Treatment satisfaction and need for shared decision-making in patients with psoriasis from Peru

Shared decision-making and satisfaction with care in patients with psoriasis: A population-based study in the United States

BACKGROUND

Shared decision-making (SDM) is a critical component of the patient-physician relationship. Although SDM has been reported to improve patient knowledge in other fields, it is still relatively unknown in dermatology.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the association between SDM and satisfaction with care among patients with psoriasis.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study using data from the 2014 to 2017 and 2019 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.

RESULTS

A weighted total of 3,715,027 patients with psoriasis were identified. The average SDM score was 3.6 (of 4), and the average satisfaction with care score was 8.6 (of 10). Approximately 42% of the cohort reported having a high SDM (score, ≥3.9). Patients who had high SDM had, on average, 85% higher satisfaction with care (P < .001) after adjusting for covariates.

LIMITATIONS

The results of our study should be interpreted within the context of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey database. The ability to measure SDM was limited by the 7 items from Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, which may not fully capture active participation in shared decision-making.

CONCLUSION

A majority of patients with psoriasis are not participating in highly SDM. It is important to construct a framework for carrying out SDM efficiently to enhance physician-patient communication and improve patient outcomes.

The road to patient-centred care in Peru: The difficulties and opportunities to achieve participatory health care

Patient-centred care (PCC) is a pillar of quality health services, where decision-making power is shared between the clinician and the patient. Although, this approach could be adopted with easiness in high income settings or in countries with unified health systems, in settings such as Peru, where universal access and other structural problems remain a challenge, the practice of PCC is not a priority. In Peru, research on PCC has been conducted for almost two decades, but this has not generated a need for development in academia, decision makers, health personnel or patients. Here, we give an overview of the road that PCC research has taken in Peru and the challenges that remain to translate it into clinical practice.