1
|
Plachouri KM, Florou V, Georgiou V, Georgiou S. Cutaneous Side Effects of Modern Targeted Therapy and Immunotherapy in Patients with Dermatological Malignancies. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3126. [PMID: 37370736 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15123126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Revised: 05/24/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
The advent of immunotherapy and targeted therapies in treating dermatological malignancies has dramatically changed the landscape of dermato-oncology in recent years. Their superior efficacy compared to previous therapeutic options, such as chemotherapy, has resulted in their use in treating devastating malignancies, such as melanoma or unresectable/metastatic basal cell and squamous cell carcinoma. Skin toxicity is a critical safety consideration, among other adverse reactions, that can occur under treatment with these agents. This article aims to summarize the cutaneous side effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted dermato-oncological therapies. Although the skin side effects of these agents are primarily mild, they can occasionally affect the decision for treatment continuation and the quality of life of the affected patients. Therefore, physicians must be acquainted with the specific cutaneous toxicity profile of such treatments to mitigate their impact on the patients and optimize the overall outcome of dermato-oncological therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kerasia-Maria Plachouri
- Dermatology Department, University General Hospital of Patras, University of Patras, 265 04 Rio, Greece
| | - Vaia Florou
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 841112, USA
| | - Vasileios Georgiou
- School of Medicine, University General Hospital of Patras, University of Patras, 265 04 Rio, Greece
| | - Sophia Georgiou
- Dermatology Department, University General Hospital of Patras, University of Patras, 265 04 Rio, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hicks B, Kaye JA, Azoulay L, Kristensen KB, Habel LA, Pottegård A. The Application of Lag Times in Cancer Pharmacoepidemiology: A Narrative Review. Ann Epidemiol 2023:S1047-2797(23)00090-X. [PMID: 37169040 DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2023.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Revised: 04/27/2023] [Accepted: 05/05/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
With the increasing utilization of medications worldwide, coupled with the increasing availability of long-term data, there is a growing opportunity and need for robust studies evaluating drug-cancer associations. One methodology of importance in such studies is the application of lag times. In this review, we discuss the main reasons for using lag times. Namely, we discuss the typically long latency period of cancer concerning both tumor promoter and initiator effects and outline why cancer latency is a key consideration when choosing a lag time. We also discuss how the use of lag times can help reduce protopathic and detection bias. Finally, we present practical advice for implementing lag periods. In general, we recommend that researchers consider the information that generated the hypothesis as well as clinical and biological knowledge to inform lag period selection. In addition, given that latency periods are usually unknown, we also advocate that researchers examine multiple lag periods in sensitivity analyses as well as duration analyses and flexible modeling approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Blánaid Hicks
- Centre for Public Health, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK; RTI Health Solutions, Waltham, Massachusetts; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada; Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute, Montreal, Québec, Canada; Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada; Clinical Pharmacology,Pharmacy and Environmental Medicine, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark; Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California.
| | - James A Kaye
- Centre for Public Health, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK; RTI Health Solutions, Waltham, Massachusetts; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada; Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute, Montreal, Québec, Canada; Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada; Clinical Pharmacology,Pharmacy and Environmental Medicine, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark; Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California
| | - Laurent Azoulay
- Centre for Public Health, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK; RTI Health Solutions, Waltham, Massachusetts; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada; Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute, Montreal, Québec, Canada; Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada; Clinical Pharmacology,Pharmacy and Environmental Medicine, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark; Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California
| | - Kasper Bruun Kristensen
- Centre for Public Health, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK; RTI Health Solutions, Waltham, Massachusetts; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada; Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute, Montreal, Québec, Canada; Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada; Clinical Pharmacology,Pharmacy and Environmental Medicine, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark; Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California
| | - Laurel A Habel
- Centre for Public Health, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK; RTI Health Solutions, Waltham, Massachusetts; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada; Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute, Montreal, Québec, Canada; Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada; Clinical Pharmacology,Pharmacy and Environmental Medicine, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark; Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California
| | - Anton Pottegård
- Centre for Public Health, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK; RTI Health Solutions, Waltham, Massachusetts; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada; Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute, Montreal, Québec, Canada; Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada; Clinical Pharmacology,Pharmacy and Environmental Medicine, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark; Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yuan C, Wang B. Acneiform eruption induced by molecularly targeted agents in antineoplastic therapy: A review. J Cosmet Dermatol 2023. [PMID: 36924348 DOI: 10.1111/jocd.15704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2022] [Revised: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Various biologic agents targeting specific molecules present new treatment options for various tumors. Acneiform eruption is a very common skin reaction to these agents. Although not life-threatening, acneiform eruption can affect patients' emotional and social lives. In very exceptional cases, it can lead to cancer therapy interruption. AIMS The aim of this study was to review the incidence rate, clinical characteristics, pathogenesis, and current management of acneiform eruption induced by molecularly targeted agents. METHODS This review was carried out through PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane searching terms 'acneiform eruption', 'papulopustular eruption' or 'acne-like rash' and 'skin toxicity', 'cutaneous toxicity', 'skin reactions', 'dermatological toxicities', 'target therapy,' or 'drug therapy'. RESULTS Of the 73 articles matched our search terms, 61 were original articles and 12 were case reports or case series. Acneiform eruption is most commonly observed in patients treated with epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors and mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitors. Typical lesions consist of erythematous papules and pustules without comedones, accompanying with burning, pruritus, or xerosis. The pathogenesis involves inflammation and abnormalities of the follicular epithelium, where a disorder in EGFR signaling plays a key role. The treatment of acneiform eruption depends on the severity of the rash. CONCLUSIONS Early recognition and effective management of this cutaneous adverse reaction can prevent unnecessary reduction and discontinuation of drug use and improve patient survival and quality of life. Close collaboration between oncologists and dermatologists is important to optimize therapy and improve patient survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chen Yuan
- Department of Dermatology, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Baoxi Wang
- Department of Dermatology, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Shalata W, Weissmann S, Itzhaki Gabay S, Sheva K, Abu Saleh O, Jama AA, Yakobson A, Rouvinov K. A Retrospective, Single-Institution Experience of Bullous Pemphigoid as an Adverse Effect of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14215451. [PMID: 36358869 PMCID: PMC9656349 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14215451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2022] [Revised: 10/30/2022] [Accepted: 11/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary This article investigates the cutaneous adverse immune effects induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors. These drugs target proteins expressed on cancer cells that aid in the avoidance of immune system detection and destruction. Immune checkpoint inhibitors inadvertently cause other immune-mediated adverse effects. Cutaneous toxicities are the commonest adverse effect from immunotherapy; furthermore, they are usually developed early in the course of treatment. A rare and severe cutaneous adverse event is Bullous Pemphigoid. This article investigates the average and median onset of these drug toxicities, as well as treatments. We found these side effects to be negatively skewed, indicating most cases occur several months into treatment. Abstract Immune checkpoint inhibitors are a class of cancer treatment drugs that stimulate the immune system’s ability to fight tumor cells. These drugs are monoclonal antibodies targeting im-mune-inhibiting proteins on cancer cells, such as CTLA-4 and PD-1/PD-L1. Immune checkpoint inhibitors cause many immune-related adverse events. Cutaneous toxicities are of the most common adverse effects and occur with a range of severity. Bullous Pemphigoid is a rare adverse event with a high impact on quality of life that may occur after immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment. In this article, we investigate current research on immune checkpoint inhibitors, cutaneous adverse events, and common presentations and treatments, with a specific focus on Bullous Pemphigoid, its characteristics, onset timing, and treatment. Significant findings include a negative skew in the onset of presentation. Furthermore, we describe exclusive cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Walid Shalata
- The Legacy Heritage Center & Dr. Larry Norton Institute, Soroka Medical Center and Ben Gurion University, Beer Sheva 84105, Israel
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +972-(0)54-296-7100
| | - Sarah Weissmann
- Medical School for International Health, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva 84105, Israel
| | - Sapir Itzhaki Gabay
- Department of Dermatology, Soroka Medical Center and Ben Gurion University, Beer Sheva 84105, Israel
| | - Kim Sheva
- The Legacy Heritage Center & Dr. Larry Norton Institute, Soroka Medical Center and Ben Gurion University, Beer Sheva 84105, Israel
| | - Omar Abu Saleh
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Emek Medical Centre, Afula 18341, Israel
| | - Ashraf Abu Jama
- The Legacy Heritage Center & Dr. Larry Norton Institute, Soroka Medical Center and Ben Gurion University, Beer Sheva 84105, Israel
| | - Alexander Yakobson
- The Legacy Heritage Center & Dr. Larry Norton Institute, Soroka Medical Center and Ben Gurion University, Beer Sheva 84105, Israel
| | - Keren Rouvinov
- The Legacy Heritage Center & Dr. Larry Norton Institute, Soroka Medical Center and Ben Gurion University, Beer Sheva 84105, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Schauer F, Rafei-Shamsabadi D, Mai S, Mai Y, Izumi K, Meiss F, Kiritsi D. Hemidesmosomal Reactivity and Treatment Recommendations in Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Bullous Pemphigoid—A Retrospective, Monocentric Study. Front Immunol 2022; 13:953546. [PMID: 35936009 PMCID: PMC9355658 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.953546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) induce T-cell-mediated antitumour responses. While ICI were initially successfully applied in metastasized melanoma, they are now approved for several tumour entities. Numerous autoimmune disorders have been reported to occur as adverse events of the treatment, among them bullous pemphigoid (BP), with less than 1% of the patients experiencing ICI-induced BP. This number is higher than the estimated prevalence of autoimmune bullous diseases in the general population of Germany, which lies around 0.05%. We here describe our cohort of eight patients, who developed a bullous pemphigoid under or shortly after ICI treatment. Half of them had a severe subtype (as shown by BPDAI >57) and showed a median onset of ICI-BP after 10 months of ICI initiation. Six patients had a palmar and/or plantar involvement, while oral involvement occurred in one case. All patients had linear epidermal IgG depositions in split skin in the indirect immunofluorescence. In four out of five biopsies available for direct immunofluorescence, linear IgG and C3 depositions were detected at the basement membrane, while one patient showed linear IgM staining. Moderate to high levels of FLBP180 autoantibodies were found in seven of eight cases. The disease can still be active after ICI discontinuation, while rituximab might be required for remission. Finally, four tumour samples were stained histochemically for collagen XVII (BP180), but no enhanced expression was found.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franziska Schauer
- Department of Dermatology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany
- *Correspondence: Franziska Schauer,
| | - David Rafei-Shamsabadi
- Department of Dermatology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Shoko Mai
- Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Yosuke Mai
- Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Kentaro Izumi
- Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Frank Meiss
- Department of Dermatology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Dimitra Kiritsi
- Department of Dermatology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Seervai RNH, Cho WC, Chu EY, Marques-Piubelli ML, Ledesma DA, Richards K, Heberton MM, Nelson KC, Nagarajan P, Torres-Cabala CA, Prieto VG, Curry JL. Diverse landscape of dermatologic toxicities from small-molecule inhibitor cancer therapy. J Cutan Pathol 2021; 49:61-81. [PMID: 34622477 DOI: 10.1111/cup.14145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2021] [Revised: 08/29/2021] [Accepted: 10/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advances in molecular biology and genetics have contributed to breakthrough treatments directed at specific pathways associated with the development of cancer. Small-molecule inhibitors (Nibs) aimed at a variety of cellular pathways have been efficacious; however, they are associated with significant dermatologic toxicities. METHODS We conducted a comprehensive review of dermatologic toxicities associated with Nibs categorized into the following five groups: (a) mitogen-activated protein kinase; (b) growth factor/multi-tyrosine kinase; (c) cell division/DNA repair; (d) signaling associated with myeloproliferative neoplasms; and (e) other signaling pathways. Prospective phase I, II, or III clinical trials, retrospective literature reviews, systematic reviews/meta-analyses, and case reviews/reports were included for analysis. RESULTS Dermatologic toxicities reviewed were associated with every class of Nibs and ranged from mild to severe or life-threatening adverse skin reactions. Inflammatory reactions manifesting as maculopapular, papulopustular/acneiform, and eczematous lesions were frequent types of dermatologic toxicities seen with Nibs. Squamous cell carcinoma with keratoacanthoma-like features was associated with a subset of Nibs. Substantial overlap in dermatologic toxicities was found between Nibs. CONCLUSIONS Dermatologic toxicities from Nibs are diverse and may overlap between classes of Nibs. Recognition of the various types of toxicities from Nibs is critical for patient care in the era of "oncodermatology/dermatopathology."
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riyad N H Seervai
- Medical Scientist Training Program, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.,Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.,Department of Dermatology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Woo Cheal Cho
- Department of Pathology, Section of Dermatopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Emily Y Chu
- Department of Dermatology, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mario L Marques-Piubelli
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Debora A Ledesma
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Kristen Richards
- Department of Dermatology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Meghan M Heberton
- Department of Dermatology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Kelly C Nelson
- Department of Dermatology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Priyadharsini Nagarajan
- Department of Pathology, Section of Dermatopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Carlos A Torres-Cabala
- Department of Pathology, Section of Dermatopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.,Department of Dermatology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Victor G Prieto
- Department of Pathology, Section of Dermatopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.,Department of Dermatology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jonathan L Curry
- Department of Pathology, Section of Dermatopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.,Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hyperkeratotic Skin Adverse Events Induced by Anticancer Treatments: A Comprehensive Review. Drug Saf 2021; 43:395-408. [PMID: 31981081 DOI: 10.1007/s40264-020-00907-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Hyperkeratotic skin adverse events are a group of toxic effects, characterized by the disruption of epidermal homeostasis and interaction with keratinocyte proliferation/differentiation or keratinocyte survival, and frequently reported with systemic anticancer treatments. These types of reactions include hand-foot skin reaction or palmoplantar keratoderma, induced psoriasis, keratosis pilaris-like or pityriasis rubra pilaris-like rashes, Grover's disease, and contact hyperkeratosis. Cutaneous squamoproliferative lesions are also described because of the presence of abnormal keratinocyte proliferation. They are usually observed with tyrosine kinase inhibitors but have also been described in association with cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents. Their pathogenesis is related mainly to the disruption of epidermal homeostasis and interaction with keratinocyte proliferation/differentiation or keratinocyte survival caused by anticancer treatment. Early recognition and adequate management are critical to prevent exacerbation of the lesions, to limit treatment interruption, and to minimize impairment of quality of life. This review summarizes the current knowledge concerning the presentation, pathogenesis, and management of secondary hyperkeratotic reactions to anticancer therapies. It also includes hyperkeratotic reactions that have been more recently described with newly approved targeted therapies or immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as keratosis pilaris-like exanthema with second-generation BCR-ABL inhibitors, lamellar ichthyosis-like lesions with ponatinib, pityriasis rubra pilaris with the newly approved selective phosphoinositide 3 kinase inhibitor idelalisib, or psoriasis with anti-programmed death-1 and programmed death ligand-1.
Collapse
|
8
|
Mandel VD, Medri M, Manganoni AM, Pavoni L, De Rosa F, Ribero S, Foca F, Andreis D, Mazzoni L, Magi S, Farnetani F, Palla M, Ulivi P, Stanganelli I. Long-term vemurafenib therapy in advanced melanoma patients: cutaneous toxicity and prognostic implications. J DERMATOL TREAT 2020; 33:1368-1375. [PMID: 32875931 DOI: 10.1080/09546634.2020.1817838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The introduction of targeted therapies for the treatment of BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma was associated with different cutaneous adverse events (AEs). OBJECTIVES To describe the type, frequency and severity of cutaneous AEs related to vemurafenib; to understand the association between AEs and vemurafenib efficacy in terms of median overall survival (OS) and median progression-free survival (PFS); to identify molecular characteristics of long-term responders. METHODS This observational, retrospective, monocentric study included all consecutive patients with unresectable stage III or stage IV melanoma and BRAF V600E mutation that started treatment with vemurafenib between May 2012 and May 2014. RESULTS 62 patients with a median age of 56 years (range 26-82) were enrolled and received vemurafenib for a median period of 7.9 months (range 0.8-63.7). Among them, 45 patients presented at least one skin AE, 12 reduced the dosage due to cutaneous toxicity, and only one firstly reduced and after stopped the therapy. No specific molecular biomarkers were detected in long-term survivors. CONCLUSIONS Among long-term survivors, skin AEs seem to be less frequent and less severe. Results on multivariable analysis revealed that the presence of at least one G2 toxicity is a protective factor considering PFS, but not in terms of OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor Desmond Mandel
- Skin Cancer Unit, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST), Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Meldola, Italy.,Dermatology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Matelda Medri
- Skin Cancer Unit, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST), Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Meldola, Italy
| | | | - Laura Pavoni
- Department of Dermatology, Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Francesco De Rosa
- Immunotherapy, Cell Therapy and Biobank, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST), Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Meldola, Italy
| | - Simone Ribero
- Dermatologic Clinic, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Flavia Foca
- Unit of Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST), Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Meldola, Italy
| | - Daniele Andreis
- Unit of Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST), Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Meldola, Italy
| | - Laura Mazzoni
- Skin Cancer Unit, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST), Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Meldola, Italy
| | - Serena Magi
- Skin Cancer Unit, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST), Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Meldola, Italy
| | - Francesca Farnetani
- Dermatology Unit, Surgical, Medical and Dental Department of Morphological Sciences related to Transplant, Oncology and Regenerative Medicine, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Marco Palla
- Unit of Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy & Innovative Therapies Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori "Fondazione G. Pascale", Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Naples, Italy
| | - Paola Ulivi
- Biosciences Laboratory, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST), Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Meldola, Italy
| | - Ignazio Stanganelli
- Skin Cancer Unit, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST), Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Meldola, Italy.,Dermatology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT The treatment of advanced melanoma has undergone a dramatic transformation over the last decade with the advent of targeted and immunomodulatory therapies. This transition from cytotoxic chemotherapy has yielded improvements in both survival and quality of life; yet despite their therapeutic advantages, these treatments have been associated with a diverse range of cutaneous adverse events (AEs). These range from relatively benign eczematous conditions to more severe inflammatory and bullous disorders, and can include induction of second malignancies. AEs can result in serious morbidity and risk of mortality if not recognised and managed early. As a consequence of their novelty, and rapid uptake, these agents have been subject to intense scrutiny and there is a general understanding that cutaneous AEs should be anticipated in treatment plans. Dermatologists should be integrated into management teams to assist in the development of treatment protocols for anticipated common AEs and to provide expert management of more severe, rare or unusual AEs. Our experience has shown a reduction in treatment interruptions, more rapid recognition of unusual AEs and improved management pathways for patients suffering cutaneous AEs.
Collapse
|
10
|
|
11
|
Pharmacodynamic Therapeutic Drug Monitoring for Cancer: Challenges, Advances, and Future Opportunities. Ther Drug Monit 2019; 41:142-159. [DOI: 10.1097/ftd.0000000000000606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|
12
|
Swetter SM, Tsao H, Bichakjian CK, Curiel-Lewandrowski C, Elder DE, Gershenwald JE, Guild V, Grant-Kels JM, Halpern AC, Johnson TM, Sober AJ, Thompson JA, Wisco OJ, Wyatt S, Hu S, Lamina T. Guidelines of care for the management of primary cutaneous melanoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 2018; 80:208-250. [PMID: 30392755 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.08.055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 320] [Impact Index Per Article: 53.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2018] [Revised: 08/28/2018] [Accepted: 08/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The incidence of primary cutaneous melanoma continues to increase each year. Melanoma accounts for the majority of skin cancer-related deaths, but treatment is usually curative following early detection of disease. In this American Academy of Dermatology clinical practice guideline, updated treatment recommendations are provided for patients with primary cutaneous melanoma (American Joint Committee on Cancer stages 0-IIC and pathologic stage III by virtue of a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy). Biopsy techniques for a lesion that is clinically suggestive of melanoma are reviewed, as are recommendations for the histopathologic interpretation of cutaneous melanoma. The use of laboratory, molecular, and imaging tests is examined in the initial work-up of patients with newly diagnosed melanoma and for follow-up of asymptomatic patients. With regard to treatment of primary cutaneous melanoma, recommendations for surgical margins and the concepts of staged excision (including Mohs micrographic surgery) and nonsurgical treatments for melanoma in situ, lentigo maligna type (including topical imiquimod and radiation therapy), are updated. The role of sentinel lymph node biopsy as a staging technique for cutaneous melanoma is described, with recommendations for its use in clinical practice. Finally, current data regarding pregnancy and melanoma, genetic testing for familial melanoma, and management of dermatologic toxicities related to novel targeted agents and immunotherapies for patients with advanced disease are summarized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan M Swetter
- Department of Dermatology, Stanford University Medical Center and Cancer Institute, Stanford, California; Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California.
| | - Hensin Tsao
- Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Wellman Center for Photomedicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Christopher K Bichakjian
- Department of Dermatology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Clara Curiel-Lewandrowski
- Division of Dermatology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona; University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, Arizona
| | - David E Elder
- Department of Dermatology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Pathology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jeffrey E Gershenwald
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Cancer Biology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Jane M Grant-Kels
- Department of Dermatology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut; Department of Pathology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut; Department of Pediatrics, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut
| | - Allan C Halpern
- Department of Dermatology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Timothy M Johnson
- Department of Dermatology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Arthur J Sober
- Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - John A Thompson
- Division of Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, Washington
| | - Oliver J Wisco
- Department of Dermatology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | | | - Shasa Hu
- Department of Dermatology, University of Miami Health System, Miami, Florida
| | - Toyin Lamina
- American Academy of Dermatology, Rosemont, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Juin C, Oliveira Junior RGD, Fleury A, Oudinet C, Pytowski L, Bérard JB, Nicolau E, Thiéry V, Lanneluc I, Beaugeard L, Prunier G, Almeida JRGDS, Picot L. Zeaxanthin from Porphyridium purpureum induces apoptosis in human melanoma cells expressing the oncogenic BRAF V600E mutation and sensitizes them to the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib. REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE FARMACOGNOSIA-BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOGNOSY 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bjp.2018.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
14
|
Incidence of Basal Cell Carcinoma and Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Patients on Antiprogrammed Cell Death-1 Therapy for Metastatic Melanoma. J Immunother 2018; 41:343-349. [PMID: 29939876 DOI: 10.1097/cji.0000000000000237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Systemic melanoma therapies have the potential to affect basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cuSCC) development. In this study, we aim to compare the incidence of BCC and cuSCC in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with antiprogrammed cell death-1 (anti-PD1), BRAF inhibitor (BRAFi) monotherapy or dabrafenib and trametinib combination therapy (CombiDT) with a group of control patients having similar risk factors. We reviewed the records of melanoma patients on anti-PD1, BRAFi, or CombiDT, and patients from the High-Risk Melanoma Clinic, Westmead Hospital. We also performed an immunohistochemical analysis of BCCs under anti-PD1 compared with controls using PD1, PD-L1, CD3, CD8, and CD20 stains. For the results, in all, 340 patients were included; 82 on anti-PD1, 134 on BRAFi, 69 on CombiDT, and 55 controls. BRAFi had the highest incidence of BCC (12.7%), followed by CombiDT (10.1%) and anti-PD1 (2.4%). The incidence of BCC was significantly lower in patients on anti-PD1 (2.4% vs. 19.4%; P<0.001) compared with controls. Patients on anti-PD1 were 8.54 times less likely to develop BCC than the controls [hazard ratio, 0.117 (95% confidence interval, 0.026-0.526), P=0.005]. BRAFi and CombiDT showed no significant differences in BCC incidence compared with controls. BRAFi had the highest cuSCC incidence (23.9%), followed by anti-PD1 (7.3%) and CombiDT (2.9%). The incidence of cuSCC was significantly higher in patients on BRAFi (23.9% vs. 3.5%; P<0.001) compared with controls, but anti-PD1 and CombiDT showed no differences in cuSCC incidence compared with controls. Immunohistochemistry analysis of 10 BCC from under anti-PD1 and 8 BCC from controls patients showed that while all BCC had negative PD-L1 staining, the percentage of PD1 staining in anti-PD1 group is significantly lower than that of the control group (independent t test, 8% vs. 26%; P<0.001). In conclusion, our study suggests that anti-PD1 therapy decreases the incidence of BCC, as a result of the PD1/PD-L1 blockade. Future studies investigating the role of anti-PD1 in suppressing or treating BCC may be warranted.
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW We sought to review past and current literature on sulfonamide drug allergy and distill it in a practical manner to assist the clinician, specifically focusing on cross-reactivity and desensitization. RECENT FINDINGS There do not appear to be consistent genetic markers to reliably predict features of or the presence hypersensitivity reactions. Recent evidence continues to alleviate early concerns cross-reactivity between sulfonamide antibiotics and non-antibiotics. Sulfonamide drug allergy is frequently encountered by the practicing clinician. For sulfonamide antibiotics, delayed rash is the most common clinical manifestation. There is no current evidence to support avoidance of all non-antibiotic sulfonamides in those with a reported allergy to sulfonamide antibiotics, although certain scenarios require caution. Available evidence supports the cautious reintroduction of sulfonamide antibiotics via desensitization, which is usually well tolerated and should be considered in those with strong indications for trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and a reported sulfonamide allergy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua M Dorn
- Mayo Clinic, Division of Allergic Diseases, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Mollie Alpern
- Mayo Clinic, Division of Allergic Diseases, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Caitlin McNulty
- Mayo Clinic, Division of Allergic Diseases, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Gerald W Volcheck
- Mayo Clinic, Division of Allergic Diseases, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Boada A, Carrera C, Segura S, Collgros H, Pasquali P, Bodet D, Puig S, Malvehy J. Cutaneous toxicities of new treatments for melanoma. Clin Transl Oncol 2018; 20:1373-1384. [PMID: 29799097 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-018-1891-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2018] [Accepted: 05/09/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
New drugs against advanced melanoma have emerged during last decade. Target therapy and immunotherapy have changed the management of patients with metastatic disease. Along with its generalized use, drug toxicities have appeared and the skin is the target organ of a significant part of them. This revision summarizes the most common side effects and consensus management to improve the compliance of therapies and patients' quality of life. Among the BRAF inhibitors, main cutaneous side effects are photosensitivity, plantar hyperkeratosis, and the appearance of verrucal keratosis or squamous cell carcinoma. Special attention must be paid to the development of new primary melanomas or changes on nevi during BRAF inhibitor therapy. The most common cutaneous side effects of immunotherapy are rash, pruritus, and vitiligo. It remains controversial the possible role of these toxicities as markers of response to therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Boada
- Dermatology Department, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Crta/Canyet s/n., Badalona, 08016, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - C Carrera
- Melanoma Unit, Dermatology Department, Hospital Clinic, Institut d'investigacions biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), CIBERER, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - S Segura
- Dermatology Department, Hospital del Mar, Parc de Salut Mar, Fundació Institut Mar d'Investigacions Mèdiques, Barcelona, Spain
| | - H Collgros
- Sydney Melanoma Diagnostic Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sidney, Australia
| | - P Pasquali
- Dermatology Department, Pius Hospital Valls, Institut d'Investigació Sanitària Pere Virgili Valls, Tarragona, Spain
| | - D Bodet
- Dermatology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, VHIR, Barcelona, Spain
| | - S Puig
- Melanoma Unit, Dermatology Department, Hospital Clinic, Institut d'investigacions biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), CIBERER, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J Malvehy
- Melanoma Unit, Dermatology Department, Hospital Clinic, Institut d'investigacions biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), CIBERER, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Masatkar V, Nagure A, Gupta LK. Unusual and Interesting Adverse Cutaneous Drug Reactions. Indian J Dermatol 2018; 63:107-116. [PMID: 29692451 PMCID: PMC5903039 DOI: 10.4103/ijd.ijd_584_17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Any drug can cause any rash! Cutaneous adverse drug reactions (CADRs) are great mimickers and can be included in the differential diagnosis of any inflammatory dermatoses. Several drugs can cause rash of similar morphology and the same drug can cause rash of different morphology. While some common and specific drug reaction patterns are recognized easily by the clinicians, many a times unusual and interesting patterns can be induced by drug(s), thus leading to erroneous diagnosis and mistreatment. This review aims to familiarize clinicians with some rare, yet interesting patterns of CADR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vaishali Masatkar
- Department of Dermatology, Ananta Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Rajsamand, India
| | - Ashok Nagure
- Department of Dermatology, Bidar Institute of Medical Sciences, Bidar, Karnataka, India
| | - Lalit Kumar Gupta
- Department of Dermatology, RNT Medical College, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Liu RC, Consuegra G, Fernández-Peñas P. Management of the cutaneous adverse effects of antimelanoma therapy. Melanoma Manag 2017; 4:187-202. [PMID: 30190925 DOI: 10.2217/mmt-2017-0015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2017] [Accepted: 10/17/2017] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The advent of targeted therapy and immunotherapy has revolutionized the management of advanced melanoma. However, these novel therapies are associated with adverse effects (AEs), of which cutaneous toxicities are the most frequently observed. These cutaneous AEs can exert significant morbidity and impact on patient quality of life, hence the recognition and management of AEs is fundamental in preventing interruption or cessation of survival-prolonging treatments. Additionally, knowledge of these AEs are necessary in order for healthcare professionals to counsel patients when starting treatment and in the initiation of AE prophylaxis. The incidence and clinical presentation of the cutaneous toxicities of novel melanoma therapies will be discussed, and treatment guidelines provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rose Congwei Liu
- Department of Dermatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney 2145, Australia.,Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney Medical School, Sydney 2145, Australia.,Department of Dermatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney 2145, Australia.,Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney Medical School, Sydney 2145, Australia
| | - Germana Consuegra
- Department of Dermatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney 2145, Australia.,Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney Medical School, Sydney 2145, Australia.,Department of Dermatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney 2145, Australia.,Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney Medical School, Sydney 2145, Australia
| | - Pablo Fernández-Peñas
- Department of Dermatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney 2145, Australia.,Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney Medical School, Sydney 2145, Australia.,Department of Dermatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney 2145, Australia.,Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney Medical School, Sydney 2145, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Hwang S, Anforth R, Carlos G, Fernandez-Peñas P. Cutaneous Adverse Events of New Anti-melanoma Therapies: Classification and Management. ACTAS DERMO-SIFILIOGRAFICAS 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.adengl.2016.05.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
|
20
|
Hwang S, Anforth R, Carlos G, Fernandez-Peñas P. Cutaneous Adverse Events of New Anti-melanoma Therapies: Classification and Management. ACTAS DERMO-SIFILIOGRAFICAS 2017; 108:6-16. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ad.2016.05.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2016] [Revised: 04/27/2016] [Accepted: 05/03/2016] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
|
21
|
|
22
|
Bullous pemphigoid, an autoantibody-mediated disease, is a novel immune-related adverse event in patients treated with anti-programmed cell death 1 antibodies. Melanoma Res 2016; 26:413-6. [DOI: 10.1097/cmr.0000000000000260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
|
23
|
Amaral T, Nouri N, Garbe C. The safety and efficacy of cobimetinib for the treatment of BRAF V600E or V600K melanoma. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2016; 16:705-15. [DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2016.1192469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Teresa Amaral
- Center for Dermatooncology, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Military Health Care Department, Portuguese Air Force Health Direction, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Noura Nouri
- Center for Dermatooncology, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Claus Garbe
- Center for Dermatooncology, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Managing Cutaneous Side Effects From Targeted Molecular Inhibitors for Melanoma and Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer. Dermatol Surg 2016; 42 Suppl 1:S40-8. [PMID: 26730973 DOI: 10.1097/dss.0000000000000519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Targeted anticancer therapies can cause cutaneous adverse events different from classical chemotherapeutic toxicities. OBJECTIVE To review the literature on dermatologic adverse events (DAEs) of targeted molecular inhibitors for melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancers with a focus on management options. MATERIALS AND METHODS A comprehensive literature search related to the side effects and management of these side effects from vemurafenib, dabrafenib, trametinib (BRAF inhibitors), pembrolizumab (antiprogrammed-death-receptor-1 antibody), imatinib (tyrosine kinase inhibitor), ipilimumab (anticytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 antibody), cetuximab (epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor), sorafenib (multikinase inhibitor), and vismodegib (smoothened receptor inhibitor). RESULTS No large controlled studies specifically examining the management of DAEs of targeted molecular inhibitors exist, although there are case report-based recommendations and algorithms developed by expert panels to manage these adverse events. CONCLUSION Many options for managing the cutaneous side effects of targeted molecular inhibitors are similar to those used in general dermatology practice. When used effectively, drug dosing and patient quality of life may be optimized.
Collapse
|
25
|
Wick MR, Gru AA. Metastatic melanoma: Pathologic characterization, current treatment, and complications of therapy. Semin Diagn Pathol 2016; 33:204-18. [PMID: 27234321 DOI: 10.1053/j.semdp.2016.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Metastatic melanoma (MM) has the potential to involve virtually any anatomical site, and it also has a wide spectrum of histological appearances. General clinicopathologic data pertaining to MM are presented in this review, together with a discussion of its differential diagnosis and therapy. "Biological" agents used in the treatment of melanoma are considered, along with the pathological features of the complications that they may cause.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark R Wick
- Division of Surgical Pathology & Cytopathology, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia.
| | - Alejandro A Gru
- Division of Surgical Pathology & Cytopathology, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Keating GM. Cobimetinib Plus Vemurafenib: A Review in BRAF V600 Mutation-Positive Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma. Drugs 2016; 76:605-15. [DOI: 10.1007/s40265-016-0562-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
27
|
Slimano F, Roessle C, Blanc C, De Maleissye MF, Bauler S. [Updates on prevention and treatment of melanoma: Pharmacist involvements and challenges]. ANNALES PHARMACEUTIQUES FRANÇAISES 2016; 74:335-49. [PMID: 26968263 DOI: 10.1016/j.pharma.2016.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2015] [Revised: 01/25/2016] [Accepted: 01/27/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Melanoma is a skin cancer that represents an actual public health problem. Its incidence is increasing every year. Environmental risk factors have been clearly identified. Early diagnosis of a suspicious skin lesion should be possible by any health professionals because the prognosis is correlated with the evolution of the disease and the presence of metastases. The advent of new therapies in metastatic forms with the development of immunotherapies and kinases inhibitors has significantly changed the management of this disease. New therapies are available in retail pharmacies and involve health professionals out of the hospital. This article is intended for community and hospital pharmacists and summarizes recommendations for primary and secondary prevention. It updates on new targeted therapies. It wants to give advices to the community pharmacists about the effective use of those treatments for melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Slimano
- Département de pharmacie clinique, Gustave-Roussy cancer campus, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif, France; Laboratoire de pharmacologie et pharmacocinétique, UFR de pharmacie, université de Reims-Champagne-Ardenne, 51, rue Cognacq-Jay, 51100 Reims, France; Unité MEDyC, UMR CNRS/URCA, université de Reims-Champagne-Ardenne, 51, rue Cognacq-Jay, 51100 Reims, France.
| | - C Roessle
- Département de pharmacie clinique, Gustave-Roussy cancer campus, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - C Blanc
- Service de pharmacie, hôpital Ambroise-Paré, 9, avenue Charles-de-Gaulle, 92104 Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - M-F De Maleissye
- Service de dermatologie, hôpital Ambroise-Paré, 9, avenue Charles-de-Gaulle, 92104 Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - S Bauler
- Service de pharmacie, hôpital Ambroise-Paré, 9, avenue Charles-de-Gaulle, 92104 Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Cutaneous Side Effects of BRAF Inhibitors in Advanced Melanoma: Review of the Literature. Dermatol Res Pract 2016; 2016:5361569. [PMID: 27042173 PMCID: PMC4794559 DOI: 10.1155/2016/5361569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2015] [Revised: 02/07/2016] [Accepted: 02/15/2016] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The incidence of melanoma has recently been increasing. BRAF mutations have been found in 40–60% of melanomas. The increased activity of BRAF V600E leads to the activation of downstream signaling through the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway, which plays a key role as a regulator of cell growth, differentiation, and survival. The use of BRAF inhibitors in metastatic melanoma with BRAF mutation ensures clinical improvement of the disease. Vemurafenib and dabrafenib are two selective BRAF inhibitors approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Both drugs are well tolerated and successfully used in clinical practice. However, some adverse reactions have been reported in patients in the course of treatment. Cutaneous side effects are the most common adverse events among them with a broad spectrum. Both the case reports and several original clinical trials reported cutaneous reactions during the treatment with BRAF inhibitors. In this review, the common cutaneous side effects of BRAF inhibitors in the treatment of metastatic melanoma with BRAF V600E mutation were reviewed.
Collapse
|
29
|
Sebaratnam D, Anforth R, Fernández-Peñas P. Treatment-specific utility weightings are needed for cost-utility analysis in metastatic melanoma. Br J Dermatol 2016; 174:462-3. [DOI: 10.1111/bjd.14264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- D.F. Sebaratnam
- St John's Institute of Dermatology; Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Trust; London U.K
- Department of Dermatology; Westmead Hospital; Westmead NSW 2145 Australia
| | - R. Anforth
- Department of Dermatology; Westmead Hospital; Westmead NSW 2145 Australia
| | - P. Fernández-Peñas
- Department of Dermatology; Westmead Hospital; Westmead NSW 2145 Australia
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Cytostatic Agents—Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Utilized in the Treatment of Solid Malignancies. SIDE EFFECTS OF DRUGS ANNUAL 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/bs.seda.2016.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|
31
|
Hassan M, Selimovic D, Hannig M, Haikel Y, Brodell RT, Megahed M. Endoplasmic reticulum stress-mediated pathways to both apoptosis and autophagy: Significance for melanoma treatment. World J Exp Med 2015; 5:206-217. [PMID: 26618107 PMCID: PMC4655250 DOI: 10.5493/wjem.v5.i4.206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2015] [Revised: 06/29/2015] [Accepted: 09/08/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Melanoma is the most aggressive form of skin cancer. Disrupted intracellular signaling pathways are responsible for melanoma's extraordinary resistance to current chemotherapeutic modalities. The pathophysiologic basis for resistance to both chemo- and radiation therapy is rooted in altered genetic and epigenetic mechanisms that, in turn, result in the impairing of cell death machinery and/or excessive activation of cell growth and survival-dependent pathways. Although most current melanoma therapies target mitochondrial dysregulation, there is increasing evidence that endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress-associated pathways play a role in the potentiation, initiation and maintenance of cell death machinery and autophagy. This review focuses on the reliability of ER-associated pathways as therapeutic targets for melanoma treatment.
Collapse
|