oncology therapies, is to identify optimal dose combinations that are tolerable and therapeutically beneficial for subjects in subsequent clinical trials. The goal differs from that of a dose-finding trial for traditional cytotoxic agents, in which the goal is to determine the maximum tolerated dose combinations. This paper proposes the new design, named 'BOIN-ETC' design, to identify optimal dose combinations based on both efficacy and toxicity outcomes using the waterfall approach. The BOIN-ETC design is model-assisted, so it is expected to be robust, and straightforward to implement in actual oncology dose-finding trials. These characteristics are quite valuable from a practical perspective. Simulation studies show that the BOIN-ETC design has advantages compared with the other approaches in the percentage of correct optimal dose combination selection and the average number of patients allocated to the optimal dose combinations across various realistic settings.
Collapse
|
5
|
Jiménez JL, Zheng H. A Bayesian adaptive design for dual-agent phase I-II oncology trials integrating efficacy data across stages. Biom J 2023; 65:e2200288. [PMID: 37199700 PMCID: PMC10952513 DOI: 10.1002/bimj.202200288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2022] [Revised: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Abstract
Combination of several anticancer treatments has typically been presumed to have enhanced drug activity. Motivated by a real clinical trial, this paper considers phase I-II dose finding designs for dual-agent combinations, where one main objective is to characterize both the toxicity and efficacy profiles. We propose a two-stage Bayesian adaptive design that accommodates a change of patient population in-between. In stage I, we estimate a maximum tolerated dose combination using the escalation with overdose control (EWOC) principle. This is followed by a stage II, conducted in a new yet relevant patient population, to find the most efficacious dose combination. We implement a robust Bayesian hierarchical random-effects model to allow sharing of information on the efficacy across stages, assuming that the related parameters are either exchangeable or nonexchangeable. Under the assumption of exchangeability, a random-effects distribution is specified for the main effects parameters to capture uncertainty about the between-stage differences. The inclusion of nonexchangeability assumption further enables that the stage-specific efficacy parameters have their own priors. The proposed methodology is assessed with an extensive simulation study. Our results suggest a general improvement of the operating characteristics for the efficacy assessment, under a conservative assumption about the exchangeability of the parameters a priori.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Haiyan Zheng
- MRC Biostatistics UnitUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wages NA, Saleh RR, Braun TM. Concurrent dose-finding of a novel cancer drug with and without a second agent. J Clin Transl Sci 2023; 7:e126. [PMID: 37313388 PMCID: PMC10260343 DOI: 10.1017/cts.2023.542] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Revised: 04/13/2023] [Accepted: 05/01/2023] [Indexed: 06/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction More complex research questions are being posed in early-phase oncology clinical trials, necessitating design strategies tailored to contemporary study objectives. This paper describes the proposed design of a Phase I trial concurrently evaluating the safety of a hematopoietic progenitor kinase-1 inhibitor (Agent A) as a single agent and in combination with an anti-PD-1 agent in patients with advanced malignancies. The study's primary objective was to concurrently determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of Agent A with and without anti-PD-1 therapy among seven possible study dose levels. Methods Our solution to this challenge was to apply a continual reassessment method shift model to meet the research objectives of the study. Results The application of this method is described herein, and a simulation study of the design's operating characteristics is conducted. This work was developed through collaboration and mentoring between the authors at the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) annual AACR/ASCO Methods in Clinical Cancer Research Workshop. Conclusions The aim of this manuscript is to highlight examples of novel design applications as a means of augmenting the implementation of innovative designs in the future and to demonstrate the flexibility of adaptive designs in satisfying modern design conditions. Although the design is presented using an investigation of Agent A with and without anti-PD-1 therapy as an illustrative example, the approach described is not specific to these agents and could be applied to other concurrent monotherapy and combination therapy studies with well-defined binary safety endpoints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nolan A. Wages
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
- Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Ramy R. Saleh
- Division of Medical Oncology & Hematology, Department of Medicine, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, and the University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Thomas M. Braun
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Chen X, Zhang J, Jiang L, Yan F. Shotgun-2: A Bayesian phase I/II basket trial design to identify indication-specific optimal biological doses. Stat Methods Med Res 2023; 32:443-464. [PMID: 36217826 DOI: 10.1177/09622802221129049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
For novel molecularly targeted agents and immunotherapies, the objective of dose-finding is often to identify the optimal biological dose, rather than the maximum tolerated dose. However, optimal biological doses may not be the same for different indications, challenging the traditional dose-finding framework. Therefore, we proposed a Bayesian phase I/II basket trial design, named "shotgun-2," to identify indication-specific optimal biological doses. A dose-escalation part is conducted in stage I to identify the maximum tolerated dose and admissible dose sets. In stage II, dose optimization is performed incorporating both toxicity and efficacy for each indication. Simulation studies under both fixed and random scenarios show that, compared with the traditional "phase I + cohort expansion" design, the shotgun-2 design is robust and can improve the probability of correctly selecting the optimal biological doses. Furthermore, this study provides a useful tool for identifying indication-specific optimal biological doses and accelerating drug development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin Chen
- Research Center of Biostatistics and Computational Pharmacy, 56651China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Jingyi Zhang
- Research Center of Biostatistics and Computational Pharmacy, 56651China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Liyun Jiang
- Research Center of Biostatistics and Computational Pharmacy, 56651China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Fangrong Yan
- Research Center of Biostatistics and Computational Pharmacy, 56651China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Takeda K, Liu S, Rong A. Constrained hierarchical Bayesian model for latent subgroups in basket trials with two classifiers. Stat Med 2021; 41:298-309. [PMID: 34697822 DOI: 10.1002/sim.9237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2021] [Revised: 10/10/2021] [Accepted: 10/12/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
The basket trial in oncology is a novel clinical trial design that enables the simultaneous assessment of one treatment in multiple cancer types. In addition to the usual basket classifier of the cancer types, many recent basket trials further contain other classifiers like biomarkers that potentially affect the clinical outcomes. In other words, the treatment effects in those baskets are often categorized by not only the cancer types but also the levels of other classifiers. Therefore, the assumption of exchangeability is often violated when some baskets are more sensitive to the targeted treatment, whereas others are less. In this article, we propose a constrained hierarchical Bayesian model for latent subgroups (CHBM-LS) to deal with potential heterogeneity of treatment effects due to both the cancer type (first classifier) and another classifier (second classifier) in basket trials. Different baskets defined by multiple cancer types and multiple levels of the second classifier are aggregated into subgroups using a latent subgroup modeling approach. Within each latent subgroup, the treatment effects are similar and approximately exchangeable to borrow information. The CHBM-LS approach evaluates the treatment effect for each basket while allowing adaptive information borrowing across the baskets by identifying latent subgroups. The simulation study shows that the CHBM-LS approach outperforms other approaches with higher statistical power and better-controlled type I error rates under various scenarios with heterogeneous treatment effects across baskets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kentaro Takeda
- Data Science, Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc., Northbrook, Illinois, USA
| | - Shufang Liu
- Data Science, Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc., Northbrook, Illinois, USA
| | - Alan Rong
- Data Science, Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc., Northbrook, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lin R, Thall PF, Yuan Y. A Phase I-II Basket Trial Design to Optimize Dose-Schedule Regimes Based on Delayed Outcomes. BAYESIAN ANALYSIS 2021; 16:179-202. [PMID: 34267857 PMCID: PMC8277108 DOI: 10.1214/20-ba1205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
This paper proposes a Bayesian adaptive basket trial design to optimize the dose-schedule regimes of an experimental agent within disease subtypes, called "baskets", for phase I-II clinical trials based on late-onset efficacy and toxicity. To characterize the association among the baskets and regimes, a Bayesian hierarchical model is assumed that includes a heterogeneity parameter, adaptively updated during the trial, that quantifies information shared across baskets. To account for late-onset outcomes when doing sequential decision making, unobserved outcomes are treated as missing values and imputed by exploiting early biomarker and low-grade toxicity information. Elicited joint utilities of efficacy and toxicity are used for decision making. Patients are randomized adaptively to regimes while accounting for baskets, with randomization probabilities proportional to the posterior probability of achieving maximum utility. Simulations are presented to assess the design's robustness and ability to identify optimal dose-schedule regimes within disease subtypes, and to compare it to a simplified design that treats the subtypes independently.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruitao Lin
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, U.S.A
| | - Peter F Thall
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, U.S.A
| | - Ying Yuan
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
Adaptive enrichment designs for clinical trials may include rules that use interim data to identify treatment-sensitive patient subgroups, select or compare treatments, or change entry criteria. A common setting is a trial to compare a new biologically targeted agent to standard therapy. An enrichment design's structure depends on its goals, how it accounts for patient heterogeneity and treatment effects, and practical constraints. This article first covers basic concepts, including treatment-biomarker interaction, precision medicine, selection bias, and sequentially adaptive decision making, and briefly describes some different types of enrichment. Numerical illustrations are provided for qualitatively different cases involving treatment-biomarker interactions. Reviews are given of adaptive signature designs; a Bayesian design that uses a random partition to identify treatment-sensitive biomarker subgroups and assign treatments; and designs that enrich superior treatment sample sizes overall or within subgroups, make subgroup-specific decisions, or include outcome-adaptive randomization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter F Thall
- Department of Biostatistics, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Prior Elicitation for Use in Clinical Trial Design and Analysis: A Literature Review. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:ijerph18041833. [PMID: 33668623 PMCID: PMC7917693 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18041833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2021] [Revised: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 02/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Bayesian inference is increasingly popular in clinical trial design and analysis. The subjective knowledge derived from an expert elicitation procedure may be useful to define a prior probability distribution when no or limited data is available. This work aims to investigate the state-of-the-art Bayesian prior elicitation methods with a focus on clinical trial research. A literature search on the Current Index to Statistics (CIS), PubMed, and Web of Science (WOS) databases, considering “prior elicitation” as a search string, was run on 1 November 2020. Summary statistics and trend of publications over time were reported. Finally, a Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) model was developed to recognise latent topics in the pertinent papers retrieved. A total of 460 documents pertinent to the Bayesian prior elicitation were identified. Of these, 213 (45.4%) were published in the “Probability and Statistics” area. A total of 42 articles pertain to clinical trial and the majority of them (81%) reports parametric techniques as elicitation method. The last decade has seen an increased interest in prior elicitation and the gap between theory and application getting narrower and narrower. Given the promising flexibility of non-parametric approaches to the experts’ elicitation, more efforts are needed to ensure their diffusion also in applied settings.
Collapse
|
12
|
Altzerinakou MA, Paoletti X. Change-point joint model for identification of plateau of activity in early phase trials. Stat Med 2021; 40:2113-2138. [PMID: 33561898 DOI: 10.1002/sim.8889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2020] [Revised: 12/19/2020] [Accepted: 01/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
This article presents a phase I/II trial design for targeted therapies and immunotherapies, with the objective of identifying the optimal dose (OD). We employ a joint modeling technique for discrete time-to-event toxicity data and repeated and continuous biomarker measurements. For the biomarker measurements, we implement a change point linear mixed effects skeleton model. This model can accommodate both plateauing and nonplateauing dose-activity relationships. For each new cohort of patients, we estimate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) taking toxicity as a cumulative endpoint, over six treatment cycles. Then, we select the OD using two different criteria. The OD is a dose that is equally active to the MTD or a dose located on the beginning of the plateau of the dose-activity relationship. Joint modeling allows us to take into account informative censoring due to toxicities or lack of activity and we also consider consent withdrawal and intermittent missing responses. Model estimation relies on likelihood inference.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Xavier Paoletti
- Université Versailles St Quentin, Université Paris Saclay, INSERM U900 STAMPM, Saint-Cloud, France.,Institut Curie, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|