Impact of asparaginase discontinuation on outcomes of children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia receiving the Japan Association of Childhood Leukaemia Study ALL-02 protocol

Silent inactivation of asparaginase in Japan: results of the prospective ALL-ASP19 trial

Silent inactivation (SI) of L-asparaginase (ASP) is a phenomenon by which a neutralizing antibody for ASP (AAA) decreases ASP activity (ASA) in patients without a clinical allergy to ASP. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has a poor prognosis in patients with SI. Therefore, measurement of ASA levels, not AAA levels, is needed to identify patients with SI. We herein report the results of the prospective clinical trial ALL-ASP19, the first study in Japan to measure ASA and AAA to identify patients with SI. A total of 110 newly diagnosed ALL patients were enrolled, and ASA levels were measured three times during ALL treatment. Besides the 12 patients who discontinued the study, 32 were excluded due to inappropriate frequency and timing of ASA measurements and inappropriate ASP dosing. The remaining 66 patients were analyzed, and 3 patients with SI (4.5%) were identified. The incidence of SI is lower in Japan than in other countries. AAA was detected in all patients with SI, but four of the seven patients with AAA did not develop SI. Clinical characteristics did not significantly differ between patients with and without SI. Therefore, ASA levels must be measured to identify patients receiving insufficient ASP treatment.

Kinetics characterization of a low immunogenic recombinant l-asparaginase from Phaseolus vulgaris with cytotoxic activity against leukemia cells

l-asparaginases play a crucial role in the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), a type of cancer that mostly affects children and teenagers. However, it is common for these molecules to cause adverse reactions during treatment. These downsides ignite the search for novel asparaginases to mitigate these problems. Thus, this work aimed to produce and characterize a recombinant asparaginase from Phaseolus vulgaris (Asp-P). In this study, Asp-P was expressed in Escherichia coli with high yields and optimum activity at 40 °C, pH 9.0. The enzyme Km and Vmax values were 7.05 mM and 1027 U/mg, respectively. Asp-P is specific for l-asparagine, showing no activity against l-glutamine and other amino acids. The enzyme showed a higher cytotoxic effect against Raji than K562 cell lines, but only at high concentrations. In silico analysis indicated that Asp-P has lower immunogenicity than a commercial enzyme. Asp-P induced biofilm formation by Candida sp. due to sublethal dose, showing an underexplored potential of asparaginases. The absence of glutaminase activity, lower immunogenicity and optimal activity similar to physiological temperature conditions are characteristics that indicate Asp-P as a potential new commercial enzyme in the treatment of ALL and its underexplored application in the treatment of other diseases.

Differential impact of asparaginase discontinuation on outcomes of children with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia and T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Asparaginase is essential for treating T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL). Despite the ongoing debate on whether T-ALL and T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma (T-LBL) are the same disease entity or two distinct diseases, patients with T-LBL often receive the same or similar treatment protocols as those with T-ALL.

METHODS

The outcomes of patients with or without L-asparaginase discontinuation were retrospectively analyzed among four national protocols: Japan Association of Childhood Leukemia Study (JACLS) ALL-02 and ALL-97 for T-ALL and Japanese Pediatric Leukemia/Lymphoma Study Group ALB-NHL03 and JACLS NHL-98 for T-LBL. The hazard ratio (HR) was calculated with the Cox regression model by considering L-asparaginase discontinuation as a time-dependent variable.

RESULTS

In total, 199 patients with T-ALL, and 133 patients with T-LBL were included. L-asparaginase discontinuation compromised event-free survival (EFS) of T-ALL patients (ALL-02: HR 3.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.40-7.90; ALL-97: HR 3.39, 95%CI 1.19-9.67). Conversely, EFS compromise was not detected among T-LBL patients (ALB-NHL03: HR 1.39, 95%CI 0.41-4.68; NHL-98: HR 0.92, 95%CI 0.11-7.60).

CONCLUSION

The effects of L-asparaginase discontinuation differed between T-ALL and T-LBL. We assume that the differential impact results from (1) the inherent differential response to L-asparaginase between them and/or (2) a less stringent assessment of early treatment response in T-LBL than in T-ALL. Given the poor salvage rate of refractory or relapsed T-ALL and T-LBL, optimization of the frontline therapy is critical, and the current study provides a new suggestion for further treatment modifications. However, larger studies in contemporary intensified treatment protocols are required.

Continuous PEGasparaginase Dosing Reduces Hypersensitivity Reactions in Pediatric ALL: A Dutch Childhood Oncology Group ALL11 Randomized Trial

PURPOSE

The primary objective of this randomized study was to determine whether a continuous dosing schedule (without the asparaginase-free interval) would result in less hypersensitivity reactions to PEGasparaginase (PEGasp) compared with the standard noncontinuous dosing schedule.

METHODS

Eight hundred eighteen patients (age 1-18 years) with ALL were enrolled in the Dutch Childhood Oncology Group-ALL11 protocol and received PEGasp. Three hundred twelve patients stratified in the medium-risk arm were randomly assigned to receive 14 individualized PEGasp doses once every two weeks in either a noncontinuous or continuous schedule after the first three doses in induction (EudraCT: 2012-000067-25). Hypersensitivity reactions were defined as allergies, allergic-like reactions, and silent inactivation. Secondary end points were other asparaginase-related toxicities, asparaginase activity and antibody levels, and outcome.

RESULTS

During induction, 27 of 818 patients (3.3%) experienced hypersensitivity reactions. After random assignment, 4 of 155 (2.6%) in the continuous treatment arm versus 17 of 157 (10.8%) patients in the noncontinuous treatment arm had hypersensitivity reactions (P < .01), of which two (1.3%) versus 13 (8.3%) were inactivating reactions (P < .01). The occurrence of inactivating hypersensitivity reactions was seven times lower in the continuous arm (odds ratio, 0.15 [0.032-0.653]). In addition, antibody levels were significantly lower in the continuous arm (P < .01). With exception of a lower incidence of increased amylase in the continuous arm, there were no significant differences in total number of asparaginase-associated toxicities between arms. However, the timing of the toxicities was associated with the timing of the asparaginase administrations. No difference in 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse, death, or disease-free survival was found between both treatment arms.

CONCLUSION

A continuous dosing schedule of PEGasp is an effective approach to prevent antibody formation and inactivating hypersensitivity reactions. The continuous PEGasp schedule did not increase toxicity and did not affect the efficacy of the therapy.