Laser treatments in early wound healing improve scar appearance: a randomized split-wound trial with nonablative fractional laser exposures vs. untreated controls

Addressing Burn Hypertrophic Scar Symptoms Earlier: Laser Scar Revision May Begin as Early as 3-6 Months After Injury

OBJECTIVES

Fractional ablative CO2 laser (FLSR) is used to treat hypertrophic scars (HTSs) resulting from burn injuries, which are characterized by factors, such as erythema, contracture, thickness, and symptoms of pain and itch. Traditionally, waiting a year after injury for scar maturation before starting laser treatment has been recommended; however, the potential benefits of earlier intervention have gained popularity. Still, the optimal timing for beginning laser intervention in patients with HTSs remains uncertain. This study aims to evaluate the ideal timing for the initiation of FLSR for HTSs using several qualitative and quantitative assessment measures. It was hypothesized that early intervention would lead to similar improvement trends as later intervention, however, would be more ideal due to the shortened time without symptom relief for patients.

METHODS

Patients who received three or more laser treatment sessions and completed both pre- and posttreatment evaluations were included in this analysis (n = 69). FLSR treatment was administered at 4-8-week intervals. Patients starting treatment before 6 months after injury were classified as the early-stage intervention group and those beginning treatment at 6-12 months after injury were classified as the late-stage intervention group. Demographic data, including the age of patients at the time of first treatment, age of scars at the time of first treatment, biological sex, ethnicity, Fitzpatrick skin type, and use of laser-assisted drug delivery, were collected by retrospective chart review. Patients were evaluated on six subjective scales and objectively for scar stiffness with durometry. For all scales, higher scores indicate worse scars. A two-way ANOVA, Student's t-test, and Mann-Whitney U-test were used to compare scores from the pre- to posttreatment evaluations.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the groups for any of the demographic or scar-specific variables; thus, differences in outcome can be attributed to the timing of intervention. Both groups demonstrated an improvement in scars with treatment over time (p < 0.05). Both early- and middle-stage initiation showed scar symptom improvement in five out of six scales. In the late-stage intervention, the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale-Patient average score did not show improvement. In the early-stage intervention, the Vancouver Scar Scale total did not show improvement. Quantitative evaluation of scar stiffness by durometry did not show symptom improvement in either group. The Scar Comparison Scale demonstrated the greatest improvement across groups.

CONCLUSION

Laser treatment led to scar improvement in at least one scale at each stage of initiation. Both intervention timelines resulted in equivalent outcomes, and early intervention should be considered when initiating FLSR treatment in burn scars to alleviate symptoms earlier.

A Comparative Analysis of the Advances in Scar Reduction: Techniques, Technologies, and Efficacy in Plastic Surgery

The study provides a comprehensive analysis of the latest methodologies and treatments aimed at improving scar management. Scar formation results from the replacement of normal skin with fibroblasts, leading to a structured unidirectional collagen bundle, as opposed to the collagen sheet matrix found in healthy skin. This review categorizes scars into hypertrophic scars and keloids, each with distinct pathophysiological characteristics. It highlights the importance of consistent scar assessment using scales such as the Vancouver Scar Scale and the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale, emphasizing the need for standardized evaluation methods. The study systematically reviews various scar management techniques, ranging from traditional surgical methods to innovative treatments. Conventional approaches such as pressure garments and silicone gel sheeting are explored, noting their roles in maintaining hydration and occlusion. The efficacy of intralesional corticosteroid injections and laser therapies is discussed, with particular attention given to their combined use for optimal outcomes. The review also covers advanced techniques such as microneedling, platelet-rich plasma therapy, and stem cell-based treatments, detailing their mechanisms and potential benefits in scar remodelling. Additionally, the study underscores the emerging role of botulinum toxin A in both preventive and corrective scar treatments, offering promising results in reducing movement-induced scar exaggeration. The systematic review includes a thorough examination of existing literature, clinical trials, and meta-analyses to evaluate the effectiveness of these interventions. It concludes by calling for further research to refine these techniques and enhance their application in clinical practice, aiming to achieve better aesthetic and functional outcomes for patients with scars.

Evaluation of a Semi-Automated Wound-Halving Algorithm for Split-Wound Design Studies: A Step towards Enhanced Wound-Healing Assessment

Background: Chronic leg ulcers present a global challenge in healthcare, necessitating precise wound measurement for effective treatment evaluation. This study is the first to validate the "split-wound design" approach for wound studies using objective measures. We further improved this relatively new approach and combined it with a semi-automated wound measurement algorithm. Method: The algorithm is capable of plotting an objective halving line that is calculated by splitting the bounding box of the wound surface along the longest side. To evaluate this algorithm, we compared the accuracy of the subjective wound halving of manual operators of different backgrounds with the algorithm-generated halving line and the ground truth, in two separate rounds. Results: The median absolute deviation (MAD) from the ground truth of the manual wound halving was 2% and 3% in the first and second round, respectively. On the other hand, the algorithm-generated halving line showed a significantly lower deviation from the ground truth (MAD = 0.3%, p < 0.001). Conclusions: The data suggest that this wound-halving algorithm is suitable and reliable for conducting wound studies. This innovative combination of a semi-automated algorithm paired with a unique study design offers several advantages, including reduced patient recruitment needs, accelerated study planning, and cost savings, thereby expediting evidence generation in the field of wound care. Our findings highlight a promising path forward for improving wound research and clinical practice.

Early postoperative interventions in the prevention and management of thyroidectomy scars

Thyroidectomy scars, located on the exposed site, can cause distress in patients. Owing to the cosmetic importance of thyroidectomy scars, many studies have been conducted on its prevention and treatment. Scar formation factors mainly include inflammatory cell infiltration, angiogenesis, fibroblast proliferation, secretion of cytokines such as transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1, and mechanical tension on the wound edges. Anti-scar methods including topical anti-scar agents, skin tension-bearing devices, and local injections of botulinum toxin, as well as lasers and phototherapies, that target these scar formation factors have been developed. However, current studies remain fragmented, and there is a lack of a comprehensive evaluation of the impacts of these anti-scar methods on treating thyroidectomy scars. Early intervention is a crucial but often neglected key to control hyperplastic thyroidectomy scars. Therefore, we review the currently adopted early postoperative strategies for thyroidectomy scar reduction, aiming to illustrate the mechanism of these anti-scar methods and provide flexible and comprehensive treatment selections for clinical physicians to deal with thyroidectomy scars.

Effect of Laser and Energy-based Device Therapies to Minimize Surgical Scar Formation: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

Utilization of lasers and energy-based devices for surgical scar minimization has been substantially evaluated in placebo-controlled trials. The aim of this study was to compare reported measures of efficacy of lasers and energy-based devices in clinical trials in preventing surgical scar formation in a systematic review and network meta-analyses. Five electronic databases, PubMed, Scopus, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Cochrane Library, were searched to retrieve relevant articles. The search was limited to randomized controlled trials that reported on clinical outcomes of surgical scars with treatment initiation no later than 6 months after surgery and a follow-up period of at least 3 months. A total of 18 randomized controlled trials involving 482 participants and 671 postsurgical wounds were included in the network meta-analyses. The results showed that the most efficacious treatments were achieved using low-level laser therapy) (weighted mean difference -3.78; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) -6.32, -1.24) and pulsed dye laser (weighted mean difference -2.46; 95% CI -4.53, -0.38). Nevertheless, low-level laser therapy and pulsed dye laser demonstrated comparable outcomes in surgical scar minimization (weighted mean difference -1.32, 95% CI -3.53, 0.89). The findings of this network meta-analyses suggest that low-level laser therapy and pulsed dye laser are both effective treatments for minimization of scar formation following primary closure of surgical wounds with comparable treatment outcomes.

Safety and Effectiveness of Laser or Intense Pulsed Light Treatment for Early Surgical Scar: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of laser or intense pulsed light therapy for early treatment of surgical scar.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted for relevant prospective, randomized controlled trials published in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Database, and VTTMS between January 2006 and January 2022. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist was used to extract literature data. The risk of bias was assessed by RevMan. Safety was assessed based on the presence of serious adverse reactions (blisters, infections, burns above the second degree), while effectiveness was assessed using the Vancouver Score Scale.

RESULTS

1512 related articles were preliminarily retrieved, including 1211 English articles and 301 Chinese articles. According to the inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria, 12 articles were selected for this analysis. In total, 475 patients were included (laser group, 238; control group, 236). All studies confirmed that the laser group was superior to the control group. In the subgroup analysis of 7 articles, the standardized mean difference was 1.99 (P = 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis demonstrates that laser or intense pulsed light therapy is a safe and effective approach for early surgical scar treatment, resulting in improved scar appearance and minimal adverse reactions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

The Measure of a Scar: Patient Perceptions and Scar Optimization after Skin Cancer Reconstruction

In facial reconstruction after skin cancer resection, management and optimization of postoperative scar is a complex paradigm. Every scar is unique and presents a different challenge-whether due to anatomic, aesthetic, or patient-specific factors. This necessitates a comprehensive evaluation and an understanding of the tools at hand to improve its appearance. How a scar looks is meaningful to patients, and the facial plastic and reconstructive surgeon is tasked with its optimization. Clear documentation of a scar is critical to assess and determine optimal care. Scar scales such as the Vancouver Scar Scale, the Manchester Scar Scale, the Patient and Observer Assessment Scale, the Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating "SCAR" Scale, and FACE-Q, among others, are reviewed here in the context of evaluating postoperative or traumatic scar. Measurement tools objectively describe a scar and may also incorporate the patient's assessment of their own scar. In addition to physical exam, these scales quantify scars that are symptomatic or visually unpleasant and would be best served by adjuvant treatment. The current literature regarding the role of postoperative laser treatment is also reviewed. While lasers are an excellent tool to assist in blending of scar and decreasing pigmentation, studies have failed to evaluate laser in a consistent, standardized way that allows for quantifiable and predictable improvement. Regardless, patients may derive benefit from laser treatment given the finding of subjective improvement in their own perception of scar, even when there is not a significant change to the clinician's eye. This article also discusses recent eye fixation studies which demonstrate the importance of careful repair of large and central defects of the face, and that patients value the quality of the reconstruction.

SMOOTH protocol: A pilot randomised prospective intra-patient single-blinded observational study for examining the mechanistic basis of ablative fractional carbon dioxide laser therapy in treating hypertrophic scarring

BACKGROUND

Burn injuries are the fourth most common type of trauma and are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. The impact of burn injury is clinically significant as burn injuries often give rise to exuberant scarring. Hypertrophic scarring (HTS) is a particular concern as up to 70% of burns patients develop HTS. Laser therapy is used for treating HTS and has shown positive clinical outcomes, although the mechanisms remain unclear limiting approaches to improve its effectiveness. Emerging evidence has shown that fibroblasts and senescent cells are important modifiers of scarring. This study aims to investigate the cellular kinetics in HTS after laser therapy, with a focus on the association of scar reduction with the presence of senescent cells.

METHODS

We will conduct a multicentre, intra-patient, single-blinded, randomised controlled longitudinal pilot study with parallel assignments to achieve this objective. 60 participants will be recruited to receive 3 interventional ablative fractional CO2 laser treatments over a 12-month period. Each participant will have two scars randomly allocated to receive either laser treatment or standard care. Biopsies will be obtained from laser-treated, scarred-no treatment and non-scarred tissues for immune-histological staining to investigate the longitudinal kinetics of p16INK4A+-senescent cells and fibroblast subpopulations (CD90+/Thy1+ and αSMA+). Combined subjective scar assessments including Modified Vancouver Scar Scale, Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale and Brisbane Burn Scar Impact Profile; and objective assessment tools including 3D-Vectra-H1 photography, DermaScan® Cortex, Cutometer® and ColoriMeter®DSMIII will be used to evaluate clinical outcomes. These will then be used to investigate the association between senescent cells and scar reduction after laser therapy. This study will also collect blood samples to explore the systemic biomarkers associated with the response to laser therapy.

DISCUSSION

This study will provide an improved understanding of mechanisms potentially mediating scar reduction with laser treatment, which will enable better designs of laser treatment regimens for those living with HTS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04736251.

Treatment and Improvement of Healing after Surgical Intervention

The development of abnormal scars has a great impact on people's well-being, and improving scarring outcomes after surgery is a field that currently lacks consensus. This review aims to identify newly researched approaches to improving the quality of surgical scars. A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect was conducted between 13 May 2023 and 17 May 2023, in accordance with the recommendations of the PRISMA Statement. Study selection and analysis of methodological quality were performed in parts, independently and blindly, based on eligibility criteria. The 21 prospective, comparative, and randomized studies reviewed included 1057 subjects and studied approaches such as topical applications of creams with herbal extracts and silicone gels, growth factors, negative pressure dressings, oligonucleotides, intralesional injection of compounds such as botulinum toxin, skin closure techniques such as suturing and tissue adhesive, and laser treatments. There are recent research techniques that generate good results and are really promising to improve the results of surgical scars; however, the available evidence is extremely limited in some cases, and it is necessary to deepen its analysis to obtain reliable action protocols in each type of surgery.

Scar Management and Dyschromia: A Summary Report from the 2021 American Burn Association State of the Science Meeting

Burn scars, and in particular, hypertrophic scars, are a challenging yet common outcome for survivors of burn injuries. In 2021, the American Burn Association brought together experts in burn care and research to discuss critical topics related to burns, including burn scars, at its State of the Science conference. Clinicians and researchers with burn scar expertise, as well as burn patients, industry representatives, and other interested stakeholders met to discuss issues related to burn scars and discuss priorities for future burn scar research. The various preventative strategies and treatment modalities currently utilized for burn scars were discussed, including relatively noninvasive therapies such as massage, compression, and silicone sheeting, as well as medical interventions such as corticosteroid injection and laser therapies. A common theme that emerged is that the efficacy of current therapies for specific patient populations is not clear, and further research is needed to improve upon these treatments and develop more effective strategies to suppress scar formation. This will necessitate quantitative analyses of outcomes and would benefit from creation of scar biobanks and shared data resources. In addition, outcomes of importance to patients, such as scar dyschromia, must be given greater attention by clinicians and researchers to improve overall quality of life in burn survivors. Herein we summarize the main topics of discussion from this meeting and offer recommendations for areas where further research and development are needed.

Ultrapulse Fractional CO2 Laser With Different Fluences and Densities in the Prevention of Periorbital Laceration Scars: A Split-Scar, Evaluator-Blinded Study

BACKGROUND

Periorbital laceration can result in complex, permanent scars, and even lead to serious complications such as cicatricial ectropion. Early intervention with laser devices has been suggested as a novel modality to reduce scar formation. However, no consensus exists regarding the optimal treatment parameters for scar management. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of ultrapulse fractional CO2 laser (UFCL) with different fluences and densities in preventing periorbital surgical scars.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of UFCL with different fluences and densities in the prevention of periorbital laceration scars.

METHODS

A prospective, randomized, blinded study was conducted on 90 patients with periorbital laceration scars of 2 weeks old. Four treatment sessions of UFCL were administered to each half of the scar at 4-week intervals, with halves treated with high fluences with low density versus low fluences with low-density treatment. Vancouver Scar Scale was used to assess the 2 portions of each individual scar at baseline, final treatment, and 6 months. The patient's 4-point satisfaction scale was used to evaluate the patient's satisfaction at baseline and 6 months. Safety was evaluated by registration of adverse events.

RESULTS

Eighty-two of 90 patients completed the clinical trial and follow-up. There was no significant difference in Vancouver Scar Scale and satisfaction score between different laser settings between the two groups (P > 0.05). Adverse events were minor and no long-term side effects were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Early application of UFCL is a safe, strategy to significantly improve the final traumatic periorbital scar appearance. Objective evaluation of scars did not identify differences in scar appearance between high fluences with low density versus low fluences with low density of UFCL treatment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Postabdominoplasty Scar Improvement after a Single Session with an Automated 1210-nm Laser

Abdominoplasty, one of the most commonly performed aesthetic procedures, aims at correcting excess abdominal skin and fat, but generates a long abdominal scar. The efficacy of an automated portative 1210-nm laser in improving the appearance of surgical scars has been previously demonstrated in a double-blind randomized controlled trial. The purpose of this work was to document the use of this laser in real-life practice.

Methods

Eighteen patients undergoing abdominoplasty and treated with the evaluated laser (UrgoTouch, Laboratoires Urgo; one single session immediately after the surgery) were included in this prospective, mono-center, observational study. Change in scar characteristics was assessed using the validated Observer Scar Assessment Scale, and the patients' and surgeon's satisfaction was rated using a four-point scale.

Results

The aesthetic outcome of the scars was very positive with a mean Observer Scar Assessment Scale score of 17.0 (SD 4.6) and 14.4 (SD 3.8) on the 6-60 point scale (60: the worst possible outcome) at 6 and 12 months, respectively. A high degree of satisfaction was also expressed by both surgeon and patients at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months. No laser-related incident was reported during the study, including in patients with darker phototypes.

Conclusions

These findings seem to be consistent with previous clinical evidence on the use of this laser on fresh incisions. The high degree of satisfaction reported by both surgeon and patients seems to comfort the benefits of this procedure at short- and long-term and support the use of this laser in daily practice of plastic surgery.

Excision and adjuvant treatment to prevent keloid recurrence. - a systematic review of prospective, clinical, controlled trials

Keloids are defined as the formation of collagen-rich scar tissue extending beyond the original lesion. Not all keloids respond to conventional treatment with intralesional triamcinolone injections. Recurrence of keloids after primary excision is reported in almost 100% of cases and should therefore always be followed by adjuvant treatment. Currently, consensus on preferred adjuvant treatment in relation to keloid excision is lacking. This study seeks to systematically review evidence on the efficacy of adjuvant treatments in relation to keloid excision. A systematic literature review was conducted on PubMed. Titles, abstracts, and articles were screened and sorted according to defined inclusion- and exclusion criteria. Each study was evaluated according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, OCEBM, Levels of Evidence by two independent authors. Seven studies were eligible. Adjuvant treatment methods included intralesional triamcinolone injection, radiotherapy, silicone gel, pressure therapy, verapamil hydrochloride and 5-fluorouracil. While all the included studies reported promising results, two studies showed that minimizing dosages when treating with radiotherapy or triamcinolone should be considered to avoid adverse events. However, a high risk of bias was found in all the included studies.

Scar Prevention With Prolonged Use of Tissue Adhesive Zipper Immediately After Facial Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Postsurgical scar management significantly affects patient satisfaction. However, reliable skin support options are limited.

OBJECTIVES

The present study aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of using tissue adhesive zippers in postsurgical scar prevention among patients undergoing surgical excision of the face. The primary outcome was a reduction in scar width, which was evaluated 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Scar width at Month 12 was considered the final outcome.

METHODS

This was a prospective, randomized, controlled, rater-blinded trial. Sixty-four patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups (the zip group, defined as those using a tissue adhesive zipper for 3 months after surgery, and the control group). Outcomes were evaluated 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively based on scar width and Patient Observer Scar Assessment Scale score. Skin irritation was monitored during the first 3 months after surgery. The incidence of hypertrophic scar formation was recorded at a 12-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Scar width differed significantly between the zip (mean [standard deviation], 1.68 [0.45] mm) and control groups (2.15 [0.64] mm). The scars spread rapidly in the first month after surgery but slowed down and stabilized after 6 months. The Patient Observer Scar Assessment Scale scores of the zip group were significantly lower than those of the control group. Neither group experienced significant complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Prolonged use of tissue adhesive zippers immediately after surgery reduced scar width and improved scar appearance without obvious side effects.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2

Efficacy of Early Application of 1540 nm Non-ablative Fractional Laser and Silicones to Improve Post-epicanthoplasty Scars

The combination of epicanthoplasty and blepharoplasty is a popular choice in Asians to acquire a pair of charming big eyes. However, the obvious scarring in the medial canthal area may result in unsatisfactory aesthetic outcomes. Recently, various laser treatments have been used to deal with scars had achieved detectable improvement, but only a few studies investigating the efficacy of lasers used in post-epicanthoplasty scarring were developed. A total of 70 participants who underwent Z-epicanthoplasty were enrolled in this prospective clinical trial and were randomly assigned to the groups of 1540nm non-ablative fractional laser (NAFL) combined with silicones treatment and silicones alone treatment. The NAFL-exposure in the treated group was additionally applied to the medial canthal area on day 21 postoperatively, compared with the participants in the control group who had only been treated with the daily usage of silicone sheets for 12 hours and silicone gels twice for 5 months after scab had fallen from the skin. Scar evolution was performed by patient and observer scar assessment Scales (POSAS) and visual analogue scale (VAS) for 21 days, and 6 months postoperatively. 64 participants have completed the entire follow-up process. The scar recovery was statistically detected in treated group compared with the control group at 6-month postoperatively assessed by POSAS, especially in pliability of scars. Furthermore, the VAS evaluations showed superior satisfaction in treated group. The early treatment of NAFL combined with silicones has improved scar formation in medial canthal region after epicantholplasties efficiently.Level of Evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

A one-time pneumatic jet-injection of 5-fluorouracil and triamcinolone acetonide for treatment of hypertrophic scars-A blinded randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Patients with hypertrophic scars (HTS) risk reduced quality of life due to itching, pain, poor cosmesis, and restriction of movement. Despite good clinical efficacy, patients are often reluctant to undergo repeated needle injections due to pain or needle phobia.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the applicability of needle-free pneumatic jet injection (PJI) and assess changes in hypertrophic scars following a single PJI treatment with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and triamcinolone acetonide (TAC).

METHODS

Twenty patients completed this blinded, randomized, controlled, split-scar trial. The intervention side of the HTS received a one-time treatment with PJIs containing a mixture of TAC + 5-FU injected at 5 mm intervals (mean 7 PJI per HTS); the control side received no treatment. Assessments were made at baseline and 4 weeks posttreatment. Outcome measures included change in (1) Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) total score and subscores, (2) scar volume and surface area assessed by three-dimensional imaging, (3) skin microarchitecture measured by optical-coherence tomography (OCT), (4) photo-assessed scar cosmesis (0-100), (5) patient-reported pain and satisfaction (0-10), and (6) depiction of drug biodistribution after PJI.

RESULTS

PJI with TAC + 5-FU significantly decreased both HTS height (-1 VSS; p = 0.01) and pliability (-1 VSS; p < 0.01) with a nonstatistically significant reduction of -1 in total VSS score (0 in control; p = 0.09). On 3D imaging, a 33% decrease in scar volume (p = 0.016) and a 37% decrease in surface area (p = 0.008) was observed. OCT indicated trends towards smoother scar surface (Ra 11.1-10.3; p = 0.61), normalized dermal microarchitecture (attenuation coefficient: 1.52-1.68; p = 0.44), and a reduction in blood flow between 9% and 17% (p = 0.50-0.79). Despite advances in VSS subscores and OCT, no improved photo-assessed cosmesis was found (-3.2 treatment vs. -1.4 control; p = 0.265). Patient-reported pain was low (2/10) and 90% of the patients that had previously received needle injections preferred PJI to needle injection. Depositions of TAC + FU were imaged reaching deep into the scar at levels corresponding to the reticular dermis.

CONCLUSION

A single PJI injection containing 5-FU and TAC can significantly improve the height and pliability of HTS. PJI is favored by the patients and may serve as a complement to conventional needle injections, especially for patients with needle phobia.

Early Treatment Effects of Nonablative Fractional Lasers (NAFL) on Hypertrophic Scars in an Animal Model

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Recently, there have been several attempts to apply the laser therapy to hypertrophic scars (HTS). In particular, the fractional laser is in the spotlight for its usefulness in rapid wound healing and dermal remodeling. However, most previous studies have focused on the ablative fractional laser (AFL), and there are no studies on the mechanism of the nonablative fractional laser (NAFL) effect in HTS treatment. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the changes in histology and molecular chemistry to provide scientific evidence for the early treatment of HTS with NAFL.

STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 40 hypertrophic burn scars were made on the abdomens of two female pigs. After epithelialization, the HTS were randomly subdivided into four groups-control, AFL, NAFL (low energy), and NAFL (high energy). Laser treatment was initiated 1 week after the crust fell and the epithelium became covered, and it was repeated for six sessions over an interval of 2 weeks. Five excisional biopsies were obtained for histologic analysis and biomarker assessment.

RESULTS

Histologically, dermal remodeling with thin coil-shaped collagen fibers was observed in the NAFL groups. It also showed a significant increase of matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) and Decorin at 16 weeks in an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction analysis showed a tendency that high-pulse energy of NAFL led to higher messenger RNA expression than did the low-energy group.

CONCLUSION

The NAFL-treated groups showed characteristic collagen re-arrangement and a significant increase in MMP-2 and Decorin. These molecular changes suggest that MMP-2 and Decorin play a significant role in dermal remodeling. Early NAFL treatment for HTS could be supported with both histological and molecular evidence. Lasers Surg. Med. © 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Laser Resurfacing for the Management of Periorbital Scarring

Laser (light amplification by the stimulated emission of radiation) skin resurfacing is currently one of the most widely adopted technologies in facial rejuvenation. While most often used for aesthetic purposes, lasers also have applications in the management of scars. Since the introduction of the CO₂ laser for skin rejuvenation in the 1990s, the last three decades have seen significant growth in the number of laser devices available to the physician. More recently, promising alternatives to light-based resurfacing technologies have emerged that include radiofrequency and intense focused ultrasound. To help the physician navigate the most current laser technologies as they apply to periocular scars, this review discusses the available treatment modalities, pre-treatment assessment of periorbital scars, treatment selection, and reported outcomes and complications. The recommendations described herein are based on published literature and the authors' experience in an academic oculoplastics practice.

Laser Treatment of Traumatic Scars and Contractures: 2020 International Consensus Recommendations

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

There is currently intense multidisciplinary interest and a maturing body of literature regarding laser treatments for traumatic scars, but international treatment guidelines and reimbursement schemes have not yet caught up with current knowledge and practice in many centers. The authors intend to highlight the tremendous potential of laser techniques, offer recommendations for safe and efficacious treatment, and promote wider patient access guided by future high-quality research.

STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS

An international panel of 26 dermatologists and plastic and reconstructive surgeons from 13 different countries and a variety of practice backgrounds was self-assembled to develop updated consensus recommendations for the laser treatment of traumatic scars. A three-step modified Delphi method took place between March 2018 and March 2019 consisting of two rounds of emailed questionnaires and supplementary face-to-face meetings. The panel members approved the final manuscript via email correspondence, and the threshold for consensus was at least 80% concurrence among the panel members.

RESULTS

The manuscript includes extensive detailed discussion regarding a variety of laser platforms commonly used for traumatic scar management such as vascular lasers and ablative and non-ablative fractional lasers, special considerations such as coding and laser treatments in skin of color, and 25 summary consensus recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

Lasers are a first-line therapy in the management of traumatic scars and contractures, and patients without access to these treatments may not be receiving the best available care after injury. Updated international treatment guidelines and reimbursement schemes, additional high-quality research, and patient access should reflect this status. Lasers Surg. Med. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Early laser intervention to reduce scar formation in wound healing by primary intention: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Hypertrophic scars frequently follow primary closure of surgical wounds. Laser application at or shortly after suture may be associated with a reduction in scar formation, although the respective study results vary.

AIM

The objective was to evaluate the efficacy of early laser applied within the first six months after surgery to reduce scar formation compared to no treatment.

METHODS

We searched the databases MEDLINE and CENTRAL on 14 January 2019 and included randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Primary outcome was the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS). Measure of treatment effect was the mean difference from baseline.

RESULTS

Seventeen relevant RCTs randomized 430 scars (413 assessed) and compared laser versus no treatment. Fourteen studies applied a split-scar and three applied a simple parallel design. Three studies with a split-scar design favored the laser group on VSS, and one study had indifferent findings. Considerable heterogeneity I² = 86% did not justify a meta-analysis. The remaining 13 studies did not report appropriate data.

CONCLUSION

On the basis of the currently available evidence, we are uncertain whether early laser can reduce scar formation, and more high-quality research is needed for a definitive conclusion.