1
|
Marin AM, Wosniaki DK, Sanchuki HBS, Munhoz EC, Nardin JM, Soares GS, Espinace DC, de Holanda Farias JS, Veroneze B, Becker LF, Costa GL, Beltrame OC, de Oliveira JC, Cambri G, Zanette DL, Aoki MN. Molecular BCR::ABL1 Quantification and ABL1 Mutation Detection as Essential Tools for the Clinical Management of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients: Results from a Brazilian Single-Center Study. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:10118. [PMID: 37373266 DOI: 10.3390/ijms241210118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Revised: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a well-characterized oncological disease in which virtually all patients possess a translocation (9;22) that generates the tyrosine kinase BCR::ABL1 protein. This translocation represents one of the milestones in molecular oncology in terms of both diagnostic and prognostic evaluations. The molecular detection of the BCR::ABL1 transcription is a required factor for CML diagnosis, and its molecular quantification is essential for assessing treatment options and clinical approaches. In the CML molecular context, point mutations on the ABL1 gene are also a challenge for clinical guidelines because several mutations are responsible for tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance, indicating that a change may be necessary in the treatment protocol. So far, the European LeukemiaNet and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) have presented international guidelines on CML molecular approaches, especially those related to BCR::ABL1 expression. In this study, we show almost three years' worth of data regarding the clinical treatment of CML patients at the Erasto Gaertner Hospital, Curitiba, Brazil. These data primarily comprise 155 patients and 532 clinical samples. BCR::ABL1 quantification by a duplex-one-step RT-qPCR and ABL1 mutations detection were conducted. Furthermore, digital PCR for both BCR::ABL1 expression and ABL1 mutations were conducted in a sub-cohort. This manuscript describes and discusses the clinical importance and relevance of molecular biology testing in Brazilian CML patients, demonstrating its cost-effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anelis Maria Marin
- Laboratory for Applied Science and Technology in Health, Carlos Chagas Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fiocruz), Curitiba 81350-010, Brazil
| | - Denise Kusma Wosniaki
- Laboratory for Applied Science and Technology in Health, Carlos Chagas Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fiocruz), Curitiba 81350-010, Brazil
| | - Heloisa Bruna Soligo Sanchuki
- Laboratory for Applied Science and Technology in Health, Carlos Chagas Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fiocruz), Curitiba 81350-010, Brazil
| | | | | | - Gabriela Silva Soares
- Laboratory for Applied Science and Technology in Health, Carlos Chagas Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fiocruz), Curitiba 81350-010, Brazil
| | - Dhienifer Caroline Espinace
- Laboratory for Applied Science and Technology in Health, Carlos Chagas Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fiocruz), Curitiba 81350-010, Brazil
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Geison Cambri
- Instituto de Biologia Molecular do Paraná (IBMP), Curitiba 81350-010, Brazil
| | - Dalila Luciola Zanette
- Laboratory for Applied Science and Technology in Health, Carlos Chagas Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fiocruz), Curitiba 81350-010, Brazil
| | - Mateus Nóbrega Aoki
- Laboratory for Applied Science and Technology in Health, Carlos Chagas Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fiocruz), Curitiba 81350-010, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Branford S. Why is it critical to achieve a deep molecular response in chronic myeloid leukemia? Haematologica 2020; 105:2730-2737. [PMID: 33054104 PMCID: PMC7716360 DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2019.240739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The primary goal of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia is survival, which is achieved by the vast majority of patients. The initial response to therapy provides a sensitive measure of future clinical outcome. Measurement of BCR-ABL1 transcript levels using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction standardized to the international reporting scale is now the principal recommended monitoring strategy. The method is used to assess early milestone responses and provides a guide for therapeutic intervention. When patients successfully traverse the critical first 12 months of TKI therapy, most will head towards another milestone response, deep molecular response (DMR, BCR-ABL1 ≤0.01%). DMR is essential for patients aiming to achieve treatment-free remission and a prerequisite for a trial of TKI discontinuation. The success of discontinuation trials has led to new treatment strategies in order for more patients to reach this milestone response. DMR has been incorporated into endpoints of clinical trials and is considered by some expert groups as the optimal treatment response. But is DMR a stable response and does it provide the ultimate protection against TKI resistance and death? Do we need to increase the sensitivity of detection of BCR-ABL1 to better identify the patients who would likely remain in treatment-free remission after TKI discontinuation? Is it necessary to switch current TKI therapy to a more potent inhibitor if the goal is to achieve DMR? These are issues that I will explore in this review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan Branford
- Department of Genetics and Molecular Pathology, Centre for Cancer Biology, SA Pathology; School of Pharmacy and Medical Science, Division of Health Sciences, University of South Australia; School of Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide and School of Biological Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Breccia M, Molica M, Colafigli G, Massaro F, Quattrocchi L, Latagliata R, Mancini M, Diverio D, Guarini A, Alimena G, Foà R. Prognostic factors associated with a stable MR4.5 achievement in chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated with imatinib. Oncotarget 2017; 9:7534-7540. [PMID: 29484130 PMCID: PMC5800922 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.23691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2017] [Accepted: 11/05/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Deep molecular response in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients treated with imatinib is a prerequisite for possible discontinuation. We identify clinico-biologic features linked with the probability of reaching MR4.5 (BCR-ABL/ABL ≤ 0.0032% IS) as a stable response (confirmed on two or more consecutive determinations). In a series of 208 patients treated with imatinib first-line outside clinical trials, after a median follow-up of 7 years the incidence of stable MR4.5 was 34.6%, obtained in median time of 5.4 years. In univariate analysis, female gender (p = 0.02), lower median age (56.4 vs 58.6, p = 0.03), Sokal risk stratification (p = 0.01) and e14a2 type of transcript (43% vs 31%, p = 0.02) are associated to achievement of a stable MR4.5. In multivariate regression analysis, female gender (HR 1.6, 95% CI: 1.1–2.6; P = 0.022), Sokal risk (HR 1.4, 95% CI: 1.1–2.3; p = 0.03), type of transcript (e14a2 vs e13a2 type, HR 1.6, 95% CI: 1.3–2.9; P = 0.03) and achievement of an early molecular response (EMR) at 3 months (HR 1.5, 95% CI: 1.2–2.8; P = 0.01), retained statistical significance. These clinical and biologic features associated with the achievement of a stable deep molecular response should be taken into account at a time when treatment-free remission strategies are being actively pursued in the management of CML.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Massimo Breccia
- Hematology, Department of Cellular Biotechnologies and Hematology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Matteo Molica
- Hematology, Department of Cellular Biotechnologies and Hematology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Gioia Colafigli
- Hematology, Department of Cellular Biotechnologies and Hematology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Fulvio Massaro
- Hematology, Department of Cellular Biotechnologies and Hematology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Luisa Quattrocchi
- Hematology, Department of Cellular Biotechnologies and Hematology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberto Latagliata
- Hematology, Department of Cellular Biotechnologies and Hematology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Mancini
- Hematology, Department of Cellular Biotechnologies and Hematology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Daniela Diverio
- Hematology, Department of Cellular Biotechnologies and Hematology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Anna Guarini
- Hematology, Department of Cellular Biotechnologies and Hematology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuliana Alimena
- Hematology, Department of Cellular Biotechnologies and Hematology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Robin Foà
- Hematology, Department of Cellular Biotechnologies and Hematology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|