Whole-genome amplification for the detection of molecular targets and minimal residual disease monitoring in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

Efficacy of chemotherapy protocols for hematological malignancies: H-CVAD versus GELA/BURKIMAB/PETHEMA LAL

The hyper-CVAD/methotrexate-cytarabine (H-CVAD/ MTX-AraC) chemotherapy protocol has been one of the standard treatments for hematological malignancies, such as mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), Burkitt lymphoma (BL), and B-cell and T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Because results of this therapy are poor, it has been progressively replaced with new specific regimens with better efficacy profiles (GELA protocol for MCL, BURKIMAB for BL, and PETHEMA for B-cell and T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia [ALL]). The objective of this study was to analyze the response rates and survival of these therapeutic regimens. This retrospective and descriptive observational study of 81 patients compared 42 patients treated with hyper-CVAD/methotrexate-cytarabine (group A) with 39 patients treated with GELA/BURKIMAB/PETHEMA (group B). More patients in group B than in group A completed the treatment (89.7% vs. 47.6%, p < 0.001). In group A, 14.3% did not complete treatment because of death compared with 7.7% in group B, and 29% in group A had cycle delays versus 6.7% in group B (p < 0.001). In group A, 78.6% of group A achieved a complete response (CR) compared with 94.9% of group B (p = 0.050). Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly higher in group B (p < 0.001 in both cases). Data for current therapeutic protocols have indicated superior efficacy, with higher complete response rates, as well as better disease-free survival and overall survival results. This article provides the best results in terms of the efficacy of treatment of four hematological malignancies (MCL, BL, B-cell ALL, and T-cell ALL) with the most current specific therapeutic regimens (GELA for MCL, BURKIMAB for BL, and PETHEMA for B-cell ALL and T-cell ALL) with respect to a classic general protocol (H-CVAD/MTX-AraC for all four). These results may represent a great advance in the treatment of these blood cancers, achieving an important long-term benefit for these hematological patients.

Next-generation sequencing analysis of lung and colon carcinomas reveals a variety of genetic alterations

The development of targeted therapies in cancer has accelerated the development of molecular diagnosis. This new cancer discipline is booming, with an increasing number of gene alterations to analyze in a growing number of patients. To deal with this fast-developing activity, current analysis techniques (Sanger sequencing, allelic discrimination and high resolution melting) take more and more time. In recent years, next generation sequencing (NGS) technologies have appeared and given new perspectives in oncology. In this study, we analyzed FFPE lung and colon carcinomas using the Truseq Cancer Panel, which analyzes the mutation hotspots of 48 genes. We also tested the use of whole-genome amplification before NGS analysis. NGS results were compared with the data obtained from routine diagnosis. All of the alterations routinely observed were identified by NGS. Moreover, NGS revealed mutations in the KRAS and EGFR genes in patients diagnosed as wild-type by routine techniques. NGS also identified concomitant mutations in EGFR and KRAS or BRAF mutations, and a 15-nt deletion in exon 19 of EGFR in colon carcinomas. The study of the other genes sequenced in the Panel revealed 14 genes altered by 27 different mutations and three SNP with a possible role in cancer susceptibility or in the response to treatment. In conclusion, this study showed that NGS analysis could be used for the analysis of gDNA extracted from FFPE tissues. However, given the high sensitivity of this technology, high-throughput clinical trials are needed to confirm its reliability for the molecular diagnosis of cancer.