Multidimensional molecular measurements-environment interaction analysis for disease outcomes

Hierarchical False Discovery Rate Control for High-dimensional Survival Analysis with Interactions

With the development of data collection techniques, analysis with a survival response and high-dimensional covariates has become routine. Here we consider an interaction model, which includes a set of low-dimensional covariates, a set of high-dimensional covariates, and their interactions. This model has been motivated by gene-environment (G-E) interaction analysis, where the E variables have a low dimension, and the G variables have a high dimension. For such a model, there has been extensive research on estimation and variable selection. Comparatively, inference studies with a valid false discovery rate (FDR) control have been very limited. The existing high-dimensional inference tools cannot be directly applied to interaction models, as interactions and main effects are not "equal". In this article, for high-dimensional survival analysis with interactions, we model survival using the Accelerated Failure Time (AFT) model and adopt a "weighted least squares + debiased Lasso" approach for estimation and selection. A hierarchical FDR control approach is developed for inference and respect of the "main effects, interactions" hierarchy. The asymptotic distribution properties of the debiased Lasso estimators are rigorously established. Simulation demonstrates the satisfactory performance of the proposed approach, and the analysis of a breast cancer dataset further establishes its practical utility.

Pathological imaging-assisted cancer gene-environment interaction analysis

Gene-environment (G-E) interactions have important implications for cancer outcomes and phenotypes beyond the main G and E effects. Compared to main-effect-only analysis, G-E interaction analysis more seriously suffers from a lack of information caused by higher dimensionality, weaker signals, and other factors. It is also uniquely challenged by the "main effects, interactions" variable selection hierarchy. Effort has been made to bring in additional information to assist cancer G-E interaction analysis. In this study, we take a strategy different from the existing literature and borrow information from pathological imaging data. Such data are a "byproduct" of biopsy, enjoys broad availability and low cost, and has been shown as informative for modeling prognosis and other cancer outcomes/phenotypes in recent studies. Building on penalization, we develop an assisted estimation and variable selection approach for G-E interaction analysis. The approach is intuitive, can be effectively realized, and has competitive performance in simulation. We further analyze The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data on lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). The outcome of interest is overall survival, and for G variables, we analyze gene expressions. Assisted by pathological imaging data, our G-E interaction analysis leads to different findings with competitive prediction performance and stability.

A novel approach to risk exposure and epigenetics-the use of multidimensional context to gain insights into the early origins of cardiometabolic and neurocognitive health

BACKGROUND

Each mother-child dyad represents a unique combination of genetic and environmental factors. This constellation of variables impacts the expression of countless genes. Numerous studies have uncovered changes in DNA methylation (DNAm), a form of epigenetic regulation, in offspring related to maternal risk factors. How these changes work together to link maternal-child risks to childhood cardiometabolic and neurocognitive traits remains unknown. This question is a key research priority as such traits predispose to future non-communicable diseases (NCDs). We propose viewing risk and the genome through a multidimensional lens to identify common DNAm patterns shared among diverse risk profiles.

METHODS

We identified multifactorial Maternal Risk Profiles (MRPs) generated from population-based data (n = 15,454, Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC)). Using cord blood HumanMethylation450 BeadChip data, we identified genome-wide patterns of DNAm that co-vary with these MRPs. We tested the prospective relation of these DNAm patterns (n = 914) to future outcomes using decision tree analysis. We then tested the reproducibility of these patterns in (1) DNAm data at age 7 and 17 years within the same cohort (n = 973 and 974, respectively) and (2) cord DNAm in an independent cohort, the Generation R Study (n = 686).

RESULTS

We identified twenty MRP-related DNAm patterns at birth in ALSPAC. Four were prospectively related to cardiometabolic and/or neurocognitive childhood outcomes. These patterns were replicated in DNAm data from blood collected at later ages. Three of these patterns were externally validated in cord DNAm data in Generation R. Compared to previous literature, DNAm patterns exhibited novel spatial distribution across the genome that intersects with chromatin functional and tissue-specific signatures.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, we are the first to leverage multifactorial population-wide data to detect patterns of variability in DNAm. This context-based approach decreases biases stemming from overreliance on specific samples or variables. We discovered molecular patterns demonstrating prospective and replicable relations to complex traits. Moreover, results suggest that patterns harbour a genome-wide organisation specific to chromatin regulation and target tissues. These preliminary findings warrant further investigation to better reflect the reality of human context in molecular studies of NCDs.

Analysis of cancer omics data: a selective review of statistical techniques

Cancer is an omics disease. The development in high-throughput profiling has fundamentally changed cancer research and clinical practice. Compared with clinical, demographic and environmental data, the analysis of omics data-which has higher dimensionality, weaker signals and more complex distributional properties-is much more challenging. Developments in the literature are often 'scattered', with individual studies focused on one or a few closely related methods. The goal of this review is to assist cancer researchers with limited statistical expertise in establishing the 'overall framework' of cancer omics data analysis. To facilitate understanding, we mainly focus on intuition, concepts and key steps, and refer readers to the original publications for mathematical details. This review broadly covers unsupervised and supervised analysis, as well as individual-gene-based, gene-set-based and gene-network-based analysis. We also briefly discuss 'special topics' including interaction analysis, multi-datasets analysis and multi-omics analysis.