Frontal fibrosing alopecia and sunscreens: cause or consequence?

Extra-follicular cutaneous manifestations of frontal fibrosing alopecia

Frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA) is an inflammatory cicatricial alopecia, which is considered to be a variant of lichen planopilaris. In addition to follicular changes, FFA often presents with associated cutaneous manifestations in most patients, including lichen planus pigmentosus, implantation line hypochromia and facial papules. The objective of the present article is to provide a detailed overview of the non-follicular cutaneous clinical manifestations of FFA and discuss their impact on the diagnosis and treatment of patients with this condition.

Enhanced Insights into Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia: Advancements in Pathogenesis Understanding and Management Strategies

Frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA) represents a distinctive form of primary lymphocytic scarring alopecia characterized by fronto-temporal hair recession and eyebrow hair loss. While predominantly affecting postmenopausal women, FFA also occurs in women of reproductive age and men, with variations observed across different ethnic groups. Genetic predisposition, environmental factors and inflammatory pathways contribute to its pathogenesis, with evolving diagnostic criteria enhancing accuracy. FFA treatment lacks standardization, encompassing topical, systemic and physical therapies, while hair transplantation remains a temporary solution. This article reviews the current understanding of FFA, aiming to provide clinicians with updated insights for its management.

Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia and Sunscreen Use: A Cross-sectional Study of Actinic Damage

Patients with frontal fibrosing alopecia report higher rates of sunscreen use than control subjects. However, it is not known whether the higher use of sunscreens is a cause or a consequence of the alopecia. A greater use of sunscreens should be associated with a lower incidence of signs of actinic damage. The aim of this study is to assess the presence of actinic damage in patients with frontal fibrosing alopecia. A cross-sectional study was carried out on 101 patients with frontal fibrosing alopecia and 40 control subjects. The presence of actinic damage, in the form of solar lentigines, actinic keratoses, and basal and squamous cell carcinomas, was recorded in both groups, together with sunscreen use. Trichoscopy and skin biopsy were performed on patients. Actinic damage was present more frequently in patients with frontal fibrosing alopecia (69.3%) than in control subjects (50%) (p = 0.031). Patients used sunscreens more frequently than did control subjects (83.2% vs 62.5%, p = 0.008). However, the prevalence of trichoscopic inflammatory signs, peripheral alopecia, and inflammatory infiltrate and sebaceous gland involvement in skin biopsy, were similar in patients who used sunscreens and those who did not use them. In conclusion, patients with frontal fibrosing alopecia had greater actinic damage than did control subjects, and this is hypothesized as a reason for the higher use of sunscreens among patients. Thus, use of sunscreens may not be the trigger for frontal fibrosing alopecia that dermatologists have proposed.

Frontal fibrosierende Alopezie – Fallbeispiele und Review

Die frontal fibrosierende Alopezie (FFA) ist eine vernarbende Alopezie, welche klinisch durch Regression des frontotemporalen Haaransatzes, disseminiert verbleibende Haare (lonely hairs) und Verlust der Brauen gekennzeichnet ist. Meist sind postmenopausale, seltener auch jüngere Frauen betroffen und gelegentlich auch Männer. Der Verlauf ist variabel, oft sehr langsam und unbeachtet. Auch Spontanremissionen sind häufig. Daher lässt sich die Inzidenz nur schätzen, jedoch ist sie wahrscheinlich zunehmend. Es werden dafür Umweltfaktoren, Sonnencremes, aber auch eine optimierte Awareness und Diagnostik diskutiert. Allerdings blieb die Pathogenese der lymphozytären Follikulitis bisher noch ungeklärt. Klinisch ist die Haut im betroffenen bandförmigen Bereich atroph und weißlich. In floriden Bereichen sind follikuläre Erytheme und Keratosen typisch. Nicht selten sind kleine, wenig erythematöse Papeln an Stirn und Wangen assoziiert („facial papules“). Evidenzbasierte Therapien existieren nicht. Lokal werden Steroide, Calcineurin-Inhibitoren oder Minoxidil angewendet, systemisch 5α-Reduktase-Hemmer, Hydroxychloroquin und Doxycyclin.

Colour Doppler ultrasound study in patients with frontal fibrosing alopecia

BACKGROUND

The sonographic characteristics of frontal fibrosing alopecia have been scarcely studied. The aim of this study was to perform a colour Doppler ultrasound evaluation in frontal fibrosing alopecia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional study including 99 women with frontal fibrosing alopecia and 40 control subjects was performed using ultrasound equipment with a lineal 18 MHz probe. Three areas were evaluated per patient: the alopecic area (a), the hairline implantation area (b) and healthy scalp (c). The diameter (cm) and flow (m/s) of the two most significant vessels were recorded.

RESULTS

With regard to the hairline implantation area, patients presented higher vessel diameter (0.127 cm vs 0.103 cm, P = .03) and vessel flow (8.183 m/s vs 7.670 m/s, P = .05) than the control group. Vessel diameter was higher in the healthy scalp area in patients than in the control group (0.088 cm vs 0.078 cm, P = .03).

CONCLUSION

Patients presented higher vessel diameter and flow in the hairline implantation area compared to the control group.

Frontal fibrosing alopecia: a disease that remains enigmatic

Frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA) is recognized to represent a generalized process of inflammatory scarring alopecia. Apart from the classic form affecting the frontal hairline, there are a range of disease manifestations involving loss of eyebrows and of eyelashes, loss of peripheral body hair, fibrosing alopecia in a pattern distribution, facial and extrafacial skin, mucous membrane, and nail involvement. Classic linear, diffuse “zigzag”, pseudo “fringe sign”, androgenetic alopecia-like, cockade-like, ophiasis-like and incomplete patterns are distinguished. The aetiology of FFA remains obscure, but a number of pathogenetic hypotheses and treatments to halt disease progression have been proposed.

Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia: An Update on Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Treatment

Frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA), first described by Kossard in the early 1990s, is a form of primary lymphocytic cicatricial alopecia characterized by selective involvement of the frontotemporal hairline and eyebrows. Since the original description, an increasing number of cases have been reported worldwide and the clinical aspects of the disease have been better characterized. However, the pathogenesis is still unknown and several hypotheses have been made about possible triggering factors, including hormones, neurogenic inflammation, smoking, UV filters, and ingredients in leave-on facial products. A genetic basis has also been hypothesized as the disease can occur in siblings and members of the same family. Besides its pathogenesis, research is also focused on treatment; FFA is a chronic condition and at present there is no validated or approved treatment for this disorder. Commonly prescribed topical treatments include corticosteroids, minoxidil, and calcineurin inhibitors. Systemic treatments include 5α-reductase inhibitors, hydroxychloroquine, and retinoids. Intralesional triamcinolone acetonide is also utilized, especially for the eyebrows. Other possible treatments include pioglitazone, naltrexone, tofacitinib, and lasers.

Case Report of Connubial Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia

Since its original report in 1994, frontal fibrosing alopecia has become increasingly common, attracting the attention of the medical community and giving rise to speculations on its etiology, specifically the possibility of environmental factors. Familial cases of frontal fibrosing alopecia point to the possible contribution of hereditary factors maybe related to androgenetic alopecia. We report thefirst case of connubial frontal fibrosing alopecia in a genetically unrelated couple pointing to the possibility of a common environmental exposure in the etiology of the condition. Our observation may be fortuitous, considering the high frequency of female frontal fibrosing alopecia. Nevertheless, the incidence of male frontal fibrosing alopecia has remained low with a consequently low statistical probability of random occurrence of the condition in a marital couple. We, therefore, suggest to systematically includes the hair condition of marital partners in the patient history of patients with frontal fibrosing alopecia, to elucidate the actual frequency of connubial frontal fibrosing alopecia and maybe a common causative agent or hair grooming practice.