Extended phenotyping does not preclude the occurrence of delayed haemolytic transfusion reactions in sickle cell disease

Investigation of Delayed Transfusion Reactions in Sickle Cell Disease Patients Polytransfused in the Brazilian Amazon

BACKGROUND

Sickle cell disease (SCD) affects approximately 100,000 people in the United States and millions worldwide, with the highest prevalence of 70% of SCD being found in individuals of African ethnicity. Delayed hemolytic, alloimmunization, and anamnestic transfusion reactions in multiple transfusion patients need to be investigated and managed to avoid a worsening of the patient's clinical status.

OBJECTIVE

This paper aims to investigate delayed transfusion reactions in SCD patients who were polytransfused in the Brazilian Amazon.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The clinical and laboratory indicators of SCD patients with more than four transfusions were investigated. The patients were treated at the Fundação Hospitalar de Hematologia e Hemoterapia do Estado do Amazonas, Brazil.

RESULTS

A total of 44 polytransfused patients with SCD were followed. Regarding Rh phenotype, it was possible to observe a frequency of 26.6% (12) patients with the RZRZ (DCE/DCE) phenotype, in addition to 4.5% (two) patients with RH and RHCE variants. It was also possible to observe 20.5% (nine) patients with an alloimmunization reaction, who presented the following alloantibodies: anti-RhD, anti-E, anti-K, anti-Jkb, anti-N, anti-S, and anti-Dia, two of which are unidentified. Of these, four (44.4%) patients also presented autoantibodies, anti-e, and three unidentified antibodies, and four (44.4%) patients presented an anamnestic reaction, with anti-RhD, K, and Jkb antibodies. Of the 44 patients monitored, 54.4% (24) had clinical and laboratory indicators of a delayed hemolytic reaction.

CONCLUSION

Delayed transfusion reactions, often neglected, occur frequently. Therefore, transfusions need to be monitored for at least 28 days, with medical investigation of clinical and laboratory indicators to make greater use of this therapeutic resource.

Alloimmunization and hyperhemolysis in sickle cell disease

Alloimmunization against red blood cell antigens and delayed hemolytic transfusion reaction (DHTR) are major barriers to transfusion in sickle cell disease (SCD). In SCD, DHTR is a potentially life-threatening. Blood group polymorphism in SCD patients, who are of African ancestry and frequently exposed to antigens they do not carry; an inflammatory clinical state; and occasional transfusion in acute situations are risk factors for alloimmunization and DHTR. In patients at risk, the transfusion indication must be balanced against the risk of developing DHTR. However, when transfusion is absolutely necessary, protocols combining the prevention of exposure to immunogenic antigens with immunosuppressive treatments must be implemented, and patients should be carefully monitored during posttransfusion follow-up. This close monitoring makes it possible to diagnose hyperhemolysis as soon as possible; to avoid retransfusion, which can exacerbate hemolysis; and to administer specific treatments, such as anticomplement therapy, in severe cases. Finally, in patients with severe disease, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation may be indicated. However, transfusion is also required in this context, and its management is complex because these risks must be taken into account.

The ongoing challenge of RBC alloimmunization in the management of patients with sickle cell disease

RBC transfusion remains a cornerstone in the treatment of sickle cell disease (SCD). However, as with many interventions, transfusion of RBCs is not without risk. Allogeneic RBC exposure can result in the development of alloantibodies, which can make it difficult to find compatible RBCs for future transfusion and increases the likelihood of life-threatening complications. The development of RBC alloantibodies occurs when a patient's immune system produces alloantibodies against foreign alloantigens present on RBCs. Despite its longstanding recognition, RBC alloimmunization has increasingly become a challenge when caring for patients with SCD. The growing prominence of alloimmunization can be attributed to several factors, including expanded indications for transfusions, increased lifespan of patients with SCD, and inadequate approaches to prevent alloimmunization. Recognizing these challenges, recent observational studies and preclinical models have begun to elucidate the immune pathways that underpin RBC alloimmunization. These emerging data hold promise in paving the way for innovative prevention strategies, with the goal of increasing the safety and efficacy of RBC transfusion in patients with SCD who are most vulnerable to alloimmunization.