Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome/drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms. Part I. Epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinicopathological features, and prognosis

Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DiHS), also known as drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), is a severe cutaneous adverse reaction (SCAR) characterized by an exanthem, fever, and hematologic and visceral organ involvement. Anticonvulsants, antibiotics, and allopurinol are the most common triggers. The pathogenesis involves a complex interplay between drugs, viruses, and the immune system primarily mediated by T-cells. DiHS/DRESS typically presents with a morbilliform eruption 2-6 weeks after drug exposure, and is associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and risk of relapse. Long-term sequelae primarily relate to organ dysfunction and autoimmune diseases. Part I of this continuing medical education activity on DiHS/DRESS provides an update on epidemiology, novel insights into pathogenesis, and a description of clinicopathological features and prognosis.

Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS): Series of 49 French Pediatric Cases

BACKGROUND

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is a rare and potentially fatal adverse reaction. It can be difficult to diagnose, even more so among children, because symptoms may mimic other commonly encountered pediatric conditions.

OBJECTIVE

To describe clinical and laboratory features of DRESS syndrome in the pediatric population (age ≤18 years) and establish causative agents and treatment modalities.

METHODS

This was a multicenter retrospective study of probable and definite DRESS cases (Registry of Sever Cutaneous Adverse Reaction score ≥ 4) in children hospitalized in 15 French university hospitals between 2000 and 2020.

RESULTS

We included 49 cases. All children had fever and rash, 69.4% had lymphadenopathy, and 65.3% had facial edema. The most common organ affected was the liver (83.7%). Treatment consisted of topical corticosteroid in only 30.6% and systemic corticosteroid in 55.1%; 12.2% received intravenous immunoglobulin. Among probable and likely culprit drugs, 65% were antibiotics and 27.5% were antiepileptics, median time to DRESS symptom onset after initiation of 15 days (13 days with antibiotics and 21 days with antiepileptics). Twenty-seven children had allergy assessment for causative agents, 65.4% of whom had positive tests.

CONCLUSIONS

Culprit drugs are frequently antibiotics and antiepileptic drugs, and onset is often less than 2 weeks after treatment starts, especially with antibiotics. Treatment with topical corticosteroids appears to be sufficient in the least severe cases. Treatment by systemic corticosteroid therapy remains the reference treatment in case of severe organ damage.

Case of vitiligo universalis as a sequela of drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome

Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DIHS) is a type of severe drug adverse reaction with high morbidity and mortality. DIHS patients have been reported to subsequently develop autoimmune disease, which may be followed by end-organ decompensation. We report a 47-year-old woman who presented with fever, generalized maculopapular eruption, facial edema and eosinophilia with liver function impairment after taking celecoxib and sulfasalazine for 1 month. The patient was diagnosed with definite DIHS. The patient was treated with immunosuppressants including systemic corticosteroid for approximately 1.5 years due to recurrent episodes. Reactivation of human herpesvirus 6 and possible reactivation of cytomegalovirus were detected. Generalized hypopigmentation of the skin and leukotrichia were noted 4 months after the onset of DIHS. Histopathological examination confirmed the diagnosis of vitiligo. Some spontaneous repigmentation was noted 4 years after DIHS without specific treatment. Further immunoserology study showed elevated plasma C-X-C motif chemokine 10 level, which is related to vitiligo activity, in our patient. The occurrence of widespread vitiligo after DIHS is an extremely rare condition. This case provides an important reminder for physicians to monitor such severe complications after DIHS.

Intracellular virus sensor MDA5 exacerbates vitiligo by inducing the secretion of chemokines in keratinocytes under virus invasion

Vitiligo is a disfiguring disease featuring chemokines-mediated cutaneous infiltration of autoreactive CD8+ T cells that kill melanocytes. Copious studies have indicated that virus invasion participates in the pathogenesis of vitiligo. IFIH1, encoding MDA5 which is an intracellular virus sensor, has been identified as a vitiligo susceptibility gene. However, the specific role of MDA5 in melanocyte death under virus invasion is not clear. In this study, we first showed that the expression of anti-CMV IgM and MDA5 was higher in vitiligo patients than healthy controls. Then, by using Poly(I:C) to imitate virus invasion, we clarified that virus invasion significantly activated MDA5 and further potentiated the keratinocyte-derived CXCL10 and CXCL16 which are the two vital chemokines for the cutaneous infiltration of CD8+ T cells in vitiligo. More importantly, IFN-β mediated by the MDA5-MAVS-NF-κB/IRF3 signaling pathway orchestrated the secretion of CXCL10 via the JAK1-STAT1 pathway and MDA5-meidiated IRF3 transcriptionally induced the production of CXCL16 in keratinocytes under virus invasion. In summary, our results demonstrate that MDA5 signaling orchestrates the aberrant skin immunity engaging in melanocyte death via mediating CXCL10 and CXCL16 secretion, which supports MDA5 as a potential therapeutic target for vitiligo under virus invasion.