Response of livedoid vasculopathy to rivaroxaban

Comparative Efficacy of Rivaroxaban and Immunoglobulin Therapy in the Treatment of Livedoid Vasculopathy: A Systematic Review

Livedoid vasculopathy (LV) is an uncommon chronic coagulation disorder whose underlying etiology is not yet fully understood. It predominantly affects females, especially those in late adolescence. There is currently limited research on treatment options for those with this diagnosis. The present systematic review aims to compare the efficacy of rivaroxaban and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapy in the treatment of livedoid vasculopathy. A detailed search was conducted from April 20, 2022, to May 1, 2022, using four databases: Elsevier, Medline Complete, Medline Ovid, and PubMed. Out of these, 20 relevant articles were used, and the data was extracted and analyzed. Both rivaroxaban and IVIG were shown to be effective treatment options with similar treatment response times. However, future large-scale clinical trials are needed to determine an established treatment regimen for these patients.

Livedoid vasculopathy: A multidisciplinary clinical approach to diagnosis and management

Livedoid vasculopathy (LV) is a rare, chronic, and occlusive disease of the veins supplying the upper parts of the skin. The pathogenesis of the disease is not precisely understood, and its attacks are often unpredictable but tend to worsen during the summer. LV affects women more often. This increased risk for LV in women might be related to sex-specific physiological conditions, such as pregnancy, or a higher incidence of LV-associated conditions, such as connective tissue diseases, hypercoagulable states, and venous stasis in women. The typical clinical appearance of LV consists of three main findings: livedo racemose, atrophie blanche, and skin ulcers. The purpose of this comprehensive review was to analyze LV in all aspects and mainly focus on early diagnosis for successful clinical management with a holistic and multidisciplinary approach. A detailed history, dermatological examination, and laboratory testing are essential for a diagnosis of LV. When LV is clinically suspected, a skin biopsy should be taken to confirm the diagnosis. Another critical step is to investigate the underlying associated conditions, such as connective tissue diseases, hypercoagulable states, thrombophilia, and malignancy. Unfortunately, no associated conditions can be detected in approximately 20% of all cases (idiopathic LV) despite all efforts. The diagnosis of the disease is delayed in most patients. Thus, irreversible, permanent scars appear. Early and appropriate treatment reduces pain and prevents the development of scars and other complications. Antiplatelet drugs and anticoagulants can be preferred as the first-line treatments along with general supportive measures. Other therapeutic options might be considered in unresponsive cases. Preference for refractory cases is based on availability, clinical experience, and patient-related factors (comorbidities, age, sex, and compliance). These include anabolic steroids, intravenous immunoglobulin, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, psoralen-ultraviolet A, vasodilators, fibrinolytics, immunomodulators, and immunosuppressives.

Rivaroxaban for treatment of livedoid vasculopathy: A systematic review

Rivaroxaban is a direct inhibitor of activated coagulation factor X and competitively targets factor Xa via reversible binding. We conducted a systematic review of the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban for treatment of livedoid vasculopathy (LV) by searching the PubMed, Cochrane and Embase databases. A total of 22 articles and 1 registered clinical trial were identified in the search of which 13 were included. The studies included 73 LV patients receiving rivaroxaban therapy (10-20 mg per day). Overall, 60 patients (82.2%) had responses to therapy, achieving remission of both pain and ulceration. Few adverse effects were observed. Thus, the consensus of the clinical evidence is that rivaroxaban is a well-tolerated and effective treatment for LV. However, this still needs to be confirmed by large prospective and/or case control studies.

Livedoid vasculopathy: Clinical course and long-term outcome in Asian patients with a review of the literature

Livedoid vasculopathy (LV) is an uncommon, chronic, and recurrent thrombo-occlusive vascular disorder. Data specific to LV in Thai population remains scarce. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical course and treatment outcomes of LV in Thai patients, and to perform a literature review for studies that reported on anticoagulant treatment in LV. Seventy-four patients with a mean age of 37.6 ± 14.7 years were included. The female to male ratio was 5.2:1, and the median follow-up was 10.5 months. Most patients had primary LV disorder. Forty-eight patients were improved with treatments, with a median duration of 11.4 months. Combination treatments were commonly used, including anti-inflammatories, antiplatelets, and immunosuppressants. Add-on therapy with anticoagulant or psoralen plus ultraviolet-A (PUVA) led to disease improvement in a majority of the patients treated. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that 38.5%, 53.7%, and 57.9% would have disease improvement at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively. Of 39 studies (n = 219) that reported on anticoagulant treatment in LV, anticoagulant drug was used as monotherapy in 104 patients. The mean duration of anticoagulant treatment was 7.2 ± 3.8 months, which led to disease improvement in 97 patients (93.3%). Bleeding side effect was found in 9 patients (8.7%). The highest incidence of LV was found among females aged 30 to 40 years. Combination therapy with anti-inflammatory drugs, antiplatelet drugs, and immunosuppressants led to disease improvement. The observed efficacy of add-on PUVA or anticoagulant is promising and should be further investigated. Further studies are needed to guide the development of an LV management guideline.

The management of livedoid vasculopathy focused on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs): four case reports successfully treated with rivaroxaban

Livedoid vasculopathy (LV) is a thrombotic skin disease characterized by episodic painful ulcerations of the distal aspects of the legs. Its healing process typically leaves small porcelain-white scars called atrophie blanche as a result of the occlusion of cutaneous microcirculation. The main goals of the treatment are pain management and the prevention of ulceration and of progressive scarring in the malleolar area. The therapeutic management is still a challenge, however, and most treatments were based on anecdotal off-label protocols. Over such context, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACS) arise as a potential treatment for this disease. This class of medications became an alternative from initial large studies applied on different pathologic scenarios regarding thromboembolic events. In that line, recent case series using DOACS, including rivaroxaban, started to emerge in the literature related to LV and reported successful prevention of cutaneous infarctions and ulcerations, providing physicians with a new promising alternative. The current report describes four cases of long-term recalcitrant LV, in which rivaroxaban monotherapy effectively reduced pain and cutaneous ulcerations in a few weeks of treatment without relevant side effects. The authors also review therapy management of the disease, focused on DOACS, and suggest a step-by-step approach to treat these patients, taking into consideration different resource profiles of each level of local health centers, the gravity of the cases, and risks/benefits for patients.

Emerging therapeutic uses of direct-acting oral anticoagulants: An evidence-based perspective

Direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) were claimed to cause a potential paradigm shift in the therapeutic scenario of patients requiring short- and long-term anticoagulation, by virtue of their pharmacological properties, perceived as innovative. The evidence gathered so far (from pre-approval pivotal trials to real-world post-marketing observational data) consistently confirmed that DOACs are overall comparable to vitamin-K antagonists (VKAs) in terms of safety, efficacy and effectiveness and unequivocally documented a consistent and clinically relevant reduced risk of intracranial bleeding in the settings of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and venous thromboembolism (VTE). Interestingly, two parallel paths can be identified in the current research scenario: A) in the aforementioned consolidated therapeutic indications, an innovative approach is directed towards tailored treatment strategies, to identify patients most likely to benefit from one of the different anticoagulant drugs, in particular subpopulations at increased risk of adverse events (e.g., bleeding); B) in unconventional settings, DOACs are gaining interest for potential use in emerging diseases characterized by arterial and venous thromboembolic risk. In these scenarios, the risk-benefit profile of DOACs, as compared to VKAs or heparins, is less defined. The aim of this review is to critically assess the body of evidence underlying emerging therapeutic uses of DOACs (e.g., heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, anti-phospholipid antibody syndrome), including evolving issues in special populations (e.g., patients with VTE and cancer or cirrhosis). This will be achieved by analyzing the strength (i.e., systematic reviews, randomized clinical trials, observational studies, case report/series) and consistency (i.e., concordance) of both published and unpublished evidence registered in major public repositories.