Efficacy and safety of daylight photodynamic therapy after tailored pretreatment with ablative fractional laser or microdermabrasion: a randomized, side‐by‐side, single‐blind trial in patients with actinic keratosis and large‐area field cancerization

Diagnosis and therapy of actinic keratosis

Actinic keratosis (AK) is considered a chronic and recurring in situ skin neoplasia, with a possible transformation into invasive squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Among others, predominant risk factors for development of AK are UV-light exposure and immunosuppression. Basal epidermal keratinocyte atypia (AK I) and proliferation (PRO score) seem to drive malignant transformation, rather than clinical appearance of AK (Olsen I-III). Due to the invasiveness of punch biopsy, those histological criteria are not regularly assessed. Non-invasive imaging techniques, such as optical coherence tomography (OCT), reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) and line-field confocal OCT (LC-OCT) are helpful to distinguish complex cases of AK, Bowen's disease, and SCC. Moreover, LC-OCT can visualize the epidermis and the papillary dermis at cellular resolution, allowing real-time PRO score assessment. The decision-making for implementation of therapy is still based on clinical risk factors, ranging from lesion- to field-targeted and ablative to non-ablative regimens, but in approximately 85% of the cases a recurrence of AK can be observed after a 1-year follow-up. The possible beneficial use of imaging techniques for a non-invasive follow-up of AK to detect recurrence or invasive progression early on should be subject to critical evaluation in further studies.

Diagnose und Therapie aktinischer Keratosen

Actinic keratosis (AK) is considered a chronic and recurring in situ skin neoplasia, with a possible transformation into invasive squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Among others, predominant risk factors for development of AK are UV-light exposure and immunosuppression. Basal epidermal keratinocyte atypia (AK I) and proliferation (PRO Score) seem to drive malignant turnover, rather than clinical appearance of AK (Olsen I-III). Due to the invasiveness of punch biopsy, those histological criteria are not regularly assessed. Non-invasive imaging techniques, such as optical coherence tomography (OCT), reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) and line-field confocal OCT (LC-OCT) are helpful to distinguish complex cases of AK, Bowen's disease and SCC. Moreover, LC-OCT can visualize the epidermis and the papillary dermis at cellular resolution, allowing real-time PRO Score assessment. The decision-making for implementation of therapy is still based on clinical risk factors, ranging from lesion- to field-targeted and ablative to non-ablative regimes, but in approximately 85% of the cases a recurrence of AK can be observed after a 1-year follow-up. The possible beneficial use of imaging techniques for a non-invasive follow-up of AK to detect recurrence or invasive progression early on should be subject to critical evaluation in further studies.

Ablative Fractional Laser Enhances Artificial or Natural Daylight Photodynamic Therapy of Actinic Field Cancerization: A Randomized and Investigator-initiated Half-side Comparative Study

Artificial daylight photodynamic therapy is a near-painless treatment for actinic keratoses, which can be performed indoors using a controlled light dose. Daylight photodynamic therapy is approved only for treatment of grade I-II actinic keratoses. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether fractional laser pre-treatment improves the outcomes of daylight photodynamic therapy for actinic keratoses of all grades. In addition, the study compared the outcomes of artificial and natural daylight photodynamic therapy. This randomized single-blinded split-side comparative study included 60 patients with  ≥ 2 actinic keratoses of the head. Fractional laser pre-treatment was assigned randomly for actinic keratoses on 1 side of the head and, subsequently, the entire treatment area was treated with artificial or natural daylight photodynamic therapy. Fractional laser-mediated daylight photodynamic therapy achieved significantly higher complete clearance (50.0% vs 30.3%, p = 0.04), partial clearance (78.6% vs 50.0%, p < 0.01) and lesion-specific clearance (86.2% vs 70.2%, p < 0.01) than daylight photodynamic therapy alone at the 6-month follow-up. No significant differences were found in the outcomes of artificial vs natural daylight photodynamic therapy or grade I lesions vs grade II-III lesions. Thus, fractional laser pre-treatment appears to significantly increase the efficacy of artificial and natural daylight photodynamic therapy, and to be suitable for treatment of actinic keratoses of all grades.

A Review of MAL-PDT for the Treatment Strategy of Actinic Keratosis: Broader Clinical Perspectives Beyond the Data and Guideline Recommendations

Methyl aminolevulinate (MAL) is a topical compound approved for use with photodynamic therapy (PDT) for the treatment of actinic keratosis (AK) and field cancerization in certain countries. There exists a high burden of disease for patients with AK: repeated treatments are required, there is a known risk of progression to keratinocyte carcinoma, and cosmetic appearance is affected. Delivery of PDT using MAL is a flexible treatment strategy available in many forms; red light, daylight, or artificial daylight can be used for illumination, all of which result in high AK clearance rates and low recurrence. MAL-PDT protocols continue to evolve to further improve adherence and treatment outcomes. Here, we used PubMed to search MEDLINE to identify guidelines, consensus recommendations, and studies describing the use of MAL for the treatment of AK. The aim of this targeted review is to consider various MAL-PDT treatment strategies on the basis of published literature, with a focus on personalizing treatment for the heterogeneous AK population.

Expert recommendations on supportive skin care for non-surgical and surgical procedures

A thorough knowledge of non-surgical procedures (laser, peelings, injections, threads) and surgical procedures (combined surgeries and skin grafts), including contraindications and potential risks and side effects, (e.g. infection, hypopigmentation, hyperpigmentation, and scarring) is essential to be able to reduce their incidence and ensure the patient receives the most benefit from the procedure. Individuals with darker skin and of high Fitzpatrick phototype are at higher risk of dyschromias, notably melasma and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, which may be treated using aesthetic procedures but may also arise as a complication of some procedures. A group of experts in cosmetic surgery and dermatology reviewed the published literature and discussed recommendations for optimizing outcomes with practical advice on supportive skincare before, during and after non-surgical or surgical procedures. A broad-spectrum sunscreen with a high sun protection factor against UVB and high protection against UVA, especially long UVA, is essential for all treatment modalities for the prevention and potential improvement of pigmentation disorders. Supportive skin care management to prepare, cleanse and protect the skin and post-procedure skin care with healing and anti-inflammatory ingredients are recommended to speed up regeneration and wound healing whilst minimizing scarring and downtime. Additionally, adjunctive skin care to procedures with antioxidant, anti-ageing and lightening properties may enhance skin benefits.

Advances in Photodynamic Therapy for the Treatment of Actinic Keratosis and Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer: A Narrative Review

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) with photosensitization using 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) [including a nanoemulsion (BF-200 ALA)] is approved in the USA for the treatment of actinic keratoses (AKs); another derivative, methyl aminolevulinate, is not approved in the USA but is used in Europe. For AK treatment, the photosensitizer may be applied to individual AK lesions or, depending on treatment regimen, to broader areas of sun-damaged skin to manage field cancerization, although not all products are approved for field treatment. ALA-PDT and photosensitizers have also been used off-label for the treatment of nonmelanoma skin cancers, primarily basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) and cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas (cSCC). Advantages of PDT include potentially improved cosmesis and patient satisfaction; disadvantages include pain and duration of treatment. Alternative illumination approaches, including intense pulsed light as well as pulsed-dye lasers, have also been used successfully. Pretreating the affected tissue or warming during incubation can help to increase photosensitizer absorption and improve therapeutic efficacy. Combinations of multiple treatments are also under exploration. Reducing incubation time between photosensitizer application and illumination may significantly reduce pain scores without affecting treatment efficacy. Substituting daylight PDT for a conventional illumination source can also reduce pain without compromising efficacy. The objective of this narrative review is to describe current and ongoing research in the use of topical photosensitizers and modified light delivery regimens to achieve improved therapeutic outcomes with less toxicity in patients with AK, cSCC, BCC, and field cancerization.

Efficacy evaluation and dermoscopy predictors of photodynamic therapy with different pretreatments in the treatment of actinic keratosis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to accurately evaluate the efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) on actinic keratosis (AK) in the Asian population and its relationship with preconditioning and dermoscopy grading, and to determine whether some dermoscopic features of AK can independently predict the response to PDT to optimize the choice of clinical treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 2017 to January 2020, patients who were diagnosed as AK with only one lesion in our hospital were included in our study. PDT was performed after pretreatment with ablative fractional CO2 laser or cryotherapy. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the characteristics of dermoscopy to determine the independent predictors of efficacy.

RESULTS

A total of 95 patients were enrolled in the study, and the final clinical evaluation was 92 cases (96.8%) as complete remission and 3 cases (3.2%) as partial remission/no response. Dermoscopy showed complete remission in 77 cases (81.1%) and partial remission/no response in 18 cases (18.9%). No significant difference was observed in the complete remission rate of dermoscopy grade 1 lesion after laser or cryotherapy pretreatment (p > 0.05), but for dermoscopy grade 2 and grade 3 lesions, the complete remission rate (dermoscopy evaluation) of the cryotherapy pretreatment group was higher than that of laser group (p < 0.05). The probability of complete remission with red pseudonetwork at the T0 time point increased by 3.8 times (odds ratio [OR] = 3.870,95%confidence interval [CI]:1.077-13.912, p = 0.048), while the probability of complete response for lesions with slight erosion at the baseline decreased by 85% (OR = 0.150,95%CI:0.033-0.671, p = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

For dermoscopy grade 2 and 3 lesions, PDT after pretreatment with cryotherapy is more effective. Dermoscopy pseudo-reticular structure and microscopic erosions were independent predictors of PDT efficacy. These findings may help clinicians to better select patients with AK for PDT.

Combination-Based Strategies for the Treatment of Actinic Keratoses with Photodynamic Therapy: An Evidence-Based Review

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a highly effective and widely adopted treatment strategy for many skin diseases, particularly for multiple actinic keratoses (AKs). However, PDT is ineffective in some cases, especially if AKs occur in the acral part of the body. Several methods to improve the efficacy of PDT without significantly increasing the risks of side effects have been proposed. In this study, we reviewed the combination-based PDT treatments described in the literature for treating AKs; both post-treatment and pretreatment were considered including topical (i.e., diclofenac, imiquimod, adapalene, 5-fluorouracil, and calcitriol), systemic (i.e., acitretin, methotrexate, and polypodium leucotomos), and mechanical–physical (i.e., radiofrequency, thermomechanical fractional injury, microneedling, microdermabrasion, and laser) treatment strategies. Topical pretreatments with imiquimod, adapalene, 5-fluorouracil, and calcipotriol were more successful than PDT alone in treating AKs, while the effect of diclofenac gel was less clear. Both mechanical laser treatment with CO2 and Er:YAG (Erbium:Yttrium–Aluminum–Garnet) as well as systemic treatment with Polypodium leucotomos were also effective. Different approaches were relatively more effective in particular situations such as in immunosuppressed patients, AKs in the extremities, or thicker AKs. Conclusions: Several studies showed that a combination-based approach enhanced the effectiveness of PDT. However, more studies are needed to further understand the effectiveness of combination therapy in clinical practice and to investigate the role of acitretin, methotrexate, vitamin D, thermomechanical fractional injury, and microdermabrasion in humans.

Efficacy and safety of laser-assisted combination chemotherapy: A follow-up study of treatment with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin for basal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

There is a growing need for effective topical treatments for basal cell carcinoma (BCC). By altering the skin barrier, ablative fractional lasers (AFLs) enhance cutaneous uptake of the synergistic chemotherapeutic agents, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). In our recently reported clinical trial, AFL-assisted delivery of cisplatin and 5-FU showed favorable short-term clearance rates of 95% with good cosmetic results at 3 months. This follow-up study assessed sustained tumor clearance, safety, and cosmesis in the same patient cohort, observed 6- and 12-months posttreatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This follow-up study assessed AFL-assisted cisplatin and 5-FU in low-risk BCC. Among the 18/19 patients who achieved clinical tumor clearance in our 3-months primary trial, all were included for a 6-months follow-up. At 12 months, 17/19 were included due to one 6-month residual. During follow-up visits, treated areas were evaluated for signs of recurrent tumour by clinical inspection and optical coherence tomography (OCT). Residual tumors were confirmed histologically. Cosmetic outcome was evaluated at both follow-up visits by patients and physicians.

RESULTS

Overall, complete tumor clearance was 89% (17/19) and 79% (15/19) at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Clearance rate for superficial BCCs (sBCCs) 1 year after treatment was 100% (6/6) and lower for nodular BCC (nBCC) at 69% (9/13). Among recurrent tumors, 67% (2/3) had received only a single treatment and all were of the nodular subtype, situated in the head and neck area. All histologically confirmed BCC recurrences were identified by OCT. Cosmetic outcomes were similarly rated "good" or "excellent" by patients and evaluators (p = 0.289 and p = 0.250). Treatment-related local skin reactions were mild and tolerable, consisting of persisting erythema in two patients at the end of the study. Dyspigmentation was commonly observed at both follow-up visits, while the appearance of scarring resolved in the majority of patients between 6 months (56%; 10/18) and 12 months (76%; 13/17).

CONCLUSION

AFL-assisted cisplatin + 5-FU in double sessions represents an acceptable and safe treatment strategy for low-risk sBCC, while clearance rates following single treatment or for nBCC seem inferior. This intensified topical strategy may be best suited to cases of multiple lesions or in instances where surgical excision or extended courses of at-home therapy is challenging.

Dermabrasion combined with photodynamic therapy: a new option for the treatment of non-melanoma skin cancer

Non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) is the most common malignancy. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is effective for the treatment of certain NMSCs. However, the clinical response rates of some NMSCs to single PDT are still far from ideal. The reason may be that PDT has shown limited efficacy in managing thicker NMSCs. To explore the efficacy and safety of dermabrasion combined with PDT (D-PDT) for the treatment of NMSCs. This was a retrospective, single-arm, multi-centre study. In total, 172 tumours from 40 patients were treated with D-PDT during the study period. The mean follow-up period was 40 months (range 15-110 months). D-PDT was performed with 633-nm red light at 80 m W/cm² after lesion dermabrasion and 4 h of photosensitizer exposure. Six nodular basal cell carcinomas (nBCCs) from 6 patients, 9 squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) from 9 patients, 17 Bowen diseases (BDs) from 10 patients and 140 actinic keratoses (AKs) from 15 patients treated with D-PDT were examined in this study. Only two patients with three AKs experienced recurrence over 12 months. The mean final follow-up periods of patients with AKs, BDs, nBCCs and SCCs were 30, 33, 45 and 60 months, respectively. Thirty-four of the 40 patients treated with D-PDT reported excellent or good cosmetic results. The mean Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) scores of the patients improved significantly after treatment (estimated MD 9.72 [95% CI 8.69 to 10.75]; p < 0.001). D-PDT is a safe, cosmetic and effective treatment that could be a new candidate therapeutic for NMSC.

Mesoscopic Simulation for the Effect of Cross-Linking Reactions on the Drug Diffusion Properties in Microneedles

The drug diffusion issue in microneedles is the focus of its medical application. It will not only affect the distribution of drugs in the needle body but will also have an impact on the drug release performance of the microneedle. The utilization of cross-linked polymer materials to obtain the drug diffusion control has been experimentally verified as a feasible method. However, the mechanism research on the molecular level is still incomplete. In this study, the dissipative particle dynamics (DPD) simulation has been applied to study the effect of the cross-linking reaction on drug diffusion in hyaluronic acid microneedles. We have discovered that when the cross-linking degree reaches 90%, the diffusion coefficient of the drug is 6.45 times lower than that of the uncross-linked system. The main reason for the decline in drug diffusion ability is that the cross-linking reaction varies the conformation of the polymer. The amplification in the cross-linking degree makes the polymer coils more compact and approach each other, finally forming a continuously distributed cross-linked network, which reduces its degradation rate in the body. Simultaneously, these cross-linked networks can also hinder the interaction of soluble drugs with water, thereby preventing the premature release of drugs. The simulation results are consistent with the data collected in the previous microneedle experiment. This work will be an extension of DPD simulation in the application of biological materials.

Comparison of clinical and histologic findings in daylight photodynamic therapy for skin field cancerization: A randomized controlled four-arm study on physical methods-assisted delivery of methyl aminolevulinate

BACKGROUND

Daylight photodynamic therapy (DL-PDT) has similar efficacy to conventional photodynamic therapy in treating actinic keratosis (AKs). Good clinical outcomes have been reported when associated with physical methods such as microneedles, but a comparison of different methods and histologic studies is lacking.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate clinical and histologic modifications induced by standard DL-PDT and compare with DL-PDT associated with physical methods in treating skin field cancerization of the face.

METHODS

Forty patients with photodamaged skin and at least one AK lesion on the face were randomly distributed into four groups, ten patients in each (I: Standard DL-PDT; II: DL-PDT + microneedles; III: DL-PDT + CO2 laser; IV: DL-PDT + microdermabrasion) and underwent two DL-PDT sessions with methyl aminolevulinate cream and 2-hour daylight exposure. Skin biopsies were performed on all patients before and 3 months after. All fragments were stained using the hematoxylin-eosin, orcein, and picrosirius.

RESULTS

All 40 patients completed the study. Group III had a higher AK-clearance after 1 (p = 0,002) and 3 (p = 0,034) months, but it was similar in every group at 6 months (p = 0,441). Group III and IV had better clinical global improvement on texture, pigmentation and fine lines. In the groups associated with physical methods, the improvement of the keratinocytes' atypia and solar elastosis were remarkable. Only group III showed a significant reduction in solar elastosis (p = 0.034) and increased collagen type I (p = 0.028) after treatment.

CONCLUSION

DL-PDT-associated with physical methods had better clinical and histologic results. AK-clearance were significantly higher after 1 and 3 months with pretreatment-CO2 laser. Photorejuvenation were more evident with pretreatment-CO2 laser and microdermabrasion. Pretreatment-CO2 laser showed a significant reduction in solar elastosis and increase of collagen type 1. These results pointed to the pretreatment with laser as a potentially better option for skin field cancerization of the face.

Pretreatment with ablative fractional carbon dioxide laser improves treatment efficacy in a synergistic PDT protocol for actinic keratoses on the head

BACKGROUND

A recently proposed synergistic photodynamic therapy protocol (s-PDT) combining advantages of both conventional- and daylight-PDT proved to be an effective and almost painless treatment for patients with actinic keratoses (AKs). This study investigated the safety and efficacy of an additional ablative fractional CO2-laser (AFXL) pretreatment.

METHODS

28 patients with AKs on the head received s-PDT using 5-aminolevulinic acid. AFXL pretreatment was conducted using the following parameters: pulse energy 8 mJ, spot density 50 spots/cm², power 30 W, beam size 4-18 mm. Outcome was assessed by AK area and severity index (AKASI) and lesion count (LC) before and 3 months after treatment. Safety was monitored by blood pressure and pulse measurements. Intensity of pain was determined by use of a visual analog scale (VAS).

RESULTS

Most patients (96.4 %) showed a significant AKASI reduction (P < 0.0001) 3 months after PDT (median AKASI 1.6 [0-2.4]) compared to baseline (5.3 [4-7.75]). Median reduction rate was 75.5 % (61.3 %-100 %). Eleven patients (39.3 %) achieved AKASI 100, three (10.7 %) AKASI 75 and ten (35.7 %) AKASI 50. Blood pressure and pulse did not change significantly throughout treatment. Median VAS for pain during irradiation was 0 (0-0), 0 (0-2) and 0 (0-2) at the beginning, in the meantime and at the end, respectively. Compared to data without AFXL pretreatment, this study showed significantly higher AKASI and LC reduction rates (75.5 % vs. 63.7 % [P = 0.023] and 91.3 % vs. 80.4 % [P = 0.043]).

CONCLUSIONS

S-PDT with AFXL pretreatment represents a safe and almost painless treatment for patients with AKs on the head and improves treatment efficacy.

Daylight Photodynamic Therapy: An Update

Daylight photodynamic therapy (dPDT) uses sunlight as a light source to treat superficial skin cancer. Using sunlight as a therapeutic device has been present for centuries, forming the basis of photodynamic therapy in the 20th century. Compared to conventional PDT, dPDT can be a less painful, more convenient and an effective alternative. The first clinical uses of dPDT on skin cancers began in Copenhagen in 2008. Currently, aminolevulinic acid-mediated dPDT has been approved to treat actinic keratosis patients in Europe. In this review article, we introduce the history and mechanism of dPDT and focus on the pros and cons of dPDT in treating superficial skin cancers. The future applications of dPDT on other skin diseases are expected to expand as conventional PDT evolves.

Efficacy and Safety of Laser-Assisted Combination Chemotherapy: An Explorative Imaging-Guided Treatment With 5-Fluorouracil and Cisplatin for Basal Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Rising incidences of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) have increased the need for effective topical therapies. By enhancing cutaneous uptake of the chemotherapeutic agents, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), laser-assisted delivery may provide a new combination treatment for BCC. Accordingly, this study aimed to evaluate tumor response, safety, and drug biodistribution in tumors and blood after topical laser-assisted 5-FU + CIS treatment in BCC patients.

STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS

This open-label, proof-of-concept trial investigated laser-assisted combination cisplatin + 5-FU treatment in 20 patients with histologically verified, low-risk superficial or nodular BCCs on the face (<20 mm) or trunk/extremities (<50 mm). After tumor demarcation guided by optical coherence tomography (OCT), BCCs were exposed to ablative fractional CO₂ laser followed by 60 minutes topical cisplatin solution and 7-day exposure to 5% 5-FU cream under occlusion. After 30 days, treatment was repeated if any tumor residual was identified. Tumor response at day 30 and month 3 was assessed clinically as well as by OCT, reflectance confocal microscopy, and ultrasound, supplemented by histological verification at 3 months. Local skin reactions (LSRs) and side effects were evaluated on days 1, 3-5, 14, 30, and month 3. Drug detection in tumors and blood was performed in a subset of patients 1- and 24 hours after treatment.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients completed the trial, with 32% (6/19) receiving a single treatment and 68% (13/19) treated twice. At 3 months, clinical clearance was seen in 18/19 patients with a corresponding 94% (17/18) achieving histological clearance. Baseline tumor thickness and subtype did not influence treatment number or clearance rate (P ≥ 0.61). LSRs were well-tolerated and consisted of erythema, edema, and erosion, followed by crusting by day 14. Erythema declined gradually by month 3, with 94% of patients and 79% of physicians rating cosmesis as "good" or "excellent." Scarring or hyperpigmentation was noted in 50% and 56%, respectively, while pain and infection were not observed during the follow-up period. Although chemotherapy uptake was visualized extending to deep skin layers, no systemic exposure to cisplatin or 5-FU was detected in patient blood.

CONCLUSION

Laser-assisted cisplatin + 5-FU shows potential as an effective and tolerable treatment option for low-risk BCC, particularly in instances where self-application is not possible or where in-office, non-surgical therapy is preferred. Lasers Surg. Med. © 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

European Dermatology Forum guidelines on topical photodynamic therapy 2019 Part 1: treatment delivery and established indications - actinic keratoses, Bowen's disease and basal cell carcinomas

Topical photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a widely approved therapy for actinic keratoses, Bowen's disease (squamous cell carcinoma in situ), superficial and certain thin basal cell carcinomas. Recurrence rates when standard treatment protocols are used are typically equivalent to existing therapies, although inferior to surgery for nodular basal cell carcinoma. PDT can be used both as lesional and field therapies and has the potential to delay/reduce the development of new lesions. A protocol using daylight to treat actinic keratoses is widely practised, with conventional PDT using a red light after typically a 3-h period of occlusion employed for other superficial skin cancer indications as well as for actinic keratoses when daylight therapy is not feasible. PDT is a well-tolerated therapy although discomfort associated with conventional protocol may require pain-reduction measures. PDT using daylight is associated with no or minimal pain and preferred by patient. There is an emerging literature on enhancing conventional PDT protocols or combined PDT with another treatment to increase response rates. This guideline, published over two parts, considers all current approved and emerging indications for the use of topical PDT in dermatology, prepared by the PDT subgroup of the European Dermatology Forum guidelines committee. It presents consensual expert recommendations reflecting current published evidence.

Fundamentals of fractional laser-assisted drug delivery: An in-depth guide to experimental methodology and data interpretation

In the decade since their advent, ablative fractional lasers have emerged as powerful tools to enhance drug delivery to and through the skin. Effective and highly customizable, laser-assisted drug delivery (LADD) has led to improved therapeutic outcomes for several medical indications. However, for LADD to reach maturity as a standard treatment technique, a greater appreciation of its underlying science is needed. This work aims to provide an in-depth guide to the technology's fundamental principles, experimental methodology and unique aspects of LADD data interpretation. We show that drug's physicochemical properties including solubility, molecular weight and tissue binding behavior, are crucial determinants of how laser channel morphology influences topical delivery. Furthermore, we identify strengths and limitations of experimental models and drug detection techniques, interrogating the usefulness of in vitro data in predicting LADD in vivo. By compiling insights from over 75 studies, we ultimately devise an approach for intelligent application of LADD, supporting its implementation in the clinical setting.

Ablative fractional laser-assisted treatments for keratinocyte carcinomas and its precursors-Clinical review and future perspectives

Keratinocyte carcinomas (KC) are the most common malignant human neoplasms. Although surgery and destructive approaches are first-line treatments, topical therapies are commonly used. Due to limited uptake of topical agents across the skin barrier, clearance rates are often sub-optimal. In pre-clinical investigations, ablative fractional laser (AFL)-assisted drug delivery has demonstrated improved uptake of topical drugs commonly used to treat KC. In 22 clinical trials, the effect of AFL-assisted treatments has been investigated for actinic keratosis (AK; n = 14), Bowen's disease (BD; n = 5), squamous cell carcinoma (n = 1), and basal cell carcinoma (n = 7). The most substantial evidence currently exists for AFL-assisted photodynamic therapy for the treatment of AK and BD. AFL improved 12-months follow-up clearance rates of photodynamic therapy from 45.0-51.0% to 78.5-84.8% for AK and from 50.0-55.3% to 87.0-87.5% for BD. AFL-assisted pharmacological therapy is a promising tool for optimizing topical treatments of KC and its precursor lesions. Future developments include AFL-assisted immune activation, changing drug administration route of systemic therapies, and utilizing drug chemo-combinations.

European Dermatology Forum guidelines on topical photodynamic therapy 2019 Part 2: emerging indications - field cancerization, photorejuvenation and inflammatory/infective dermatoses

In addition to approved indications in non-melanoma skin cancer in immunocompetent patients, topical photodynamic therapy (PDT) has also been studied for its place in the treatment of, as well as its potential to prevent, superficial skin cancers in immune-suppressed patients, although sustained clearance rates are lower than for immune-competent individuals. PDT using a nanoemulsion of ALA in a daylight or conventional PDT protocol has been approved for use in field cancerization, although evidence of the potential of the treatment to prevent new SCC remained limited. High-quality evidence supports a strong recommendation for the use of topical PDT in photorejuvenation as well as for acne, refractory warts, cutaneous leishmaniasis and in onychomycosis, although these indications currently lack approvals for use and protocols remain to be optimized, with more comparative evidence with established therapies required to establish its place in practice. Adverse events across all indications for PDT can be minimized through the use of modified and low-irradiance regimens, with a low risk of contact allergy to photosensitizer prodrugs, and no other significant documented longer-term risks with no current evidence of cumulative toxicity or photocarcinogenic risk. The literature on the pharmacoeconomics for using PDT is also reviewed, although accurate comparisons are difficult to establish in different healthcare settings, comparing hospital/office-based therapies of PDT and surgery with topical ointments, requiring inclusion of number of visits, real-world efficacy as well as considering the value to be placed on cosmetic outcome and patient preference. This guideline, published over two parts, considers all current approved and emerging indications for the use of topical photodynamic therapy in Dermatology prepared by the PDT subgroup of the European Dermatology Forum guidelines committee. It presents consensual expert recommendations reflecting current published evidence.

Measuring Daylight: A Review of Dosimetry in Daylight Photodynamic Therapy

Successful daylight photodynamic therapy (DPDT) relies on the interaction of light, photosensitisers and oxygen. Therefore, the 'dose' of light that a patient receives during treatment is a clinically relevant quantity, with a minimum dose for effective treatment recommended in the literature. However, there are many different light measurement methods used in the published literature, which may lead to confusion surrounding reliable and traceable dose measurement in DPDT, and what the most appropriate method of light measurement in DPDT might be. Furthermore, for the majority of practitioners who do not carry out any formal dosimetry and for the patients receiving DPDT, building confidence in the evidence supporting this important treatment option is of key importance. This review seeks to clarify the methodology of DPDT and discusses the literature relating to DPDT dosimetry.

Updates on Treatment Approaches for Cutaneous Field Cancerization

Purpose of Review

Field cancerization describes the phenomenon that multiple heterogenous mutations may arise in an area exposed to chronic carcinogenic stimuli. Advances in the understanding of cutaneous field cancerization have led to novel therapeutic approaches to the management of actinic keratoses (AKs). Herein, we review the literature on the pathophysiology and emerging research of field cancerization in dermatology.

Recent Findings

The classification systems for grading AK lesions are being refined with investigations focusing on their clinical utility. There is a growing shift towards field-directed treatment for AKs as the importance of field cancerization becomes clearer. Current field-directed therapies are being optimized and novel therapeutic modalities are being studied.

Summary

Field cancerization underlies the transformation of photodamaged skin into AKs and potentially cutaneous SCC (cSCC). Clinically meaningful classification systems for AKs are needed to better inform decisions regarding treatment. As we learn more about the role of field characterization in photodamage, AKs and cSCCs, therapeutic strategies are becoming more field-directed rather than lesion-directed.

Clinical utility of daylight photodynamic therapy in the treatment of actinic keratosis - a review of the literature

Actinic keratosis (AK) is an early in situ squamous cell carcinoma that results from UV light exposure and has the potential to evolve into invasive tumor. Therefore, it is crucial that AKs are monitored and treated appropriately. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a treatment option that is minimally invasive and leaves patients with cosmetically superior results. However, disadvantages of PDT include pain and lengthy clinic visits. Accordingly, there has been much interest in the use of daylight photodynamic therapy (daylight-PDT) as a more convenient and less painful alternative to conventional photodynamic therapy (c-PDT). Current evidence shows that daylight-PDT is noninferior to c-PDT in the short and long term. Patients reported decreased pain with daylight-PDT and were more satisfied with the procedure (P<0.001). Current evidence suggests that 2 hrs of daylight exposure was sufficient for treatment, and its efficacy does not appear to be limited by weather conditions. Given the decreased intensity of treatment, daylight-PDT is better for mild disease, as it is less effective in moderate-to-thick AKs. Though further studies are still needed to refine the technique, daylight-PDT is a potential alternative to c-PDT for thin-to-moderate AKs and should be offered to patients with lower pain tolerance or busy schedules.