A model of interdisciplinary care

Anticipated Versus Unanticipated Incomplete Mohs Micrographic Surgery for Keratinocyte Carcinomas: Impact on Treatment Delays and Final Margin Status

BACKGROUND

Mohs micrographic surgery may be discontinued with positive margins as an anticipated strategy for multidisciplinary care or as an unanticipated occurrence. Management of primary tumors has not been compared after anticipated versus unanticipated incomplete Mohs micrographic surgery (iMMS).

OBJECTIVE

To compare rates and timing of adjuvant surgery after iMMS and final margin status when iMMS is anticipated versus unanticipated. Secondary outcomes were preoperative and intraoperative clinicopathologic factors associated with iMMS.

METHODS

Cases of iMMS of keratinocyte carcinomas at a tertiary academic center between 2005 and 2022 were classified as anticipated (preoperative assembly of multidisciplinary teams) or unanticipated (ad hoc management of positive margins). Rate, timing, and final margin status of adjuvant surgery was compared between anticipated and unanticipated iMMS cohorts using χ2/Fisher exact test for categorical variables and t-test for continuous variables.

RESULTS

Of 127 iMMS cases, 51.2% (65/127) were anticipated. Anticipated iMMS cases were more likely to undergo additional resection (98.5% vs 72.6%, p < .001), with fewer delays (3.9 vs 13.2 days, p < .001) and higher rates of final margin clearance (84.6% vs 59.7%, p < .001).

CONCLUSION

When iMMS is anticipated as part of multidisciplinary care, patients are more likely to undergo additional resection, with fewer delays to next surgery and higher final margin clearance rates.

Multidisciplinary Tumor Boards in Dermatologic Surgery

BACKGROUND

Recent advances in diagnostic and therapeutic modalities have made oncologic care ever more challenging, and multidisciplinary tumor boards (MTBs) are increasingly being used as a forum to discuss and coordinate care for complex oncology patients. Literature on the use of MTBs specific to cutaneous oncology and dermatologic surgery remains limited.

OBJECTIVE

To share our experiences with cutaneous oncology MTBs at the University of Vermont Medical Center (UVMMC).

METHODS

We describe the formation, timing, participation, clinical discussion, case follow-up, and coordination of care of our MTBs.

RESULTS

A log of all cases discussed at cutaneous oncology MTBs from August 2018 to August 2019 is presented as an example. Five specific cases are described in further detail to demonstrate critical components of multidisciplinary care.

CONCLUSION

The MTBs at UVMMC has created a collaborative environment for providers in multiple specialties to jointly formulate and coordinate optimal treatment plans for difficult cases, particularly when treatment guidelines do not exist or are insufficient. Furthermore, MTBs can serve as an educational forum for all participants.