Major surgery management in patients with haemophilia A and inhibitors on emicizumab prophylaxis without global coagulation monitoring

Non-clotting factor therapies for preventing bleeds in people with congenital hemophilia A or B

BACKGROUND

Management of congenital hemophilia A and B is by prophylactic or on-demand replacement therapy with clotting factor concentrates. The effects of newer non-clotting factor therapies such as emicizumab, concizumab, marstacimab, and fitusiran compared with existing standards of care are yet to be systematically reviewed.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects (clinical, economic, patient-reported, and adverse outcomes) of non-clotting factor therapies for preventing bleeding and bleeding-related complications in people with congenital hemophilia A or B compared with prophylaxis with clotting factor therapies, bypassing agents, placebo, or no prophylaxis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's Coagulopathies Trials Register, electronic databases, conference proceedings, and reference lists of relevant articles and reviews. The date of the last search was 16 August 2023.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating people with congenital hemophilia A or B with and without inhibitors, who were treated with non-clotting factor therapies to prevent bleeds.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently reviewed studies for eligibility, assessed risk of bias, and extracted data for the primary outcomes (bleeding rates, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), adverse events) and secondary outcomes (joint health, pain scores, and economic outcomes). We assessed the mean difference (MD), risk ratio (RR), 95% confidence interval (CI) of effect estimates, and evaluated the certainty of the evidence using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

Six RCTs (including 397 males aged 12 to 75 years) were eligible for inclusion. Prophylaxis versus on-demand therapy in people with inhibitors Four trials (189 participants) compared emicizumab, fitusiran, and concizumab with on-demand therapy in people with inhibitors. Prophylaxis using emicizumab likely reduced annualized bleeding rates (ABR) for all bleeds (MD -22.80, 95% CI -37.39 to -8.21), treated bleeds (MD -20.40, 95% CI -35.19 to -5.61), and annualized spontaneous bleeds (MD -15.50, 95% CI -24.06 to -6.94), but did not significantly reduce annualized joint and target joint bleeding rates (AjBR and AtjBR) (1 trial; 53 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Fitusiran also likely reduced ABR for all bleeds (MD -28.80, 95% CI -40.07 to -17.53), treated bleeds (MD -16.80, 95% CI -25.80 to -7.80), joint bleeds (MD -12.50, 95% CI -19.91 to -5.09), and spontaneous bleeds (MD -14.80, 95% CI -24.90 to -4.71; 1 trial; 57 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). No evidence was available on the effect of bleed prophylaxis using fitusiran versus on-demand therapy on AtjBR. Concizumab may reduce ABR for all bleeds (MD -12.31, 95% CI -19.17 to -5.45), treated bleeds (MD -10.10, 95% CI -17.74 to -2.46), joint bleeds (MD -9.55, 95% CI -13.55 to -5.55), and spontaneous bleeds (MD -11.96, 95% CI -19.89 to -4.03; 2 trials; 78 participants; very low-certainty evidence), but not target joint bleeds (MD -1.00, 95% CI -3.26 to 1.26). Emicizumab prophylaxis resulted in an 11.31-fold increase, fitusiran in a 12.5-fold increase, and concizumab in a 1.59-fold increase in the proportion of participants with no bleeds. HRQoL measured using the Haemophilia Quality of Life Questionnaire for Adults (Haem-A-QoL) physical and total health scores was improved with emicizumab, fitusiran, and concizumab prophylaxis (low-certainty evidence). Non-serious adverse events were higher with non-clotting factor therapies versus on-demand therapy, with injection site reactions being the most frequently reported adverse events. Transient antidrug antibodies were reported for fitusiran and concizumab. Prophylaxis versus on-demand therapy in people without inhibitors Two trials (208 participants) compared emicizumab and fitusiran with on-demand therapy in people without inhibitors. One trial assessed two doses of emicizumab (1.5 mg/kg weekly and 3.0 mg/kg bi-weekly). Fitusiran 80 mg monthly, emicizumab 1.5 mg/kg/week, and emicizumab 3.0 mg/kg bi-weekly all likely resulted in a large reduction in ABR for all bleeds, all treated bleeds, and joint bleeds. AtjBR was not reduced with either of the emicizumab dosing regimens. The effect of fitusiran prophylaxis on target joint bleeds was not assessed. Spontaneous bleeds were likely reduced with fitusiran (MD -20.21, 95% CI -32.12 to -8.30) and emicizumab 3.0 mg/kg bi-weekly (MD -15.30, 95% CI -30.46 to -0.14), but not with emicizumab 1.5 mg/kg/week (MD -14.60, 95% CI -29.78 to 0.58). The percentage of participants with zero bleeds was higher following emicizumab 1.5 mg/kg/week (50% versus 0%), emicizumab 3.0 mg/kg bi-weekly (40% versus 0%), and fitusiran prophylaxis (40% versus 5%) compared with on-demand therapy. Emicizumab 1.5 mg/kg/week did not improve Haem-A-QoL physical and total health scores, EQ-5D-5L VAS, or utility index scores (low-certainty evidence) when compared with on-demand therapy at 25 weeks. Emicizumab 3.0 mg/kg bi-weekly may improve HRQoL measured by the Haem-A-QoL physical health score (MD -15.97, 95% CI -29.14 to -2.80) and EQ-5D-5L VAS (MD 9.15, 95% CI 2.05 to 16.25; 1 trial; 43 participants; low-certainty evidence). Fitusiran may result in improved HRQoL shown as a reduction in Haem-A-QoL total score (MD -7.06, 95% CI -11.50 to -2.62) and physical health score (MD -19.75, 95% CI -25.76 to -11.94; 1 trial; 103 participants; low-certainty evidence). The risk of serious adverse events in participants without inhibitors also likely did not differ following prophylaxis with either emicizumab or fitusiran versus on-demand therapy (moderate-certainty evidence). Transient antidrug antibodies were reported in 4% (3/80) participants to fitusiran, with no observed effect on antithrombin lowering. A comparison of the different dosing regimens of emicizumab identified no differences in bleeding, safety, or patient-reported outcomes. No case of treatment-related cancer or mortality was reported in any study group. None of the included studies assessed our secondary outcomes of joint health, clinical joint function, and economic outcomes. None of the included studies evaluated marstacimab.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Evidence from RCTs shows that prophylaxis using non-clotting factor therapies compared with on-demand treatment may reduce bleeding events, increase the percentage of individuals with zero bleeds, increase the incidence of non-serious adverse events, and improve HRQoL. Comparative assessments with other prophylaxis regimens, assessment of long-term joint outcomes, and assessment of economic outcomes will improve evidence-based decision-making for the use of these therapies in bleed prevention.

[Methodological recommendations for surgical care in patients with hemophilia A receiving prophylactic therapy with emicizumab]

Methodological recommendations for surgical care in patients with hemophilia A receiving prophylactic therapy with emicizumab. Recommendations of the expert group. Moscow, 2024.

Surgical Experience from the STASEY Study of Emicizumab Prophylaxis in People with Hemophilia A with Factor VIII Inhibitors

Background  Guidelines surrounding emicizumab prophylaxis and perioperative treatment for people with hemophilia A (PwHA) with factor (F)VIII inhibitors undergoing surgeries are limited. The phase IIIb multicenter, single-arm STASEY study evaluated safety and tolerability of emicizumab prophylaxis in PwHA aged ≥12 years with FVIII inhibitors. This analysis assesses surgeries during study conduct, associated hemophilia medications, and postoperative bleeds (treated and untreated). Methods  PwHA with FVIII inhibitors received emicizumab 3.0 mg/kg/week for 4 weeks, then 1.5 mg/kg/week until 2 years. Surgeries were managed and documented by treating physicians. Bleeds and treatments were recorded by physicians and participants. Results  Forty-six participants had ≥1 on-study surgery, 37 underwent 56 minor surgeries, and 13 underwent 22 major surgeries. Four participants underwent both minor and major surgeries. Of 18 (81.8%) and 4 (18.2%) major surgeries managed with/without additional hemostatic medication, 33.3 and 25.0% were associated with a treated postoperative bleed, respectively. Of 24 (42.9%) and 32 (57.1%) minor surgeries managed with/without additional hemostatic medication, 15.6 and 25.0% were associated with a treated postoperative bleed, respectively. Recombinant activated FVII was the most common medication for prophylaxis and bleed treatment. There were no thrombotic microangiopathies (TMAs). One hypertrophic clot, considered unrelated to emicizumab, occurred following tooth extraction. Conclusion  In this challenging population with a high bleeding risk, major surgeries were performed in PwHA receiving emicizumab with/without additional hemostatic medication. Postoperative bleeds occurred following 59.1% of major surgeries; 53.8% were treated. No arterial/venous thrombotic events or TMAs occurred due to concomitant emicizumab and bypassing agents. Trial registration  This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03191799).

Emicizumab: a novel drug in hemophilia A prophylaxis - a narrative review

INTRODUCTION

Hemophilia A is a genetically conditioned disease leading to hemostatic disorders due to factor VIII (FVIII) deficiency. The treatment of hemophilia has evolved throughout the past years and has significantly changed. One of the newest drugs for prophylactic treatment is the humanized bispecific IgG antibody - emicizumab, which binds with factor IXa and factor X, bridging those factors and thus mimicking the activity of factor VIII.

AREAS COVERED

The literature search was made via PubMed database, with the emphasis on clinical trials and case reports, describing the off-label emicizumab use. This review presents an extensive summary and considers advantages and disadvantages (side-effects) of emicizumab, describing additional clinical situations, where emicizumab has been successfully used. In our review we cover information about the mechanisms of action, indications, efficacy and discuss some chosen case reports about off-label emicizumab use.

EXPERT OPINION

Its convenient administration method (subcutaneous) and frequency of injections (from once a week to once a month) makes it a more comfortable treatment, limiting injection-site reactions, hospital stays, costs of prophylaxis, and significantly increasing patients' quality of life. Adverse effects are scarce and rarely serious - the most common ones are reactions at the injection-site and upper respiratory tract infections.

Managing invasive procedures in haemophilia patients with limited resources, extended half-life concentrates or non-replacement therapies in 2022

New treatment possibilities and modalities are now available globally for patients with haemophilia requiring surgery or invasive procedures. The first is the appropriate application of low-dose protocols of clotting factor concentrates (CFC) achieving adequate perioperative haemostasis in resources constraint environments. The increasing availability of CFC through humanitarian aid programs allows more invasive surgeries to be performed for which efficacy and safety data should be more widely collected and reported. Second, extended half-life CFC that are increasingly available in many countries represent valuable alternatives to standard half-life products in surgical patients allowing reduced number of infusions and lower consumption, in particular for extended half-life factor IX. Third, in the era of recently introduced nonfactor prophylaxis, some minor surgical procedures can now be performed without additional haemostatic treatment, others with few low-dose administrations of CFC or bypassing agents. Additional factor VIII/IX or recombinant activated factor VII has proven to be safe and effective in association with emicizumab for major surgeries and it was effectively given at low doses in association with fitusiran (including activated prothrombin complex concentrate). No thrombotic complications have been reported in the surgical setting so far. A multidisciplinary team/facility remains crucial to manage major surgery in patients on prophylaxis with these new agents.

Challenges of biological monitoring in a hemophilia A patient without inhibitors on emicizumab undergoing major orthopedic surgery: a case report

A man with severe hemophilia A (HA) without factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors was admitted for total arthroplasty of his elbow. The patient was being treated with emicizumab, with his last administration given 8 days before surgery. Preoperatively, he received a bolus of 4000 international units (IU) of recombinant (r)FVIII. Throughout the operation, a continuous infusion of 4 IU/kg/h was administered and maintained over 24 hours. On the first postoperative day, the FVIII infusion rate was reduced to 225 IU/h for 4 days and stopped on the fifth day. Under this treatment, no bleeding complications occurred. Emicizumab is known to interfere with a wide range of coagulation assays, thereby challenging replacement therapy monitoring before, during, and after surgery. In this case study, we report on the assessment of FVIII levels at different time points using various reagents. We conclude that for both hematologists and non-hematology clinicians, it is crucial to be aware of emicizumab interferences with routine coagulation tests so as to avoid misinterpretation. In addition, laboratory specialists must be familiar with this treatment in order to select appropriate coagulation tests and provide rapid and reliable result interpretations.

An update of the current pharmacotherapeutic armamentarium for hemophilia A

INTRODUCTION

For several decades, we have seen unprecedented advances in novel therapy development for hemophilia A. These advances address the unmet need of replacement therapy, and they include the development of recombinant products with improved pharmacokinetics, subcutaneously administered products, and those with better efficacy and safety profiles in hemophilia A management.

AREAS COVERED

In this update of hemophilia A treatment, the author summarizes data from completed standard half-life FVIII products, extended half-life FVIII products and FVIII mimetic studies. All products have an acceptable safety profile. The standard half-life products, EHL-FVIII products and emicizumab are efficacious in the prevention and treatment of bleeds and for EHL-FVIII in the perisurgical setting.

EXPERT OPINION

Advances in pharmacotherapy for hemophilia A have been characterized by changing care goals from supportive care to eliminating infections, preventing inhibitors, and more recently achieving zero bleeds in many patients. While gene therapy has the potential for functional cure in hemophilia A, it has many limitations which need to be addressed. Therefore, pharmacotherapy is likely to remain the mainstay in the management of hemophilia A and promises to get better with currently available therapies. Evolving factor and non-factor replacement therapies may also improve current unmet needs in hemophilia A management.

Bispecific antibodies for the treatment of hemophilia A

INTRODUCTION

Emicizumab is a bispecific antibody exerting cofactor function of FVIIIa irrespective of the presence of FVIII inhibitors. Long-term data of phase 1/2 and phase 3 studies have been accumulated. Various questions such as indicated patients, ITI, application to PUPs, hemostatic treatment including surgeries, and emicizumab-related morbidity remain to be solved.

AREAS COVERED

The review describes the mode of action, data from pre-/post-marketing and ongoing clinical studies according to PubMed search and our own works.

EXPERT OPINION

For patients with a persistent inhibitor, emicizumab is a definite therapeutic option, although the possibility of BPAs-associated thromboembolic/TMA events raises concerns. The use of ITI together with emicizumab prophylaxis is being examined in clinical trials. For non-inhibitor, especially pediatric patients, emicizumab prophylaxis can be an option. Outcome assessment 'beyond ABR' such as joint health, physical/mental activity, QOL is required. Furthermore, continuous data collection for emicizumab-related adverse events and morbidity would be recommended.

Effectiveness of ankle fusion in patients with hemophilia, advanced ankle degeneration, and unbearable pain for whom nonsurgical and surgical treatments have been ineffective

Introduction: In underdeveloped countries, patients with hemophilia often experience repetitive ankle joint hemorrhages due to a shortage of coagulation factors (factor VIII [FVIII] and factor IX [FIX] for hemophilia A and B, respectively).Areas covered: This is a narrative literature review in which we searched the Cochrane Library and PubMed for articles related to ankle arthrodesis in patients with hemophilia. The searches covered the period from the databases´ inception to 28 February 2021. In the event of unsuccessful hematologic prophylaxis and conservative measures (e.g. analgesics, cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors, taping, intra-articular injections of hyaluronic acid and corticosteroids, physical and rehabilitation medicine, orthoses, radiosynovectomy, and joint-preserving surgery (e.g. removal of the distal tibia by open surgery or by arthroscopic surgery, joint debridement by arthroscopic surgery), the classical surgical solution is ankle arthrodesis, which does not preserve the ankle joint.Expert opinion: Ankle pain is reduced after ankle arthrodesis (75% of patients experience no pain). Approximately 5% of patients require reoperation due to lack of fusion, and deep infection occurs in 2.5%. After tibiotalar fusion, a self-reported activity scale shows that approximately 12% of patients improve, 9% worsen, and 79% show no improvement. The results of ankle arthrodesis therefore appear to be poor.Therefore, although 75% of the patients stopped having ankle pain after arthrodesis, according to a self-reported activity scale 88% of them did not improve or worsened.

Practical considerations for nonfactor-replacement therapies in the treatment of haemophilia with inhibitors

New therapeutic agents for haemophilia with inhibitors that are in development or already licensed are expected to provide transformative treatment options. Many of these new therapies are not based on simply replacing the missing factor; new strategies include bispecific antibody technology that mimics factor VIII coagulation function (emicizumab), and inhibition of anticoagulant proteins such as tissue factor pathway inhibitor (eg PF-06741086) and antithrombin (eg fitusiran). These agents are administered subcutaneously and should significantly reduce treatment burden and increase the ability to deliver prophylaxis for patients. Limited real-world data and validated practical guidance on these recently licensed/upcoming treatments resulted in the authors convening to discuss recommendations on their use. Emicizumab is currently the only licenced nonfactor therapy; thus, our recommendations focus on this product. Target candidates for emicizumab prophylaxis are difficult-to-treat patients with haemophilia A and inhibitors and/or venous access issues, frequent bleeds and target joints. In case of breakthrough bleeding while receiving emicizumab, patients still require treatment with bypassing agents; the adjunct treatment of choice is recombinant activated factor VII. This treatment is also recommended to prevent bleeds in patients with inhibitors undergoing surgery. Our recommendations on suitable laboratory assays and monitoring new products, as well as the benefit of patient-reported outcomes (such as pain and physical activity levels), are included. We also briefly discuss future treatment options for patients with haemophilia B and inhibitors. Although these nonfactor treatments offer great promise, further data and real-world evidence are needed.

Emicizumab prophylaxis: Prospective longitudinal real-world follow-up and monitoring

INTRODUCTION

Real-world data on prophylaxis of severe haemophilia A (HA) patients treated by emicizumab are scarce.

AIM

To study the efficacy and safety of longitudinal emicizumab prophylaxis and assess laboratory monitoring correlations in a large patient cohort.

METHODS

HA patients with and without FVIII inhibitors, initiating emicizumab prophylaxis, were prospectively enrolled. Bleeding, adverse events and surgeries were documented. FVIII inhibitors, emicizumab levels and thrombin generation (TG) were sequentially measured.

RESULTS

A total of 107 patients, including 58 children (whose median (IQR) age was 6 (1-11) years) with severe HA, composed the study cohort. Twenty-nine per cent (31/107) of our HA patients had FVIII inhibitors. Patients were followed for a median of 67 weeks (up to 144 weeks). Fifty-three patients, whose median follow-up was 53 weeks, experienced zero bleeds. Most bleeds (94%) among children were trauma-related, whereas 61% of adults sustained spontaneous joint bleeds. Four patients experienced major bleeds, with a fatal outcome in one infant, who also presented with central venous line thrombosis. No other serious adverse events were encountered. Seven patients have decided to stop emicizumab treatment for various reasons. Emicizumab plasma levels increased after emicizumab prophylaxis initiation, and values were maintained during follow-up, in all but one patient, suspected of anti-drug antibodies. A significant reduction of FVIII inhibitor levels was noted among inhibitor patients. TG was increased and sustained yet could not prognosticate bleeding risk.

CONCLUSION

Emicizumab prophylaxis was mostly well tolerated, although 50% of patients experienced breakthrough bleeds. Routine TG monitoring is not obligatory, and further studies are warranted in selected patient populations.

Emicizumab prophylaxis in haemophilia patients older than 50 years with cardiovascular risk factors: Real-world data

INTRODUCTION

Emicizumab (Hemlibra™) is approved for prophylaxis of Haemophilia A (HA) patients with and without inhibitors. However, real-world data on emicizumab use in the elderly HA patients with concomitant cardiovascular risk factors are lacking.

AIM

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of emicizumab in a real-world cohort of elderly HA patients.

METHODS

A prospective longitudinal observational study on HA patients over 50 years old treated, followed and monitored during emicizumab prophylaxis was conducted. We documented any bleeding or adverse events and collected plasma samples for emicizumab levels, aPTT and thrombin generation (TG).

RESULTS

Seventeen HA patients (2 with inhibitor), whose median age was 62.4 years (range: 51.5-77.1) composed the cohort, including 9/17 with multiple cardiovascular risk factors (high risk group). Seven patients had chronic HIV infection. The median follow-up of our cohort was 400 days (range 89-805, IQR 211-479 days). The median annualized bleeding rate (ABR) significantly decreased for all patients. Among patients who displayed significant bleeding tendencies, emicizumab steady state levels as well as TG were lower as compared with the group. The ABR of four patients concomitantly treated by antiplatelet agents was significantly higher compared with the rest of the cohort. Neither thrombosis nor thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) was encountered.

CONCLUSIONS

Emicizumab prophylaxis for HA patients older than 50 years including those with cardiovascular risk factors was well tolerated. As lower emicizumab and TG levels were observed among bleeding patients, we suggest that monitoring laboratory assays could be of value within this age group.

The availability of new drugs for hemophilia treatment

INTRODUCTION

A number of new FVIII/IX concentrates enriched the portfolio of products available for the treatment of hemophilia A/B patients. Due to the large inter-patient variability, accurate tailoring of the therapy became essential to improve patients' adherence, clinical outcomes, and cost/effectiveness ratio. Recently, non-replacement therapies have taken the limelight and succeeded in decreasing the bleedings of patients.

AREAS COVERED

The PK characteristics, efficacy, and safety of the new rFVIII and rFIX concentrates and of non-replacement therapy, are reported in detail in the published clinical trials.

EXPERT OPINION

Outstanding improvements of rFIX concentrates' pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics have allowed to reduce the bleedings in hemophilia B patients, in order to increase their adherence to prophylaxis and quality of life. Less significant are the effects of pegylation or Fc fusion on the pharmacokinetics of the new rFVIII concentrates. The new non-replacement therapy is achieving the favor of many treaters and patients, in particular those with Factor VIII inhibitors. Great attention must be paid to the dangerous synergy of APCC and emicizumab, responsible for some fatal events during the clinical trials and compassionate use of this drug. So far, replacement therapy should be the standard of care for hemophilia patients without inhibitors or difficulties in venous access.