Rituximab therapy in pemphigus foliaceus: report of 12 cases and review of recent literature

Current biologics in treatment of pemphigus foliaceus: a systematic review

Background

Pemphigus foliaceus (PF) differs from pemphigus vulgaris (PV) in that it affects only the skin and mucous membranes are not involved. Pemphigus is commonly treated with systemic corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents (ISAs). More recently, biologics have been used. The current literature on biologic therapy often combines treatment of PF with PV, hence it is often difficult for clinicians to isolate the treatment of PF from PV. The purpose of this review was to provide information regarding the use of current biological therapy, specifically in PF.

Materials and methods

A search of PubMed, Embase, and other databases was conducted using keywords pemphigus foliaceus (PF), rituximab (RTX), intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), and biologics. Forty-one studies were included in this review, which produced 105 patients with PF, treated with RTX, IVIg, or a combination of both. Eighty-five patients were treated with RTX, eight patients with IVIg, and 12 received both RTX and IVIg.

Results

Most patients in this review had PF that was nonresponsive to conventional immunosuppressive therapies (CIST), and had significant side effects from their use. RTX treatment resulted in complete remission (CR) in 63.2%, a relapse rate of 39.5%, an infection rate of 19.7%, and a mortality rate of 3.9%. Relapse was greater in the lymphoma (LP) protocol than the rheumatoid arthritis (RA) protocol (p<0.0001). IVIg led to CR in 62.5% of patients, with no relapses or infections. Patients receiving both biologics experienced better outcomes when RTX was first administered, then followed by IVIg. Follow-up durations for patients receiving RTX, IVIg, and both were 22.1, 24.8, and 35.7 months, respectively.

Discussion

In pemphigus foliaceus patients nonresponsive to conventional immunosuppressive therapy or in those with significant side effects from CIST, RTX and IVIg appear to be useful agents. Profile of clinical response, as well as relapse, infection, and mortality rates in PF patients treated with RTX were similar to those observed in PV patients. The data suggests that protocols specific for PF may produce better outcomes, less adverse effects, and improved quality of life.

Treatment of Pediatric Pemphigus Foliaceus

Pemphigus foliaceus (PF) is an autoimmune blistering disease limited to the superficial skin without mucosal involvement. It is clinically, histologically, and immunopathologically distinct from pemphigus vulgaris (PV). As data on pediatric PF is often merged with data on both pediatric and adult PV patients, isolating clinical outcomes in pediatric PF is not always possible. Therefore, the authors of this review analyzed clinical outcomes following therapy in pediatric PF patients only. A search of databases resulted in 33 pediatric patients with PF. In total, 19 (57.6%) patients were treated with conventional immunosuppressive therapies (CISTs), which consisted of systemic corticosteroids and multiple immunosuppressive agents (ISAs). Further, 14 (42.4%) patients were treated with biologic agents, predominantly rituximab (RTX). The mean age of those treated with biologics was 12.8 years (range = 0.88-18 years) compared to 8.9 years (range = 0.92-15 years) of those treated with CIST (p = 0.01). Treatment with biologics was initiated significantly longer after the diagnosis of PF when compared to patients treated with CIST (p = 0.003). RTX was used in all patients who received biologic therapy. Two (6%) patients also received intravenous immunoglobulin. When clinical outcomes were compared between CIST and biologic therapy, rates of clinical remission, partial remission, and relapse, were not statistically significantly different between groups. When RTX was used, rates of relapse and adverse events were higher in those treated with the lymphoma protocol (375 mg/m2 once weekly for four weeks) compared to those treated with the rheumatoid arthritis protocol (two doses of 1,000 mg two weeks apart) (p < 0.0001). The incidence of adverse events was statistically significantly higher in patients treated with CIST when compared to RTX (p = 0.003). These included both physical and psychological changes. The infection rate after treatment with RTX was 7.1%. These outcomes occurred during a follow-up of 12.5 months (range = 1-36 months) in the CIST group and 20.5 months (range = 6-67 months) in the biologic therapy group. The difference in the follow-up period was not statistically significant. The literature suggests that biologics are superior to CIST in treating pemphigus patients. The results of this review suggest similar responses to therapy in pediatric PF patients treated with biologics compared to CIST. This may have been due to a limited duration of follow-up and a lack of detailed treatment outcomes in pediatric PF patients. The data in this review strongly suggests that specific treatment protocols need to be developed and implemented for pediatric PF patients. These patients are at a critical phase in life where PF therapy can influence or affect physical growth, hormonal changes, psychosocial development, and essential education.

B-cell targeted therapy of pemphigus

Pemphigus is an autoimmune disease that causes blistering and erosion of the skin and mucous membranes because of autoantibodies against desmoglein, which plays an important role in adhesion between epidermal keratinocytes. Treatment of pemphigus has long been centered on corticosteroids, and the guidelines for management of pemphigus have recommended high-dose systemic corticosteroids as the first-line treatment. While guideline-based treatment has been shown to be beneficial in patients with pemphigus, it has also become clear that this treatment is accompanied by significant burden and risk. The challenge for future pemphigus treatment is to maximize efficacy while minimizing risk during the course of the disease. In this regard, treatment targeting B cells is expected to become increasingly important as autoreactive B cells in pemphigus patients are thought to play a major role in the production of autoantibodies, which form the basis of the pathogenesis. The recent expansion of insurance coverage to rituximab, a monoclonal antibody against CD20, for refractory pemphigus in the USA, Europe, and Japan has opened up a new era of pemphigus treatment by enabling treatment strategies with drugs targeting B cells in patients. Here, we discuss the current status and future prospects of pemphigus treatment, focusing on rituximab and Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors, which are expected to become essential drugs for pemphigus treatment in the future.

Clinical and biological activity of rituximab in the treatment of pemphigus

B-cells are major effector cells in autoimmunity since they differentiate into plasmocytes that produce pathogenic auto-antibody such as anti-desmoglein antibodies in pemphigus patients. Major advances were obtained using whole B-cell depleting therapies including anti-CD20 antibodies in refractory pemphigus patients that lead to rituximab approval in pemphigus patients in EU and USA. This review summarizes the data supporting the efficacy of rituximab in pemphigus and provides an overview of the reported immunological changes underlying its therapeutic action. Short and long-term remission in pemphigus is explained by the removal of autoreactive B-cells involved in the production of pathogenic IgG auto-antibodies and by enhancement of the appearance of regulatory B-cells that could maintain long term immune tolerance.

B-cell targeted therapies in pemphigus

Pemphigus is a rare autoimmune disease of the skin, characterized by autoantibodies targeting adhesion proteins of the epidermis, in particular desmoglein 3 and desmoglein 1, that cause the loss of cell-cell adhesion and the formation of intraepidermal blisters. Given that these autoantibodies are both necessary and sufficient for pemphigus to occur, the goal of pemphigus therapy is the elimination of autoreactive B-cells responsible for autoantibody production. Rituximab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, was the first targeted B-cell therapy approved for use in pemphigus and is now considered the frontline therapy for new onset disease. One limitation of this treatment is that it targets both autoreactive and non -autoreactive B-cells, which accounts for the increased risk of serious infections in treated patients. In addition, most rituximab-treated patients experience disease relapse, highlighting the need of new therapeutic options. This review provides a concise overview of rituximab use in pemphigus and discusses new B-cell and antibody-directed therapies undergoing investigation in clinical studies.

Pemphigus Vulgaris and Bullous Pemphigoid: Update on Diagnosis and Treatment

Autoimmune bullous disorders are a heterogeneous spectrum of skin disorders characterized by the production of autoantibodies against adhesion molecules of the skin. The 2 major groups of diseases are "pemphigus diseases" and "autoimmune bullous diseases of the pemphigoid type." Pemphigus diseases are a group of autoimmune blistering diseases of the skin and mucous membranes characterized by intraepithelial cleft and acantholysis. The main subtypes of pemphigus include pemphigus vulgaris, pemphigus foliaceus, and paraneoplastic pemphigus. Diagnosis is based on clinical manifestations and confirmed with histological, immunofluorescence, and serological testing. Recently multivariant enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay systems have been developed as practical screening tools for patients with suspected autoimmune bullous dermatoses. The current first-line treatment of pemphigus is based on systemic corticosteroids that are often combined with immunosuppressive adjuvants, such as azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, and the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab, usually at initiation of treatment. Rituximab efficacy is higher when it is administered early in the course of the disease. Therefore, it should be used as first-line treatment to improve efficacy and reduce cumulative doses of corticosteroids and their side effects. Treatment of bullous pemphigoid is based on disease extension. Localized and mild forms can be treated with superpotent topical corticosteroids or with nonimmunosuppressive agents. In patients with generalized disease or whose disease is resistant to the treatments described above, systemic corticosteroids are preferred and effective. Adjuvant immunosuppressants are often combined with steroids for their steroid-sparing effect.

Pemphigus: Current and Future Therapeutic Strategies

Pemphigus encompasses a heterogeneous group of autoimmune blistering diseases, which affect both mucous membranes and the skin. The disease usually runs a chronic-relapsing course, with a potentially devastating impact on the patients' quality of life. Pemphigus pathogenesis is related to IgG autoantibodies targeting various adhesion molecules in the epidermis, including desmoglein (Dsg) 1 and 3, major components of desmosomes. The pathogenic relevance of such autoantibodies has been largely demonstrated experimentally. IgG autoantibody binding to Dsg results in loss of epidermal keratinocyte adhesion, a phenomenon referred to as acantholysis. This in turn causes intra-epidermal blistering and the clinical appearance of flaccid blisters and erosions at involved sites. Since the advent of glucocorticoids, the overall prognosis of pemphigus has largely improved. However, mortality persists elevated, since long-term use of high dose corticosteroids and adjuvant steroid-sparing immunosuppressants portend a high risk of serious adverse events, especially infections. Recently, rituximab, a chimeric anti CD20 monoclonal antibody which induces B-cell depletion, has been shown to improve patients' survival, as early rituximab use results in higher disease remission rates, long term clinical response and faster prednisone tapering compared to conventional immunosuppressive therapies, leading to its approval as a first line therapy in pemphigus. Other anti B-cell therapies targeting B-cell receptor or downstream molecules are currently tried in clinical studies. More intriguingly, a preliminary study in a preclinical mouse model of pemphigus has shown promise regarding future therapeutic application of Chimeric Autoantibody Receptor T-cells engineered using Dsg domains to selectively target autoreactive B-cells. Conversely, previous studies from our group have demonstrated that B-cell depletion in pemphigus resulted in secondary impairment of T-cell function; this may account for the observed long-term remission following B-cell recovery in rituximab treated patients. Likewise, our data support the critical role of Dsg-specific T-cell clones in orchestrating the inflammatory response and B-cell activation in pemphigus. Monitoring autoreactive T-cells in patients may indeed provide further information on the role of these cells, and would be the starting point for designating therapies aimed at restoring the lost immune tolerance against Dsg. The present review focuses on current advances, unmet challenges and future perspectives of pemphigus management.

Pemphigus Foliaceus-Repeated Treatment With Rituximab 7 Years After Initial Response: A Case Report

Pemphigus foliaceus is an autoimmune skin disease mediated by autoantibodies directed against desmoglein-1 located in the upper epidermal layer. Rituximab, a monoclonal anit-CD20 antibody depleting b-cells, offers an effective treatment possibility for therapy-resistant pemphigus foliaceus. Here, we present the case of 55-year-old man who did not respond sufficiently to conventional treatment with prednisolone, azathioprine, and cyclophosphamide, but underwent almost complete remission after rituximab treatment. The patient relapsed 7 years later, and a repeated course of rituximab infusions led to a partial remission.