TTP: From empiricism for an enigmatic disease to targeted molecular therapies

Hemostasis Testing in the Emergency Department: A Narrative Review

Routine laboratory screening is typically performed at initial evaluation of the vast majority of presentations to the emergency department (ED). These laboratory results are crucial to the diagnostic process, as they may influence up to 70% of clinical decisions. However, despite the usefulness of biological assessments, many tests performed are inappropriate or of doubtful clinical relevance. This overutilization rate of laboratory testing in hospitals, which represents a significant medical-economic burden, ranges from 20 to 67%, with coagulation tests at the top of the list. While reviews frequently focus on nonintensive care units, there are few published assessments of emergency-specific interventions or guidelines/guidance to date. The aim of this review is to highlight current recommendations for hemostasis evaluation in the emergency setting with a specific analysis of common situations leading to ED admissions, such as suspected venous thrombosis or severe bleeding. We revisit the evidence related to the assessment of patient's hemostatic capacity based on comprehensive history taking and physical examination as well as best practice recommendations for blood sample collection to ensure the reliability of results. This review also includes an examination of various currently available point of care tests and a comprehensive discussion on indications, limitations, and interpretation of these tests.

Therapeutic Plasma Exchange Versus FcRn Inhibition in Autoimmune Disease

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE or PLEX) is used in a broad range of autoimmune diseases, with the goal of removing autoantibodies from the circulation. A newer approach for the selective removal of immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies is the use of therapeutic molecules targeting the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn). FcRn regulates IgG recycling, and its inhibition results in a marked decrease in circulating autoantibodies of the IgG subtype. The difference between FcRn inhibition and PLEX is often questioned. With anti-FcRn monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and fragments only recently entering this space, limited data are available regarding long-term efficacy and safety. However, the biology of FcRn is well understood, and mounting evidence regarding the efficacy, safety, and potential differences among compounds in development is available, allowing us to compare against nonselective plasma protein depletion methods such as PLEX. FcRn inhibitors may have distinct advantages and disadvantages over PLEX in certain scenarios. Use of PLEX is preferred over FcRn inhibition where removal of antibodies other than IgG or when concomitant repletion of missing plasma proteins is needed for therapeutic benefit. Also, FcRn targeting has not yet been studied for use in acute flares or crisis states of IgG-mediated diseases. Compared with PLEX, FcRn inhibition is associated with less invasive access requirements, more specific removal of IgG versus other immunoglobulins without a broad impact on circulating proteins, and any impacts on other therapeutic drug levels are restricted to other mAbs. In addition, the degree of IgG reduction is similar with FcRn inhibitors compared with that afforded by PLEX. Here we describe the scientific literature regarding the use of PLEX and FcRn inhibitors in autoimmune diseases and provide an expert discussion around the potential benefits of these options in varying clinical conditions and scenarios.

Impact of N-glycan mediated shielding of ADAMTS-13 on the binding of pathogenic antibodies in immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura

BACKGROUND

Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is a rare thrombotic disorder, with 1.5 to 6.0 cases per million per year. The majority of patients with TTP develop inhibitory autoantibodies that predominantly target the spacer domain of ADAMTS-13. ADAMTS-13 is responsible for cleaving von Willebrand factor (VWF) multimers, thereby regulating platelet adhesion at sites of high-vascular shear stress. Inhibition and/or clearance of ADAMTS-13 by pathogenic autoantibodies results in accumulation of VWF multimers that promotes the formation of platelet-rich microthrombi. Previously, we have shown that insertion of a single N-glycan (NGLY) in the spacer domain prevents the binding of antispacer domain antibodies.

OBJECTIVES

To explore whether NGLY mediated shielding of the ADAMTS-13 spacer domain effectively prevents binding of pathogenic antispacer autoantibodies in patients with immune-mediated TTP (iTTP).

METHODS

We screened 5 NGLY-ADAMTS-13 variants (NGLY3, NGLY7, NGLY8, NGLY3+7, and NGLY3+8) for binding of autoantibodies and for their activity in the presence and absence of 50 samples derived from patients with iTTP.

RESULTS

NGLY variants showed greatly reduced antibody binding, down to 27% of wild-type (wt) ADAMTS-13 binding. Moreover, NGLY variants of ADAMTS-13 remained more active in FRETS-VWF73 assay in the presence of the plasma samples from these 50 patients with acute phase iTTP when compared with wtADAMTS-13. On average, wtADAMTS-13 activity was reduced to 37% of regular levels in the presence of plasma, while NGLY3 and NGLY3+7 remained 69% and 81% active, respectively.

CONCLUSION

These results reinforce our previous findings that NGLYs shield ADAMTS-13 from antibody binding and hence restore ADAMTS-13 activity in the presence of autoantibodies.

Epidemiology, Outcomes, and Complement Gene Variants in Secondary Thrombotic Microangiopathies

BACKGROUND

The identification of complement defects as major drivers of primary atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) has transformed the landscape of thrombotic microangiopathies (TMAs), leading to the development of targeted therapies and better patient outcomes. By contrast, little is known about the presentation, genetics, and outcomes of TMA associated with specific diseases or conditions, also referred to as secondary TMA.

METHODS

In this study, we assessed the relative incidence, clinical and genetic spectra, and long-term outcomes of secondary TMA versus other TMAs in consecutive patients hospitalized with a first episode of TMA from 2009 to 2019 at two European reference centers.

RESULTS

During the study period, 336 patients were hospitalized with a first episode of TMA. Etiologies included atypical HUS in 49 patients (15%), thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) in 29 (9%), shigatoxin-associated HUS in 70 (21%), and secondary TMA in 188 (56%). The main causes of secondary TMA were hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation ( n =56, 30%), solid-organ transplantation ( n =44, 23%), and malignant hypertension ( n =25, 13%). Rare variants in complement genes were identified in 32 of 49 patients (65%) with atypical HUS and eight of 64 patients (13%) with secondary TMA; pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants were found in 24 of 49 (49%) and two of 64 (3%) of them, respectively ( P < 0.001). After a median follow-up of 1157 days, death or kidney failure occurred in 14 (29%), eight (28%), five (7%), and 121 (64%) patients with atypical HUS, TTP, shigatoxin-associated HUS, and secondary TMA, respectively. Unadjusted and adjusted Cox regressions showed that patients with secondary TMA had the highest risk of death or kidney failure (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR], 3.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.85 to 6.07; P < 0.001; adjusted HR, 4.11; 95% CI, 2.00 to 8.46; P < 0.001; considering atypical HUS as reference).

CONCLUSIONS

Secondary TMAs represent the main cause of TMA and are independently associated with a high risk of death and progression to kidney failure.

Challenges in the diagnosis of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura

INTRODUCTION

Immune-mediated TTP (iTTP) is a rare condition without pathognomonic signs and symptoms. For this reason, the diagnosis of iTTP may be delayed or even missed, with potentially catastrophic consequences.

AREAS COVERED

The authors performed an extensive literature review on the diagnosis of iTTP and its challenges combined with their own experience in a referral center for patients with iTTP.

EXPERT OPINION

Although a definitive diagnosis of iTTP depends on the ADAMTS13 activity result, timely testing is rarely available at many centers to which patients present. If less complex tests were to become available, they would decrease the chances of late and/or missed diagnoses of iTTP throughout the world. While clinical scores to estimate the likelihood of iTTP exist, they are not well known, and can be misleading if used in the wrong context. Furthermore, the three scoring systems (PLASMIC, Bentley, and French) only moderately correlate with each other, which further complicates the landscape. The existence of these scores and how they should be used in practice is but one opportunity that can be seized through more robust programs to educate nonspecialist clinicians on how to recognize and treat patients with iTTP.

N-Acetylcistein for thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura: an observational case series study

Acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is a life-threatening disorder. N-Acetylcysteine (NAC) rapidly degrades ultra-large von Willebrand factor multimers by disrupting the disulfide bonds. We report a series of twelve consecutive patients diagnosed with acquired TTP successfully treated with high-dose NAC (150 mg/kg/day) in combination with plasma exchange and steroids. Eight patients also received rituximab. Two patients presented refractory TTP. All patients achieved a quick clinical response in a median time of 5.5 days after starting NAC and are alive after a median follow-up of 29 months. The treatment was feasible and well tolerated. These data provide further evidence of the potential benefit and safety of adding NAC to the standard of care.

Response to belimumab in thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura associated with systemic lupus erythematosus: a case-based review

Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP), a life-threatening syndrome characterized by acute microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and visceral ischemia, can be classified as congenital TTP (inherited due to a mutation in ADAMTS13) and acquired TTP. The acquired TTP is further classified as idiopathic and secondary TTP. Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is regarded as one of the most common causes of secondary TTP (SLE-TTP). In contrast to patients with idiopathic TTP, some patients with SLE-TTP, especially those diagnosed with refractory TTP, are resistant to plasma exchange and high-dose corticosteroids and usually require second-line drugs, including newly developed biologicals. Belimumab, a B-lymphocyte stimulator-specific inhibitor, was the first approved new therapy for SLE in the past 50 years. Only two cases of SLE-TTP using belimumab have been reported; however, detailed information has not been made available. Herein, we describe a 28-year-old female patient who presented with palm petechiae, strong tawny urine, and yellow stained skin and sclera, and was diagnosed with SLE-TTP supported by high anti-ANA titers; positive anti-SSA/SM; pleural effusion; decreased platelet count, hemoglobin, and complement C3/C4 counts; increased lactate dehydrogenase level, along with increased schistocytes; and a significant deficiency of ADAMTS13 activity. Belimumab (10 mg/kg) was administered after six plasma exchanges. Good efficiency and outcomes without any adverse events, SLE, or TTP relapse were observed during 12 months of follow-up. Therefore, belimumab is a promising choice for SLE-TTP management. In addition, we provide a focused review of the existing literature on the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and therapeutic strategies for SLE-TTP.

[CME: Diagnostic Approach and Management of Thrombotic Microangiopathy]

CME: Diagnostic Approach and Management of Thrombotic Microangiopathy Abstract. Thrombotic microangiopathies (TMA) are characterized by organ thrombosis induced by endothelial injury. They present with thrombocytopenia, hemolytic anemia and schistocytes. In case of an underlying disease-causing TMA, the treatment of the underlying disease is essential. Primary TMAs are divided into thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, hemolytic-uremic syndrome and atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome. Differentiation of these entities is essential, as fast initiation of empiric treatment might be life-saving and disease-modifying treatments for the different entities do exist.