1
|
Kroft SH, Sever CE, Bagg A, Billman B, Diefenbach C, Dorfman DM, Finn WG, Gratzinger DA, Gregg PA, Leonard JP, Smith S, Souter L, Weiss RL, Ventura CB, Cheung MC. Laboratory Workup of Lymphoma in Adults: Guideline From the American Society for Clinical Pathology and the College of American Pathologists. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2021; 145:269-290. [PMID: 33175094 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2020-0261-sa] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/31/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT.— The diagnostic workup of lymphoma continues to evolve rapidly as experience and discovery led to the addition of new clinicopathologic entities and techniques to differentiate them. The optimal clinically effective, efficient, and cost-effective approach to diagnosis that is safe for patients can be elusive, in both community-based and academic practice. Studies suggest that there is variation in practice in both settings. OBJECTIVE.— To develop an evidence-based guideline for the preanalytic phase of testing, focusing on specimen requirements for the diagnostic evaluation of lymphoma. DESIGN.— The American Society for Clinical Pathology, the College of American Pathologists, and the American Society of Hematology convened a panel of experts in the laboratory workup of lymphoma to develop evidence-based recommendations. The panel conducted a systematic review of literature to address key questions. Using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach, recommendations were derived based on the available evidence, strength of that evidence, and key judgements as defined in the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation Evidence to Decision framework. RESULTS.— Thirteen guideline statements were established to optimize specimen selection, ancillary diagnostic testing, and appropriate follow-up for safe and accurate diagnosis of indolent and aggressive lymphoma. CONCLUSIONS.— Primary diagnosis and classification of lymphoma can be achieved with a variety of specimens. Application of the recommendations can guide decisions on specimen suitability, diagnostic capabilities, and correct use of ancillary testing. Disease prevalence in patient populations, availability of ancillary testing, and diagnostic goals should be incorporated into algorithms tailored to each practice environment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven H Kroft
- From the Department of Pathology, Froedtert Hospital and the Medical Colleges of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (Kroft)
| | - Cordelia E Sever
- Pathology Associates of Albuquerque, Albuquerque, New Mexico (Sever)
| | - Adam Bagg
- The Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (Bagg)
| | - Brooke Billman
- Governance Services (Billman), College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois
| | - Catherine Diefenbach
- The Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York (Diefenbach)
| | - David M Dorfman
- The Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (Dorfman)
| | - William G Finn
- The Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Warde Medical Laboratory, Ann Arbor, Michigan (Finn)
| | - Dita A Gratzinger
- The Department of Pathology, Stanford Health Care, Stanford, California (Gratzinger)
| | - Patricia A Gregg
- The Department of Pathology, Lehigh Regional Medical Center, Lehigh Acres, Florida (Gregg)
| | - John P Leonard
- The Department of Hematology and Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York (Leonard)
| | - Sonali Smith
- The Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois (Smith)
| | - Lesley Souter
- Souter is in private practice in Wellandport, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ronald L Weiss
- The Department of Pathology, ARUP Laboratories Inc, Salt Lake City, Utah (Weiss)
| | - Christina B Ventura
- The Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center (Ventura), College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois
| | - Matthew C Cheung
- The Department of Medicine, Odette Cancer Centre/Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Cheung)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kroft SH, Sever CE, Bagg A, Billman B, Diefenbach C, Dorfman DM, Finn WG, Gratzinger DA, Gregg PA, Leonard JP, Smith S, Souter L, Weiss RL, Ventura CB, Cheung MC. Laboratory Workup of Lymphoma in Adults. Am J Clin Pathol 2021; 155:12-37. [PMID: 33219376 DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/aqaa191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The diagnostic workup of lymphoma continues to evolve rapidly as experience and discovery lead to the addition of new clinicopathologic entities and techniques to differentiate them. The optimal clinically effective, efficient, and cost-effective approach to diagnosis that is safe for patients can be elusive, in both community-based and academic practice. Studies suggest that there is variation in practice in both settings. THE AIM OF THIS REVIEW IS TO develop an evidence-based guideline for the preanalytic phase of testing, focusing on specimen requirements for the diagnostic evaluation of lymphoma. METHODS The American Society for Clinical Pathology, the College of American Pathologists, and the American Society of Hematology convened a panel of experts in the laboratory workup of lymphoma to develop evidence-based recommendations. The panel conducted a systematic review of the literature to address key questions. Using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, recommendations were derived based on the available evidence, the strength of that evidence, and key judgments as defined in the GRADE Evidence to Decision framework. RESULTS Thirteen guideline statements were established to optimize specimen selection, ancillary diagnostic testing, and appropriate follow-up for safe and accurate diagnosis of indolent and aggressive lymphoma. CONCLUSIONS Primary diagnosis and classification of lymphoma can be achieved with a variety of specimens. Application of the recommendations can guide decisions about specimen suitability, diagnostic capabilities, and correct utilization of ancillary testing. Disease prevalence in patient populations, availability of ancillary testing, and diagnostic goals should be incorporated into algorithms tailored to each practice environment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven H Kroft
- Department of Pathology, Froedtert Hospital and the Medical Colleges of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
| | | | - Adam Bagg
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Brooke Billman
- Governance Services, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL
| | | | - David M Dorfman
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - William G Finn
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Warde Medical Laboratory, Ann Arbor, MI
| | | | - Patricia A Gregg
- Dept of Pathology, Lehigh Regional Medical Center, Lehigh Acres, FL
| | - John P Leonard
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Sonali Smith
- Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | | | - Ronald L Weiss
- Department of Pathology, ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Christina B Ventura
- Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL
| | - Matthew C Cheung
- Department of Medicine, Odette Cancer Centre/Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Balancing risk and benefit in early-stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood 2018; 131:1666-1678. [DOI: 10.1182/blood-2017-10-772665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2017] [Accepted: 02/07/2018] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Abstract
With defined chemotherapy and radiotherapy (RT) and risk-adapted treatment, early-stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) has become curable in a majority of patients. Hence, a major current goal is to reduce treatment-related toxicity while maintaining long-term disease control. Patients with early-stage favorable disease (ie, limited stage without risk factors [RFs]) are frequently treated with 2 cycles of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (2×ABVD) followed by 20-Gy involved-field or involved-site RT (IF/ISRT). In patients with early-stage unfavorable disease (ie, limited stage with RFs), 4 cycles of chemotherapy are usually consolidated with 30-Gy IF/ISRT. Compared with 4×ABVD, 2 cycles of bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (2×BEACOPPescalated) followed by 2×ABVD improved 5-year progression-free survival (PFS), with similar 5-year overall survival. Recently, treatment strategies based on [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) response were evaluated. In early-stage unfavorable HL, a majority of patients achieved a negative interim PET after 2×ABVD and an excellent outcome after 4×ABVD, whereas in those with a positive interim PET, 2×BEACOPPescalated improved 5-year PFS. Furthermore, a PET-guided RT approach was evaluated to decrease long-term toxicity. Although both the RAPID and H10 trials reported poorer disease control without RT, PET-guided omission of RT can constitute a valid therapeutic option in patients with an increased risk of RT-associated toxicity (eg, because of sex, age, or disease localization). Implementation of drugs such as the anti-CD30 antibody-drug conjugate brentuximab vedotin or the anti–programmed death 1 antibodies nivolumab or pembrolizumab might allow further reduction of overall mortality and improve quality of life in affected patients.
Collapse
|
4
|
Second Opinion Expert Pathology in Endometrial Cancer: Potential Clinical Implications. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2018; 27:289-296. [PMID: 27922981 DOI: 10.1097/igc.0000000000000870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In cancer patients, the pathology report serves as an important basis for treatment. Therefore, a correct cancer diagnosis is crucial, and diagnostic discrepancies may be of clinical relevance. It was the aim of this study to perform a specialized histopathology review and to investigate potential clinical implications of expert second opinion pathology in endometrial cancer. METHODS Patients treated for endometrial carcinoma at the Tübingen University Women's hospital between 2003 and 2013 were identified. Original pathology reports were reviewed, and contributing pathologists were asked to submit original slides and paraffin blocks. Case review was subsequently performed by 3 pathologists specialized in gynecological pathology who were blinded for clinical information. For histological typing, the World Health Organization 2014 classification was used, grading and staging were performed according to International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009. Risk assignment was performed based on the 2013 European Society for Medical Oncology clinical practice guidelines. RESULTS In 565 of 745 cases, which had originally been diagnosed as endometrial carcinoma, archival histological slides and blocks were available. In 55 (9.7%) of 565 cases, a major diagnostic discrepancy of potential clinical relevance was found after expert review. In 38 of these 55 cases, the diagnostic discrepancy was related to tumor type (n = 24), grade (n = 10) or myoinvasion (n = 4). In 17 cases, the diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma could not be confirmed (atypical hyperplasia, n = 10; endometrial carcinosarcoma, n = 4; neuroendocrine carcinoma, n = 1; leiomyosarcoma, n = 1; atypical polypoid adenomyoma, n = 1). Minor discrepancies not changing risk classification were also noted in 214 (37.9%) of 565, most frequently for grade within the low-grade (G1/G2) category (n = 184). CONCLUSIONS A retrospective gynecopathological case review was shown to reveal limited but significant discrepancies in histological diagnoses as well as typing and grading of endometrial carcinomas, some directly impacting clinical management. Second opinion pathology therefore not only helps to improve the quality of translational research study cohorts but might also help to optimize patient care in difficult cases.
Collapse
|
5
|
Groneck L, Quaas A, Hallek M, Zander T, Weihrauch MR. Ultrasound-guided core needle biopsies for workup of lymphadenopathy and lymphoma. Eur J Haematol 2016; 97:379-86. [DOI: 10.1111/ejh.12742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/27/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Groneck
- Klinik I für Innere Medizin, Hämatologie und Onkologie; Universitätsklinik Köln; Köln Germany
| | - Alexander Quaas
- Institut für Pathologie; Universitätsklinik Köln; Köln Germany
| | - Michael Hallek
- Klinik I für Innere Medizin, Hämatologie und Onkologie; Universitätsklinik Köln; Köln Germany
- Centrum für Integrierte Onkologie CIO Köln; Köln Germany
| | - Thomas Zander
- Klinik I für Innere Medizin, Hämatologie und Onkologie; Universitätsklinik Köln; Köln Germany
- Centrum für Integrierte Onkologie CIO Köln; Köln Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|