The evolving role of allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation in the era of chimaeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy

Consensus on the monitoring, treatment, and prevention of leukaemia relapse after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in China: 2024 update

The consensus in 2018 from The Chinese Society of Haematology (CSH) on the monitoring, treatment, and prevention of leukaemia relapse after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) facilitated the standardization of clinical practices in China and progressive integration with the world. To integrate recent developments and further improve the consensus, a panel of experts from the CSH recently updated the following consensus: (1) integrate risk-adapted, measurable residual disease (MRD)-guided strategy on modified donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) and interferon-α into total therapy, which was pioneered and refined by Chinese researchers; (2) provide additional evidence of the superiority of haploidentical HSCT (the dominant donor source in China) to matched HSCT for high-risk populations, especially for pre-HSCT MRD-positive patients; (3) support the rapid progress of techniques for MRD detection, such as next-generation sequencing (NGS) and leukaemia stem cell-based MRD detection; and (4) address the role of new targeted options in transplant settings. In conclusion, the establishment of a "total therapy" strategy represents a great step forward. We hope that the consensus updated by Chinese scholars will include the latest cutting-edge developments and inspire progress in post-HSCT relapse management.

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation and CAR-T in B-cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: a two-center experience and review of the literature

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is still a potentially curative option for B-cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (B-NHL) in the modern immunotherapy era. The objective of this study was to analyze long-term outcomes of patients with B-NHL who received allo-HSCT. We analyzed overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and graft versus host disease (GVHD) relapse-free survival (GRFS) in 53 patients undergoing allo-HSCT from two institutions. The median follow-up of the study was 72 months (range 29-115 months). The median number of lines of therapy before allo-HSCT was 3 (range 1-6) and twenty-eight patients (53%) had received a previous autologous transplant. The 3-year PFS, OS and GRFS were 55%, 63%, and 55%, respectively. One-year non-relapse mortality was 26%. Karnofsky Performance Scale < 90 was associated with worse OS in multivariable analysis. A non-comparative analysis of a cohort of 44 patients with similar characteristics who received chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy was done, showing a 1-year PFS and OS were 60% and 66%, respectively. Our data shows that allo-HSCT is still a useful option for treating selected patients with R/R B-NHL. Our retrospective analysis and review of the literature demonstrate that allo-HSCT can provide durable remissions in a subset of patients with R/R B-NHL.

Failure of CAR-T cell therapy in relapsed and refractory large cell lymphoma and multiple myeloma: An urgent unmet need

Since its FDA approval, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy is changing the landscape of the treatment algorithm for relapsed and refractory large cell lymphoma and multiple myeloma. While initially hailed as a game changer and received widely with great enthusiasm, the reality of treatment failure soon became a major disappointment. This situation left patients and clinicians alike wondering about the next treatment options. CAR-T cell therapy failure for aggressive lymphoma or multiple myeloma creates a very poor prognosis and the treatment options are very limited. New emerging data, however, show promise for the use of approaches that include bispecific antibodies and other strategies to rescue affected patients. In this review, we summarize the current emerging data on the treatment options for patients whose disease has relapsed or remains refractory after CAR-T cell therapy failure, an area of great unmet need.

Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation after Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy in Large B Cell Lymphoma

Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy has transformed the care of patients with relapsed/refractory large B cell lymphoma (LBCL). However, approximately 60% of CAR-T recipients ultimately will experience disease recurrence or progression. Salvage therapies after CAR-T treatment failures are of limited efficacy and have a short duration of response. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the role of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) after CAR-T therapy in LBCL patients. This was a multicenter observational study reporting the outcome of 39 adult LBCL patients who underwent allo-HCT following anti-CD19 CAR-T therapy. The median patient age was 47 years (range, 20 to 68 years). HLA-matched sibling, HLA-matched unrelated, and alternative donors were used in 36%, 36%, and 28% of transplantations, respectively. Conditioning regimens were primarily of low or intermediate intensity. Disease status at allo-HCT was complete response in 41%, partial response in 38%, and progressive disease in 21%. Allo-HCT was performed at a median of 127 days (range, 82 to 206 days) after CAR-T therapy. A high incidence of hepatic toxicity (28%), including sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (15.4%; 95% confidence interval; [CI], 6.2% to 28.5%), was observed. The 1-year cumulative incidence of grade II-IV and grade III-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was 38.5% (95% CI, 23.2% to 53.6%) and 15.4% (95% CI, 6.1% to 28.5%), respectively. The 2-year cumulative incidence of moderate-severe chronic GVHD was 11.1% (95% CI, 3.3% to 24.3%). Overall, 2-year nonrelapse mortality and relapse/progression incidence were 26% (95% CI, 13% to 41%) and 43% (95% CI, 27% to 59%), respectively. With a median follow-up of 32 months, the 2-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 45% (95% CI, 31% to 66%) and 31% (95% CI, 19% to 50%), respectively. In multivariable analyses, pre-HCT elevated lactate dehydrogenase level and transformed lymphoma were predictive of OS and PFS, respectively. Our data suggest that allo-HCT after anti-CD19 CAR-T treatment failure is feasible with a relatively promising efficacy but possibly high toxicity rate.

[Role of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation after anti-CD19 CAR T-cell treatment: Guidelines from the SFGM-TC]

The role of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) after CAR T- treatment cells in hematologic malignancies is currently controversial. Prolonged remissions after several years of follow-up suggest that there is a curative effect of CAR T-cells therapy, whereas allo-HCT was previously considered the only curative treatment in relapse situation. The aim of this harmonization workshop is to detail the existing data in the literature on the feasibility of allo-HCT after CAR T-cells and to propose to consider allograft in selected patients with B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). In B-ALL, various intrinsic factors (inherent to the patient, to the disease, to the type of CAR T-cells) and especially various post CAR T-cells criteria (early expansion kinetics, residual disease at D28, early loss of B-cell aplasia) should lead to consider performing allo-HCT before the occurrence of a relapse. In DLBCL, although there are risk factors for relapse at diagnosis and prior to CAR T-cells therapy, response assessed by PET-CT at three months is critical and allo-HCT cannot currently be recommended in cases of complete or partial remission. In any case, if the age is appropriate for allogeneic transplantation, HLA typing should be performed before CAR T-cells treatment in order not to delay the allo-HCT project if needed.

Biobehavioral Implications of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell Therapy: Current State and Future Directions

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has demonstrated remarkable clinical responses in hematologic malignancies. Recent advances in CAR T-cell therapy have expanded its application into other populations including older patients and those with central nervous system and solid tumors. Although its clinical efficacy has been excellent for some malignancies, CAR T-cell therapy is associated with severe and even life-threatening immune-mediated toxicities, including cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity. There is a strong body of scientific evidence highlighting the connection between immune activation and neurocognitive and psychological phenomena. To date, there has been limited investigation into this relationship in the context of immunotherapy. In this review, we present a biobehavioral framework to inform current and future cellular therapy research and contribute to improving the multidimensional outcomes of patients receiving CAR T-cell therapy.

Role of CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells in Second-Line Large B Cell Lymphoma: Lessons from Phase 3 Trials. An Expert Panel Opinion from the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy

Since 2017, 3 CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies-axicabtagene ciloleucel, tisagenlecleucel, and lisocabtagene maraleucel-have been approved for relapsed/refractory aggressive diffuse large B cell lymphoma after 2 lines of therapy. Recently, 3 prospective phase 3 randomized clinical trials were conducted to define the optimal second-line treatment by comparing each of the CAR T cell products to the current standard of care: ZUMA-7 for axicabtagene ciloleucel, BELINDA for tisagenlecleucel, and TRANSFORM for lisocabtagene maraleucel. These 3 studies, although largely addressing the same question, had different outcomes, with ZUMA-7 and TRANSFORM demonstrating significant improvement with CD19 CAR T cells in second-line therapy compared with standard of care but BELINDA not showing any benefit. The US Food and Drug Administration has now approved axicabtagene ciloleucel and lisocabtagene maraleucel for LBCL that is refractory to first-line chemoimmunotherapy or relapse occurring within 12 months of first-line chemoimmunotherapy. Following the reporting of these practice changing studies, here a group of experts convened by the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy provides a comprehensive review of the 3 studies, emphasizing potential differences, and shares perspectives on what these results mean to clinical practice in this new era of treatment of B cell lymphomas.

Impact of High Disease Burden on Survival in Pediatric Patients with B-ALL Treated with Tisagenlecleucel

CD19-specific chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies, including the FDA-approved tisagenlecleucel, induce high rates of remission in pediatric patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). However, post-treatment relapse remains an issue. Optimal management of B-ALL after tisagenlecleucel treatment remains elusive, and continued tracking of outcomes is necessary to establish a standard of care for this population. We sought to evaluate outcomes on the real-world use of tisagenlecleucel in a contemporary pediatric patient population and to identify risk factors influencing event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS). Additionally, we aimed to describe post-tisagenlecleucel management strategies, including use of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (AlloHCT) or repeat CAR T-cell infusions. We report on 31 pediatric and adolescent and young adult patients (AYA) with B-ALL, treated with lymphodepleting chemotherapy followed by tisagenlecleucel. Patients were treated at Johns Hopkins Hospital and St. Jude Children's Research Hospital between March 2018 and November 2020. Data on patient, disease, and treatment characteristics were collected retrospectively from medical records and described. EFS and OS were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. Single-factor and multiple-factor analysis of EFS and OS were performed by fitting Cox regression models. Of the 30 evaluable patients, 25 (83.3%) experienced a complete response, with 21 having negative minimal residual disease. Treatment was well tolerated, with expected rates of cytokine release syndrome (61.3%) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity (29%). After initial complete response, 12 patients (48%) had subsequent disease recurrence, with CD19-negative relapse (n = 6) occurring sooner than CD19-positive relapse (P = .0125). With a median follow-up time of 386 days (range 11-1187 days), the EFS for the entire cohort (n = 31) at 6 and 12 months after infusion was 47% (95% confidence interval [CI], 28.4%-63.4%) and 35.2% (95% CI, 18.4%-52.5%), respectively. In multivariate analysis, high pretreatment leukemic burden (≥5% bone marrow blasts) was an independent risk factor for inferior EFS (HR 5.98 [95% CI, 1.1-32.4], P = .0380) and OS (HR 4.2 [95% CI, 1.33-13.39], P = .0148). Tisagenlecleucel induced high initial response rates in a contemporary cohort of pediatric and AYA patients with B-ALL. However, 48% of patients experienced subsequent disease relapse, including 6 with antigen-escape variants. This highlights a considerable limitation of single-agent autologous CD19-CAR T-cell therapy. Pretreatment leukemic disease burden of ≥5% blasts was significantly associated with worse outcomes in this study, including lower EFS and OS. Our findings suggest that reducing preinfusion leukemic burden is a viable treatment strategy to improve outcomes of CAR T-cell therapy.

Challenges and Advances in Chimeric Antigen Receptor Therapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia

The advent of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has led to dramatic remission rates in multiple relapsed/refractory hematologic malignancies. While CAR T-cell therapy has been particularly successful as a treatment for B-cell malignancies, effectively treating acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with CARs has posed a larger challenge. AML not only creates an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment that dampens CAR T-cell responses, but it also lacks many unique tumor-associated antigens, making leukemic-specific targeting difficult. One advantage of CAR T-cell therapy compared to alternative treatment options is the ability to provide prolonged antigen-specific immune effector and surveillance functions. Since many AML CAR targets under investigation including CD33, CD117, and CD123 are also expressed on hematopoietic stem cells, CAR T-cell therapy can lead to severe and potentially lethal myeloablation. Novel strategies to combat these issues include creation of bispecific CARs, CAR T-cell "safety switches", TCR-like CARs, NK CARs, and universal CARs, but all vary in their ability to provide a sustained remission, and consolidation with an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) will be necessary in most cases This review highlights the delicate balance between effectively eliminating AML blasts and leukemic stem cells, while preserving the ability for bone marrow to regenerate. The impact of CAR therapy on treatment landscape of AML and changing scope of allo-HCT is discussed. Continued advances in AML CAR therapy would be of great benefit to a disease that still has high morbidity and mortality.