Primary therapy and relative survival in patients with lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma/Waldenström macroglobulinaemia: a population-based study in the Netherlands, 1989-2018

New developments in the diagnosis and characterization of Waldenström's macroglobulinemia

INTRODUCTION

Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM) is defined as a lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL) with immunoglobulin M (IgM) monoclonal gammopathy and morphologic evidence of bone marrow infiltration by LPL. Immunophenotyping and genotyping provide a firm pathological basis for diagnosis and are particularly valuable in differential diagnosis between WM and related diseases. Emerging technologies in mutational analysis present new opportunities, but challenges remain around standardization of methodologies and reporting of mutational data across centers.

AREAS COVERED

The review provides an overview of the diagnosis of WM, with a particular focus on the role of immunophenotyping and genotyping.

EXPERT OPINION

Demonstration of LPL with a bone marrow biopsy is essential to reach a definitive diagnosis of WM. However, MYD88L265P and a typical WM immunophenotypic profile are valuable for the differential diagnosis of WM and related diseases, such as marginal zone lymphoma, multiple myeloma, and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. These methodologies must be utilized across centers and with appropriate standards followed in the evaluation and reporting of sensitivities and specificities. The diagnostic and/or prognostic value of mutations in genes such as CXCR4 and TP53 that are currently not routinely evaluated in the diagnosis of WM should be explored.

Waldenström macroglobulinemia: 2023 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management

DISEASE OVERVIEW

Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) is a lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma with immunoglobulin M (IgM) monoclonal protein. Clinical features include anemia, thrombocytopenia, hepatosplenomegaly, lymphadenopathy, and rarely hyperviscosity.

DIAGNOSIS

Presence of IgM monoclonal protein associated with ≥10% clonal lymphoplasmacytic cells in bone marrow confirms the diagnosis. The L265P mutation in MYD88 is detectable in more than 90% of patients and is found in most IgM MGUS patients. MYD88 is not required for the diagnosis.

RISK STRATIFICATION

Age, hemoglobin level, platelet count, β2 microglobulin, LDH, and monoclonal IgM concentrations are characteristics that are predictive of outcomes.

RISK-ADAPTED THERAPY

Not all patients who fulfill WM criteria require therapy; these patients can be observed until symptoms develop. Rituximab-monotherapy is inferior to regimens that combine it with bendamustine, an alkylating agent, a proteosome inhibitor, or a BTK inhibitor. The preferred Mayo Clinic induction is either rituximab and bendamustine (without rituximab maintenance) or zanubrutinib.

MANAGEMENT OF REFRACTORY DISEASE

Bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, fludarabine, thalidomide, everolimus, Bruton Tyrosine Kinase inhibitors, carfilzomib, lenalidomide, bendamustine, and venetoclax have all been shown to have activity in relapsed WM. Given WM's natural history, the reduction of therapy toxicity is an important part of treatment selection.

Treatment of relapsed and refractory Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia

Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia (WM) is a rare type of indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) that remains incurable. Several effective agents such as monoclonal antibodies (in combination with chemotherapy), Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors, proteasome inhibitors, and BCL2 inhibitors are (becoming) available for the treatment of relapsed and refractory WM. There is however no consensus on a preferred treatment in the relapsed setting. Choice of therapy in relapsed WM should be individualized by taking several treatment and patients characteristics into account, such as treatment duration, toxicity, age, comorbidities and MYD88^L265P and CXCR4 mutational status. Due to better understanding of WM biology and the arrival of novel anti-lymphoma agents, the therapeutic options are increasing. Non-cytotoxic and fixed duration regimens, such as those explored in other indolent NHLs should be the focus of future clinical trials in WM.

First-Line Treatment of Waldenström’s Macroglobulinaemia: Considerations Based on the Dutch National Guideline

Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) is a rare B-cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma. There are only few prospective randomized clinical trials to guide treatment recommendations and there is no international consensus on a preferred first line treatment approach. In the recently revised Dutch guideline for WM, we describe recommendations for practice based as much as possible on the known data. Here, we summarize the considerations for first-line treatment based on these Dutch guidelines. Available evidence is summarized, including efficacy and toxicity data. Combinations of Rituximab with chemotherapy, proteasome inhibition or BTK-inhibition are all valid first line treatment options. The Dutch WM working group considers Dexamethasone/Rituximab/Cylofosfamide (DRC) a suitable first-line treatment for many WM patients, given the efficacy, the relatively mild toxicity profile and the extensive experience with this regimen. However, the long-term toxicities of DRC are unclear and need further clarification. Other regimens such as R-bendamustine, R-Bortezomib-dexamethason are also effective options, however with specific toxicities. BTK-inhibitors are not a preferred option in first line for most patients in the Dutch WM guidelines because of the need for longterm treatment and toxicities. Based on patient preferences research, future clinical trials should focus on effective fixed-duration regimens with non-cytotoxic therapies that have a favorable toxicity profile. Further development of (combinations with) BCL-2 inhibititors, novel proteasome inhibitors and BTK-inhibition could be interesting. In addition T-cell-directed treatments including bispecific antibodies as a monotherapy or combined with other novel agents deserve further study in WM.

Baseline 18 F-FDG PET/CT May Portend the Prognosis of Patients With Waldenström Macroglobulinemia/Lymphoplasmacytic Lymphoma After First-Line Treatment

PURPOSE

The outcome of patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia/lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (WM/LPL) is variable. We aim to study if baseline 18 F-FDG PET/CT has some prognostic significance in WM/LPL.

METHODS

Thirty-three patients with newly diagnosed WM/LPL who underwent baseline 18 F-FDG PET/CT and received active treatment thereafter were recruited in this retrospective study. Semiquantitative indices of baseline 18 F-FDG PET/CT were measured as total lesion glycolysis (TLG), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and SUV max . The patients were followed up for at least 3 years or until reaching the endpoint, which were defined as progression-free survival (PFS) and the time to next treatment (TTNT).

RESULTS

The overall response rate of the first-line treatment in the recruited patients was 84.8% (28/33). The 3-year PFS and overall survival rates were 56.3% and 89.3%, respectively. Patients with PFS <36 months and TTNT <36 months showed TLG and MTV significantly higher than those with PFS ≥36 months and TTNT ≥36 months ( P < 0.05). SUV max in patients with PFS <36 months was significantly higher than those with PFS ≥36 months ( P = 0.033). Receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated that cutoff values of TLG >291.28 SUVbw * mL, MTV >108.78 mL, and SUV max >3.16 were optimal for predicting PFS <36 months. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that TLG >291.28 SUVbw * mL and MTV >108.78 mL were predictive for shorter PFS ( P = 0.003) and TTNT ( P = 0.002). In multivariate analysis, TLG >291.28 SUVbw * mL and MTV >108.78 mL were independent predictors for shorter PFS (hazard ratio, 3.06; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-8.57; P = 0.033) and TTNT (hazard ratio, 10.01; 95% confidence interval, 2.56-39.22; P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The metabolic indices of TLG and MTV in baseline 18 F-FDG PET/CT were independent prognostic factors to predict PFS and TTNT in patients with WM/LPL.

Patient preferences regarding treatment options for Waldenström's macroglobulinemia: A discrete choice experiment

INTRODUCTION

Treatment options for Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia (WM) have expanded rapidly in the last decades. However, there is no consensus on a preferred treatment. Therefore, patient preferences become increasingly important in making individualized treatment plans. Still, WM patients' priorities and perspectives regarding their treatment options are unknown. We evaluated treatment preferences of WM patients using a discrete choice experiment (DCE).

METHODS

A mixed-method approach was utilized for identification and selection of attributes/levels. The DCE questionnaire included five attributes: type of agent (targeted versus chemotherapy); frequency and route of administration; 5-year progression-free survival (PFS); adverse events; and risk of secondary malignancies. An orthogonal design and a mixed logit panel data model were used to construct choice tasks and assess patient preferences, respectively.

RESULTS

Three hundred thirty WM patients participated in the project. In total, 214 (65%) complete questionnaires were included for data analysis. The 5-year PFS, followed by risk of secondary malignancies were the most important attributes for making treatment choices. Regarding side effects, patients chose to avoid neuropathy the most compared to nausea/vomiting and extreme fatigue. Patients preferred a fixed-duration treatment with IV/SC administration at the hospital over a continuous daily oral regimen at home.

CONCLUSION

These are the first systematic data obtained on WM patient preferences for treatment. The results may help discussions with individual patients about their treatment choices. Also, these data can help design clinical trials in WM and inform health-care decision-making regarding outcomes that are most relevant to patients.

Dutch Physician's Perspectives on Diagnosis and Treatment of Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia Before and After the Implementation of a National Guideline

Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM), a rare low-grade B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), has a distinct clinical presentation and different treatment-related side effects compared with other NHL. Currently, a wide variety of therapeutic agents are available for the treatment of WM but there is no consensus on optimal treatment in first line and/or at relapse. The aim of this survey was to evaluate the current knowledge and perspectives of hematologists on diagnosis and treatment of WM. Also, we compare these results to a similar survey done before the publication of the first Dutch national guideline, in order to evaluate the impact of the implementation of a national guideline. A link to an online survey was sent out to all registered hematologists and hemato-oncologists in the Netherlands with the request to participate. The survey contained questions regarding the preferred diagnostic and treatment methods in patients with WM as well as treatment goals. We also compared physicians preferred treatment goals to those of patients (as studied in a recent nationwide patient questionnaire). Ninety-five responses (30% response rate) were obtained, out of which 82 (86%) surveys were complete. The respondents most commonly used dexamethasone-rituximab-cyclophosphamide as first-line treatment. For second-line treatment, bendamustine with rituximab and ibrutinib monotherapy were the most frequently applied. Compared with the initial survey, serum IgM M-protein was determined in all cases, MYD88 mutation analysis was currently widely implemented, prevention of an IgM "flare" was uniformly managed by the respondents and use of rituximab-cyclophosphamide-vincristine-prednisone was entirely abandoned. Physicians differed somewhat from patients with regard to most important treatment goals. The approach to diagnostic methods and treatment options in WM was more consistent with international guidelines and was more homogeneous after implementation of the national guideline. These data indicate an increase in knowledge on WM diagnosis and treatment. This may have resulted from implementation of a local guideline or the global rise in awareness and attention for WM.