A phase IIb trial of vorinostat in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with multiple myeloma refractory to previous lenalidomide-containing regimens

Histone deacetylase-based dual targeted inhibition in multiple myeloma

Despite enormous advances in terms of therapeutic strategies, multiple myeloma (MM) still remains an incurable disease with MM patients often becoming resistant to standard treatments. To date, multiple combined and targeted therapies have proven to be more beneficial compared to monotherapy approaches, leading to a decrease in drug resistance and an improvement in median overall survival in patients. Moreover, recent breakthroughs highlighted the relevant role of histone deacetylases (HDACs) in cancer treatment, including MM. Thus, the simultaneous use of HDAC inhibitors with other conventional regimens, such as proteasome inhibitors, is of interest in the field. In this review, we provide a general overview of HDAC-based combination treatments in MM, through a critical presentation of publications from the past few decades related to in vitro and in vivo studies, as well as clinical trials. Furthermore, we discuss the recent introduction of dual-inhibitor entities that could have the same beneficial effects as drug combinations with the advantage of having two or more pharmacophores in one molecular structure. These findings could represent a starting-point for both reducing therapeutic doses and lowering the risk of developing drug resistance.

DUX4-r exerts a neomorphic activity that depends on GTF2I in acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Translocations producing rearranged versions of the transcription factor double homeobox 4 (DUX4-r) are one of the most frequent causes of B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). DUX4-r retains the DNA binding domain of wild-type DUX4 but is truncated on the C-terminal transcription activation domain. The precise mechanism through which DUX4-r causes leukemia is unknown, and no targeted therapy is currently available. We found that the rearrangement leads to both a loss and a gain of function in DUX4-r. Loss of CBP/EP300 transcriptional coactivator interaction leads to an inability to bind and activate repressed chromatin. Concurrently, a gain of interaction with the general transcription factor 2 I (GTF2I) redirects DUX4-r toward leukemogenic targets. This neomorphic activity exposes an Achilles' heel whereby DUX4-r-positive leukemia cells are exquisitely sensitive to GTF2I targeting, which inhibits DUX4-r leukemogenic activity. Our work elucidates the molecular mechanism through which DUX4-r causes leukemia and suggests a possible therapeutic avenue tailored to this B-ALL subtype.

Chidamide with PEL regimen (prednisone, etoposide, lenalidomide) for elderly or frail patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-Cell lymphoma -results of a single center, retrospective cohort in China

Treatment for relapsed/refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (R/R DLBCL) is evolving rapidly due to the emergence of novel drugs, of which histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACis) are an important example. This study showed efficacy in patients with R/R DLBCL after failure of conventional therapies. We conducted a single-center, retrospective study of 34 frail or elderly R/R DLBCL patients who had been treated off-label with chidamide-containing regimens from 2018 to 2020. X² or Fisher test were used to compare response rate and Kaplan-Meier method was used to perform the survival analyses which compared with log-rank test between different groups. The test standard was p < 0.05. In total, 34 patients with R/R DLBCL received CPEL+/-R for at least 1 cycle were included. Most of them were refractory patients (n = 28,82.4%). The interim objective response rate (ORR) was 73.5% (32.4% complete remission [CR]), and the ultimate ORR was 50.0% (35.3% CR). After a median follow-up of 13.1 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 10.5 months (95%CI 6.4-14.6) and the median overall survival (OS) was 19.3 months (95%CI 11.8-26.9). The 1 year expected PFS and OS rate was 43.0% and 73.7%, respectively. The most common grade 3/4 hematologic adverse events (AEs) were neutropenia (n = 11,32.3%) and anemia (n = 4, 11.8%) 0.23.5% (8/34) of all patients experienced grade 3/4 nonhematologic AEs. No treatment-related deaths were observed. The study showed chidamide-included regimen could be an option for R/R DLBCL patients ineligible for intensive chemotherapies. Current data showed favorable efficiency and moderate safety profile. Further study is warranted for better illustration of efficacy and usage in combination therapies.

Hypoxia-regulated microRNAs: the molecular drivers of tumor progression

Hypoxia is a common feature of the tumor microenvironment (TME) of nearly all solid tumors, leading to therapeutic failure. The changes in stiffness of the extracellular matrix (ECM), pH gradients, and chemical balance that contribute to multiple cancer hallmarks are closely regulated by intratumoral oxygen tension via its primary mediators, hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs). HIFs, especially HIF-1α, influence these changes in the TME by regulating vital cancer-associated signaling pathways and cellular processes including MAPK/ERK, NF-κB, STAT3, PI3K/Akt, Wnt, p53, and glycolysis. Interestingly, research has revealed the involvement of epigenetic regulation by hypoxia-regulated microRNAs (HRMs) of downstream target genes involved in these signaling. Through literature search and analysis, we identified 48 HRMs that have a functional role in the regulation of 5 key cellular processes: proliferation, metabolism, survival, invasion and migration, and immunoregulation in various cancers in hypoxic condition. Among these HRMs, 17 were identified to be directly associated with HIFs which include miR-135b, miR-145, miR-155, miR-181a, miR-182, miR-210, miR-224, miR-301a, and miR-675-5p as oncomiRNAs, and miR-100-5p, miR-138, miR-138-5p, miR-153, miR-22, miR-338-3p, miR-519d-3p, and miR-548an as tumor suppressor miRNAs. These HRMs serve as a potential lead in the development of miRNA-based targeted therapy for advanced solid tumors. Future development of combined HIF-targeted and miRNA-targeted therapy is possible, which requires comprehensive profiling of HIFs-HRMs regulatory network, and improved formula of the delivery vehicles to enhance the therapeutic kinetics of the targeted cancer therapy (TCT) moving forward.

Successful treatment with lenalidomide plus chidamide combination therapy in 3 heavily treated patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma: Three cases report

RATIONALE

The prognosis of patients with aggressive relapsed or refractory (R/R) non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) remains poor. Both immunomodulatory drugs and histone deacetylase inhibitors have demonstrated activity against R/R NHL; yet, the combination of these 2 targeted therapies has rarely been explored.

PATIENT CONCERNS

Here, we report 3 cases. Case 1 was a 68-year-old woman who presented to our hospital with dyspnea. Case 2 was a 75-year-old man with massive upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Case 3 was a 62-year-old woman with cough, dyspnea, and lymphadenopathy.

DIAGNOSIS

The biopsy results revealed diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), DLBCL, and angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma, for Case 1, 2, and 3 respectively.

INTERVENTION

All 3 patients experienced relapse after first-line therapy and multiple lines of salvage therapy. Finally, they all received lenalidomide combined with chidamide.

OUTCOMES

All 3 patients achieved complete and durable remission. Case 1 relapsed again after 3 months, while the other 2 cases remained in complete remission.

LESSONS

To our knowledge, this is the first report of lenalidomide combined with chidamide for the treatment of R/R NHL. Our findings warrant further evaluation of this novel chemo-free therapy in future prospective clinical trials.

Phase 1 Trial Evaluating Vorinostat Plus Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

INTRODUCTION

Bortezomib plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (VRD) is a standard induction therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients. Given preclinical and clinical data suggesting the synergistic activity of the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat with both bortezomib and lenalidomide for the treatment of multiple myeloma, we hypothesized that adding vorinostat to VRD (R2V2) would increase the rate and the quality of responses to induction treatment. Here we report the results of a phase 1 trial (NCT01038388) evaluating R2V2 as up-front treatment for NDMM patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

R2V2 was tested as induction therapy in a dose-escalation phase 1 study in 30 NDMM patients deemed eligible for autologous stem-cell transplantation. Treatment consisted of 4 induction cycles with R2V2, followed by either autologous stem-cell transplantation or 4 additional R2V2 cycles and lenalidomide maintenance therapy.

RESULTS

The maximum tolerated dose of vorinostat was 200 mg daily. The most common adverse events were gastrointestinal (87%), fatigue and peripheral neuropathy (60%), and thrombocytopenia (33%). R2V2 induced an objective response in 96% of patients, with 48% obtaining at least a complete remission. Median progression-free survival was 52 months, with 77% of patients alive at 5 years.

CONCLUSION

R2V2 as induction treatment for NDMM patients resulted in remarkable response rates at the cost of increased toxicity.

Efficacy and toxicity of histone deacetylase inhibitors in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: Systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials

Multiple myeloma (MM) remains incurable primarily due to relapse. Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACis) have shown potential application for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). To assess the efficacy and safety of HDACis in RRMM treatment, a systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted based on clinical trial data. A literature search was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library databases. Subsequently, 19 trials with 2193 patients treated with one of the three HDACis, panobinostat, ricolinostat and vorinostat, were identified and included in the present study. The efficacy and toxicity of each agent were assessed. The data were pooled using a random effects model in STATA 13.0. The results showed that the overall response rate (ORR) was 0.64 with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.61–0.68 for panobinostat, 0.51 (95% CI, 0.46–0.55) for vorinostat and 0.38 (95% CI, 0.29–0.48) for ricolinostat. Additionally, subgroup analysis revealed an ORR of 0.36 (95% CI, 0.27–0.46) for HDACis-treated bortezomib-refractory MM patients and 0.43 (95% CI, 0.30–0.55) for lenalidomide-refractory patients. The most common grade 3 and 4 hematological adverse events were thrombocytopenia, neutropenia and anemia. Non-hematological adverse events included fatigue/asthenia, diarrhea and nausea. In conclusion, analysis of the pooled data revealed that panobinostat-containing regimens were effective and tolerable for patients with RRMM. Furthermore, lenalidomide-refractory patients may derive greater benefits from these regimens. More clinical and real-world studies are required to validate these results.

Seeking Convergence and Cure with New Myeloma Therapies

For over a decade, the mainstay of multiple myeloma therapy has been small molecules that directly attack malignant plasma cell biology. However, potent immunotherapies have recently emerged, transforming the myeloma therapeutic landscape. Here we first review new promising strategies to target plasma cells through protein homeostasis and epigenetic modulators. We then discuss emerging immunotherapy strategies that are leading to dramatic results in patients. Finally, we focus on recent preclinical data suggesting that enforcing cell-surface antigen expression through small molecules may enhance immunotherapy efficacy and avoid resistance. We argue that these emerging observations point the way toward potential convergence between drug classes. With recent rapid progress we may finally be on the verge of the 'C' word: a cure for myeloma.

Novel Proteasome Inhibitors and Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors: Progress in Myeloma Therapeutics

The unfolded protein response is responsible for the detection of misfolded proteins and the coordination of their disposal and is necessary to maintain the cellular homoeostasis. Multiple myeloma cells secrete large amounts of immunoglobulins, proteins that need to be correctly folded by the chaperone system. If this process fails, the misfolded proteins have to be eliminated by the two main garbage-disposal systems of the cell: proteasome and aggresome. The blockade of either of these systems will result in accumulation of immunoglobulins and other toxic proteins in the cytoplasm and cell death. The simultaneous inhibition of the proteasome, by proteasome inhibitors (PIs) and the aggresome, by histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) results in a synergistic increase in cytotoxicity in myeloma cell lines. This review provides an overview of mechanisms of action of second-generation PIs and HDACi in multiple myeloma (MM), the clinical results currently observed with these agents and assesses the potential therapeutic impact of the different agents in the two classes. The second-generation PIs offer benefits in terms of increased efficacy, reduced neurotoxicity as off-target effect and may overcome resistance to bortezomib because of their different chemical structure, mechanism of action and biological properties. HDACi with anti-myeloma activity in clinical development discussed in this review include vorinostat, panobinostat and selective HDAC6 inhibitor, ricolinostat.