1
|
Winograd DM, Hyde JK, Bloeser K, Santos SL, Anastasides N, Petrakis BA, Pigeon WR, Litke DR, Helmer DA, McAndrew LM. Exploring the acceptability of behavioral interventions for veterans with persistent "medically unexplained" physical symptoms. J Psychosom Res 2023; 167:111193. [PMID: 36822031 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2023.111193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2022] [Revised: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/08/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study evaluated the factors that led to enrollment in, and satisfaction with, behavioral interventions for Veterans living with Gulf War Illness (GWI). METHODS One-on-one interviews were conducted pre- and post-intervention with participants randomized to receive either telephone delivered problem-solving treatment (n = 51) or health education (N = 49). A total of 99 Veterans were interviewed pre-intervention and 60 post-intervention. Qualitative data were thematically coded and similarities in themes across the two interventions were examined. RESULTS Before the study began, participants reported desiring to learn new information about their GWI, learn symptom-management strategies, and support improvements to care for other patients with GWI. After the intervention, Veterans felt positively about both interventions because they built strong therapeutic relationships with providers, their experiences were validated by providers, and they were provided GWI information and symptom-management strategies. Results also suggested that interventions do not have to be designed to meet all of the needs held by patients to be acceptable. A minority of participants described that they did not benefit from the interventions. CONCLUSION The results suggest that satisfaction with behavioral interventions for GWI is driven by a strong therapeutic relationship, validating patient's experiences with GWI, and the intervention meeting some of the patient's needs, particularly increasing knowledge of GWI and improving symptom management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darren M Winograd
- Veterans Affairs New Jersey Healthcare System, 385 Tremont Ave. East Orange, NJ 07018, USA; University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, NY, USA
| | - Justeen K Hyde
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), VA Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, MA, USA; Department of Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Katharine Bloeser
- Veterans Affairs New Jersey Healthcare System, 385 Tremont Ave. East Orange, NJ 07018, USA; Silberman School of Social Work at Hunter College, The City University of New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - Susan L Santos
- Veterans Affairs New Jersey Healthcare System, 385 Tremont Ave. East Orange, NJ 07018, USA
| | - Nicole Anastasides
- Veterans Affairs New Jersey Healthcare System, 385 Tremont Ave. East Orange, NJ 07018, USA
| | - Beth Ann Petrakis
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), VA Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, MA, USA
| | - Wilfred R Pigeon
- VISN 2 Center of Excellence for Suicide Prevention, Veterans Affairs Finger Lakes Healthcare System, Canandaigua, NY, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - David R Litke
- Veterans Affairs New Jersey Healthcare System, 385 Tremont Ave. East Orange, NJ 07018, USA; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Drew A Helmer
- Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety (IQuESt), Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Lisa M McAndrew
- Veterans Affairs New Jersey Healthcare System, 385 Tremont Ave. East Orange, NJ 07018, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Waite F, Chilcot J, Moss-Morris R, Farrington K, Picariello F. Experiences of a cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) intervention for fatigue in patients receiving haemodialysis. J Ren Care 2022; 49:110-124. [PMID: 35338577 DOI: 10.1111/jorc.12418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2021] [Revised: 02/27/2022] [Accepted: 02/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A feasibility randomised-controlled trial found that a cognitive-behavioural therapy intervention for renal fatigue has the potential to reduce fatigue in patients receiving haemodialysis, but uptake was low. OBJECTIVES Nested in the randomised-controlled trial (RC) qualitative interviews were undertaken to understand the acceptability of renal fatigue, the facilitators of, and barriers to, engagement, and the psychosocial processes of change. DESIGN The trial included 24 participants at baseline. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with nine participants from the intervention arm (n = 12). Approach Interviews were carried out immediately following treatment (3 months post-randomisation). Data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis. FINDINGS Five main themes were formulated. The overarching theme was a sense of coherence (whether the illness, symptoms and treatment made sense to individuals), which appeared to be central to acceptability and engagement. Two themes captured the key barriers and facilitators to engagement, cognitive and illness/treatment burdens and collaboration with the therapist. Participants described changes related to their activity, thoughts and social identity/interactions, which shaped perceptions of change in fatigue. Lastly, participants discussed the optimal delivery of the intervention. CONCLUSIONS This study revealed the importance of patients' understanding of fatigue and acceptance of the treatment model for the acceptability of and engagement with a cognitive-behavioural therapy-based intervention for fatigue. Overall, there was an indication that such an intervention is acceptable to patients and the mechanisms of change align with the proposed biopsychosocial model of fatigue. However, it needs to be delivered in a way that is appealing and practical to patients, acknowledging the illness and treatment burdens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frances Waite
- Health Psychology Section, Psychology Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Joseph Chilcot
- Health Psychology Section, Psychology Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Rona Moss-Morris
- Health Psychology Section, Psychology Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Ken Farrington
- Department of Renal Medicine, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, UK.,University of Hertfordshire, Hertfordshire, UK
| | - Federica Picariello
- Health Psychology Section, Psychology Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Clark C, Holttum S. 'A life I can cope with'. An alternative model of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for CFS/ME. Health Expect 2021; 25:91-102. [PMID: 34472690 PMCID: PMC8849251 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2021] [Revised: 06/14/2021] [Accepted: 07/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives This study aimed to explore the experience of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) aimed at better management of chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME), rather than increasing activity. Design This was a qualitative study using grounded theory analysis. Methods Semi‐structured interviews were conducted with 13 adults who had engaged in CBT at a specialist CFS/ME service in which CBT is aimed at improved management of the condition. Results A model was produced in which participants felt more able to cope with CFS/ME. Reduced fatigue did not seem to be a necessary precondition to managing. This has implications for CBT for CFS/ME. Conclusions Specialist CBT for CFS/ME may result in improved coping and reduced distress, independently of changes in fatigue. Patient or Public Contribution The researcher met with a representative from the university's service user advisory group (SAGE), who had lived experience of CFS/ME. They commented on possible questions for the interview topic guide and provided advice on ways in which ethical issues specific to CFS/ME could be considered, for example, prevention of harm during interviews. Second, for quality assurance as part of respondent validation, a proposed draft of the grounded theory was discussed with participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Clark
- Salomons Institute for Applied Psychology, Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, UK
| | - Sue Holttum
- Salomons Institute for Applied Psychology, Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Charles C, Di Meglio A, Arnedos M, Arvis J, Baciarello G, Blanchard P, Djehal N, Dumas A, Hollbecque A, Martin E, Matias M, Menvielle G, Zingarello A, Dauchy S, Vaz-Luis I. QualFatigue study: which factors influence the use of specific interventions for breast cancer survivors with fatigue? A cross-sectional exploratory study. Support Care Cancer 2021; 29:4827-4834. [PMID: 33547524 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06040-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2020] [Accepted: 02/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE International guidelines recommend specific interventions to reduce cancer-related fatigue (CRF). Evidence suggests underutilization of these interventions among breast cancer survivors. The QualFatigue study aimed to explore the potential factors influencing the use of specific interventions, for relief, in patients with CRF through qualitative analyses. METHODS Patients with stage I-III breast cancer, and CRF ≥4 on a 10-point numerical scale were recruited within 6-24 months at the end of their primary treatment. Semi-structured interviews were performed. Emergent themes were identified using a stepped content analysis (QDA Miner software). RESULTS Data saturation was achieved with 15 interviews. Four main themes emerged as potential sources of influence in the participants' use of specific interventions: (1) expectations regarding the management of CRF, (2) representations of the benefits provided by the interventions, (3) individual physical and psychological conditions, and (4) social and environmental situations. Six key levers came out transversally to optimize the use of specific interventions to relieve CRF: (1) listening and recognition of the individual difficulties and needs; (2) individual and global health assessments; (3) information and advice on how to manage CRF; (4) discussion groups focused on the management of CRF; (5) group activities; and (6) professional and personalized guidance. CONCLUSION This study calls for multi-level action to address many persistent barriers and exploit levers in the management of CRF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cécile Charles
- Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, F-94805, Villejuif Cedex, France.
- Laboratoire de Psychopathologie et Processus de Santé (EA 4057), Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 71 avenue Edouard Vaillant, 92100, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
| | - Antonio Di Meglio
- Inserm, Biomarqueurs prédictifs et nouvelles stratégies thérapeutiques en oncologie, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, F-94805, Villejuif, France
| | - Monica Arnedos
- Département d'Oncologie Médicale, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, F-94805, Villejuif, France
| | - Johanna Arvis
- Ligue nationale contre le cancer, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Giulia Baciarello
- Département d'Oncologie Médicale, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, F-94805, Villejuif, France
| | - Pierre Blanchard
- Département d'Oncologie Médicale, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, F-94805, Villejuif, France
| | - Nardjes Djehal
- Département d'Oncologie Médicale, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, F-94805, Villejuif, France
| | - Agnès Dumas
- INSERM (National Institute for Health and Medical Research), Université de Paris, ECEVE UMR 1123, F-75010, Paris, France
| | - Antoine Hollbecque
- Département d'Oncologie Médicale, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, F-94805, Villejuif, France
| | - Elise Martin
- Inserm, Biomarqueurs prédictifs et nouvelles stratégies thérapeutiques en oncologie, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, F-94805, Villejuif, France
| | - Margarida Matias
- Département d'Oncologie Médicale, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, F-94805, Villejuif, France
| | - Gwenn Menvielle
- Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et Santé Publique, Sorbonne Université, Inserm, 75012, Paris, France
| | - Anna Zingarello
- Département d'Oncologie Médicale, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, F-94805, Villejuif, France
| | - Sarah Dauchy
- Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, F-94805, Villejuif Cedex, France
| | - Ines Vaz-Luis
- Inserm, Biomarqueurs prédictifs et nouvelles stratégies thérapeutiques en oncologie, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, F-94805, Villejuif, France
- Département d'Oncologie Médicale, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, F-94805, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mengshoel AM, Helland IB, Meeus M, Castro-Marrero J, Pheby D, Bolle Strand E. Patients' experiences and effects of non-pharmacological treatment for myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome - a scoping mixed methods review. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being 2021; 15:1764830. [PMID: 32432991 PMCID: PMC7782327 DOI: 10.1080/17482631.2020.1764830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The EU COST Action 15111 collaboration on myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) aims to assess current research and identify knowledge gaps in Europe. Presently, our purpose is to map the effects of non-pharmacological therapies (NPTs) for ME/CFS, and what patients find important in the treatment process. METHODS A scoping mixed methods literature review of European studies identified 16 papers fulfiling our inclusion criteria. The quantitative and qualitative studies were synthesized separately in tables. Additionally, extracts from the qualitative studies were subjected to translational analysis. RESULTS Effect studies addressed cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT, n = 4), multimodal rehabilitation (n = 2) and activity-pacing (n = 2). CBT reduced fatigue scores more than usual care or waiting list controls. The effects of rehabilitation and activity-pacing were inconsistent. The contents, assessment methods and effects of rehabilitation and activity pacing studies varied. For patients, health professionals' recognition of ME/CFS and support were crucial, but they expressed ambiguous experiences of what the NPTs entail. CONCLUSIONS Methodological differences make comparisons across NPTs impossible, and from a patient perspective the relevance of the specific contents of NPTs are unclear. Future well-designed studies should focus on developing NPTs tailored to patients' concerns and evaluation tools reflecting what is essential for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Marit Mengshoel
- Department of Interdisciplinary Health Sciences, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo , Oslo, Norway
| | - Ingrid Bergliot Helland
- Norwegian National Advisory Unit on CFS/ME, Division of Pediatrics and Adolescents, Rikshospitalet, Oslo University Hospital , Oslo, Norway
| | - Mira Meeus
- Research Group MOVANT, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, University of Antwerp , Wilrijk, Belgium.,Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Ghent University , Ghent, Belgium.,Pain in Motion, International Research Group
| | - Jesus Castro-Marrero
- CFS/ME Unit, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital Research Institute, Universitat Autònoma De Barcelona , Barcelona, Spain
| | - Derek Pheby
- Society and Health, Buckinghamshire New University , High Wycombe, UK
| | - Elin Bolle Strand
- Faculty of Health Studies, VID Specialized University , Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pilkington K, Ridge DT, Igwesi-Chidobe CN, Chew-Graham CA, Little P, Babatunde O, Corp N, McDermott C, Cheshire A. A relational analysis of an invisible illness: A meta-ethnography of people with chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME) and their support needs. Soc Sci Med 2020; 265:113369. [DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Revised: 08/17/2020] [Accepted: 09/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
7
|
Leaviss J, Davis S, Ren S, Hamilton J, Scope A, Booth A, Sutton A, Parry G, Buszewicz M, Moss-Morris R, White P. Behavioural modification interventions for medically unexplained symptoms in primary care: systematic reviews and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2020; 24:1-490. [PMID: 32975190 PMCID: PMC7548871 DOI: 10.3310/hta24460] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The term 'medically unexplained symptoms' is used to cover a wide range of persistent bodily complaints for which adequate examination and appropriate investigations do not reveal sufficiently explanatory structural or other specified pathologies. A wide range of interventions may be delivered to patients presenting with medically unexplained symptoms in primary care. Many of these therapies aim to change the behaviours of the individual who may have worsening symptoms. OBJECTIVES An evidence synthesis to determine the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of behavioural modification interventions for medically unexplained symptoms delivered in primary care settings was undertaken. Barriers to and facilitators of the effectiveness and acceptability of these interventions from the perspective of patients and service providers were evaluated through qualitative review and realist synthesis. DATA SOURCES Full search strategies were developed to identify relevant literature. Eleven electronic sources were searched. Eligibility criteria - for the review of clinical effectiveness, randomised controlled trials were sought. For the qualitative review, UK studies of any design were included. For the cost-effectiveness review, papers were restricted to UK studies reporting outcomes as quality-adjusted life-year gains. Clinical searches were conducted in November 2015 and December 2015, qualitative searches were conducted in July 2016 and economic searches were conducted in August 2016. The databases searched included MEDLINE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PsycINFO and EMBASE. Updated searches were conducted in February 2019 and March 2019. PARTICIPANTS Adult participants meeting the criteria for medically unexplained symptoms, including somatoform disorders, chronic unexplained pain and functional somatic syndromes. INTERVENTIONS Behavioural interventions were categorised into types. These included psychotherapies, exercise-based interventions, multimodal therapies (consisting of more than one intervention type), relaxation/stretching/social support/emotional support, guided self-help and general practitioner interventions, such as reattribution. Evidence synthesis: a network meta-analysis was conducted to allow a simultaneous comparison of all evaluated interventions in a single coherent analysis. Separate network meta-analyses were performed at three time points: end of treatment, short-term follow-up (< 6 months since the end of treatment) and long-term follow-up (≥ 6 months after the end of treatment). Outcomes included physical and psychological symptoms, physical functioning and impact of the illness on daily activities. Economic evaluation: within-trial estimates of cost-effectiveness were generated for the subset of studies where utility values (or quality-adjusted life-years) were reported or where these could be estimated by mapping from Short Form questionnaire-36 items or Short Form questionnaire-12 items outcomes. RESULTS Fifty-nine studies involving 9077 patients were included in the clinical effectiveness review. There was a large degree of heterogeneity both between and within intervention types, and the networks were sparse across all outcomes. At the end of treatment, behavioural interventions showed some beneficial effects when compared with usual care, in particular for improvement of specific physical symptoms [(1) pain: high-intensity cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBTHI) standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.54 [95% credible interval (CrI) 0.28 to 0.84], multimodal SMD 0.52 (95% CrI 0.19 to 0.89); and (2) fatigue: low-intensity cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBTLI) SMD 0.72 (95% CrI 0.27 to 1.21), relaxation/stretching/social support/emotional support SMD 0.87 (95% CrI 0.20 to 1.55), graded activity SMD 0.51 (95% CrI 0.14 to 0.93), multimodal SMD 0.52 (95% CrI 0.14 to 0.92)] and psychological outcomes [(1) anxiety CBTHI SMD 0.52 (95% CrI 0.06 to 0.96); (2) depression CBTHI SMD 0.80 (95% CrI 0.26 to 1.38); and (3) emotional distress other psychotherapy SMD 0.58 (95% CrI 0.05 to 1.13), relaxation/stretching/social support/emotional support SMD 0.66 (95% CrI 0.18 to 1.28) and sport/exercise SMD 0.49 (95% CrI 0.03 to 1.01)]. At short-term follow-up, behavioural interventions showed some beneficial effects for specific physical symptoms [(1) pain: CBTHI SMD 0.73 (95% CrI 0.10 to 1.39); (2) fatigue: CBTLI SMD 0.62 (95% CrI 0.11 to 1.14), relaxation/stretching/social support/emotional support SMD 0.51 (95% CrI 0.06 to 1.00)] and psychological outcomes [(1) anxiety: CBTHI SMD 0.74 (95% CrI 0.14 to 1.34); (2) depression: CBTHI SMD 0.93 (95% CrI 0.37 to 1.52); and (3) emotional distress: relaxation/stretching/social support/emotional support SMD 0.82 (95% CrI 0.02 to 1.65), multimodal SMD 0.43 (95% CrI 0.04 to 0.91)]. For physical functioning, only multimodal therapy showed beneficial effects: end-of-treatment SMD 0.33 (95% CrI 0.09 to 0.59); and short-term follow-up SMD 0.78 (95% CrI 0.23 to 1.40). For impact on daily activities, CBTHI was the only behavioural intervention to show beneficial effects [end-of-treatment SMD 1.30 (95% CrI 0.59 to 2.00); and short-term follow-up SMD 2.25 (95% CrI 1.34 to 3.16)]. Few effects remained at long-term follow-up. General practitioner interventions showed no significant beneficial effects for any outcome. No intervention group showed conclusive beneficial effects for measures of symptom load (somatisation). A large degree of heterogeneity was found across individual studies in the assessment of cost-effectiveness. Several studies suggested that the interventions produce fewer quality-adjusted life-years than usual care. For those interventions that generated quality-adjusted life-year gains, the mid-point incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) ranged from £1397 to £129,267, but, where the mid-point ICER fell below £30,000, the exploratory assessment of uncertainty suggested that it may be above £30,000. LIMITATIONS Sparse networks meant that it was not possible to conduct a metaregression to explain between-study differences in effects. Results were not consistent within intervention type, and there were considerable differences in characteristics between studies of the same type. There were moderate to high levels of statistical heterogeneity. Separate analyses were conducted for three time points and, therefore, analyses are not repeated-measures analyses and do not account for correlations between time points. CONCLUSIONS Behavioural interventions showed some beneficial effects for specific medically unexplained symptoms, but no one behavioural intervention was effective across all medically unexplained symptoms. There was little evidence that these interventions are effective for measures of symptom load (somatisation). General practitioner-led interventions were not shown to be effective. Considerable heterogeneity in interventions, populations and sparse networks mean that results should be interpreted with caution. The relationship between patient and service provider is perceived to play a key role in facilitating a successful intervention. Future research should focus on testing the therapeutic effects of the general practitioner-patient relationship within trials of behavioural interventions, and explaining the observed between-study differences in effects within the same intervention type (e.g. with more detailed reporting of defined mechanisms of the interventions under study). STUDY REGISTRATION This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42015025520. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 24, No. 46. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Leaviss
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Sarah Davis
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Shijie Ren
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Jean Hamilton
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Alison Scope
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Andrew Booth
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Anthea Sutton
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Glenys Parry
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Marta Buszewicz
- Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London Medical School, London, UK
| | | | - Peter White
- Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sharpe M, Goldsmith K, Chalder T. The PACE trial of treatments for chronic fatigue syndrome: a response to WILSHIRE et al. BMC Psychol 2019; 7:15. [PMID: 30871632 PMCID: PMC6419398 DOI: 10.1186/s40359-019-0288-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2018] [Accepted: 02/19/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) is chronic disabling illness characterized by severe disabling fatigue, typically made worse by exertion. Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME) is thought by some to be the same disorder (then referred to as CFS/ME) and by others to be different. There is an urgent need to find effective treatments for CFS. The UK Medical Research Council PACE trial published in 2011 compared available treatments and concluded that when added to specialist medical care, cognitive behaviour therapy and graded exercise therapy were more effective in improving both fatigue and physical function in participants with CFS, than both adaptive pacing therapy and specialised medical care alone. In this paper, we respond to the methodological criticisms of the trial and a reanalysis of the trial data reported by Wilshire at al. We conclude that neither the criticisms nor the reanalysis offer any convincing reason to change the conclusions of the PACE trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Sharpe
- University of Oxford Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, OX3 7JX, UK.
| | - Kim Goldsmith
- Biostatistics & Health Informatics Department, Division of Psychology and Systems Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Trudie Chalder
- Academic Department of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cheshire A, Ridge D, Clark L, White P. Guided graded Exercise Self-help for chronic fatigue syndrome: patient experiences and perceptions. Disabil Rehabil 2018; 42:368-377. [DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1499822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Cheshire
- College of Arts and Liberal Sciences, University of Westminster, London, UK
| | - Damien Ridge
- College of Arts and Liberal Sciences, University of Westminster, London, UK
| | - Lucy Clark
- Centre for Psychiatry, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Bart’s and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University, London, UK
| | - Peter White
- Centre for Psychiatry, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Bart’s and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Collin SM, Crawley E. Specialist treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome/ME: a cohort study among adult patients in England. BMC Health Serv Res 2017; 17:488. [PMID: 28709432 PMCID: PMC5513420 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-017-2437-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2017] [Accepted: 07/06/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND NHS specialist chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS/ME) services in England treat approximately 8000 adult patients each year. Variation in therapy programmes and treatment outcomes across services has not been described. METHODS We described treatments provided by 11 CFS/ME specialist services and we measured changes in patient-reported fatigue (Chalder, Checklist Individual Strength), function (SF-36 physical subscale, Work & Social Adjustment Scale), anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety & Depression Scale), pain (visual analogue rating), sleep (Epworth, Jenkins), and overall health (Clinical Global Impression) 1 year after the start of treatment, plus questions about impact of CFS/ME on employment, education/training and domestic tasks/unpaid work. A subset of these outcome measures was collected from former patients 2-5 years after assessment at 7 of the 11 specialist services. RESULTS Baseline data at clinical assessment were available for 952 patients, of whom 440 (46.2%) provided 1-year follow-up data. Treatment data were available for 435/440 (98.9%) of these patients, of whom 175 (40.2%) had been discharged at time of follow-up. Therapy programmes varied substantially in mode of delivery (individual or group) and number of sessions. Overall change in health 1 year after first attending specialist services was 'very much' or 'much better' for 27.5% (115/418) of patients, 'a little better' for 36.6% (153/418), 'no change' for 15.8% (66/418), 'a little worse' for 12.2% (51/418), and 'worse' or 'very much worse' for 7.9% (33/418). Among former patients who provided 2- to 5-year follow-up (30.4% (385/1265)), these proportions were 30.4% (117/385), 27.5% (106/385), 11.4% (44/385), 13.5% (52/385), and 17.1% (66/385), respectively. 85.4% (327/383) of former patients responded "Yes" to "Do you think that you are still suffering from CFS/ME?" 8.9% (34/383) were "Uncertain", and 5.7% (22/383) responded "No". CONCLUSIONS This multi-centre NHS study has shown that, although one third of patients reported substantial overall improvement in their health, CFS/ME is a long term condition that persists for the majority of adult patients even after receiving specialist treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon M Collin
- School of Social & Community Medicine, Oakfield House, University of Bristol, Oakfield Grove, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK.
| | - Esther Crawley
- School of Social & Community Medicine, Oakfield House, University of Bristol, Oakfield Grove, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK
| |
Collapse
|