Differential prognostic impact of GELTAMO-IPI in cell of origin subtypes of Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma as defined by the Hans algorithm

Revisiting beta-2 microglobulin as a prognostic marker in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Several clinical prognostic models for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have been proposed, including the most commonly used International Prognostic Index (IPI), the National Comprehensive Cancer Network IPI (NCCN-IPI), and models incorporating beta-2 microglobulin (β2M). However, the role of β2M in DLBCL patients is not fully understood.

METHODS

We identified 6075 patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL treated with immunochemotherapy registered in the Danish Lymphoma Registry.

RESULTS

A total of 3232 patients had data available to calculate risk scores from each of the nine considered risk models for DLBCL, including a model developed from our population. Three of four models with β2M and NCCN-IPI performed better than the International Prognostic Indexes (IPI, age-adjusted IPI, and revised IPI). Five-year overall survival for high- and low-risk patients were 43.6% and 86.4% for IPI and 34.9% and 96.2% for NCCN-IPI. In univariate analysis, higher levels of β2M were associated with inferior survival, higher tumor burden (advanced clinical stage and bulky disease), previous malignancy and increased age, and creatinine levels. Furthermore, we developed a model (β2M-NCCN-IPI) by adding β2M to NCCN-IPI (c-index 0.708) with improved discriminatory ability compared to NCCN-IPI (c-index 0.698, p < 0.05) and 5-year OS of 33.1%, 56.2%, 82.4%, and 96.4% in the high, high-intermediate, low-intermediate and low-risk group, respectively.

CONCLUSION

International Prognostic Indices, except for NCCN-IPI, fail to accurately discriminate risk groups in the rituximab era. β2M, a readily available marker, could improve the discriminatory performance of NCCN-IPI and should be re-evaluated in the development setting of future models for DLBCL.

Treatment of refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma by chidamide combined with autologous stem cell transplantation: a case report

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common subtype of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, with certain DLBCLs affecting specific anatomic sites, such as primary cutaneous DLBCL, leg type and intravascular large B-cell lymphoma. However, the occurrence of secondary cutaneous involvement in DLBCL while patients are undergoing regular chemotherapy is rare. In this study, we reported a case of refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with cutaneous involvement that achieved complete remission for more than 4 years with epigenetic regulation of chidamide in combination with chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation including a pretreatment regimen containing chidamide.

Value of total lesion glycolysis and cell-of-origin subtypes for prognostic stratification of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients

Background

This study aimed to explore the added prognostic value of baseline metabolic volumetric parameters and cell of origin subtypes to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network International Prognostic Index (NCCN-IPI) in nodal diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients.

Methods

A total of 184 consecutive de novo nodal DLBCL patients who underwent baseline positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) were included in this study. Kaplan-Meier estimates were generated to evaluate the clinical, biological, and PET/CT parameters' prognostic value. The Cox proportional hazards model was performed to examine the potential independent predictors for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results

With a median follow-up of 35 months, the 3-year PFS and OS were 65.2% and 73.0%, respectively. In univariate analysis, total lesion glycolysis (TLG), cell-of-origin subtypes, and NCCN-IPI were both PFS and OS predictors. High TLG (≥1,852), non-germinal center B (non-GCB), as well as high NCCN-IPI (≥4), were shown to be independently significantly associated with inferior PFS and OS after multivariate analysis. Based on the number of risk factors (high TLG, non-GCB, and high NCCN-IPI), a revised risk model was designed, and the participants were divided into four risk groups with very different outcomes, in which the PFS rates were 89.7%, 66.2%, 51.7%, and 26.7% (χ²=30.179, P<0.001), and OS rates were 93.1%, 73.8%, 56.7%, and 43.3%, respectively (χ²=23.649, P<0.001), respectively. Compared with the NCCN-IPI alone, the revised risk model showed a stronger ability to reveal further discrimination among subgroups, especially for participants with very unfavorable survival outcomes (PFS: χ²=9.963, P=0.002; OS: χ²=4.166, P=0.041, respectively).

Conclusions

The TLG, cell-of-origin subtypes, and NCCN-IPI are independent prognostic survival factors in DLBCL patients. Moreover, the revised risk model composed of the number of risk factors (high TLG, non-GCB, and high NCCN-IPI) can stratify patients better than the NCCN-IPI, especially for patients at high risk, which suggests its potential integration into decision making for personalized medicine.

Validation of the NCCN-IPI and the GELTAMO-IPI for diffuse large B-Cell lymphoma treated with R-CHOP in a large cohort of patients from a single institution

The discriminative power of International Prognostic Index (IPI) in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) decreased with the addition of rituximab to chemotherapy. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)-IPI and the Grupo Español de Linfomas y Trasplante Autólogo de Médula Ósea (GELTAMO)-IPI were developed to improve the risk prediction for DLBCL patients. We aim to validate the NCCN-IPI and GELTAMO-IPI in a large and homogeneous cohort of 337 DLBCL patients treated with curative intent with R-CHOP/R-CHOP-like immunochemotherapy. The IPI stratifies patients in two independent risk groups and the estimated 5-year overall survival (OS) of the high-risk (HR) group was 43%. NCCN-IPI discriminated four risk groups and GELTAMO-IPI three risk groups of patients. The predicted 5-year OS of the HR group was 38% and 29%, respectively. NCCN-IPI and GELTAMO-IPI are more accurate prognostic indices than IPI in DBLCL patients treated with immunochemotherapy. GELTAMO-IPI demonstrated enhanced discrimination than NCCN-IPI for the higher-risk population.

Clinical impact of the cell-of-origin classification based on immunohistochemistry criteria and Lymph2Cx of diffuse large B-Cell lymphoma patients in a South-east Asian population: a single center experience and review of the literature

Background: Previous studies in Western populations, using immunohistochemistry (IHC) methods to subtype diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), suggest that germinal center B-cell lymphomas (GCBs) have improved outcomes. However, data in Asians have been limited and conflicting. This study aims to evaluate the prognostic impact of cell-of-origin (COO) subtyping by IHC and Lymph2Cx in South-East Asian (SEA) DLBCL patients, and to summarize the existing literature.Methods: A single-center retrospective analysis of 384 DLBCL patients diagnosed 2013-2018 who received Rituximab-based chemotherapy was performed. Hans and Lymph2Cx were used to assign COO and correlated with outcomes.Results: International Prognostic Index (IPI) score was associated with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The 5-yr-OS for non-GCB versus GCB for COO by Hans was 70% versus 71% p=0.39, while 5-yr-OS for ABC versus GCB for COO by Lymph2Cx was 74% versus 92% p=0.19. The 5-yr-PFS for non-GCB versus GCB for COO by Hans was 65% versus 70% p=0.26, while 5-yr-PFS for ABC versus GCB for COO by Lymph2Cx was 64% versus 86% p=0.07.Conclusions: IPI is reaffirmed to be relevant in the rituximab era. COO by Hans has no prognostic significance, while subtyping by Lymph2Cx trends toward GCBs having better PFS and OS.