A phase 2 trial of high dose lenalidomide in patients with relapsed/refractory higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukaemia with trilineage dysplasia

A multicenter phase Ib trial of the histone deacetylase inhibitor entinostat in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms or acute myeloid leukemia refractory to hypomethylating agents

Patients with myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with hypomethylating agent failure have a poor prognosis. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) can contribute to MDS progression and mediate resistance to anti-PD1 therapy. As histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) decrease MDSCs in preclinical models, we conducted an investigator-initiated, NCI-Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program-sponsored, multicenter, dose escalation, and expansion phase Ib trial (NCT02936752) of the HDACi entinostat and the anti-PD1 antibody pembrolizumab. Twenty-eight patients (25 MDS and 3 AML) were enrolled. During dose escalation (n=13 patients), there was one dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) on dose level (DL) 1 (G5 pneumonia/bronchoalveolar hemorrhage) and two DLTs at DL 2 (G3 pharyngeal mucositis and G3 anorexia). Per the 3 + 3 dose escalation design, DL 1 (entinostat 8 mg PO days 1 and 15 + pembrolizumab 200 mg IV day 1 every 21 days) was expanded and another 15 patients were enrolled. Hematologic adverse events (AEs) were common. The most common non-hematologic ≥G3 AEs were infection (32%), hypoxia/respiratory failure (11%), and dyspnea (11%). There were no protocol-defined responses among the 28 patients enrolled. Two patients achieved a marrow complete remission (mCR). Using a systems immunology approach with mass cytometry and machine learning analysis, mCR patients had increased classical monocytes and macrophages but there was no significant change of MDSCs. In conclusion, combining entinostat with pembrolizumab in patients with advanced MDS and AML was associated with limited clinical efficacy and substantial toxicity. Absence of an effect on MDSCs could be a potential explanation for the limited efficacy of this combination. ClinicalTrial.gov Identifier: NCT02936752.

What's Next after Hypomethylating Agents Failure in Myeloid Neoplasms? A Rational Approach

Hypomethylating agents (HMA) such as azacitidine and decitabine are a mainstay in the current management of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) as either single agents or in multidrug combinations. Resistance to HMA is not uncommon, and it can result due to several tumor cellular adaptations. Several clinical and genomic factors have been identified as predictors of HMA resistance. However, the management of MDS/AML patients after the failure of HMA remains challenging in the absence of standardized guidelines. Indeed, this is an area of active research with several potential therapeutic agents currently under development, some of which have demonstrated therapeutic potential in early clinical trials, especially in cases with particular mutational characteristics. Here, we review the latest findings and give a rational approach for such a challenging scenario.

Treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes in the era of precision medicine and immunomodulatory drugs: a focus on higher-risk disease

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a heterogeneous clonal disease of myeloid neoplasms characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis, variable degree of cytopenias, and an increased risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Molecular and genetic characterization of MDS has led to a better understanding of the disease pathophysiology and is leading to the development of novel therapies. Targeted and immune therapies have shown promising results in different hematologic malignancies. However, their potential use in MDS is yet to be fully defined. Here, we review the most recent advances in therapeutic approaches in MDS, focusing on higher-risk disease. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation is beyond the scope of this article.

Leukemia stem cell-bone marrow microenvironment interplay in acute myeloid leukemia development

Despite the advances in intensive chemotherapy regimens and targeted therapies, overall survival (OS) of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains unfavorable due to inevitable chemotherapy resistance and high relapse rate, which mainly caused by the persistence existence of leukemia stem cells (LSCs). Bone marrow microenvironment (BMM), the home of hematopoiesis, has been considered to play a crucial role in both hematopoiesis and leukemogenesis. When interrupted by the AML cells, a malignant BMM formed and thus provided a refuge for LSCs and protecting them from the cytotoxic effects of chemotherapy. In this review, we summarized the alterations in the bidirectional interplay between hematopoietic cells and BMM in the normal/AML hematopoietic environment, and pointed out the key role of these alterations in pathogenesis and chemotherapy resistance of AML. Finally, we focused on the current potential BMM-targeted strategies together with future prospects and challenges. Accordingly, while further research is necessary to elucidate the underlying mechanisms behind LSC–BMM interaction, targeting the interaction is perceived as a potential therapeutic strategy to eradicate LSCs and ultimately improve the outcome of AML.

Clinical Management of Anemia in Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes: An Update on Emerging Therapeutic Options

For the majority of patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (LR-MDS), one of the primary clinical goals is to alleviate the symptoms associated with the resultant cytopenias and to minimize the transfusion burden. While supportive red blood cell (RBC) transfusions and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) may lead to clinical improvement, frequent transfusions are often complicated by iron overload and decreased quality of life; furthermore, most patients either do not respond to ESAs or will eventually develop resistance. As such, there is a great need for further therapeutic options in the management of anemia related to MDS. Several additional therapeutics are now available in select patients with LR-MDS and symptomatic anemia including luspatercept, lenalidomide, and immunosuppressive therapy. Furthermore, several novel agents are currently in development to address this area of clinical need such as imetelstat and roxadustat. In this article, we review the currently available therapeutic options for symptomatic anemia in LR-MDS as well as review the therapeutic agents in development.

Emerging treatment options for patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorders characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis with peripheral blood cytopenias, dysplastic cell morphology, and a variable risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The hypomethylating agents (HMA) azacitidine and decitabine have been used for over a decade in MDS treatment and lead to a modest survival benefit. However, response rates are only around 40% and responses are mostly transient. For HMA-refractory patients the prognosis is poor and there are no therapies approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration.

Combinations of HMAs, especially along with immune checkpoint inhibitors, have shown promising signals in both the frontline and HMA-refractory setting. Several other novel agents including orally available and longer acting HMAs, the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax, oral agents targeting driver mutations (IDH1/2, FLT3), immunotherapies, and new options for intensive chemotherapy have been studied with variable success and will be reviewed herein. Except for the minority of patients with targetable driver mutations, HMAs – likely as part of combination therapies – will remain the backbone of frontline MDS treatment. However, the wider use of genetic testing may enable a more targeted and individualized therapy of MDS patients.

Lenalidomide added to standard intensive treatment for older patients with AML and high-risk MDS

More effective treatment modalities are urgently needed in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) of older age. We hypothesized that adding lenalidomide to intensive standard chemotherapy might improve their outcome. After establishing a safe lenalidomide, dose elderly patients with AML were randomly assigned in this randomized Phase 2 study (n = 222) to receive standard chemotherapy ("3 + 7") with or without lenalidomide at a dose of 20 mg/day 1-21. In the second cycle, patients received cytarabine 1000 mg/m² twice daily on days 1-6 with or without lenalidomide (20 mg/day 1-21). The CR/CRi rates in the two arms were not different (69 vs. 66%). Event-free survival (EFS) at 36 months was 19% for the standard arm versus 21% for the lenalidomide arm and overall survival (OS) 35% vs. 30%, respectively. The frequencies and grade of adverse events were not significantly different between the treatment arms. Cardiovascular toxicities were rare and equally distributed between the arms. The results of the present study show that the addition of lenalidomide to standard remission induction chemotherapy does not improve the therapeutic outcome of older AML patients. This trial is registered as number NTR2294 in The NederlandsTrial Register (www.trialregister.nl).

Immunomodulation with pomalidomide at early lymphocyte recovery after induction chemotherapy in newly diagnosed AML and high-risk MDS

An immunosuppressive microenvironment promoting leukemia cell immune escape plays an important role in the pathogenesis of AML. Through its interaction with cereblon, a substrate receptor for the E3 ubiquitin ligase complex, pomalidomide leads to selective ubiquitination of transcription factors Aiolos and Ikaros thereby promoting immune modulation. In this phase I trial, 51 newly diagnosed non-favorable risk AML and high-risk MDS patients were enrolled and treated with AcDVP16 (cytarabine 667 mg/m²/day IV continuous infusion days 1-3, daunorubicin 45 mg/m² IV days 1-3, etoposide 400 mg/m² IV days 8-10) induction therapy followed by dose- and duration-escalation pomalidomide beginning at early lymphocyte recovery. Forty-three patients (AML: n = 39, MDS: n = 4) received pomalidomide. The maximum tolerated dose of pomalidomide was 4 mg for 21 consecutive days. The overall complete remission (CR + CRi) rate, median overall survival, and disease-free survival were 75%, 27.1 and 20.6 months, respectively. Subset analyses revealed 86% CR/CRi rate in AML patients with unfavorable-risk karyotype treated with pomalidomide. Pomalidomide significantly decreased Aiolos expression in both CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ peripheral blood and bone marrow T cells, promoted T cell differentiation, proliferation, and heightened their cytokine production. Finally, pomalidomide induced distinct gene expression changes in immune function-related ontologies in CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells.

One plus one does not always equal two, especially with regard to hypomethylating agents: the question of synergy of azacitidine and lenalidomide for treatment of relapsed acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes post allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant

Key paper evaluation: Craddock C, et al. Combination Lenalidomide and Azacitidine: A Novel Salvage Therapy in Patients Who Relapse After Allogeneic Stem-Cell Transplantation for Acute Myeloid Leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2019; 37: 580-8. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT) is the only potentially curative treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). However, most patients relapse after allo-HSCT and treatment options are limited. Craddock et al. reported recently in the Journal of Clinical Oncology results from a small phase Ib study combining azacitidine (AZA) and lenalidomide (LEN) for treatment of 29 patients (24 AML and 5 MDS patients) who relapsed after allo-HSCT. Overall response rate was 24%. Patients who received ≥3 cycles of treatment had a higher response rate and responders had a better survival compared to non-responders (27 months vs. 10 months; p = 0.004). Combination treatment was well tolerated with three cases of graft-versus-host disease. While this study suggests a potential synergistic effect of LEN + AZA combination therapy, many questions remain. Efficacy and safety should be confirmed in larger, ideally randomized, studies. Further research on mechanism of action of this combination, comparison with other treatment combinations (e.g. AZA + venetoclax) and use during other disease stages are needed.

Heterogeneity in refractory acute myeloid leukemia

Successful clinical remission to therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is required for long-term survival to be achieved. Despite trends in improved survival due to better supportive care, up to 40% of patients will have refractory disease, which has a poorly understood biology and carries a dismal prognosis. The development of effective treatment strategies has been hindered by a general lack of knowledge about mechanisms of chemotherapy resistance. Here, through transcriptomic analysis of 154 cases of treatment-naive AML, three chemorefractory patient groups with distinct expression profiles are identified. A classifier, four key refractory gene signatures (RG4), trained based on the expression profile of the highest risk refractory patients, validated in an independent cohort (n = 131), was prognostic for overall survival (OS) and refined an established 17-gene stemness score. Refractory subpopulations have differential expression in pathways involved in cell cycle, transcription, translation, metabolism, and/or stem cell properties. Ex vivo drug sensitivity to 122 small-molecule inhibitors revealed effective group-specific targeting of pathways among these three refractory groups. Gene expression profiling by RNA sequencing had a suboptimal ability to correctly predict those individuals resistant to conventional cytotoxic induction therapy, but could risk-stratify for OS and identify subjects most likely to have superior responses to a specific alternative therapy. Such personalized therapy may be studied prospectively in clinical trials.

How I treat MDS after hypomethylating agent failure

Hypomethylating agents (HMA) azacitidine and decitabine are standard of care for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Response to these agents occurs in ∼50% of treated patients, and duration of response, although variable, is transient. Prediction of response to HMAs is possible with clinical and molecular parameters, but alternative approved treatments are not available, and in the case of HMA failure, there are no standard therapeutic opportunities. It is important to develop a reasoned choice of therapy after HMA failure. This choice should be based on evaluation of type of resistance (primary vs secondary, progression of disease [acute leukemia or higher risk MDS] vs absence of hematological improvement) as well as on molecular and cytogenetic characteristics reassessed at the moment of HMA failure. Rescue strategies may include stem-cell transplantation, which remains the only curative option, and chemotherapy, both of which are feasible in only a minority of cases, and experimental agents. Patients experiencing HMA failure should be recruited to clinical experimental trials as often as possible. Several novel agents with different mechanisms of action are currently being tested in this setting. Drugs targeting molecular alterations (IDH2 mutations, spliceosome gene mutations) or altered signaling pathways (BCL2 inhibitors) seem to be the most promising.

Immunosuppressive therapy in myelodysplastic syndromes: a borrowed therapy in search of the right place

INTRODUCTION

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) encompass a heterogenous collection of clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorders defined by dysregulated hematopoiesis, peripheral cytopenias, and a risk of leukemic progression. Increasing data support the role of innate and adaptive immune pathways in the pathogenesis and disease course of MDS. The role of immunosuppressive therapy has an established role in the treatment of other hematologic diseases, such as aplastic anemia whose pathogenesis is postulated to reflect that of MDS with regards to many aspects of immune activation. Areas covered: This paper discusses the current understanding of immune dysregulation as it pertains to MDS, the clinical experience with immunosuppressive therapy in the management of MDS, as well as future prospects which will likely improve therapeutic options and outcomes for patients with MDS. Expert commentary: Though limited by paucity of high quality data, immunomodulatory and immunosuppressive therapies for the treatment of MDS have shown meaningful clinical activity in selected patients. Continued clarification of the immune pathways that are dysregulated in MDS and establishing predictors for clinical benefit of immunosuppressive therapy are vital to improve the use and outcomes with these therapies.

Hypomethylating agents (HMA) treatment for myelodysplastic syndromes: alternatives in the frontline and relapse settings

INTRODUCTION

Hypomethylating agents (HMA) have played a pivotal role for treating myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) over the past decade, inducing sustained hematological responses and delaying progression to leukemia. However, a vast majority of patients will experience treatment failure within 2 years, with poor prognoses and limited options, and management of this growing patient population remains unclear. Areas covered: With the introduction of new agents in the MDS field, a better understanding of the biology of MDS, and updated information on standard of care options (including allogeneic transplantation), we re-evaluate the global treatment strategy in MDS via novel agents, focusing in particular on investigational approaches for patients who fail to respond to HMA when applicable. This review aims to address two questions: what are reasonable alternatives to HMA in MDS, and what strategies can be used for patients experiencing HMA failure. Expert opinion/commentary: HMA therapy remains a mainstay of treatment, even if additional research is still warranted to maximize its benefits for the different groups of patients. The outcome of patients experiencing HMA failure remains grim, without standard of care, but several new approaches seem promising, as there is an increasing focus on studying treatments for patients refractory to HMA treatment.

Lenalidomide: Myelodysplastic syndromes with del(5q) and beyond

Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with deletion 5q (del(5q)) is a distinct clinical and pathological disease subset that is exquisitely sensitive to lenalidomide for the treatment of red blood cell transfusion-dependent anemia. Although lenalidomide has erythropoeitic promoting activity in MDS without del(5q) (non-del(5q) MDS), the frequency of response to treatment is lower and relates to biologically separate drug effects. In del(5q) MDS, lenalidomide suppresses the malignant clone to restore effective erythropoiesis by virtue of synthetic lethality, arising from cereblon-dependent degradation of haplodeficient proteins encoded within the commonly deleted region of the chromosome 5q deletion. In contrast, in non-del(5q) MDS, lenalidomide restores effective erythropoiesis via enhancement of erythropoietin (EPO) receptor-initiated transcriptional response arising from the assembly of signaling-competent receptor complexes within membrane lipid raft domains. Recently, large phase III clinical studies have explored the role of lenalidomide, alone and in combination with, erythropoiesis-stimulating agents showing additive improvement in erythroid responses. Herein, we will describe the mechanisms of lenalidomide action in MDS and pivotal clinical studies testing the benefit of lenalidomide in both del(5q) and non-del(5q) MDS. Furthermore, we discuss evidence-based strategies to incorporate lenalidomide into the treatment algorithm for patients with MDS.

Lenalidomide use in myelodysplastic syndromes: Insights into the biologic mechanisms and clinical applications

Myelosysplastic syndromes (MDS) include a heterogeneous group of clonal myeloid neoplasms characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis leading to blood cytopenias and a variable risk of progression into acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Although the hypomethylating agent azacitidine prolongs survival among patients with higher risk (HR)-MDS compared with conventional care, no drug has been shown conclusively to prolong survival or delay progression to AML among patients with lower-risk MDS (LR-MDS). Lenalidomide is the drug with the most impressive clinical activity in the subset of anemic LR-MDS patients who harbor a deletion of the long arm of chromosome 5 (5q-), where it leads to high rates of transfusion independence and cytogenetic responses. Furthermore, lenalidomide delays progression to AML and prolongs survival among responders. In this article, we review the recently recognized mechanisms of action of lenalidomide and discuss the most recent clinical data regarding its use in patients with both 5q- MDS as well as non-5q- MDS. Finally, we forecast the future directions to improve the efficacy of lenalidomide in MDS with and without 5q-. Cancer 2017;123:1703-1713. © 2017 American Cancer Society.