Superior outcome for splenectomised patients in a population-based study of splenic marginal zone lymphoma in Sweden

Time Trend Analysis of Splenectomy for Splenic Marginal Zone Lymphoma: Declining Surgery, Promising Survival

BACKGROUND

The purpose of current study was to examine the incidence, characteristics, treatment, and survival of splenic marginal zone lymphoma (SMZL).

METHODS

Using SEER-18 database, patients diagnosed with SMZL between 2000 and 2018 were included. Effect of splenectomy on survival was evaluated after balancing the confounding factors by propensity score matching. Rates of splenectomy and 1-year relative survival were calculated for each year. A logistic regression model identified factors related to splenectomy, and a Cox regression model assessed factors linked to overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

A total of 2790 patients with SMZL were analyzed. The majority were older than 60 years, female, and white. The age-adjusted incidence of SMZL was 0.17/100,000 person-years, with higher incidence in males. Incidence increased by 0.68%/year and peaked at 80-84 years for both genders. The SMZL-specific survival rates at 3 and 5 years were 89.6% and 85.3%, respectively. Meanwhile, the relative survival rates for the same periods were 88.6% and 85.9%, respectively. Splenectomy patients were more likely to be younger, male, and diagnosed with early-stage disease. Despite the decreasing utilization rate of splenectomy from 59.4% in 2000 to 16.2% in 2018, the 1-year relative survival rate remained relatively stable with minor fluctuations over time. Whether or not the patient underwent splenectomy was not found to be a significant prognostic indicator for OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated a decreasing use of splenectomy but a relatively stable survival in patients with SMZL, highlighting the urgency to better understand the role of splenectomy and its associated outcomes.

Splenic marginal zone lymphoma in Sweden 2000-2020: Increasing rituximab use and better survival in the elderly

The treatment of splenic marginal zone lymphoma is debated: splenectomy (the old standard-of-care) is better than chemotherapy but maybe not better than rituximab-containing treatment. We examined all 358 patients diagnosed with splenic marginal zone lymphoma in Sweden 2000-2020. The median overall survival was 11.0 years. The median age was 73 years; 61% were women. Age was the only independently prognostic clinical characteristic. Eighty-six patients were started on wait-and-watch, 90 rituximab monotherapy, 47 rituximab-chemotherapy, 88 splenectomy, 37 chemotherapy, and 10 both systemic therapy and splenectomy. Overall survival was inferior in patients treated with chemotherapy, but equal in patients treated with rituximab, rituximab-chemotherapy and splenectomy. Patients treated with both systemic therapy and splenectomy showed good outcome, suggesting that surgery can be safely reserved for nonresponders. After adjustment for age, survival did not differ between patients started on wait-and-watch and those treated with splenectomy or rituximab-containing therapy. Over time, rituximab use and survival increased in patients ≥73 years. This is, to our knowledge, the largest population-based study of splenic marginal zone lymphoma patients treated with upfront rituximab. We conclude that wait-and-watch remains the most reasonable option in asymptomatic splenic marginal zone lymphoma patients. Symptomatic patients should be offered single-agent rituximab in first line.

New Insights into the Biology and Diagnosis of Splenic Marginal Zone Lymphomas

Splenic marginal zone lymphoma (SMZL) is a small B-cell lymphoma, which has been recognized as a distinct pathological entity since the WHO 2008 classification. It classically presents an indolent evolution, but a third of patients progress rapidly and require aggressive treatments, such as immuno-chemotherapy or splenectomy, with all associated side effects. In recent years, advances in the comprehension of SMZL physiopathology have multiplied, thanks to the arrival of new devices in the panel of available molecular biology techniques, allowing the discovery of new molecular findings. In the era of targeted therapies, an update of current knowledge is needed to guide future researches, such as those on epigenetic modifications or the microenvironment of these lymphomas.